Attorney General Orders Prosecutors To End Crack Cocaine Sentencing Disparity as Congress Dithers
The move comes as legislation flounders in Congress to end the crack-powder sentencing disparity once and for all.

Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memo today to federal prosecutors seeking to effectively end charging and sentencing disparities between crack cocaine and powder cocaine.
The memo, first reported by The Washington Post, orders federal prosecutors assigned to a crack cocaine case to seek charges and advocate for sentence lengths equivalent to powder cocaine. It also directs federal prosecutors to avoid drug charges that would trigger mandatory minimum sentences if the case meets several criteria, such as not involving violence or a defendant with an extensive criminal history.
Criminal justice advocates have lobbied for decades to erase the sentencing disparity, arguing it resulted in monstrously unfair, racially unbalanced sentences for drug crimes. The U.S. Sentencing Commission reported that black people made up nearly 77 percent of all federal crack cocaine convictions in fiscal year 2020.
"Any move to limit the use of one-size-fits-all mandatory minimums is a step in the right direction, and the Attorney General's memos make clear that's what he wants to see," says Kevin Ring, president of the criminal justice advocacy nonprofit FAMM. "Today's announcement leaves prosecutors with discretion over charging while restoring judges' discretion over sentencing. We are especially pleased to see the Attorney General repeat his call for eliminating the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine offenses. This racist disparity serves no public safety purpose and has punished primarily Black families for more than three decades."
The sentences were the result of the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act, co-sponsored by then-Sen. Joe Biden (D–Del.). The law created a 100 to 1 sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine offenders, the former of whom were predominantly black. The result was that someone possessing five grams of crack cocaine would receive the same five-year mandatory minimum sentence as someone with 500 grams of powder cocaine, despite there being little to no pharmacological difference between the two substances.
In 2007, Biden endorsed legislation that would have completely eliminated the disparity. A compromise bill, the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, reduced it to 18 to 1. In 2018, the FIRST Step Act made the Fair Sentencing Act's reductions retroactive, leading to the release of roughly 3,000 federal crack offenders.
The attorney general's memo comes as legislation flounders in Congress to end the crack vs. powder sentencing disparity. The EQUAL Act would reduce the penalties for federal crack cocaine offenses to the same level as those for powder cocaine offenses, and it would make those changes retroactive, meaning federal crack offenders currently serving prison sentences would be eligible to have their sentences reduced. The bill passed the House last year by a wide bipartisan margin. However, it has languished in the Senate, despite intense lobbying from criminal justice advocacy groups. It has failed to make it to the Senate floor, and as the legislative session draws to a close, its only hope for passage now is to be shoved into the gigantic omnibus spending bill slithering its way through Congress.
Reuters reported today that Senate negotiators had reached a potential compromise to appease Republicans. The compromise legislation would reduce the sentencing disparity to 2.5 to 1, and it would not be retroactive. However, congressional leaders from both parties in both chambers will have to agree on the language, and Senate Republicans could still balk.
The Justice Department supports the EQUAL Act, citing the lack of pharmacological differences between crack and powder cocaine and the racial disparities created by sentencing differences. It also says harsh sentences are unnecessary for law enforcement purposes.
Without legislation, though, future administrations could roll back Garland's memo and resume sentencing crack cocaine offenders under unjust statutes that remain on the books.
"While we applaud this guidance, it's important to keep in mind that it is not permanent," Ring says. "It will not bind future administrations. That's why Congress must pass the EQUAL Act."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
100 to 1, i.e. apparently only 1 out of 100 people are smart enough not to use crack vs. powdered coke and their decision has nothing to do with the time you might serve if caught with either variety. Crack is whack. Coke is dope.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks cdy03 online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link---------------------------------------------->>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
I’m currently generating over $35,100 a month thanks to one small internet job, therefore I really like your work! I am aware that with a beginning cdx05 capital of $28,800, you are cdx02 presently making a sizeable quantity of money online.
Just Check ———>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I’ve made $1250 so far this week working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’AM made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do, .for more information simply.
Open this link thank you……>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
What about Newports vs Marlboro lights?
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
remember when you could buy an 8-ball an not worry it was laced with fentanyl?
Ask again later
Sex isn’t just a part of a successful relationship (and an essential one) that can also offer numerous health benefits, such as helping burn calories, relieving stress, anxiety, and depression, lowering blood pressure, and even strengthening cardiovascular health. That is the reason that one may feel the need for male enhancement pills in day-to-day life. Opeen This >>>> MAKEMEHORNY
Executive action is so much better than time consuming legislation.
Well, if the fucking GOP got its head out of its collective arse, the executive wouldn't have to act in this case. Garland is acting in the interests of justice. What are the GOP doing?
Uh, the Democrats had a majority in the Senate the last 2 years. And, many times since 1986.
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website.. http://Www.onlinecash1.com
there's a "disparity" in sentencing because crack cocaine hit the streets like mass murder and insanity - especially for black people. Crack is so lethal that even most dopers have learned to avoid it. The harsh sentencing was a response to a plague. Now VIRTUE SIGNALING and ignorant historical revisions are the plague.
No part of that is true. Moral panic is the reason, nothing to do with facts.
Does the author mean the "crack-powder sentencing disparity" that black community leaders begged lawmakers to create, because crack cocaine was destroying their neighborhoods?
History and facts have no place inbruleing
Does the author mean the “crack-powder sentencing disparity” that black community leaders begged lawmakers to create, because crack cocaine was destroying their neighborhoods?
Absolutely.
And when they get rid of it, at the behest of those same black community leaders those leaders will gain a major race card as they blame the clueless white privilege that allowed white politicians to loose the plague of crack on their streets again.
This is similar to the three strikes laws that were put in place because black leaders knew that white judges were sentencing black defendants disproportionately right up until they demanded the repeal of three strikes laws because they were racist in their impact.
This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started with 25 persons company now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.
For more info visit on this web Site………………>>> onlinecareer1
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://www.worksclick.com
This seems to confirm the notion that Hunter has friends in high places.
Sounds good, but from where does the federal government derive the power to punish people for possessing substances? Absurdly stretched interpretations of the Interstate Commerce Clause?
Fairness in sentencing is a laudable goal (especially if you're the poor unjustly imprisoned bastard), but it seems like time might ultimately be better spent attacking the very foundations of modern Prohibition, rather than bickering over the severity of penalties which the feds have no Constitutional right to impose in the first place!
Granted, Reason does better work than most where the Drug War is concerned. Still and all, I'd think they'd strive to hammer home modern Prohibition's dubious constitutionality in every article. The government ignoring the highest law of the land affects every American and thus should be even more alarming than the 'racial-disparity' angle that mainly appeals to woke-types who mostly couldn't care less about returning the federal government to its Constitutional shackles!
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://www.worksclick.com
Everyone can win upto $15k consistently from home by working on the web. I have gotten $17294 a month ago by doing this simple and straightforward occupation online from home. Its a simple and straightforward occupation to do on the web and even a little kid can carry out this activity from home. Everyone can land this position now by simply tap on the connection given beneath... go to home media tech tab for more detail support your heart.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.richsalary.com