Senate Investigation Finds Federal Prisons Fail to Prevent or Investigate Rapes
Long delays and management failures "allowed serious, repeated sexual abuse in at least four facilities to go undetected."

The federal Bureau of Prison's deeply flawed, backlogged system for investigating sexual assault fails to protect female inmates from rape while protecting employees who commit sexual assault, according to a bipartisan report issued today by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI).
The PSI investigation found that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has failed to implement a federal law to prevent prison rapes, and that long delays in investigating complaints have led to a backlog of more than 8,000 internal affairs cases, leading to failures to hold employees accountable. The report says that these management failures "allowed serious, repeated sexual abuse in at least four facilities to go undetected."
"BOP's internal affairs practices have failed to hold employees accountable, and multiple admitted sexual abusers were not criminally prosecuted as a result," the report concludes. "Further, for a decade, BOP failed to respond to this abuse or implement agency-wide reforms."
Overall, the PSI investigation found that BOP employees sexually abused female inmates in at least two-thirds of federal women's prisons over the last decade. However, the report focused on four prisons—MCC New York, MDC Brooklyn, FCC Coleman, and FCI Dublin—where it says multiple BOP employees abused multiple women.
"Our findings are deeply disturbing and demonstrate, in my view, that the BOP is failing
systemically to prevent, detect, and address sexual abuse of prisoners by its own employees," Sen. Jon Ossoff (D–Ga.), the subcommittee chair, said in his opening remarks at a Senate hearing today on the investigation.
Briane Moore testified at the hearing about her time in FCP Alderson, a federal prison where she was sexually abused by a BOP captain.
"The captain had total power over me, and he knew that," Moore said. "He knew I had no control and could not say no. The captain made sure I knew that and made sure I knew he could make things worse for me. Even before his threat, I knew that if I reported him, I could be placed in solitary or shipped out to another prison even further away from my family. The prison system calls this 'protection' because it separates us from the abuser. But it is punishment. It is retaliation. I saw it happen to other women in prison, and I knew that I would be punished unless and I endured sexual abuse. I had to not help myself to help myself. After an investigation began, the captain resigned and was prosecuted. He pled guilty."
In February, an investigation by the Associated Press into FCI Dublin, a federal women's prison in California, found "a permissive and toxic culture at the Bay Area lockup, enabling years of sexual misconduct by predatory employees and cover-ups that have largely kept the abuse out of the public eye." Since then, both the former warden and prison chaplain, among other employees, have been found guilty of sexually abusing incarcerated women.
In 2019, 14 current and former inmates of FCC Coleman, a federal prison complex in Florida, filed a lawsuit saying guards subjected them to unending sexual abuse and threats. The suit also claimed that prison leadership created a "sanctuary" for guards who were known sexual predators.
"The sexual abuse at these female prisons is rampant but goes largely unchecked as a result of cultural tolerance, orchestrated cover-ups and organizational reprisals of inmates who dare to complain or report sexual abuse," the suit said.
"I was incarcerated for almost eight years, and I saw it at pretty much every single institution I was at," one of the plaintiffs, Kara Guggino, told Reason. "I was at maybe six different places, and this was going on everywhere. But it was by far the worst at Coleman."
The federal government later settled that lawsuit for at least $1.5 million.
According to the PSI report, congressional investigators "obtained copies of non-public sworn, compelled statements from officers at FCC Coleman, wherein the officers admitted to sexual abuse of female detainees in graphic detail." However, the Justice Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) declined to investigate those officers, and they were never prosecuted.
It may seem strange that a government employee can admit to criminal conduct in a sworn interview and not face prosecution, but as the PSI report explains, the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case, Garrity v. New Jersey, that when a government employee is compelled to answer questions under oath as a condition of employment, those statements can't be used to prosecute him or her.
By compelling BOP prison guards to admit to criminal conduct, BOP internal affairs investigators actually shield them from prosecution.
"There is no world in which we can say this is a good outcome," the Justice Department Inspector General told the PSI subcommittee, according to the report. "These individuals knew they have been compelled and could retire and resign and spill to [BOP] OIA and basically have immunity in some cases for engaging in sexual activity with multiple inmates. It is a terrible outcome."
Ostensibly, incarcerated people are protected from sexual assault by not only the Constitution and criminal law, but the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA). The PREA, passed in 2003, was supposed to create zero-tolerance policies for sexual abuse in U.S. prisons. However, in practice, PREA is toothless. As the report notes, at FCI Dublin "the former PREA compliance officer, responsible for training supervisors on the PREA requirements and coordinating the PREA audit, was convicted of sexually abusing female prisoners on December 8, 2022." Both Dublin and Coleman were found to be in compliance with PREA standards.
The PSI report is the latest in a string of congressional investigations into endemic corruption and misconduct inside the beleaguered federal prison system. This fall, the PSI released the results of an investigation into widespread corruption and abuse at a federal prison complex in Atlanta. Congressional investigators found that senior leadership at both the complex and the BOP had been aware of the problems for years but failed to act.
Ossoff, Sen. Mike Braun (R–Ind.), and Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D–Ill.) introduced the Federal Prison Oversight Act in September. The bill would require the Department of Justice's Inspector General to conduct detailed inspections of each of the BOP's 122 facilities and, more significantly, create an independent Justice Department ombudsman to investigate complaints.
"Given the fear of retaliation by survivors of sexual abuse, the apparent apathy by senior BOP officials at the facility, regional office, and headquarters levels, and severe shortcomings in the investigative practices implemented by BOP's Office of Internal Affairs and the Department of Justice Inspector General," Ossoff said, "I suspect the extent of abuse is significantly wider."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And? What is the point of this investigation if nothing is done about the problem? What are they going to do, pass another law to make it even more illegal to rape prisoners?
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job csx10 online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,125 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link——————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
Double secret probation.
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://www.LiveJob247.com
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
How about repealing the law that gives guards immunity for compelled statements.
Compelled statements are covered by the constitution, not regulation or law.
Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case, Garrity v. New Jersey,
Wouldn't that be the same mechanism that allows prosecutors to compel testimony against oneself and others by offering up a deal? Otherwise that just falls into the "cops can lie to secure arrests" bucket.
I have even managed $20,000 per calendar month by simply working some easy tasks from my apartment. As I had lost my office career, I was very disturbed but luckily I’ve discovered this best on-line career that’s why I’m capable of earning a thousand USD just from home. Each person can avail this best offer & collect more greenbacks online
checking this article>>OPEN>> GOOGLE WORK
c
The guards call it a perk.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..
For more detail visit the given link…………..>>> onlinecareer1
Maybe the perpetrators of toxic femininity should just figure out how to stop raping each other and reduce the backlog of investigations to zero, like the men's prisons.
No, it is not strange that compelled testimony of wrongdoing does not result in prosecutions. 5th Amendment protection against self-incrimination do not have an exception for government employees.
5th Amendment protection against self-incrimination do not have an exception for government employees.
It should. Government employees have powers. Rights are for the victims of power, not those who exercise it.
Authoritarians love compelled testimony.
Totalitarians love to have the same rights as their victims.
The other day you defended Muslims who engage in genital mutilation, and now you're defending people who commit rape under color of law.
Just when I thought my opinion of you couldn't get any lower, you manage to prove me wrong.
“Rights are for the victims of power” requires a judgement of the relative power between two actors, not that the individuals are presumed equal. It is a pernicious, reprehensible and corrupt standard that has no place in a just system.
The system I see is one where people in power commit crimes with impunity because the law does not apply to them, and yet they're still given the same rights as those they victimize.
I'm not sure what your comment means. You saying it's wrong that those who wield power are given the same rights as their victims, or that they give up rights when they take on power?
I am saying no one gives up their rights to take on a job. Everyone has the same rights. The right against self-incrimination is inherent and inalienable, it is not “given”.
I’m afraid I must disagree. Everything is a trade off, including power. When you take on power you give up rights.
Power is not just "a job." It means you can do what others cannot. You're not subject to the same rules as everyone else. You can do things that would be a crime if done by someone without power. Because of that you cannot have rights. Rights are for those you interact while in a position of power. Rights are for the victims of power, not for those who wield it.
No, you cannot give up an inalienable right.
You are making a similar argument to the Obama/Biden Administration's argument that collage students accused of rape are undeserving of due process rights. The rights of the accused need to be defended for anyone accused at the risk of undermining the idea for everyone.
Your argument is set against the basic idea of civil rights.
You are making a similar argument to the Obama/Biden Administration’s argument that collage students accused of rape are undeserving of due process rights.
What power to those college students accused of rape have? Can they commit perjury with impunity? Are they held to a different set of rules than the rest of us? Can they legally initiate violence against anyone and then make up an excuse that will be believed by people who know it is not true?
If that were the case then you might have a point. But it’s not, so you don’t.
People in power should be held to a different standard with fewer rights than their victims.
re: "no one gives up their rights to take on a job"
Sorry but that's just not true. The clearest examples are members of the military who give up quite a few "inherent and inalienable" rights during their term of enlistment. Whether that precedent should or should not be extended to prison guards is an interesting question but you cannot simply wave it away by pretending that those precedents don't exist.
What's the distinction between 'compelled testimony' and cruel and unusual punishment or torture?
Either you put the facts before a/the power structure or a/the power structure before the facts.
Part of the point about the 5A is if you’re adamant about objectively and justly convicting the guilty, their testimony isn’t and shouldn’t be necessary. It may benefit them them to give it, but if your case hinges on their own testimony, you’re likely prosecuting a victim and shouldn’t be able to compel their testimony. And, indeed this proves to be the case and, wrt to the specific issue, is a bias against men in that the inherent nature of human biology makes it easier to convict men of rape than it does women.
Edit: Being clear, many of these assault and rape convictions were the result of DNA evidence, which doesn't require the man's testimony for a conviction.
Tell me again now why privatizing prisons is supposedly such a bad idea...?
https://twitter.com/MAJTOURE/status/1602661522127347714?t=ZYpCowhsCvkD0uvvN711Rw&s=19
The Biden Administration invited a drag Queen who performs for children to the white house to sign the “respect for marriage” act.
You CANT make this shit up.
If drag queens are safe enough for kids, then they certainly are safe enough for prisoners. From now on, all guards at women's prisons must be cross dressers. Problem solved.
Silly Goose's GIF at the top is pretty feakin' epic.
I always understood that being ass raped in prison was just part of the punishment. Just not part of the formal sentencing.
It's part of the punishment only for men.
Since politics are dominated by white-knighting cis-hetero white males and man hating Amazons, what happens to men in prison doesn't matter.
Hmmm. One very underappreciated issue---do these women forfeit the right to self-defense against these rapists? I would argue that they do not.
the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has failed to implement a federal law to prevent prison rapes...BOP employees sexually abused female inmates in at least two-thirds of federal women's prisons over the last decade
Isn't rape already a fucking crime? And while we're out there using statistics to get people riled up, let's see what percentage of federal men's prisons have had male inmates sexually abused. I'm willing to wager a considerable amount of money it is more than 66%.
This is usually depicted on tv and in movies as a feature of the system so cops can use "don't drop the soap" remarks to coerce information from reluctant alleged criminals.
What makes you think that they care about men being raped in prison?
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://ukincome6.blogspot.com/
How to actually shut down this whole mess in one step:
1) Only allow heterosexual women as staff in women's prisons.
Seriously, human nature is such that if you put people in positions of power over those they find sexually attractive, that power will be abused for sexual purposes. There is no humanly-possible level of oversight that will prevent that.
Thus, it's simple enough. In situations where the potential for abuse of the weaker party is very high, you do not allow supervision by person of the opposite sex, or by bisexuals or homosexuals of the same sex. This is not "fair" to various supervisory candidates, but the more important thing is to protect the weaker parties.
The places where the potential of abuse are highest are places where the parties live together in a degree of isolation from the outside world. Accordingly, places like boarding schools, the military, and prisons should be single-sex institutions where all positions of authority are held by heterosexuals.
re: "Only allow heterosexual women as staff"
Sorry but that won't solve it. Multiple studies have shown that sex abuse is primarily motivated by a desire to exert power, not sex.
Those "studies" are "wet sidewalks cause rain" bullshit, well-refuted by better studies. Sexual abuse is facilitated by power, absolutely; that is in fact central to my point. But it is motivated by sexual desire.
(I mean, seriously. If it were motivated by the desire to exert power, then middle-aged men would wind up giving blowjobs to casting directors just as often as young women; perhaps even more so, since forcing a middle-aged man to suck you off is a more obvious exertion of power.)
Studies have also shown that women are much less likely to engage in rape or other violent crimes to begin with. They are also usually much less capable of doing so.
The anti-discrimination issues notwithstanding, our current government is insisting that there is no objective definition of "woman".
The logical thing in the matter of anti-discrimination law is to write an exception.
The logical thing in the face of a government that denies basic biology is to replace the government.
Granted, both of these may be politically unfeasible, but it doesn't change how one can eliminate prison rape by guards.
This is what people beg for, for everyone else. Everyone wants to suffocate everyone else under millions of new laws on top of the millions already smothering us. Laws are nothing but reasons the state will throw you at gunpoint into a rape cage for decades. People all deserve to be in the rape cage they demand for everyone else.