Don't Bet on Inflation Going Away Soon
"The history of developed countries since 1970 is very discouraging about the prospects of bringing down 8 percent inflation," says Larry Summers.

More than a year after Americans were told that inflation would be "transitory," several prominent economists now warn that persistently rising prices could be here to stay for a while.
"The history of developed countries since 1970 is very discouraging about the prospects of bringing down 8 percent inflation," tweeted Larry Summers, the Barack Obama advisor who was one of several economists to correctly warn that the American Rescue Plan's spending surge would trigger inflation. If anything, Summers wrote, the current belief that interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve will curtail rising prices while slowing the economy might be overly optimistic.
Summers outlined his argument in more detail in an op-ed published Monday by The Washington Post. While the Fed has raised interest rates several times in recent months, Summers says it is "simply not plausible" to think that rates have risen high enough to bring inflation back down to the central bank's target rate of 2 percent.
The argument against more aggressive action is that sharply rising interest rates could trigger a bad recession, but Summers thinks that worry misses the point. Unless inflation is controlled—even at the expense of a bad recession, as was required in the early 1980s to stop the inflationary spiral of the late 1970s—"workers will not see meaningful increases in their purchasing power."
As usual, the root cause of the inflation crisis is an overly loose monetary policy. When there are more dollars chasing the same number of goods, prices will rise.
And there is a lot of excess money in the system right now, as the Harvard economist (and another former Obama advisor) Jason Furman pointed out on Twitter last week. Furman noted that pandemic-era stimulus efforts resulted in bulging household savings rates and that much of those savings have yet to be spent.
Households saved about $2.2T during the initial pandemic and pandemic stimulus. Have spent out $0.7T of that maintaining consumption in the face of flat/declining real incomes. Still leaves about $1.5T--which could easily last a year. pic.twitter.com/zbBarTrgd5
— Jason Furman (@jasonfurman) October 28, 2022
Furman believes the economy is headed for a period of "stagflation," which he describes as an "ongoing hard landing" in which unemployment rises and inflation falls, but not to the Fed's desired levels.
Inflation ramped up during the spring and summer of 2021, as America exited the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, officials at the Federal Reserve and within the Biden administration claimed the rising prices were a "transitory" phenomenon caused by the pandemic and various supply chain problems. That was "probably the worst inflation call in the history of the Federal Reserve," according to Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor for Allianz, a German-based firm that is one of the world's largest insurance companies.
Months later, as prices continued to rise, the Biden administration switched gears to blame Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine. While it's true that the war in Ukraine has helped nudge fuel and food prices higher, the true driver of inflation is monetary policy rather than short-term shocks to supply chains. If the money supply had been kept in check, consumers would have offset higher gas prices, for example, by cutting back on purchases elsewhere and inflation would have been contained.
It wasn't. And whether it can be contained now remains an open question.
A Deutsche Bank report published last week looked at periods where developed economies saw inflation above 8 percent—as is happening now in the United States and Europe. Historically, it takes around two years for inflation to fall below 6 percent "before settling at about that level for five years after the initial spike," the Financial Post notes.
Citing a report from Oxford Economics, a forecasting firm, the Financial Post warns that "painfully tight monetary policy might be required for central banks to bring inflation all the way back to target. Public support for such a policy appears limited."
That brings us back around to the dilemma highlighted by Summers. The sure way to bring inflation down quickly is to experience a bad recession, which of course comes with its own plentiful downsides.
"The idea that the economy has overheated, and thus monetary policy needs to be restrictive, is at last widely accepted even by acolytes of 'team transitory,'" Summers wrote Monday in the Post, casting some shade at those who misled Americans about inflation a year ago.
Don't expect things to look a lot better a year from now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who did you vote for, Eric?
This was Eric Boehm in October 2020.
ERIC BOEHM
Reporter
Who do you plan to vote for this year? I am currently not registered to vote in Virginia, where I live. If I change that before the election, I will vote for Jo Jorgensen—unless I believe there is a chance that Joe Biden will somehow fail to win Virginia, in which case I will vote strategically and reluctantly for Biden.
If you could change any vote you cast in the past, what would it be? I can't imagine thinking a single vote is valuable enough to spend time regretting.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… http://www.Profit97.com
Speaking of voting, Arizona LP candidate Marc Victor just dropped out and endorsed Republican Blake Masters.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/11/01/libertarian-u-s-senate-candidate-marc-victor-drops-out-race/10655998002/
To repeat, you dumbass, if federal spending set off worldwide inflation then Fat.ass Donne did the most harm in 2020 with his Cares Act and PPP. Sleepy Joe fueled the fire with ARR.
HOWEVER, Boehm clearly believes the Fed is to blame:
As usual, the root cause of the inflation crisis is an overly loose monetary policy.
You still haven't explained why you think the 2020 spending bills weren't the responsibility of the house but the president.
GOP president and Senate voted 96-0 for CARES Act.
Republicans could have blocked it but didn't want to. the buck stops at the president (or did at one time before Trump).
I realize you are heavily invested in the "Nancy tricked Donnie" narrative though.
Yeah, Trump contributed to the spending, no shit Sherlock. But Trump isn't in office anymore, Joe "the Big Guy" Biden is. He's pouring more fuel on the fire, while simultaneously cutting off the fuel supply.
He's in charge, it's his responsibility.
So you're arguing that it's Trump and the Republicans fault because they didn't stop the Democrats.
Never mind that the bill was unvetoable anyway, so Trump couldn't have stopped it if was inclined.
It's like I'm debating a cartoon.
Her staff wrote the fucking bill you goddamned child rapist.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, a TDS-addled pile of lefty shit and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
Turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
So let me guess, when your team does things that don't align with their own stated beliefs it's strategic but when the other team does things that don't align with their own stated beliefs its hypocrisy, right?
Sevo is saying that Shrike is a lying child molester. Which he is.
Is this that wingnut.com place I’ve been hearing so much about?
Yes, and Buttplug will try to deny it as anything but the price of spittin' tobaccy.
HAPERINFLATION!
#MoreButtplugInsights
"Say have I ever told you my most recent rig count?"
Why not? He still denies he posted child porn here. Even though it’s a proven fact.
I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction
On the given website.........>>> Topcitypay
yes, I have made $22k per month I am so excited. kohi clicks
casting some shade at those who misled Americans about inflation a year ago.
You mean exposing the liars?
Rig count up. No inflation. Economy great. Praise Biden.
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
Price of spittin' tobaccy is only up 10 cents.
#TwoCanDoThisToo
When are we going to see the congressional Democrat’s adopt Buttplug’s plan for eliminating age of consent laws?
As usual, the root cause of the inflation crisis is an overly loose monetary policy.
BIDENS FAULT !!!
Overly loose monetary policy is Biden's fault. You can't print your way out of inflation.
US monetary policy is set by the Fed and only the Fed.
Jerome Powell was nominated by Obama, elevated to Chair by Trump and renominated by Biden.
Like him or not he is deploying a standard Fed reaction to inflation.
The last time inflation was this high Reagan was president and Volcker slammed the brakes on it.
That was because Reagan and Volcker discussed it beforehand. The inflation belonged to Carter.
1 -- Inflation in the 70s began with Nixon and Ford. Nixon even tried wage and price freezes. WIN (Whip Inflation Now) buttons were everywhere in 74-75.
2 -- Carter put Volcker on the Fed as Chair
1 + 2 = you are a dumbass.
It actually started in the 60s, twit, under LBJ who tried to fund both the Vietnam War and the Great Society without raising taxes or borrowing. You'd know that if you'd bother to read past a book cover. Inflation got worse under Carter before he replaced Miller with Volcker. Again, you know very little and try to pass it off as the Oracle of Dogshit, Georgia.
^Took the words about Vietnam and the Great (Inflate) Society right out of my mouth. This is what caused Nixon to cut the dollar's last ties to gold and set off the Inflation Nation we see today.
You skipped over Nixon, whose lapdog Burns did the real damage.
Excellent! (Tents fingers)
That was because Reagan and Volcker discussed it beforehand. The inflation belonged to Carter.
Yeah, like Volcker was perplexed and Reagan and Nancy guided him through the complexities of monetary policy.
You conservatives adore your fairy tale heroes.
You are an idiot. They agreed on what needed to be done, and that it would hurt, but was necessary.
Oh, yeah, it happened like that.
Volcker waits saying "I better hold off until Ronnie, Nancy, and their astrologer tell me what to do".
Yeah.
You really are an idiot.
I doubt you're so dumb as to think the administration has no say in what the Fed does. They never talk. They never discuss. No discussions off the books or in back rooms, right?
No, I can believe he’s that stupid. Most of the time he’s focused on kiddie porn and getting his pedophilic talons into his next prepubescent victim.
Just because your credit card has a high limit doesn't mean you need to spend it all. The Fed can have all the bad policy they want but it can only do so much damage without the government borrowing/spending trillions of dollars.
The whole point of an independent Fed was so the government can't print unlimited amounts of money to spend, but when the Fed "loans" the government any amount of money they want the result is the same.
When the Treasury needs to borrow to fund the government it does so despite the Fed's monetary policy.
It was loose most of the past ten years.
Now that monetary policy is tight the Treasury will still need to borrow despite the higher cost.
This myth that fiscal policy and deficit funding causes "money printing" is false.
QE is money printing but the purchased assets by the Fed remain on its balance sheet - not floating around in the economy at large.
Loose policy for the last ten years? So that explains why inflation was around 1% or so. Yeah, all that money. Never mind that money was printed like it was going out of style over the past 2.5 years.
Are you pretending you don't know what monetizing the debt is?
A few years back you posted kiddy porn to this site, and your initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead you keep showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get you to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
Don't respond to SPB, just shun him.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie fiddler, a TDS addled pile of lefty shit. and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
what inflation? "the usual price of gas is $3.28 a gallon" or something like that
No, dude.
You use the shutdown/pandemic price for gas instead. Like $2.20. It is in the GOP stylebook.
$3.00 is "normal".
You are so full of shit.https://www.gasbuddy.com/charts
It was less than $2.70/gallon in October 2019. It’s $3.70/gallon today. Do the math, dipshit.
But our totally not brain- dead president said gas was 5.00 a gallon when he took office.
More like, while our totally not brain-dead president is in office. It started out about $2.40/gallon on January 20, 2021. It hit $5.00/gallon about 16-18 months later. Our Con-artist In Chief is trying to pull a fast one.
Look, the guy had "oil cancer" as a kid. He gets it wrong sometimes.
you may have missed Brandon last week quoting the "usual price of gas"
We had gas prices around $2.25/gallon before the shutdown where I lived. They’re currently over double that. So fuck off with your bullshit you fucking child rapist.
No. Shit.
Also, I think it's worth remembering that first inflation was "not really happening/ a right wing meme" then it was "transitory" then it was "hurting 'the rich' more (somehow) than everyone else." Anyone dumb enough to believe any of that should be flogged for their stupidity.
"Anyone dumb enough to believe any of that should be flogged for their stupidity."
There are a number of active posters here that believe whatever the leftist media says. And they will defend their position no mater what the actual facts reveal.
Remember the WaPo headline article about how inflation could be financially beneficial for you?
https://twitter.com/ClayTravis/status/1575161697978941442
Inflation is profit!
Too bad Reason wasn't running articles during the pandemic warning of impending inflation caused by all this spending. Wait a sec, they did? I couldn't tell with all the comments saying "You wanted this you voted for Biden it's all your fault you can't criticize what you asked for Reason is run by leftist leftists waahhhh!"
No they didn't. Links or it didn't happen. I do recall them supporting the hell out of the lockdowns which totally screwed up the supply chain.
No they didn't support the hell out of lockdowns! Prove it! Links or it didn't happen!
I'm pretty sure Shikha Dalmia among others saw it coming. Except she's been mean to Trump and likes immigration. What could she possibly know about economics?
Which is exactly the reason why we accuse these people of "you actually wanted this" instead of "you were too stupid to realize that this would happen".
You first.
I'm so sorry.
I forgot the rules.
When you say something IT IS KNOWN because you're on the girls' team.
When I say something "Show me the link! I don't like the source, show me another link! That person did this in their personal life so they're wrong! Show me some real proof! Not good enough! I win!"
You don’t show real proof. Then you whine and cry when you’re called on it. You’re the asshole here, not us.
"Sarcasmic" is Reason's so-called Editor In Chief: Mingo-Mango-Mongo. The freaky-deaky non libertarian old school stereotypical college liberal hippie chick with the blue-purple (or purple-blue) hair.
And she defends Reason the way a mother defends her human children, because Reason is, for all intents and purposes, her substitute for an actual human child.
Ideas!
Yeah. Ideas. Like "All this spending is going to catch up to us."
Things you never think or talk about.
We’re against the spending, and the people most guilty of it. You deflect for them. So by extension, you support the spending.
Waiting for your thoughtful thoughts on inflation, the causes, and how to respond to it.
Glad I'm not holding my breath. That's like asking a first grader to recite multiplication tables past four.
"Waiting for your thoughtful thoughts"
No you're not, trollboy. You're just waiting to harrass him again.
You're amazing. You troll and harrass and shitpost all day, and then as soon as people punch back you pretend to be the poor little victim, and that you're only here for discourse and debate.
How dare I say what I think or want?
That's Mother's Lament's job.
If I disagree with what he says then I'm a liar!
"How dare I say what I think"
If only you'd actually think. Then maybe we'd get less shitty trolling interspersed with bouts of maudlin self pity from you.
Trolling and self pity are all he’s got.
No, you’re a liar because you lie.
The fact that they ran articles warning of impending inflation by all this spending AND then voted for Biden anyway is the reason why we accuse Reason of "wanting this".
That is, Reason writers can't plead ignorance because they documented in black on white that they understood the likely consequences of their political choices.
This response is assuming that Biden is the cause of this inflation. You think we'd be at 2% inflation if Trump had another term?
On spending/inflation, Don and Joe are nearly indistinguishable. Who knows where we'd be with Trump. Slightly better at best.
We have years to go before inflation is stabilized at a 2%-2.5% level.
Pick your poison: limp along with stagflation until inflation peters out; or get it over much quicker with high rates and deal with a severe economic downturn.
Not a great choice.
I'll take option 3 - beer and hookers.
It won't bring down inflation, but whatever.
Yo, does Healey win NJ-3 against Kim?
I say no. What do you think?
I haven't been following it. I'm in NJ-1, where Don Norcross is running against the best the GOP has. And I don't mean that in a nice way.
On the upside though, if those EVUL RETHUGLIKKKANZ take over Congress in the mid-terms, any recession can just be blamed on them. Never let a crisis go to waste, right?
They are already blaming the future recession on the future Republicans taking over future congress.
Not surprised. The one good thing about the media is that they're 100% predictable.
Transexuelles Saint Etienne is web place with fine ladies ready for casual contacts with you
Worst fifty-bucks I've ever spent. It's in France and I think there were some dudes in there.
I think there were some dudes in there.
How dare you assume their gender, you bigot!
As usual, the root cause of the inflation crisis is an overly loose monetary policy.
This is loose fiscal policy moreso than monetary policy. I've heard a lot of debates about what the fed should be doing, but this feels more like Washington spending than the core interest rates. Insofar as they allow for Washington to spend like profligrates I suppose it's on them.
In ideal equilibrium the amount of currency matches the value of the available goods and services.
Worldwide available goods and services were restricted. Without currency being pulled out, that's going to cause inflation. What happens? Massive increase in currency! Let's make it worse!
Worse. As in it was going to happen thanks to lockdowns and such unless money was taken out. But governments did the opposite.
"In ideal equilibrium the amount of currency matches the value of the available goods and services."
What the hell? This doesn't mean anything. There's no amount of currency that matches anything. It's all relative.
What a profound misunderstanding of just about everything. There's a reason Sarcasmic is one of the top muted posters on this site. Truly a waste of electrons.
He was right about government's response making it worse.
i would expect inflation to persist for at least this decade. Even if they address supply chain issues, we're going to see the effects of promising a massive elderly cohort a comfortable retirement and unlimited medical care.
just wait til they have to run the printing presses to 'keep' social security and pension promises.
Old folks need money, you better put in some overtime sonny.
i already rationalize my social security and medicare payroll deductions as direct payments to my septuagenarian father (which basically they are)
Old folks need money
Why, they're just going to waste it on shitty home shopping network jewelry.
More than a year after Americans were told that inflation would be "transitory,"
12 percent, here we come!
Remember, there used to be the way to insulate yourself from the volatility of the Stock Market as you came to depend on your brokerage account for retirement. Nice, stable bonds didn't earn as much, but they wouldn't lose value right when you needed them. The anti-correlation between stocks and bonds was thought to be the primary tool that private investors had.
Quantitative Easing broke that anti-correlation. The Fed has spent the past 10 years buying up bonds in order to reduce their yield, and push people into the stock market for any sort of Return on Investment. And now that the Fed has tapered off of QE, there is nothing to keep bonds up and that market is deflating at exactly the same time the stock market is capitulating. The anti-correlation is broken.
If you were being "Responsible" and shifting your assets from Stocks to Bonds as you got into retirement, you got fucked this year. The 60/40 Stock/Bond index is down over 34%.
At my company (a TBTF Bank) and around the industry, all the NEW HOT wealth management people are pushing alternative asset classes as their new products. Since you can't trust stocks and bonds, you need to invest in Private Debt and Private Equity. This whole new set of products is seen as the way to keep pulling 1% fees from high earners.
And all of this will, of course, be considered a "Market Failure" that justifies the government doing even more to fuck over the economy.
People can play games with government spending, interests rates, and government spending as long as they want to, the fact is that the past couple of decades have created massive malinvestments and reduced the actual productive output of the global economy greatly.
Stuff costs more and people are getting poorer because the global economy objectively is less efficient than it should be. It doesn't matter how you invest your money, you can't escape that simple reality.
But wait! They literally passed a bill to reduce inflation? Why is it not working?
Needz moar spending before it takes effect!
Weird because I remember reading just a couple months ago that inflation had peaked.......
Probably just a very wide and continuous peak.
It's very easy to bring down monetary inflation. It will take years to fix the supply chain problems caused by globalization. We chose to be overly dependent on China as the world's (and particularly America's) low-cost manufacturer. And China has chosen to shut down their economy periodically for as long as Covid exists.
Fuck off and die, asshole chick little.
Fuck Joe Biden.
It's gonna rain hard next Tuesday.
Gee, this sure sounds familiar to me. Almost as if someone in these very comments has been saying this same thing for months on end now! Who, pray tell could that be, I wonder?
I will say though to Boehm's credit that this piece strongly indicates that he just might actually be capable of assimilating and incorporatibg new information (the process we sometimes call "learning"). Which means there's some hope for him; that he might actually be potentially capable of becoming better informed, more educated, and little smarter and wiser.
Fake Unbacked funny money doesn’t disappear until it’s *VALUE* has been reimbursed. For the government that means they can ‘tax’ the people by printing funny-money the people use. For the citizen it means they must CREATE/EARN the amount of funny-money the government spent.
It’s deceitful/manipulative slavery/socialism 101.
From 1950 to 2010 you couldn’t wear out a tractor as fast as government wore out your saved-wealth via funny-money. Since Biden and Democrats took control; you can’t even wear out a car faster than government will wear out your wealth.
Inflation hasn't "gone away" at all for any significant period of time since the creation of the Federal Reserve bank excepting the early/mid 1930s
^EXACTLY... The Federal Reserve was the very foundational instrument of National Socialism conquering the USA and wildly conquered the Constitutionals Gold/Silver debt payment strategy.
Introduced by Democrats... And resulting in their running record of producing the Great Depression.
But I was assured that it was transitory. Seems like that was a while ago though.
Life is "transitory" too.
What do the unemployed people do all day? How do they pay rent or buy food?
Gov-GUNS of course. [WE] voting gangs of armed-robbers.
Didn't you hear about how all the 'rich' people were going to be gunned down to supply their living for them?
It is easy to "bring down" inflation: stop printing money, stop government borrowing, and massively cut government spending.
The problem isn't bringing down inflation, the problem is bringing down inflation without having the idiots that created it in the first place accept responsibility and admit that they were wrong.
What the "bad recession" means is that people lose jobs and companies go out of business because those jobs and companies are economically wasteful and destructive. Currently, those jobs and companies are subsidized by US tax payers and debt, and the longer that goes on, the worse it gets, the more people suffer in aggregate.
The sooner we eliminate economically wasteful and destructive parts of the economy, the better for everybody.
The only "dilemma" here is that actually doing the right thing is politically costly to whoever signs off on it.
The history of developed countries points to one fundamental step to take to tame inflation;
STOP ELECTING PROGRESSIVES!
Thanks for the article highlighting the "Economist of the Week" and his "Critical Inflation Factor of the Week." Once again experts ignoring the fact that the economy is a chaotic system that is not subject to multifactor analysis or linear modeling. In that setting, history is NEVER a good predictor of the future - of inflation or of anything else for that matter. The old Confucian concept that one can never bathe in the same river twice comes to mind. Although I have little doubt - as a non-expert - that government spending that increases the money supply is the prime motivator of inflation, there is no easy answer to the question of what to do about it. No, we can't get away with going back in time and preventing government from (dramatically) increasing the money supply. Once the process is in motion, all options have politically unpalatable consequences. Good luck with "meaningful growth in purchasing power" guys ...
bn
Want To Work From Home Without Selling Anything? No Experience Needed, Weekly Payments... Join The Exclusive Group Of People That Cracked The Code Of Financial Freedom! Learn More details Good luck... http://www.pay.hiring9.com
Not with Biden’s polices. Biden plans to print billions in money for aid for high heating fuel prices he caused, and he plans to windfall tax oil companies, both making fuels and inflation go higher. At the same time the fed raised another .25 % on interest, less than the .75 they wanted, because it is self defeating with Biden still printing billions.
The Fed’s move raised its key short-term rate to a range of 3.75% to 4%, its highest level in 15 years.
Biden-Harris Administration Announces $4.5 Billion to Lower Heating Costs for American Families This Winter
Biden to suggest new tax on oil companies amid windfall profits.
What an economic clown!