Here's an Officer Who Might Have Actually ODed From Fentanyl Contact—but Not Because He Just Touched It
A North Carolina detective may have inhaled a significant amount during a drug bust.

A North Carolina man faces charges of assault with intent to kill for exposing two detectives and a sheriff's deputy to opioids—possibly fentanyl—during a traffic stop on January 5. One detective reportedly lost consciousness after exposure to the drugs. Given the recent misleading reports of police overdosing by simply touching fentanyl, it's worth taking a closer look at cases like this.
The New Hanover County Sheriff's Office put out a press release on Friday describing the arrest. The suspect, Lewis Rudolph Brown Drayton, 37, was a passenger in a vehicle pulled over by deputies on Interstate 40 as part of a drug investigation. Drayton allegedly responded by attempting to toss drugs out of the vehicle's window. Two detectives and a deputy approaching the vehicle were "exposed to a powerful and highly addictive opioid drug," according to the release. One detective had a reaction and lost consciousness at the scene. He was administered Narcan, which reverses opioid overdoses, and the three were taken to the hospital and treated. He has since been released. The sheriff's office is testing the drug to find out if there was fentanyl in it.
The vague description of how the detective was "exposed" raised questions. Simply touching fentanyl is not dangerous. And according to a study conducted by the American College of Medical Toxicology and American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, being in proximity to small amounts of open fentanyl only carries risk by inhalation if the person is standing by it for hours.
This has led to a lot of credulous media reports of police overdosing by merely touching fentanyl or breathing in the proximity of the drug for a few moments. Critiques of the police and the media for making this false claim are warranted. While fentanyl is indeed very dangerous and potentially deadly, fueling false panic about the risks involved helps nobody.
But, it turns out, this particular case may involve more than simply coming in contact with or being in proximity to fentanyl. Reason spoke with J.J. Brewer, the public information officer for the sheriff's department, to clarify what happened.
"This is the first time it's ever happened to us," Brewer said about the detective's exposure and collapse. Brewer explained that the detectives and deputy were approaching the car (which had been pulled over and stopped in Interstate 40's median) as Drayton was allegedly dumping drugs out of a back window. Brewer said the drugs were not bagged as Drayton dumped them: "It was loose and blew everywhere."
Having a large amount of fentanyl and other opioids blown into your face is quite different than standing around open fentanyl. And so it's possible that the detective may well have lost consciousness after inhaling a dangerous amount of fentanyl and whatever other opioids might have been in the mix, particularly if there was a high concentration of fentanyl in what was thrown out. Brewer said that the other detective and the deputy did not show any symptoms.
Brewer said he didn't believe the detective was tested for drugs in his system at the hospital, and he's recovering fine. They're still testing the drugs they've recovered from the stop to determine what they were.
Drayton is charged with assault with intent to kill for exposing the officers to the drugs, as well as two felony counts of trafficking in opium or heroin, possession of less than half an ounce of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Brewer tells Reason Drayton will likely face additional drug-related charges based on what drugs they determine were in the car.
It may well be the case this time that the detective's exposure was, in fact, dangerous. It shows how important it is for law enforcement to be clear in their public reports describing what exactly happened and for journalists to ask questions when reporting on accounts of fentanyl exposure.
Still, charging Drayton with assault with intent to kill is inappropriate unless police can prove he was trying to force the officers to inhale the drugs. These trumped-up charges fuel the panic around both the idea that any contact with fentanyl is extremely dangerous and the typical drug war view that dealers are deliberately trying to kill users.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Didn’t the George Floyd trial teach us that a deadly dose of fentanyl can’t be deadly?
Drayton is charged with assault with intent to kill for exposing the officers to the drugs...
"We say you intended to kill us so that means you intended to kill us, even if you didn't!"
It shows how important it is for law enforcement to be clear in their public reports describing what exactly happened and for journalists to ask questions when reporting on accounts of fentanyl exposure.
I wouldn't trust a police officer to tell someone the correct time, let alone believe anything in any of their reports. It's all bullshit. For them to be "clear" they'd first have to start telling the truth.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————>>> http://Www.SmartCash1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.PAYNET2.COM
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.RICHAPP2.com
Fentenyl debuted as a war drug in 2002 when Chechen terrorists seized Moscow's Dubrovka Theater.
Russian security services flooded the auditorium with fentanyl dust to put them to sleep, but incidentally killed 170 of the 800 hostages
For what it's worth, I don't think there's ever been a conclusive answer as to which chemical was used in the Moscow Theater raid. Fentanyl was probably not the drug in question as it arguably wouldn't be potent enough to incapacitate the gunmen quickly enough in aerosol form.
According to Russia's then Disaster Services chief, they used 3-methyl-fentanyl which is 1000x more potent than Fentanyl. Tests done on clothing of British victims revealed Carfentanil and Remifentanil, both orders of magnitude more potent than Fentanyl.
Hence the generic lower-case 'fentenyl'
Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
.
.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
So the initiation of force by men with guns paid to act like vices are crime had nothing to do with Deppity Dawg catching a contact high. This is enlightening.
Exactly, even if he did target them, attempting to kill someone trying kidnap you is self defence, not attempted murder. Arguably even killing slavers is a public good, not a crime.
Getting high with the intent to get high. Book ‘em
Yeah, right, sure. Far more likely he had done a bit too big a bump before he ever got near the drug dealers, after raiding the evidence locker.
hi
The PIO says they don't think the "victim" was tested for drugs?!?!? So we're claiming that he was poisoned without gathering obvious evidence, the poison being in the victim's system? Makes you wonder if the cops know he didn't OD on the drug, and don't want to gather any exculpatory evidence.
I hope the defendants don't get a credulous, boot-licking jury.
I always wonder why press releases include irrelevant details.
"was exposed to a powerful and highly addictive opioid drug".
There is no reason to include the words "and highly addictive". NOBODY is worrying about the officer becoming addicted. It's the "powerful" aspect that is relevant. If mentioning addictive, why not also describe what color the airborne particles were or how they sparkled in the flashing red and blue lights.