Pennsylvania Republicans Impeached Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner. Now What?
If it comes down to a party-line vote, Republicans don't have enough seats in the state Senate to remove Krasner from office.

The impeachment last week of Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner by the Republican-controlled Pennsylvania House sets up one of the highest-profile battles yet between reformer prosecutors and their conservative opponents.
If Republicans are successful in their efforts to remove Krasner, they would knock off one of the most high-profile and aggressive members in a wave of reformer district attorneys elected over the past five years. But if Krasner survives, it will only further cement the twice-elected prosecutor's reputation and his mandate.
The Pennsylvania House voted along party lines last week, 107–85, to impeach Krasner. Pennsylvania Republicans accused Krasner's policies of leading to the horrific spike in gun violence and homicides in Philadelphia. "His lack of proper leadership serves as a direct and proximate cause of the crisis currently facing the city of Philadelphia," the House resolution calling for Krasner's impeachment says.
The House will now send the articles of impeachment to the state Senate, where, after a trial, a two-thirds vote would be required to remove Krasner from office. However, Republicans only control 28 out of 50 seats.
Krasner held a press conference today, flanked by City Council members and local activists, defending his record and attacking the impeachment vote. "What you're seeing is the MAGA wing of the Republican Party acknowledging they can't win elections against criminal justice reform, because that is what the people want," Krasner said.
The impeachment is the latest move by Republican legislators and governors against elected prosecutors they view as too soft on crime. This summer, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis removed Tampa Bay–area State Attorney Andrew Warren from office, accusing him of neglect of duty for refusing to prosecute some low-level crimes and saying he would not press charges for violations of Florida's new laws restricting abortion and transition-related care for transgender minors. In Virginia, Republican lawmakers tried and failed to pass a law targeting progressive prosecutors that would have allowed the state attorney general to take over violent crime cases.
The New York Post editorial board somewhat bizarrely characterized the vote to impeach Krasner as part of a "revolt against woke DAs," as if it was engineered by everyday Philadelphians rather than a state GOP that just lost its House majority.
In a press release, Krasner said Republican lawmakers impeached him "without presenting a single shred of evidence connecting our policies to any uptick in crime."
When Krasner, a longtime civil rights and criminal defense attorney, announced his candidacy for Philadelphia district attorney in 2017, the local police union called it "hilarious." They stopped laughing after he won the Democratic primary, thanks in part to generous funding from a super PAC connected to liberal megadonor George Soros.
After handily winning the general election, Krasner fired around 30 prosecutors. He ended cash bail for many low-level offenses and stopped prosecuting some misdemeanor crimes, such as marijuana possession, altogether. He also started a conviction review unit and began working to overturn old convictions that were tainted by misconduct and sloppy work.
But nothing enraged police unions more than his prosecutions of cops for excessive force, something that was practically unheard of in Philadelphia before he took office. Krasner's office brought murder charges against three officers for three fatal shootings, and in September, his office secured the first homicide conviction against an on-duty Philadelphia cop in 44 years.
The rise in violent crime seemed like it would create political headwinds for Krasner, but despite Republicans' and police unions' best efforts, he cruised to reelection in 2021 with 69 percent of the vote.
While Krasner makes an easy target for Republicans looking for someone to blame, less attention has been paid to the Philadelphia Police Department's failures.
An audit last year by the Philadelphia City Controller reported that the city's police department was shockingly disorganized, wasteful, and ineffective. Among its findings: Between 2016 and 2020, the department had the lowest homicide clearance rate among the 10 largest cities in the country, even as its budget ballooned during that same period.
The Pennsylvania House Select Committee on Restoring Law and Order, created to investigate Krasner and Philadelphia's rise in violent crime, released a report in October that found that "a jaw-dropping 81% of non-fatal shootings and 61.5% of fatal shootings did not result in arrests," a failure the committee attributes to staffing shortages.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And if it comes down to a party-line vote PA Republicans have established an issue to run against PA Democrats on unless the crime situation improves.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by (ins-11) doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
He also started a conviction review unit and began working to overturn old convictions that were tainted by misconduct and sloppy work.
But nothing enraged police unions more than his prosecutions of cops for excessive force, something that was practically unheard of in Philadelphia before he took office. Krasner's office brought murder charges against three officers for three fatal shootings, and in September, his office secured the first homicide conviction against an on-duty Philadelphia cop in 44 years.
-------------------------------------------
Oh, so *that* is why they hate him. No wonder. You can't just go around holding police accountable to the law ... what was he thinking.
I have even managed $20,000 per calendar month by simply working some easy tasks from my apartment. As I had lost my office career, I was very disturbed but luckily I’ve discovered this best on-line career that’s why I’m capable of earning a thousand USD just from home. Each person can avail this best offer & collect more greenbacks online
HERE====)> http://pay.hiring9.com/
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
shockingly disorganized, wasteful, and ineffective. That doesn't excuse Krasner. That's just evidence BOTH institutions need dozens at the top to be replaced by people with color blind and objective common sense, and a sense of fair play and justice (for all).
He’s been impeached. That’s all it should take to disqualify him from public office. See, for example, the Trump impeachment and the Trump impeachment II.
That's not how it works. Impeachment is equivalent to an indictment; the office holder is not removed from office unless they are convicted at a trial. Trump is perhaps uniquely unqualified to hold office, but he was not removed from office in two "trials", so the impeachments failed. Same with (Bill) Clinton.
This DA was elected to office by a large majority of the voters. It should be up to the voters to remove him, unless he has committed a crime in office. This impeachment appears to be just the result of a policy difference with the state legislature.
Gesture politics on the Alt-Right.
Pennsylvania Republicans Impeached Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner. Now What?
Dump him in Olney at 2 AM, and give him a 5 minute head start.
Don't remember much outrage at Reason when the Democrats impeached Trump twice without 2/3rds in the senate. But he wasn't a Soros fav so, yeah. I fully support criminal justice reform and if this guy is willing to prosecute criminal cops and exonerate people who were victims of police and prosecutorial misconduct, good on him. But the reality is that the Soros prosecutors policies have encouraged criminals who no longer fear prosecution. Their victims are the middle and working class who do not have the wherewithal to defend themselves. The fact that this was a party line vote is an indictment of the Democrats, not one of whom would cross the party line to defend their constituents.
"Don’t remember much outrage at Reason when the Democrats impeached Trump twice without 2/3rds in the senate. "
There may have been one or two shouts of outrage, but they were drowned out by the unified chorus of "THIS IS IT! WE GOT HIM THIS TIME!"
There were no shouts of outrage, just several articles along the lines of "we should be impeaching presidents more often!" which is a particularly craven way of admitting that the impeachments were nothingburgers of political show.
Although PA's impeachment process is different than the federal one, "any misbehavior in office" is clearly targeted at criminal-type activities, not policy differences.
How can he have "misbehaved" if he's being accused of doing exactly what he said he would do when he won the election? If the voters of Philly are unhappy with his performance, they can vote him out of office at the next election.
Impeach everyone.
Pennsylvania Republicans have refrained from impeaching Republican prosecutors who raped, coerced sex from defendants and witnesses, and engaged in lesser offenses, but have impeached Democrat Larry Krasner for refusing to flatter Pennsylvania's vestigial bigots and clingers.
Clingers gonna cling. But, as usual, they won't accomplish much.
I am sure you think this is some sort of gotcha, but it isn't. If he is guilty of rape, he'll go to jail. The fact that you are trying to conflate a democrat being impeached (no prison sentence) with a republican being charged with rape (definite prison sentence if found guilty) just shows the rest of the comment section yet another reason to not listen to your partisan ramblings.
He has zero credibility already. Just a raving progtard who would be more useful as mulch.
Impeachment is designed to enable removal of a substandard official from office for misconduct.
Clingers went after Krasner but have declined to act with respect to more than one Republican wrongdoer in Pennsylvania.
I attribute this to the fact that Pennsylvania Republicans tend to come from the half-educated, desolate, emptying, bigoted communities that most people see only at a glance as they pass those can't-keep-up backwaters along the Turnpike or Interstate 80 while traveling between successful, modern, productive communities. Even at the state legislature, Pennsylvania Republicans tend to be products of backwater religious schooling or maybe homeschooling, with the occasional associate's degree thrown in somewhere among the slack-jaws.
Just another troll looking for attention. Mute his bigoted ass.
...which you obviously have never done. Why is that?
Actually he is muted, that is why I'm not replying to him. Keep trying, you may get a gotcha someday.
It's the kirkland subroutine. Its programmers are still working out the bugs.
How are you the reform candidate when you're a 2x incumbent?
"How we gon' run on reeform when we the damned incument!"
The most crime riddled districts of Phila. are where Krasner got his largest margins of victory. Let Philadelphians stew in their own juices. Should Krasner ever run for state wide office...well, as a Blue State, you never know.
Stay-at-home mom Kelly Richards from New York after quitting her full-time job managed to earn an average of between $6,000 and $8,000 a month freelancing at home...
Here's how she did it..............>>> onlinecareer1
Can Reason ever admit that these leftist prosecutors are more concerned with virtue signaling than actually reform? Or that their style of reform is making things worse? Oh no, it's always blame the cops and Republicans in these stories. Always portray the prosecutors as angels being attacked by those evil Republicans and cops by presenting only cherry picked narratives and ignoring any other facts. Like their story on the NYC prosecutor. No mention of the fact he's also a "reformer" prosecutor that even the left is criticizing for his approach. Oh no, must be the evil Republicans with ulterior motives that we all know are rooted in racism. Fuck, Reason journalists are fucking lazy anymore. No original takes on anything and pretty much the same line we get from MSNBC and the New Yorker.
Krasner is the game changer that's long overdue and needed
Wait, what? Are you saying the politicians will vote along Party lines and not on the merits of the case? I don't believe it.
Eternal legal harassment?
House Democrats Impeached President Donald Trump. Now What? If it comes down to a party-line vote, Democrats don't have enough seats in the Senate to remove Trump from office.
The precedent has been set.
Why do you quote that kind of bullshit without challenging it? Post hoc ergo propter hoc may not be a strong argument, but it is absolutely a "single shred of evidence". Has Krasner presented "a single shred of evidence" that something besides his policies are driving Philadelphia's surge in murder and robberies?