Texas Death Row Prisoners Sue Over Automatic Solitary Confinement
The state's "arbitrary requirement to house all male death row prisoners in permanent solitary confinement does not promote safety and security, is inconsistent with correctional best practices, and serves no penological purpose," the lawsuit claims.

A group of Texas death row prisoners is suing the state's prison system, arguing that its policy of holding male death row inmates in indefinite solitary confinement violates their constitutional rights.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday on behalf of a group of male inmates at a single facility, argues that the policy has had devastating effects on the prisoners' physical and mental health—and that the state has little practical reason to justify it.
"Researchers have extensively documented the physical and psychological harms caused by solitary confinement specifically—and social isolation more generally—in a substantial body of peer-reviewed literature spanning decades. There is no longer any question that prolonged solitary confinement causes severe harm," the 45-page complaint states.
Texas is not alone in automatically confining death row inmates in isolation. As of 2021, 12 states also practiced automatic solitary confinement for death row prisoners.
According to the lawsuit, these Texas death row inmates spend at least 22 hours each day in cramped, 8-by-12-foot cells. They are only allowed to leave their cells on days when the prison allows for "recreation," during which "they are moved to individual concrete-and-metal cages and permitted to exercise alone."
Further, the complaint argues that the state has no justification for such harsh measures. "Defendants' arbitrary requirement to house all male death row prisoners in permanent solitary confinement does not promote safety and security, is inconsistent with correctional best practices, and serves no penological purpose."
The effect of this policy has been devastating. Several of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit have been in solitary confinement for decades—with one plaintiff serving almost 30 years in solitary confinement. Due to their isolation, plaintiffs have reported dramatic declines in their physical and mental health, such as significant weight gain, hypertension, depression, and PTSD.
Further, prison officials have made it incredibly difficult for these death row inmates to get appropriate medical care or access their lawyers. Medical visits "are sporadic, and mental and physical health providers are often forced to converse with their patients openly on the row," the complaint reads. "Legal visits can take weeks to schedule and occur in a public setting where conversations are easily overheard."
The suit argues, among other complaints, that such prolonged isolation violates plaintiffs' Eighth Amendment rights. Several federal courts have acknowledged the Eighth Amendment concerns created by lengthy solitary confinement. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit—which has jurisdiction in Texas—has "acknowledged that it is 'more than plausible' that decades of solitary confinement can cause serious physical and psychological deterioration 'sufficiently serious to invoke Eighth Amendment concerns,'" according to the complaint.
This lawsuit is the latest in a series of attempts to curtail the use of solitary confinement in Texas prisons. Inmate Dennis Wayne Hope, who has been in solitary confinement for almost 30 years, asked the Supreme Court last year to take up his case, alleging that this practice constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Currently, several inmates in Texas prisons are on a hunger strike, protesting the state's use of solitary confinement.
Prolonged solitary confinement is endemic in U.S. prisons. As of July 2021, almost 50,000 people were held in isolation in U.S. prisons—around 3 percent of the total prison population. In Texas, almost 4,000 people were estimated to be held in isolation—and over two-thirds of those inmates had been held for more than a year.
"Decades of evidence shows the irreversible physical and psychological harm long-term solitary confinement causes," David Fathi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Prison Project, told Reason's C.J. Ciaramella last year. "There is no defensible reason for prisons and other detention facilities to keep using long term solitary confinement, which is recognized as a form of torture."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"There is no defensible reason for prisons and other detention facilities to keep using long term solitary confinement, which is recognized as a form of torture."
They do it because it is torture. Duh.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
My college Anthropology professor did his thesis work studying death row inmates and he made us read his book, of course.
Turns out that prisoners are highly in favor of the death penalty — for prisoners who kill other prisoners, not so much for those who have killed outsiders.
They do it because it is torture. Duh.
Exactly. It is all they merit.
They are dangers to others.
You don't get sentenced to death because you're such a great guy.
We can't punish them in the manner they deserve but we can leave them alone. To reflect on what they did. Without surcease. Until all the appeals and leftist attempts to free them to prey on their victims again are over.
And then we will be permitted to gently nudge them into death.
So if they've got to spend a few years in their own diseased heads too fucking bad.
They are missing out on the shower rapes and feel like they aren’t getting the full prison experience.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Everyone thinks they'll be the rapist and not the raped.
Yeah, I think if you commit murder, being tossed into an oubliette is a suitable punishment.
Then make it part of the sentence. This is extra-judicial punishment that is supposed to have no place in our system.
What threat is there to encourage non violent behavior from someone on death row in general population?
Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK
Isn't it, though, already part of the sentence. All death-row inmates go directly to solitary confinement. Get sentenced to death, you go on death row (solitary). Are you saying there should be "death, but not solitary" and "death, with solitary" sentences?
Then make it part of the sentence.
The sentence is death.
The only reason these fuckers are lounging in solitary is because you people demand that you get to try every lie you can think of to free them before we're allowed to put them down.
If you'd get the hell out of the way there wouldn't BE a 'death row'. There'd be a sentence. A quiet room to have a last meal in and talk to a religious official, and a noose, a chair, or a blade. Everything wrapped up in about two hours.
No need for 'death row'.
So, they should demand to be executed without further delay.
Just provide free, unlimited recreational drugs. It solves the problem one way or another.
It doesn't take researchers to understand the physical and psychological harm of letting vicious, violent murderers with nothing left to lose loose in the general prison population.
That's why they are being confined.
You can split the difference, though. People need a bit of social interaction to remain sane, they don't need to actually be within REACH of another person. You just need to give them the opportunity to see and talk to other people on a regular basis, while keeping them at arm's length.
probably still better than the definite solitary confinement foisted on the victims.
"Researchers have extensively documented the physical and psychological harms caused by solitary confinement specifically"
Ah, so THAT'S why they closed the schools!
Well, after all, it's just for a week or so while the judge reviews the case for procedural errors, then it's up against the wall.
Right?
"Several federal courts have acknowledged the Eighth Amendment concerns created by lengthy solitary confinement."
"Your Honors, we in the State of Texas have a suggestion on how to stop keeping death-row inmates in *lengthy* solitary confinement."
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.workstar24.com
Maybe don't kill anyone next time then.
Right! No solitary, cuz it's mean. Certainly no execution. And probably no imprisonment at all.
As I often mention, we need to revive the practice of exile. And that could include exiling some people from land.
They’re on death row waiting to die, suing for better conditions while alive, costing taxpayers.
The solution, albeit a final one, is obvious.
I don't really care about the well being of death row inmates. They are literally waiting to be killed. If being locked in a room by yourself is so terrible maybe don't rape and murder people.
Or, provide them with the means to end their lives themselves if they don't like their accommodations.
They have something close to that option already – drop their appeals, like Gary Gilmore did. It got him executed much quicker.
It wouldn't be suicide, as such, but it would be not fighting the sentence as much as one could.
★ I am making $98/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is acquiring $20 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it. simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart....
HERE====)>OPEN>> http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
“I don’t really care about the well being of death row inmates.”
I wouldn’t want them tortured while awaiting execution, and the question is whether *lengthy* stays on Death Row are tortuous. Even if so, there are a couple of answers to that – execute them quicker, or quickly decide not to exeute them after all.
I wish I could trust the system more, but sometimes one of the inmate's appeals, years later, uncovers something which calls his conviction, or at least his sentence, into question. Raising the question - what if he'd been executed sooner, would the problem have stayed hidden?
Maybe provide an experienced, and well-compensated, defense attorney at the original trial, so a later attorney won't have to go over the case and find some problem the original attorney didn't notice.
Budgets for the legal system are already stretched to the limit. So, providing a “well-compensated” attorney is not feasible, if you mean paying the $300 to $400 per hour that most law firms routinely charge. You are only guaranteed state-paid “legal counsel” if you cannot afford one. You aren’t guaranteed a “dream team” of attorneys.
Maybe for capital cases, there should be a stipulation that the Defense is allowed the same budget as the state is spending to prosecute that case (including the overtime pay for the cops to show up to court to testify). If the Defendant wants to spend MORE than the prosecutor, then his entire defense comes out of pocket.
Didn't I read somewhere, about a dog handler, now deceased, who put a pit bull back into the 'general population' after it had attacked and killed someone?
1. Fire up Sparky.
2. Give prisoners the option of either going straight to the Chair or Solitary.
3. Any complaints abour Solitary? See 1.