The World Is Still Getting Less Free. A Distressing Number of People Think That's Fine.
Report: “Half of democratic governments around the world are in decline.”

It's no secret that individual freedom has taken a hit over the past few years. What's more depressing is that pandemic-fueled public health panic only accelerated preexisting decay among liberal democracies.
Even before lockdowns, closed borders, and suppression of "misinformation," personal liberty and open, transparent governance were already losing steam. Now, as the world's population learns to live with COVID-19, the bad news just keeps coming.
"Half of democratic governments around the world are in decline, undermined by problems ranging from restrictions on freedom of expression to distrust in the legitimacy of elections," is how Stockholm's International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance cheerfully summarizes a recent report.
The specifics of the report, Global State of Democracy 2022: Forging Social Contracts in a Time of Discontent, don't get more encouraging.
"Over the last five years, progress has stalled across all four aggregated Global State of Democracy Indices (GSoD Indices) attributes. In some cases, scores are the same as they were in 1990. The stagnation exists in parallel to democratic decline elsewhere. The number of backsliding countries (seven) remains at its peak, and the number of countries moving towards authoritarianism is more than double the number moving towards democracy. As of the end 2021, nearly one half of the 173 countries assessed by International IDEA are experiencing declines in at least one subattribute of democracy."
Without getting too bogged down in IDEA's methodology, the organization draws from measures that include protections for civil liberties like freedom of expression, checks on government power, the independence of political parties, absence of corruption, and the health of civil society independent of the state. It's always possible (even inevitable) to argue with the assumptions and methods behind these reports, but it's clear that International IDEA makes a game attempt to apply consistent assessments of the health of liberal democracy—including protections for individual freedom, not just electoral procedures—over time. What the organization finds is stagnation and decline.
Worse, the decline is not just in the function of free societies, but in public support for the "liberalism, in the free-market European sense" (in the words of economist Deirdre McCloskey) that corresponds most closely with limited government, protections for individual rights, and prosperity.
"The World Values Survey (which covers 77 countries) demonstrates that less than half (47.4 percent) of all respondents believe democracy is important, down from 52.4 per cent in 2017. This is a worrying drop, especially since less than half believe that having a democracy is 'very good'," adds International IDEA.
What sort of government would people prefer? A whopping 52 percent now say they favor "a strong leader who does not have to bother with parliament or elections"—up from 38 percent in 2009.
The United States doesn't entirely escape the madness. A related 2020 survey by the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group found "one-third (33 percent) of Americans have at some point in the last three years said that they think having 'a strong leader who doesn't have to bother with Congress or elections' would be a good system of government."
In the rankings, the United States is considered a "moderately backsliding" democracy because it's losing ground across several measures. And no, getting rid of everybody's favorite outsider authoritarian president and replacing him with a more mainstream authoritarian didn't solve the problem. "In the USA, threats to democracy persist after the Trump presidency, illustrated by polarization, counter-majoritarianism and the rolling back of long-established rights," notes International IDEA.
If this report was an outlier, it would be disturbing, but easier to dismiss. Unfortunately, it comes as just the latest in a series of assessments from different sources that paint a grim picture of creeping illiberalism across the globe. Last year's International IDEA report specifically placed the blame for worsening erosion of liberty on pandemic measures "that were disproportionate, illegal, indefinite or unconnected to the nature of the emergency."
The latest edition of the annual Human Freedom Index, produced by the Cato Institute and Canada's Frasier Institute, found that "fully 83 percent of the global population lives in jurisdictions that have seen a fall in human freedom since 2008."
Co-author Ian Vásquez emphasized that the data from which the team worked pre-dated pandemic responses and wrote that he and his colleagues "fully expect to see a deterioration in global freedom indicators in future reports."
"The pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented withdrawal of civil liberties among developed democracies and authoritarian regimes alike," cautioned The Economist's Democracy Index 2021. This "compounded many pre-pandemic trends such as an increasingly technocratic approach to managing society in Western democracies, and a tendency in many non-consolidated democracies or authoritarian regimes to resort to coercion."
"As COVID-19 spread during the year, governments across the democratic spectrum repeatedly resorted to excessive surveillance, discriminatory restrictions on freedoms like movement and assembly, and arbitrary or violent enforcement of such restrictions by police and nonstate actors," Freedom House observed last year.
"The present threat to democracy is the product of 16 consecutive years of decline in global freedom. A total of 60 countries suffered declines over the past year, while only 25 improved," the organization added in this year's report.
And now here we are, after years of declining democracy and decaying liberty, accelerated by "public health" dictates, amidst growing support for authoritarianism. And the unfortunate trend continues.
To reverse the global erosion of liberty and democracy, International IDEA makes multiple recommendations, some good ("ensure the protection of freedom of expression") and others weirdly vague ("dedicated spaces … to meaningfully participate in politics"). But most assume the good faith of governments and politicians, as if authoritarianism happens by accident.
Unfortunately, the world is almost certainly becoming less free because many of those in power like it that way. If we're to reverse the recent slide towards an unfree world, the changes are unlikely to come from those who benefit by accumulating authority and control.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job csx13 online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,125 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
I'm pretty sure White Mike's worry is that there's not enough authoritarianism, rather than too much. Ask him what constitutes an insurrection.
I’m currently generating over $35,100 a month thanks to one small internet job, therefore I really like your work! I am aware that with a beginning cdx05 capital of $28,800, you are cdx02 presently making a sizeable quantity of money online.
Just Check ———>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
Both he and the Reason staff should look in a mirror for a clue as to why the world is becoming less free.
"n the USA, threats to democracy persist after the Trump presidency, illustrated by polarization, counter-majoritarianism..."
Letting the majority have its way always is not conducive to protecting rights. Democracy is useful in protecting rights when the majority feels threatened, but it is a danger to rights when is putting its prejudices into law.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Letting a minority rig elections to provide an illusion of majority rule does even more damage.
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://www.LiveJob247.com
Exactly right, Mickey Rat. I am getting completely alienated from the supposedly pro-freedom think tanks and really depressed about the future of freedom when I read sentences like this in what is supposed to be a leading pro-freedom publication. And I have worked on one of the best-known indices of economic freedom for ten years in a row and I know for a fact that most of the political indices are a complete mish-mash of logically incompatible concepts. The Economist’s Democracy Index 2021, in particular, is completely cretinistic. A perfect score in that index could only be attained by a country that would be a completely stifling dystopic Swedish-Norvegian-Danish country with a DDR-style surveillance state. No, thank you very much. Been there, done that, did not like it.
Well said.
The World Is Still Getting Less Free. A Distressing Number of People Think That's Fine.
Report: “Half of democratic governments around the world are in decline.”
Wouldn't greater numbers of anti-freedom people be an argument against unlimited democracy, 2Chilli?
Freedom has always been an unpopular concept, imposed, where it exists at all, on an unwilling populace by elites.
Poe?
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>>> GOOGLE WORK
Dipsy
Russell?
Only if freedom is like "The Pit and the Pendulum" or "The Masque of The Red Death" or a Roto Rooter Commercial.
Edgar Allan Poe Themed Commercial for Roto-Rooter
https://youtu.be/drsiXQxuGgw
Quoth TheReEncogitationer evermore. 😉
Wow. Quite a few mentions of "democracy."
I have a question. Let's assume in the United States fewer than 50% of registered voters support open borders. Yet many billionaires not only support it, they fund writers who relentlessly promote it.
In that scenario, what would be the more "democratic" policy: having open borders, or not?
What is the skin color and gender identity of the billionaires and writers?
ALL humans should go back to Africa, where they evolved! BACK to where they came from!!!
8 billion people in any one spot would make it worse...and Africa can't get much worse.
Not all humans evolved in Africa. Denisovans and Neanderthals who contribute to modern Eurasian and Native North American ancestry evolved solely in Eurasia. Groups like West and North Eurasian Hunter Gatherers, Sahul peoples and Tianyuan related peoples continued to adapt genetically in the 70+ thousand years since they entered Eurasia.
Not all humans evolved in Africa.
Kind of depends on where you draw the line for "human".
Let's not restrict this to policies you disapprove of. There is research showing that US legislation generally follows the wishes of major donors, and the opinions of the average American count for, basically, zero - and this is true across the board, not just for immigration.
Fix that problem. Which isn't easy when donations are regarded as speech, and when a Supreme Court holds that it's not corrupt if there is no explicit and specific quid pro quo.
The problem is not too much speech, but too little. If networks were viewpoint neutral the problem would largely disappear.
First, how do you compel private viewpoint neutrality? What networks say - unlike campaign contributions - is actual speech.
Second, you're not addressing the donor issue at all. Do you think that large corporations or Scaife or Koch particularly care when thet can get the legislation passed they want, regardless of what people think after watching partisan network shows?
That doesn't go away when you restrict campaign contributions. It just puts the power and influence in a smaller group's hands. The only way to limit this kind of corruption is to make it so government has less regulatory power and fewer goodies to give away.
"The only way to limit this kind of corruption is to make it so government has less regulatory power and fewer goodies to give away."
Precisely.
Yes, this! Make Government Almighty LESS Almighty! Leave SOME actually significant vestiges of decision-making powers to individuals, families, corporations, and voluntary associations!
"Leave SOME actually significant vestiges of decision-making powers to individuals, families, corporations, and voluntary associations!"
...but...but... ANARCHY!!!!
We'll all turn into Somalians, and some aliens, alienated from TRUE (forced) togetherness and unanimity!
Space Lizards!
I prefer the free market. Fox News came from an unmet need in cable news. Talk radio, which is largely outside the center-right, is dominated by conservatives who didn't feel they had an outlet for their beliefs. Internet journalism speaks to a vast patchwork of political ideologies and special interests. Podcasts tell in-depth stories that many people wouldn't be exposed to in legacy media.
There have never been more voices or sources in news. Saying there is "too little speech" ignores the width and breadth of the information landscape.
More importantly, legislation or regulation aimed at requiring "neutral" viewpoints are impossible to define or enforce and antithetical to the Constitution and A.erican values.
Government manipulation of news networks – as proven in the Twitter files – has prevented viewpoint neutrality and should be punished very, very severely.
The free market ain’t free! Are you even paying attention?
The Twitter Files proved no such thing. If you walked to the very end of A Bridge Too Far, off on the distance you would see your belief thatbtbe Twitter Files have proved anything like that.
The Twitter Files proved no such thing.
This statement couldn't be any more false. Clearly you did not read them.
The World Is Still Getting Less Free. A Distressing Number of People Think That's Fine.
With the staff at Reason striving to be first among them.
Do you people READ the drivel you vomit forth?
Bake the cake. Trans the kids. Defer to official sources.
If you print ANYTHING libertarian at all it's by accident --and you correct it as soon as anyone notices.
Oh, but Azathoth!!, if you can avoid getting sent to the camps, they'll totally celebrate sex work, have readily available drugs, and celebrate 389 genders! Just as long as you aren't suspected of wrongthink.
Bigot! How dare you limit me to 389 genders, that's barely enough to try one on each day for a year. What am I to do after that?
Yup exactly. They crow about the "threats to Democracy from Trump" and yet can't there weren't any but a ton with Biden.
They are leading the charge for less freedom.
Hey, can't you recognize good authoritarianism when it is forced on you?
Authoritarianism makes us more free. Freedom from having to think or do for yourself, freedom from having to take responsibility for yourself, freedom from having to worry about your future, freedom from having to plan your life out. It's wonderful actually, and all you need do is get a lobotomy or act like you've had one. Just revert to your animal nature and this can all be yours.
You spoke too soon, Jerry.
Of course, we don't really want a democracy, do we? The founding fathers considered that an anathema, which is why we are organized as a constitutional republic.
Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page…
AND GOOD LUCK HERE…………….>>> onlinecareer1
distrust in the legitimacy of elections
Fucking voters. Why can't those deplorable people see that questioning the legitimacy of elections is toxic to democracy?
Alternatively why can't uninformed conspiracy-minded wackos see that questioning a legitimate election is toxic to democracy? And the answer is, they don't want to see because they don't want to accept the results of any election they don't win.
Until we have a fully transparent and auditable system there will always be legitimate concerns about election honesty.
After checking a person’s status as a voter, dip their fingers in ink, like in Iraq.
We shouldn't audit government spending either. Just trust them. The foxes can definitely guard the hen house.
So legitimate you can’t question it or ask for proof. Trust the government
It is amazing how anti transparency you are simply because your team won.
He is anti transparency precisely because his team won.
"So legitimate you can’t question it or ask for proof."
There is no proof. All of the evidence is on one side, and it isn't the one that claims the election wasn't free and fair.
Show that evidence, then, if you're so certain. Get at it.
You nailed it! Hillary Clinton sucks.
You're never going to get clear answers from surveys that conflate democracy with freedom. The internal workings of government may have little connection to the effects of government on people outside of government. How Trump ranks as authoritarian is beyond me, too.
Most such assessments done by any but radical libertarians go only as far as "liberal democracy", which is fully achieved as long as you're allowed to complain publicly about whatever shit they're pulling, and that it's done according to the rules and that all bribery be above board.
Fuck off you marxist cunt. You and your coworkers have been cheering every step into authoritarianism from one party for YEARS. From the support of national healthcare, climate change alarmism to the more recent pro child mutilation and sexual assault stances along with your cheering for violence in the street from one party and support for indefinite detentions for protesting for the other. Then there is your "private company" lie to support censorship and the myriad lies you tell all in one political direction. YOU are the problem along with every teacher and official like you. You do not believe in liberty but power to exercise and impose your amorality on others.
Cool your jets. Tucille has been fairly consistent in his anti-authoritarian stance pro gun freedom, and more importantly his push toward school/homeschooling freedoms. You aren't being reasonable by painting him and his work as "marxist" any more than I would be by lumping you with "reason trolls."
Or maybe?
And where has he been on the J6 detention and show trials? Where has he been on honest reporting about BLM? Where has he been on the censorship by government & social media?
You can pick a couple of topics you like to blind yourself to his overall supported worldview if you like, but that's just you deluding yourself to hold onto a lie.
Maybe, if you completely ignore the last 5 years
Fook TooSilly.
“He’s goood on gunz and ‘letting’ people educate their own kids” is lame and says you have not been paying attention to where he really stands on just about everything else.
The 'substance' of this article alone should tell you that.
Seems to me that much of the decline in freedom comes directly from supposedly democratic governments. And democracy isn't freedom. The US has traditionally been a relatively free country exactly because of constraints put on democracy.
^THIS +100000000000000000....
Gov-Gun LIMITS (i.e. US Constitution) is what preserves freedom...
NOT [WE] mob RULES!
When leftard "save our democracy" indoctrination has brainwashed everyone to the point they cannot even identify how freedom is ensured there is no chance of its ensured existence.
Course this is not by mistake. The National Sozialist(Nazi)-Regime fan-club has openly insisted the USA doesn't work. The US Constitution is flawed/racist and therefore the USA must be conquered for a Nazi-Empire building 'plan'. (Word for word the preaching of Hitler).
You write this talking about some amorphous "them" who are backsliding on freedom....
As if you personally did not oppose doing anything about the propaganda and censorship regime being put in place in the west. How many articles did Reason run telling us that only crazy people think big tech censors conservatives (and real libertarians)? How many times did you stand up for the right of the democrat cabal to silence dissent and to use the state to silence the opposition?
You lot failed miserably when put to the test. Given the choice of fighting for free speech, a free press and an accountable bureaucracy with limited power, you all stood up for "stop Republicans from doing anything about it" as the top priority.
Now, as a group we libertarians are notably impotent..... but the fact remains, you have been on the wrong side of this fight at every step. And all because team based thinking is more important than principle. Even before Trump broke all your brains, you were lost to the cause of liberty.
You now have your proof. Something only an idiot could have avoided knowing back in 2015, you finally cannot avoid.
And still... all you have in your arsenal is criticism of those who are actually fighting the fight? No vitriol for all your buddies in the press who are also carrying the water for a corrupt one-party system in the making? No vitriol for Facebook and Google who are more complicit than Twitter was.... and who still are completely integrated into the machine?
Not even a rebuke for your own team, who have decided that free speech on Twitter is a bridge too far and definitely the impetus needed for everyone to jump to mastodon?
What kind of libertarian says "hey, that guy spent a huge chunk of his fortune in defense of free speech..... I am going to help tear him down!!!"
ENB was right.... you are a contemptible lot.
+1000
If they had a conscience and were who they purport to be they would be having an Alec Guiness Bridge on the River Kwai moment.
But they never will, because they are already fully conscious of what they are doing. and why they are doing it
Define free.
People keep telling me it's great I'm free to buy weapons of war so easily and that the 2A is great.
But do I feel free knowing I can be gunned down randomly at any moment when I'm minding my own business? Am I free to live my life normally without that kind of fear?
I'm also perfectly "free" to die because I couldn't afford healthcare. Am I really "free"? I think I'd rather be free of the that possibility quite honestly, even if it means "less free" to you.
This is a really great example of the morphing concept of what “free” means. Your position here is that “freedom” is not the ability to do as you please and to be left alone by the government as much as possible, but, rather, the reverse of being fully protected from life and the people around you by the government.
This moves the concept of “freedom of self” to "freedom from self.” Instead of freedom to choose, decide, and act. The freedom you seek is the freedom from responsibility and consequence.
Nail on the head Inquisitive (Not that he will be able to comprehend it).
IOW, such a person all too willingly trades their liberty and freedom from government for freedom from want and an illusive sense of security (to paraphrase Franklin). The craving to feel taken care of and protected from the vicissitudes of life is just too strong, and such a person with a paucity of courage sees nothing wrong with this
It betrays a fundamental sense of entitlement - the world owes him his feelings of safety; and a childish mentality - that the wide, wide world can even be rendered completely safe, at least for him.
Over 250,000 people die each year from medical errors. You are free to participate as you wish. If you can’t pay there are charitable groups who will, and some charity hospitals. Or sell your car and house to save your life. Your choice.
That’s freedom.
""People keep telling me it’s great I’m free to buy weapons of war so easily""
You can buy knives pretty much anywhere.
Tell us how you are entitled to a risk-free, care-free life?
Am I free to live my life normally without that kind of fear?
Yes. Stop being afraid of risks that are miniscule in your life unless you are a career criminal.
Remind me which side wanted to defund the police, again?
"Am I really “free”?
Well, what can I say? If “freedom” to you means being somehow insulated from the actions (any kind of action), from other individuals, organizations, or governments, well, good luck. Such a state of being can not exist outside of your own mind.
People are flawed. The institutions they create are flawed. Why?
“Ah, one man’s hawk is another man dove One man’s hug is another man’s shove One man’s rock is another man’s sand One man’s fist is another man’s hand
Ah, one man’s tool is another man’s toy One man’s grief is another man’s joy One man’s squawk is another man’s sing One man’s crutch is another man’s wing…”
(Guy Clark)
But do I feel free knowing I can be gunned down randomly at any moment when I’m minding my own business?
Like in a totalitarian police state? No. I wouldn't feel free there.
Am I free to live my life normally without that kind of fear?
No. Because you're a pussy.
Not a pussy, a deeply neurotic anus.
Am I free to live my life normally without that kind of fear?
No. Irrational, delusional fear will greatly constrict your life. See a psychiatrist for help with that.
"People keep telling me it’s great I’m free to buy weapons of war so easily and that the 2A is great."
It is.
"But do I feel free knowing I can be gunned down randomly at any moment when I’m minding my own business?"
You *are* free. How you feel is irrelevant to that. The fact that you might suddenly die (by gunfire, auto accident, a falling air conditioner, or any other means) doesn't change that truth.
"I’m also perfectly “free” to die because I couldn’t afford healthcare."
Yes. Because your healthcare (or lack thereof) doesn't restrict your freedom. It may shorten your life, but you are still free every day of that life.
You are trying to say that if you aren't free from every want, you aren't free at all. That's bullshit. Free doesn't mean that and attempting to expand it to such a ludicrous degree is insane.
The chances of either of those happening would be far less if governments were limited to protecting Individual Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property.
Alas, we have governments that won't prosecute rioters and murderers, yet adds 10 years and Hundreds of Millions of Dollars to approval of new drugs.
We have a government whose "War On (Some) Drugs" has turned streets into gang war zones and yet jacks up heath care costs by being the middle man on payment.
Laser-focus on the cause, not the externality.
We also have government the practices dysgenics by subsidizing the reproduction of people most likely to produce undersocialized and violent offspring.
The rationale is not nearly so exciting.
They simply are simply buying off the underclass for not doing otherwise.
Rome, and most every other great civilization, had a grain dole. Cheapest and easiest way to keep them quiescent.
But they continue to do so even though the result is the opposite of keeping them quiescent. The offspring of those raised on the dole are the most violently disruptive in our society. I'm not so sure that's by accident.
And the government in many states is now forcing poor women to bear children they don't want (because fetuses are more important than women or already-born children) thus forcing the reproduction of possibly undersocialized and violent offspring you mention.
The government didn't force anything. The women willingly put themselves in a position to get pregnant and now must face consequences.
Fetuses are objectively human beings based on science, and thus earn to be as equally important as women and children. To predict that they will be violent is absolutely disgusting of you. Repent of your evil and wrong ways.
The World Is Still Getting Less Free. A Distressing Number of People Think That's Fine.
Unfortunately, that seems to include more than a few writers at Reason.
Who the hell wants "freedom"? Not the utopian social Marxists on the left, who can't impose their vision if people are free. Not the populist nationalists on the right, who can't have a strongman ruling us if people are free. Not any of the partisans who try everyday to "own" the other tribe. Not the angertainment media industry. And certainly not the entrenched twin-party power structure and their mega-corporate fascist allies.
"BoAf sIdEz!"
Steve Bannon has called on Christian Nationalists to reject the free-market free trade globalist liberal world order.
Basically it is Christo-Fascism vs The Party of Davos.
(Bannon gets credit for coining "The Party of Davos") to describe liberal democracy.
Since when was a bunch of unelected fools like Gates and Schwab a liberal democracy, pedo? No one elected to them to be dogcatcher, much less a world leader, yet, there they are, dictating to world leaders what they should/should not do.
World order? Doesn't sound very freedom oriented.
Don't know about this Bannon character, but this "free-market free trade globalist liberal world order" isn't what you'd like to claim it is. It's a globalist world order, sure enough, but there ain't much free-market free trade liberal about it.
The Party of Davos refers to crony capitalism, like Obamacare and the IRA, although those also could be classified as fascism since they are gov-industry collusion.
"free-market free trade globalist"
Lol. Liar. He certainly opposes the current globalist system, but Bannon is not so stupid as to think it has anything to do with a free market.
Yeah... but are correct pronouns being used?
That's being changed to do you have the right luggage.
I assume you mean that your bag matches your shoes.
If it doesn't, just grab a different bag at the airport.
You should write a column, Tips for Cross-dressing Kleptomaniacs.
His pronouns are yours/mine
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://ukincome6.blogspot.com/
The concept of freedom is often best understood by people who don't have it.
Making money online more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page…
AND GOOD LUCK HERE…………….>>> onlinecareer1
I'll stick with freedom. I've got nothing left to lose.
We progressives say 'if you act as if you were free, you will be free.' We are prisoners of habit and self imposed routine and voting for one party over another isn't going to change that.
So Trump = droolin' Joe?
Fucking ignoramus...
No, you progressives say "if I think I deserve something then other people should provide it free to me."
That is not true. Progressives have recently taken to the streets to get what they deserve. The idea that the women of Iran are sitting around waiting for others to give them the freedom to wear what they want is simply wrong.
If anything it's the reactionaries here who are content with letting others do the heavy lifting for them. See the fawning over Elon Musk and how he's going to save free speech for us.
UR so Power-mad you cannot even think outside of Gov-Gun authoritarianism... What gets created by "taking to the streets"? You think lobbying for Gov-Gun usage is "heavy lifting"?? That's how you *EARN* is by Gov-Gunning for other peoples creation/property? Keeping Elon Musk inline with speech code?
Oh but off in completely unrelated territory Iran; there's a completely unrelated EXCUSE for you to hang your hat on??? Pathetic... Absolutely pathetic.
Skeptic is 100% True but lets see if you can weasel out another pathetic excuse.
Keep fawning over Uncle Elon. He will bring you free speech for Christmas if you behave nicely and don't do anything bad.
And if you don't criticize him, he may let you keep your twitter account.
Doxxing =/= criticism.
The journalists knowingly broke the rules and deserved to face the consequences. You two should let go of the lies.
"Progressives" say, "‘if you act as if you were free", we will slander, ostracize, and silence you.
"we will slander, ostracize, and silence you."
Freedom has its risks. In Iran the government is hanging protestors. Slander is getting off easily. Don't be such a snowflake. Grow a pair. Grow a spine. Grow a pair of spines.
Well, at least you're not denying your violent intolerance. Admitting you have a problem is the first step.
"Well, at least you’re not denying your violent intolerance. "
People of Iran are violently intolerant of tyrants infringing on their freedom to dress as they please. That's the first step. If you're not willing to take it, and rely on people like Musk to set you free, you're in for a long wait.
I don't need to take that step, because we are not facing oppression at that level here.
"It's no secret that individual freedom has taken a hit over the past few years. "
It's governments who have become more heavy handed, often in response to demands for increased individual freedom. Freedom to dress as one pleases in Iran, freedom from covid restrictions in China and Canada, freedom from structural racism in American cities. There millions of individuals around the globe who've never experienced more freedom than they have opposing tyranny.
Entitle me! Entitle me! I'm a victim of structural racism.... /s
Ya know that skin-color (racism), gender-identity (sexism) HAS to mean absolutely EVERYTHING structure entire created and maintained by leftards from the days of slavery and still going.
I suspect you prefer whining over not having freedom to actual freedom.
The freedom to conquer and consume the USA with a Nazi-Empire?
That's exactly what leftards push for every F'En day.
They literally think *entitlement* to other people's things is freedom. (actually THEFT)
So if we demand less individual freedom, they'll give us more of it?
People in China and Iran are demanding more freedom, freedom from covid restrictions, freedom to wear what they please. I don't know of any mass movement that is demanding less freedom. If you want less freedom, just restrict your activities by making inane, pseudonymous comments on the Internet.
"I don’t know of any mass movement that is demanding less freedom."
Western leftism. Do you ever read a newspaper or watch the news?
"Western leftism. "
Hardly a mass movement. The closest thing there is to it in the US is Black Lives Matter, where Marxism seems to predominate. They've taken to the streets in great numbers recently protesting state tyranny. That means more freedom, not less. My advice: watch less news. You can probably find better things to do with your time.
Hardly a mass movement.
I suppose when a movement has been so successful that it dominates nearly every societal institution, there comes a point where the term "movement" no longer applies and it becomes the "establishment".
You think that Black Lives Matter is 'the establishment?' The members I'm aware of are mostly young, black and marginalized. They do have higher education which arguably makes them 'elite,' but establishment? Doesn't that mean money and access to power? As far as Black Lives Matter dominating every societal institution, it seems an absurd claim. How many BLM activists are dominating Exxon, Google, the two parties, the Supreme Court, the military, etc?
BLM absolutely has access to large amounts of money and is fawned over by the rich and powerful. But I was talking about leftists in general, not just BLM.
"I don’t know of any mass movement that is demanding less freedom."
Obviously you must not live in the USA where Nazi-Bureacrats are everywhere and lobbyists continue to push for MORE, MORE, MORE Gov-Guns.
structural racism
And the left says only the right believes in conspiracy theories.
Racism can only be ‘structural’ if the arrangement of positions is somehow racist regardless of the occupants of those positions. It is a non sequitur.
Next time you see a mob of black people burning down your community, tell them they are committing a logical fallacy.
The Black people in my neighborhood are normal, so I don't anticipate that happening.
"The Black people in my neighborhood are normal,"
Normal as in not free?
Normal as in not violent savages.
A distressing number of people are fine with the world getting more normal.
It's obvious why normality would be distressing to you.
So freedom is "a mob of black people burning down your community"..
Yes Dumb*ss that's exactly what you just stated.
I don't call you Nazi-fanboys leftards for nothing. Freak-en stupid.
"structural racism"
Sorry to trigger you. I understand the resentment that you must feel over our black brothers and sisters taking to the streets and venting their anger over tyranny.
This is sarcasm, right?
Not sarcasm, but provocation, and true to form, the commenters here have risen to take the bait. I knew that the examples of Canadians and Chinese taking action against the government would meet with approval, and mentioning blacks would lead to disapproval. This is America, after all.
Yes, this is America, which means no one of any color here is being oppressed like the Chinese people. But, I don't need to explain your own lies to you.
"no one of any color here is being oppressed "
Tell that to all the colored folk swept up by government goons for their participation in the Jan. 6 effort to stop the steal.
In China they would simply have been killed.
Freedom isn't free. In Iran protestors are being killed for the freedom to wear clothes of their own choosing.
But in the US, they're not. No matter what color they are.
Freedom from structural racism in the US? So, the issue in the US is a fantasy issue?
"So, the issue in the US is a fantasy issue?"
For many it is. You've read the comments here. The issues the drive black Americans to risk everything and confront tyranny directly are dismissed as fantasies, largely by the right. The issues that drive Chinese and Iranians into the streets seem to be taken more seriously.
Smashing the windows of minority-owned businesses so you can steal sneakers and TVs is confronting tyranny? You're an idiot.
It's insurrection. Idiotic insurrection, perhaps, but any confrontation with government thugs is anti government.
Minority business owners are "government thugs"?
"Minority business owners are “government thugs”?"
Leftists have never been too keen on business owners, despite what the TV tells you. They are part of the bourgeoisie, exploiting the working class.
Or, they took an opportunity to riot and loot without and level of overall political goal or desire.
the working class
I doubt that you'll find many people who actually work among the rioters and looters.
Can you please explain the tyranny you think they are fighting?
And being that the US is the most diverse and tolerant country on the planet, the claim of “structural racism” is patently absurd in any broad sense. Moreover, the term “structural racism” is used lazily because actual racism can’t be found. Thus, have to create a form of racism that people can’t see, smell, taste, or feel in order to keep the racism grift going. It’s whole point is to undermine people’s own eyes and create an unfalsifiable metric.
And your hysteric claims of it contrasted with things like the riots in China and Iran show just how unserious most claims of racism are in the US.
Sorry, I know you want the US to be a race-hating hellhole, but it’s just not; no matter how hard to gaslight to convince of your desired narrative.
"Can you please explain the tyranny you think they are fighting? "
I did that in my original post: China, Canada - covid restrictions. Iran - Hijab laws, US - structural racism.
"the claim of “structural racism” is patently absurd in any broad sense. "
Tell that to the BLM activists. They are Marxist inspired, young, educated and would disagree with you on many points.
"the riots in China and Iran show just how unserious most claims of racism are in the US. "
The riots are deadly serious and may be the only taste of freedom the participants get in their lives.
So, you actually couldn’t provide the tyranny that black people in this country are fighting. That is significantly my point.
And BLM activists? I’m sure they would disagree with me on many points. Just like a flat earther would disagree with me on many points. It doesn’t make their position right or even cogent. That’s the problem. You can scream “structural racism” all you want, but if you can’t define it or actually empirically demonstrate its existence, all that is left is a hollow false narrative.
Yes, the riots in China and Iran are deadly serious. That’s why you using them to compare to what black people are fighting for in the US is astoundingly ignorant and incorrect.
mtrueman has lost the argument.
Democratic societies are becoming less free precisely because they are democratic societies. The voters are getting what they are asking for.
The depressing truth.
So democracy is a bad thing?
Is?
Can be.
Always entertaining to see how no enemies to the left closeted statists in the guise of libertarians employ a clown nose on – clown nose off approach to slippery slope arguments.
Democracy is a dangerous thing. Especially to individual liberty. That is why we are a constitutional republic with decidedly undemocratic principles and institutions.
Also why people who fetishize “our democracy” should be deeply distrusted, either because they are ignorant or because they are nefarious.
"Also why people who fetishize “our democracy” should be deeply distrusted"
What kind of fetishist would you have us trust?
Liberty fetishists.
And pretty much any other fetish that stands in opposition to proggressives, Marxists (BIRM) and any other authoritarian statists like you.
Is that clear?
“Is that clear?”
It is. Trust me.
I don't believe you.
Elon Musk Buys Santa's Workshop, Releases Emails Showing How Naughty And Nice Lists Were Created
https://babylonbee.com/news/elon-musk-buys-santas-workshop-releases-emails-showing-how-naughty-and-nice-lists-were-created
Bee happy!
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://www.worksclick.com
The concept of freedom is often best understood by people who don’t have it.
https://www.lsbo.co.uk
The World Is Still Getting Less Free. A Distressing Number of People Think That's Fine.
They will realize their mistake as they or a loved one is marched to the gulag or the firing squad wall.
Well, so far mass detentions of political prisoners and military raids on private homes isn't waking people up. It's not far-fetched that marches to the gulags and firing squads might be quietly accepted.
The author seems to be using "liberty" and "democracy" interchangeably and without notice during the entire article. In several places opinion polls suggest that people want less freedom and more effective government; and in other places democratic indicators are down. So which is it? If the people want less freedom and government gives them less freedom, isn't that democracy in action? The way most people think of democracy, it's not - and should not be - the goal but, rather, just a tool to achieve what people want. The devil is in the details. Historically democracy isn't a positive but, rather, simply the absence of any other form of ruler over the people. Just because the representatives and executive government officials are chosen by open and honest elections is (obviously) no guarantee that the majority or plurality or whatever will chose wisely or elect officials who value and enforce liberty. If liberty is not the steadfast goal of large majorities, then democracy will end up being only marginally better than other forms of authoritarianism. When people panic in an emergency, abstruse theories such as "freedom" tend to be ejected out the nearest window first as more and more people become distracted from principles in favor of concentrating on being protected by momma and poppa.
Some people want authoritarian leaders until they get them and start being persecuted. But, but, but- you were supposed to persecute the *other* guy!
You will learn that the hard way with the way the Biden administration is running.