Biden's Spending Spree Is Unprecedented
Instead of redirecting course, Biden is continuing Trump’s spending legacy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20bed/20bed0455abe4f07075ed06320c589198514125c" alt="President Biden pointing to a money sign. President Biden pointing to a money sign. | CNP/AdMedia/Newscom"
More than any time in recent history, the consequences of government over-spending are becoming apparent. Inflation continues to be well above the Federal Reserve's target, and the national debt recently topped $31 trillion for the first time in U.S. history—just eight months after it crossed $30 trillion. Yet few seem to connect these events with one of their underlying causes: President Joe Biden's continued spending binge.
Tacking on $1 trillion in debt in barely more than half a year used to be unheard of. But that norm went out the window when Biden's predecessor, President Donald Trump, turbocharged the national debt—even before he put federal spending on steroids in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. What is shocking now, however, is that hardly anyone is paying attention to Biden's spending, even amid historic inflation.
For much of recent history, presidents have been able to get away with ignoring their campaign promises of fiscal responsibility. But as the bills are coming due for the U.S. economy, those days should be numbered.
Despite campaigning as a moderate, President Biden has dramatically accelerated federal spending during his time in office. He has now spent more in his first two years than President Trump did during his last two years at the height of the pandemic.
Official estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) show that, since January 2021, legislation signed by President Biden has set in motion a record $3.37 trillion in new spending, surpassing Trump's previous record of $3.28 trillion during the 116th Congress.
Like Trump, Biden has overseen significant pandemic-related relief, but he also has ramped up spending on priorities well beyond COVID-19. The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), passed in March 2021, cost $1.8 trillion, more than half of the new spending enacted during Biden's time in office.
But it's the other expensive legislation Biden has signed that pushed him past Trump. The much-vaunted Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act spent another $765 billion, though the infrastructure expenditures will occur over the course of the next five years. The Jon Stewart-promoted Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act contributed another $278 billion, while the recently passed CHIPS Act "chipped" in $255 billion more. And though congressional Democrats failed to pass Biden's Build Back Better legislation earlier this year, its eventual successor, the Inflation Reduction Act, is still estimated by the CBO to add another $51 billion to the federal ledger.
Of course, these new laws all represent spending carried out by Biden in consort with the Democratic-controlled Congress. But on top of everything Congress is doing, the president has taken numerous, expensive executive actions that make his impact on the federal budget even greater than official numbers indicate.
In response to a request from House Republicans, the CBO estimated in June that a number of the president's executive actions total another $532 billion, including interest expenses. The list of actions reviewed by the CBO include $300 billion for an expansion of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, $34 billion for the extension of various healthcare subsidies, and $85 billion for pauses in student loan repayment.
What's more, on the topic of student loans, Biden has since taken even greater actions. One estimate puts his most recent pause at another $40 billion, while the cost of fuller loan forgiveness would be more than $400 billion. Taken together, these add more than another $1 trillion in spending to Biden's legislative impact, and help explain how the administration racked up a whopping $4.8 trillion in new borrowing in just the last two years.
Meanwhile, this trend is scarcely noticed in the media or even by some congressional Republicans more interested in fighting the culture war.
It is worth considering how radical this new norm is. For example, in 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) spent more than $575 billion and was estimated by the CBO to raise the national debt by $787 billion over the subsequent decade. That legislation helped spark a nationwide backlash against Washington's spending, eventually culminating in the rise of the so-called "Tea Party" movement on the right.
In contrast, the bipartisan infrastructure bill will spend nearly $200 billion more than the ARRA and has been championed as a compromise—and the bill is not even the most expensive one passed during Biden's first two years. But few seem to object.
It seems that the Biden administration is determined to prove that deficits don't matter, and when it comes to media and public accountability, this may be the case. But the economy may prove that notion wrong. Instead of taking the opportunity to fix the egregious fiscal trends President Trump helped set in motion, Biden continues to carry on one of Trump's worst legacies as inflation remains high.
This is a strikingly ahistorical choice. A bit more than a decade ago, President Barack Obama, with his first term also occurring under united Democratic party rule, contributed just shy of $2.2 trillion in new spending during his time in office, or more than $1 trillion less than Biden. He was met with loud and sustained opposition.
While Obama eventually struck a compromise with congressional Republicans in the form of the Budget Control Act of 2011, it remains unclear if Biden will do the same. But if history is any guide, continued inflation may ultimately force a course correction. Political power, after all, can only be sustained so long without strong economic fundamentals.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
Irrumabo Ioseph Biden et Factionem Democraticam destruet.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by (gbf-04) doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
Google pays $100 per hour. My last paycheck was $3500 working 40 hours a week online. My younger brother’s friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 30 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once.
For more details visit this article.. http://www.LiveJob247.com
No one will, not even Jill.
Willingly.
Unwillingly he can have his way with all sorts of women and the press will run cover for him.
all sorts of women
and children
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Stop being mean to biden yells sarc.
https://reason.com/2022/11/23/making-the-gop-liberty-friendly-requires-more-than-just-rejecting-donald-trump/?comments=true#comment-9806642
I'm glad someone agrees with that sentiment. I'm also glad that at least for now, that thought can be expressed here. I was permanently banned from commenting at Powerline blog for appending the initials "FJB" at the end of a comment.
It's interesting that Reason writers think that all of Biden's spending programs and our current record inflation are all the fault of Trump. At the beginning of the pandemic, all the governors, "deep state" actors and Congress demanded and and insisted that Trump authorize large sums of money be spent on ridiculous programs which were supposed to "stop the spread" and "flatten the curve". The media vilified Trump and anyone else who said those expenditures might not be necessary. Trump refused to use EOs to dictate nationals shut downs of businesses and schools, and the media was outraged. However, they were appeased a bit when some governors issued those orders.
Even though we now know that spending money on plastic shields, masks, testing, and work from home policies will do nothing to stop the spread of the virus, and that it becomes least harmful as it mutates (as all viruses do), Biden still continues to extend the "emergency" and spend more money.
Reason writers insist that it is "all Trump's fault" and "Orangemanbad" is the reason for inflation.
You have to be a special brand of stupid to stick with that narrative. Trump hasn't been President for two years and the GOP has had no control of spending decisions of the House since 2018. Still, the left insists that the current inflation is all Trump's fault. As I said, it's a special brand of stupid.
If the Reason writers don't say that "Trump is worse than Hitler" at least twice a day, they won't get invited to all the "cool" parties that the progressives throw.
The article you're commenting on mentions Trump only as a reference point, while blaming the current spending spree squarely on Joe Biden (and, to a lesser extent, on the Democrat-controlled Congress), and all you can see is "Reason writers insist that it is “all Trump’s fault”".
TDS in action...
Uh:
"...But that norm went out the window when Biden's predecessor, President Donald Trump, turbocharged the national debt—even before he put federal spending on steroids in response to the COVID-19 pandemic..."
Stuff YOUR TDS up your ass, spam.
Exactly. Trump is only mentioned as a reference point for Biden's even more egregious efforts.
But, of course, any mention of Trump which is not accompanied by enthusiastic sucking sounds and doe-eyed upward gazing is taken by the TDS-addled crew as a horrible insult to their dear leader.
Pathetic.
They always have to take a shot at him before saying anything about the democrats. So no, you’re wrong.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..OPEN>> GOOGLE WORK
You have TDS. The article not only didn't say it was Trump's fault it didn't even imply it.
Fuck all that spend borrowed money.
Spending is the elephant in the room for my entire adult life, but eveyone is concerned about the irrelevant.
An alarming number of "progressive" ideologues truly believe that there's no actual connection between spending and deficits; no idea whether they see any connection between deficits and growing the debt.
A lot of Dems (many of them otherwise intelligent people) truly believe that there's no real connection between the size of the Fed balance sheet (money supply) and inflation. Or there's the ones whose chosen media bubble has let to them being unaware of any significant change in the money supply since 2008.
Also, official Democrat dogma is that the government "has a lot of different options" when it comes to getting inflation under control (and that any spending cuts which might be part of that are contained within the ~35% of the budget that's made up of discretionary spending) outside of any actions taken by the Fed.
Younger (millennial) leftists that I've heard from also seem to think that the primary motivation on the part of the Fed in raising rates is actually direct malice toward the lower economic deciles in the population; who are also the ones most negatively impacted by the inflation which "progressive" economic policies seem to be intended to create. Many in that age group also see 6% interest on secured loans to be "more than anyone has ever paid in history" though and probably also buy into the
Perhaps we’re best served by thinning the progressive herd.
Who first said deficits don't matter? Was it a Democrat? Partisans are such simple minded organisms.
I can't remember who first said it, but I don't know that there's been a point in my lifetime where either party really cared about balancing the budget while they were the ones in power. Both have been "deeply concerned" about deficits and the National Debt when the other side was in charge though, and for pretty much the entire 21st century it's just been "game on" for blowing out any semblance of "fiscal responsibility".
Fuck this stooge of a "journalist", Trump has been out of office for three years. GTFO.
Checks out. The author is a woke millennial bot.
Amazing how now, of all times, we can talk about this, but even then, boaf sidz gets trotted out.
We must save democracy.
Preferably in suspended animation. Who wants their lives controlled by the stupidest half of the population +1?
Kill democracy and resurrect our constitutional republic.
Yeah. History is stupid.
Yeah, because he forgets about the expansion of government under Obama, Bush II, and even Clinton.
You expecting a thesis?
Why go back just one admin? What is the point?
Bidens spending spree is on the backs of him and his democrat party. Why are you so happy w the deflecting?
Well I'll be damned; Trump is the one making Biden spend all that money.
Silly me, I thought it was a fully democrat controlled legislature implementing the party platform.
Couldn't get past the second paragraph. Great job Reason.
Why yes, you would think Reason would use the "Nancy tricked Donnie" argument that ML and Jesse like to lead with.
You could go to the police and turn yourself in as a criminal pedophile. Or just leave a confession next to your lifeless body after you hopefully commit suicide.
Ukraine spending is bipartisan
2021 federal budget spending = $6.8 trillion
Ukraine aid = $28.2 billion
You figure out where the decimal point goes
I get your point, but there’s no way Ukrainian spending is only at 20 something billion or going to stay that way if it is. And with barely a shred of oversight from anyone.
Republicans are absolutely letting some of this happen.
You have so much TDS you think any mention of Trump is blaming him.
Biden is continuing Trump’s spending legacy
Sadly, they both get an "F" grade on restraining the size of government. We can do better. Find two different candidates for 2024 please.
Surprising! I’ve been making 100 Dollars an hour since I started freelance on the Internet six months ago. I work long hours a day from home and do the basic work that I get from the business I met online. share this work for you opportunity This is definitely the best job I have ever done.
Go to this link...................>>> onlinecareer1
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Hey, things cost more so you gotta spend more, amiright?
dude track it back to TARP at the very least.
TARP was an outlier in that IIRC it was repaid.
43 killed (R) with it either way.
TARP actually ended up as a slight gain.
The problem was Reid and Pelosi moved the spending outlays into baseline budgets and used the outlays as the new floor without taking account of the repayments. Then Obama used the repayments to show a "deficit reduction" despite the much higher floor.
No, no, Shreek assures us that massive deficits are strictly the fault of republicans.
got to get the TDS in when in reality it is Obama's spending policies which are Bushes policies which are Clinton's policies which are etc etc......
Seems to me i remember the first time I think during Regan years everyone was in a panic over a single billion now its 31 trillions
Yes its bad and its every politicians dam fault and no libertarians won't solve it either since they will never be elected
YES, someone gets it!
LOL. I love the trope that Presidents spend all the money.
Unless it's Obama. Then the story is that his stimulus spending wasn't actually spent.
US presidents' actual role in government spending is exaggerated or de-emphasised, seemingly depending on the writer's whim, but presidents who sign spending bills into law cannot claim to not support the spending.
Few spending bills have been passed over presidential vetos in recent memory (Trump's January 2021 veto of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was one of those few.) Congress then overrode his veto and the NDAA became law, so Trump can't be blamed for that particular $740 billion.
When your party is in the White House and the other party is in Congress, all the fault belongs to Congress.
When your party is in Congress and the other party is in the White House, all the fault belongs to the White House.
When your party has both, all fault belongs to the previous administration.
When your party has neither, all fault belongs to the current administration.
Sounds like something you would come up to justify being unprincipled.
Also sounds like a simplified, but pretty on target, summary of how political partisans typically spin it.
That's basically a spot on framing of it.
However, I would also include that when a party has both, all fault belongs to the previous adminstration and also the minority party for gumming up the works.
Even when the president's tighter fisted than Congress, the most s/he can do is whittle spending down to the point where a bipartisan compromise will over-ride hir veto. What percentage do you think that would be of current spending?
The President could permanently lay off all non-essential govt personnel (they're identified any time there's a shutdown), then implement a hiring freeze. But none ever does.
Continuing the Trump Legacy?
The national debt increased more under the first three years of Obama than under the pre Covid Trump. This doesn't defend Trump but it puts things in perspective.
The bastard who started the spending spree was G W Bush who doubled the national debt after coming in to office with a budget that balanced under Clinton (give Gingrich some credit if you want). Obama redoubled the debt.
Biden, however, is in a class by himself. He wasn't continuing the Bush-Obama-Trump legacy, he was trying to turn the US into China as Bill Gates, Larry Fink and Klaus Schwab all want.
Clinton's budget was only "balanced" in that it assumed that the stratospheric growth of the dot com era would continue indefinitely, and given that it was Clinton's meddling in the housing market that created the housing bubble he gets zero credit.
The national debt went up every year. The last President to balance the budget was Andrew Jackson. The last President to pay off the debt was Thomas Jefferson.
Teacher says every time we bipartisan vote to send billions of taxpayer funds into a corrupt unaccountable country and unaudited bureaucracy, an Angel gets their wings.
Perhaps we should be sending them weapons, not money?
What does the money printer say?
brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Obama did this exact same thing. Take "emergency" spending and turn it into the new baseline.
How many trillions will they print in 2025? 2030?
True. When is the last time we had an actual budget passed by Congress?
It's been so long that I completely forgot that they haven't been doing it.
Anyone else not surprised these articles are coming after the election on this site? Biden's spending gas actually decreased slightly from the last 2 years, granted mostly due to courts and lawsuits.
biden has to spend this money or he will be considered stingy in comparison to trump by all the progressives
paul krughole at the new york times can masterfully explain how government profligacy doesn't cause inflation and trickles down to poor people
if you don't agree you are a herbert hoover liquidationist
Biden is using the same method democrats did in 2009 to justify higher baseline spending. Using "one time" events as the new baselines.
Ding ding ding!
There's a reason why Republicans and Democrats both love to spend more money. It's because the vast majority of American voters have no sense of fiscal responsibility, and they love all the spending, and they will quickly vote out any politician who tries to cut any of it off.
Most people have no idea where the money comes from nor where/how the goods and services it consumes are produced. It all just happens. Somehow.
Most people know that the money is not coming from them, because most people don't actually pay federal income tax.
You are right. The use of deficit spending means people can have service and not pay all the cost. I have noted before that Americans are untaxed. If the government taxed at an appropriate rate for the services provided people would better understand the cost of these services. Understanding the costs would help people decide what services are worth keeping and what are worth cutting.
I so wish taxes were in line with spending. It would be so stark for people at that point.
LMAO..... " If the government taxed at an appropriate rate for the services provided people would better understand the cost of these services." .... 'Understanding the costs would help people decide what services are worth keeping and what are worth cutting."
And how did you not just state that Free-Markets work and Gov-GUN forced Redistribution SUCKS?
Maybe it's time to stop worshiping government and align yourself to what you really know. (as all leftard voters should do)
Don't worry Reason, the democrats will never lose an election again and you get to blame Trump. Yay!
Wait, if it's "unprecedented" then how is it continuing Trump's legacy?
As if words have meaning anymore.
Grammar literally decimated.
Surprising! I’ve been making 100 Dollars an hour since I started freelance on the Internet six months ago. I work long hours a day from home and do the basic work that I get from the business I met online. share this work for you opportunity This is definitely the best job I have ever done.
Go to this link...................>>> onlinecareer1
That is surprising. I wouldn't pay you a nickel for anything.
Biden’s Spending Spree Is Unprecedented
Biden’s Support for COVID Protests Hinges on What Country They’re in
Biden’s ‘Made In America’ Plan Is Bullying Homeowners Off Their Land to Build a Taxpayer-Subsidized Chip Plant
Biden Is Pushing ‘Equity’ and ‘Environmental Justice’ Into Every Corner of the Regulatory State
Reason’s analysis of Biden: IT’S ALL TRUMPS FAULT!
Are these all supposed to be headlines?
Usually, words like "is" are not given the initial-cap treatment.
But I guess we should be thankful you haven't discovered Caps Lock...
Another TDS-addled shit-pile checks in.
some congressional Republicans more interested in fighting the culture war.
Similarly the Jews and Hutus were the problem. If they would have just stopped fighting back everything would have been fine.
No doubt. Someone's the aggressor here. Probably all started with Trump. We were on track to Utopia till he showed up.
“The national debt recently topped $31 trillion for the first time in US history.”
Wait, what? You mean we haven’t got to $31T before and then paid some of it back? This is a first?
Jeez, now I am kinda worried.
I'm thinking that every minute that goes by the national debt tops a new number for the first time.
GDP is only 23 trillion. So the debt is 135% of GDP.
But GDP includes government spending (6 trillion).
So the productive economy is only 17 trillion.
And the debt is 182% of actual productivity per year.
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [bdt-13] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:. EXTRA DETAILS HERE:….. Salaryapp1.com
The next two years could be an opportunity for the Republican party as the opposition to lay out a plan for spending less. By plan I mean a sensible one not the usual, we will cut all the programs we don't like and nothing else. I am thinking of the Healthcare Repeal and Replace and when they had the power to do so they did nothing because they had no plan.
Alternatively, the Republicans could spend the next two years with a thorough investigation of Hunter Biden.
Could they do both? Spend less and investigate Hunter Biden?
You know they will pick the latter. No way they try to get a hold of spending or do anything regarding healthcare.
Why does the federal government have to run healthcare? They can’t even run Amtrak.
Unjust Armed-Robbery… What it’s been about all along.
I'm not the smartest guy in the world but if something is "unprecedented" how can it also be a continuance of something prior? Seems those are mutually exclusive
The Biden administration with congressional backing has spent more 10-Fold more than anything prior. Putting the KING at the helm of the most recent Executive Order to SPEND, SPEND, SPEND is also a bigger stretch than anything prior.
The Nazi's (Democratic National Socialists) are closing in on their Nazi Conquer of the USA.
I'm confused here: Spending is initiated by Congress, right? It's literally illegal for Presidents to spend money Congress hasn't appropriated, and Congress has also made it illegal for Presidents to refuse to spend money they've appropriated.
This isn't Biden continuing Trump policies. It's the Democratic Congress continuing the Democratic Congress' policies!
It's like you guys failed HS civics class, or something.
And one of the people Reason hates most, Taylor-Greene, was one of the more outspoken critics of the spending and the lack of any recorded votes for most of it.
When do laws ever stop democrats?
@Jonathan Bydlak
The trend is that each successive president spends more than their predecessor. Why you single out Trump is a mystery. He only did what Obama did, what Bush did, etc.
I understand calling out a current president on over spending, but casting blame backwards does not help to change anything. They are no longer in power.
Not sure why Trump remains so "top of mind" with people who have Trump Derangement Syndrome. Trump was a mediocre president, but not all things evil. Trump has his flaws, but so does every other president. Obama is just as narcissistic as Trump, but manifests if differently.
So much of Trump Derangement Syndrome is due to the extreme focus of the corporate media. There is a huge double standard in how the Corporate media treated Obama versus Trump and now Trump versus Biden.
It is comical just how deranged and just how little credibility the corporate media has. Trump is comical in his own right, but the corporate media reaction to him is even more comical.
Meanwhile, there are at minimum a thousand and one good jokes that could be told about Biden, but for some reason he's considered off limits. With Trump even the bad jokes were allowed.
What budgeting should be for the US, and for every state and municipality:
1) Take what you are spending this year. That is X.
2) Establish a BASELINE of X adjusted for inflation and population growth (or decline).
3) From that point on, all spending increases must be "paid for" with a cut somewhere else. If you have already committed to an increase, that may be legitimate (such as Social Security, which gives you your own money back with below-market rate of return, IF you live long enough), but it still must be paid for.
This is the only way to avoid a "painful" net cut in spending in the years ahead.
Actually, government spending as a percentage of the economy should fall every year, since government's functions are supposed to be limited, and economic growth is not.
It's the same thing Obama did. Take a one-time, "dire crisis" emergency level of spending from your Repub predecessor, and make it the new baseline. Then hire more govt employees so you have more votes.
Reason endorsed and supported Joe Biden in the 2020 Presidential election. Never forget that.
Trump added more to the National Debt than Obama did.
COMPLETE LIE.