Los Angeles Sheriff's Department
L.A. Sheriff Who Fought Against Oversight and Transparency Concedes Election Defeat
Alex Villanueva was ousted after a single combative, troubled term. Voters also approved giving county leaders the power to remove future sheriffs.

Los Angeles County's embattled, combative Sheriff Alex Villanueva conceded defeat Tuesday afternoon and will serve just a single, memorable term and be replaced by retired Long Beach Police Chief Robert Luna.
Los Angeles is slow to count its votes (mail-in votes will be accepted for days after the election as long as they're postmarked by Election Day), but from the very initial tallies, Luna held a significant lead over Villanueva that was never in danger. With 70 percent of the vote counted, Luna has a 20-percentage-point lead over Villanueva, ahead 60–40 percent.
It's an unsurprising rejection of a sheriff who was elected amid a "blue wave" in the 2018 midterms with the support of local Democratic Party organizations, but who fought transparency and accountability—feuding with county leadership—going so far as to open investigations into his critics and prompting lawsuits from department whistleblowers saying they were punished for bringing department problems to light. When Reason attempted to use a new police transparency law to get copies of any of Villanueva's past discipline records, the department got a restraining order to resist. Ultimately they lost the fight (then later told Reason there were no disciplinary records to send us that were covered by the transparency law).
All the while, Villanueva was downplaying very real concerns about the chronic problems of gang-style behavior from within the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department. Soon after taking office, he rehired a deputy that was fired for stalking and abusing his ex-girlfriend. The County Board of Supervisors balked at the move, blocked the rehiring, and it has all turned into a legal mess.
Essentially, Villanueva's attempts to present himself as both a crime fighter and a reformer were undermined by his behavior that consistently appeared to protect his deputies' worst behavior.
He barely scraped his way into the top spot in the June primaries, a remarkably poor showing by an incumbent, getting just 32 percent of the vote out of a field of nine candidates. Luna was right behind him with 26 percent of the vote. The majority of the votes for those other candidates appear to have gone to Luna, not Villanueva.
Even as he accepted defeat, the Los Angeles Times reported he blamed the media and political establishment for his loss, saying, "The whole thing on the deputy gangs was literally a campaign strategy." He still insists that he was a reformer, somehow.
Los Angeles residents were so put off by Villanueva's behavior that they have also approved County Measure A, a referendum put on the ballot by the county Board of Supervisors that gives them the authority to remove the sheriff from office. The measure requires that the sheriff be removed for cause, such as violation of laws related to the sheriff's duties, neglect of duties, misuse of public funds, falsification of documents, or obstruction of investigations into department conduct. Removal would require four of the five county's supervisors to agree. With 70 percent of vote counted, Measure A is currently passing 71 percent to 29 percent. So not only is Villanueva going down, he appears to be taking some of the independence of the office with him.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Los Angeles is slow to count its votes (mail-in votes will be accepted for days after the election as long as they're postmarked by Election Day)"
Which we're all supposed to pretend is perfectly normal even though it was never this way before 2020.
It's the New Normal, to use one of the most obnoxious terms from the pandemic era.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job (knd-19) online! i do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
Which we’re all supposed to pretend is perfectly normal even though it was never this way before 2020.
That's not true, at least in California. The rule that mail-in ballots count as long as they are postmarked on election day has been that way for a little while. Here is an article from 2018 complaining about exactly the same thing, the slow count of ballots in California.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/28/politics/why-california-is-still-counting-ballots/index.html
Wrong. Mail in ballots never were allowed for the general public in most states, including California, with exception only for disability and absence from the county.
The idea that thousands of able-bodied people could sit home while activists went out to distribute, collect, and deposit their ballots… without any meaningful voter identification process… is new.
Trump traitors lie, we know you lie, and the lies don't convince anyone. Why do you bother? It just ain't true, not in any way, shape, or form. The elections aren't rigged, people just vote against your vile ideology, your idiot candidates, and your conman leader.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
A city that keeps voting Democrat seeks their own demise. Much like a man who cheats on his wife.
★I am making a real GOOD MONEY (123$ / hr ) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly $30k, this online work is simple and straightforward, don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE. I hope you also got what I...go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart.
OPEN>>
https://www.pay.hiring9.com
Alex Villanueva was ousted after a single combative, troubled term. Voters also approved giving county leaders the power to remove future sheriffs.
Without knowing anything about this particular election, or Sheriff, regarding giving county leaders the ability to remove future Sheriffs, isn't that what the election does?
Were those HIS storm troopers who just got run over en-masse?
Were you driving, Hank?
Now if the people of L.A. could get rid of Gascon......
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18k to $21k. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26K in this month by just working online from home in my part time.
Every person easily do this job by just.........>>> onlinecareer1
Villanueva didn't make enemies of the city council for resisting transparency. He started out as wokish cop who resisted ICE visitation to local jail to a guy who questioned George Gascon's insane policies and the city's failure to clean up the homelessness. He also refused vaccine mandates.
There's no evidence that he was involved in any criminal police gang. The city council itself is almost CERTAINLY corrupt (hello, Nuri Martinez). Bribery is a thing, just ask Mark Ridley Thomas.
George Gascon routinely demotes people who question him. And this is a guy who won't charge someone for running down a mother walking down the street with a stroller. Why no response from Reason? The writers here turned on Villanueva because he transitioned into law and order cop, the very kind they detest.
I've listened to Villanueva (in local talk shows like John and Ken) talk about real city problems that affect people who live where - the various fire hazards that media almost never talks about, homeless people threatening specific businesses, etc. This wasn't a "rogue cop", he had a real sense of things going wrong with the city, in real time. It's a tremendous loss for the city.
LA voters are stupid. Tremendously stupid. They had a perfectly serviceable DA in Jackie Lacy and replaced with her with a total loon. The society hating activists rule the electorate here.
"There’s no evidence that he was involved in any criminal police gang"
He is an ex-cop, QED.
So is the new guy any less terrible than the old guy ?
Potentially. At least he hasn't outed himself as a thief and a Nazi stooge.