Biden's Marijuana Pardons Did Not Free a Single Federal Prisoner or Deliver the Expungement He Promised
A protest at the White House calls attention to the thousands of federal cannabis offenders who remain incarcerated.

Edwin Rubis has served more than two decades of a 40-year federal prison sentence for participating in a marijuana distribution operation. Taking into account "good time" credit, he is not scheduled to be released until August 2032.
Rubis is one of about 3,000 federal prisoners whose cannabis-related sentences were unaffected by President Joe Biden's mass pardon for low-level marijuana offenders. A protest at the White House today called attention to their predicament.
Biden's October 6 proclamation applied only to U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents convicted of simple marijuana possession under the Controlled Substances Act or the District of Columbia Code, none of whom was still incarcerated. Although his pardons could benefit as many as 10,000 or so individuals, that represents a tiny percentage of all simple possession cases, which typically are charged under state law. And Biden's action will not release a single federal prisoner.
According to a 2021 report from Recidiviz, "more than 3,000 individuals are
currently serving marijuana-related sentences in federal prison." The report estimated that ending federal marijuana prohibition—a step that Biden has steadfastly resisted—would reduce the federal prison population by more than 2,800 over five years.
"Your recent executive order, while a great first step, did nothing to address the thousands of federal cannabis prisoners currently incarcerated in federal prison," 16 drug policy reform groups noted in an October 10 letter to Biden. "While your recent executive order will help many, it will not release a single one of the nearly 2,800 federal cannabis prisoners." Although "eighteen states and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis," the letter said, "there are thousands of Americans who are serving long-term prison sentences, including some life sentences, in federal facilities for conduct involving amounts of cannabis that are far less than what dispensaries routinely handle on a daily basis."
The moral logic of Biden's distinction between simple possession and other marijuana offenses is puzzling. He says marijuana use should not be treated as a crime. Yet he is willing to let individuals like Rubis languish in prison merely for helping people use marijuana, which today is recognized as a legitimate business in most states, 19 of which allow recreational as well as medical use.
That puzzle is compounded by the fact that Biden has acknowledged the injustice of long prison terms for growing or distributing marijuana in particular cases. Last April, he announced 75 commutations for federal drug offenders. The beneficiaries included eight people convicted of marijuana offenses:
• Jose Luis Colunga received a 20-year sentence in 2010 for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana. Colunga will now be released next October.
• Fermin Serna received a 20-year sentence in 2007 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. Thanks to Biden's commutation, Serna was released in August.
• Stacie Demers received a 10-year sentence in 2016 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and for aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Demers is now scheduled to be released next April.
• Carry Le received a 10-year sentence in 2016 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 or more marijuana plants. Le is now scheduled to be released next April.
• Quang Nguyen received a 10-year sentence in 2017 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 or more marijuana plants. Nguyen is now scheduled to be released next April.
• Ramola Kaye Brown received a 12-year sentence in 2015 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and less than 50 kilograms of marijuana. Biden's commutation means Brown will be released next April.
• Christopher Gunter received a 20-year sentence in 2008 for various drug offenses, including conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. Thanks to Biden's commutation, Gunter was released in August.
• Paul A. Lupercio received a 20-year sentence in 2008 for conspiracy to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana and five kilograms or more of cocaine. Thanks to Biden's commutation, Lupercio was released in August.
When it comes to cannabis consumers, Biden thinks a blanket pardon is appropriate. But when it comes to the people who supply those consumers with marijuana, he insists on individualized assessments through a backlogged system that offers hope of relief only for the lucky few.
When Rubis was locked up, he had two children, then 3 and 5 years old, and a third was on the way. "He hasn't been able to watch his kids grow up," The Washington Post notes, "and dreams of rebuilding relationships lost to time." It adds that "he's worried that by the time he is released, his mother and father will no longer be alive."
The Post notes that Rubis, who was born in El Salvador and immigrated to the United States with his family as a child, "has earned three degrees, including a master's in Christian counseling, and is working on his doctorate, mentored others who are incarcerated, worked as a law library clerk and as a dental assistant, and led Christian Bible studies." He "has gained the support of prison staffers, including a unit manager, the staff chaplain and a library supervisor, who wrote letters submitted in a court motion to reduce Rubis's sentence, describing how Rubis is kind and patient, has a positive attitude and is dedicated to bettering his life and others."
Rubis, in short, has displayed all the signs of the "rehabilitation" that occasionally earns federal prisoners clemency. But that approach assumes that it was just to imprison him to begin with for conduct that violated no one's rights, conduct that has made many other people successful and respected entrepreneurs as marijuana prohibition has crumbled in one state after another.
"I'm keeping my promise that no one should be in jail for merely using or possessing marijuana," Biden said on Friday. "None. And the records, which hold up people from being able to get jobs and the like, should be totally expunged. Totally expunged."
That mercy, Biden added, does not extend to people convicted of other marijuana offenses. "You can't sell it," he said. "But if it's just use, you're completely free."
According to the Biden administration, anyone falling into that category was already free. And even the promise of expungement is more than Biden can deliver.
"No one should be in jail because of marijuana," Biden said while running for president. "As president, I will decriminalize cannabis use and automatically expunge prior convictions." His mass pardon did not accomplish either of those things, which are beyond Biden's powers "as president."
Decriminalizing marijuana use would require new legislation. Unless and until Congress acts, simple possession will remain a federal crime punishable by a fine of $1,000 or more and up to a year in jail.
As for expungement, it is available to people convicted of simple possession under federal law if they were younger than 21 at the time of the offense. Under that provision, "the effect of the order shall be to restore such person, in the contemplation of the law, to the status he occupied before such arrest or institution of criminal proceedings." That means "a person concerning whom such an order has been entered shall not be held thereafter under any provision of law to be guilty of perjury, false swearing, or making a false statement by reason of his failure to recite or acknowledge such arrests or institution of criminal proceedings, or the results thereof, in response to an inquiry made of him for any purpose."
But for people who do not meet that law's narrow criteria, expungement would require a new act of Congress. As Harris Bricken lawyer Vince Sliwoski notes, Biden's proclamation "doesn't expunge the underlying convictions at issue, or clear anyone's record." Sliwoski adds that "in many ways" the pardon recipients "find themselves in a similar spot today as prior to October 5," because "they are still walking around as convicted criminals of record, and will be for the foreseeable future."
When he announced his mass pardon, Biden noted that people convicted of simple possession "may be denied employment, housing, or educational opportunities as a result." He claimed that "my action will help relieve the collateral consequences arising from these convictions." Yet without expungement, people still have to report those convictions when they apply for jobs or housing. And if they are convicted while enrolled in college, it can still jeopardize their access to student aid.
Although Biden can't unilaterally eliminate those "collateral consequences," he could support legislation to eliminate them. But like freedom for federal marijuana prisoners and decriminalization of possession, the expungement Biden promised seems to have fallen by the wayside.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Biden's
Marijuana PardonsDid NotFree a Single Federal Prisoner orDeliver a single thingthe ExpungementHe PromisedThat’s actually wrong. Biden promised to deliver everything in the Green New Deal and to give trillions of dollars to his favored political friends. Apparently, a large portion of the population thought that they belonged to that group and voted for him.
He's given trillions to his favored political friends, unfortunately for the people who voted for him they were not, in fact, his favored political friends.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (ks-52) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link——————–>>> http://Www.TopCityPay.Com
I take it Isaac isn't one of those favored political friends. THAT makes it deeply wrong, evil and unethical to the point of Satanic.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… http://www.Profit97.com
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link.......>>> Topcitypay
So, Joe Biden was talking through his ass.
What else is new?
At least Orange Hitler delivered on promises to help persecute plant users and de-person, de-individualize, strip of rights and hunt like fugitive slaves all Comstock-noncompliant women. Grabbers Of Pussy deliver!
Biden lied. People died.
No one goes to federal prison for simple pot possession. Thinking they do is something so stupid only Joe Biden and the American major media could believe.
Third strike?
There is no three strike rule in the federal system. That is a state thing.
Agreed, this never made sense. When this was announced, it was described as helping a few thousand offenders convicted over the past 30 years.
This removes the possession convictions of users, but when would someone get the attention of federal prosecutors and agents? As ancillary charges when picking people up for other charges, and MAYBE for trying to carry marijuana onto an airliner.
I would love for a reporter to ask KJP how many pot convicted users were released from federal prisons? And for bonus points, ask KJP how many of the people eligible for Biden's pardons had their federal pot possession charge as their only criminal convictions, in effect had their records wiped clean by Biden's pardon.
I suspect the answer to both is NONE.
I doubt Peter Doocey really cares about the topic, and none of the other WH reporters would ask.
Who wants to bet $100 that Ken is wrong? Do I hear $200...? OK, what kind of odds are we holding out for? Ten to one? Do I hear crickets?
Who wants to bet yours a deranged old bigot that everyone hates?
LOL. Biden promised to pardon "low-level possession" and you list people convicted of distributing A METRIC TON of marijuana.
Yeah. It's not a great argument they're making.
At $10/gram, 1000 kg would sell for around $10 million. At that level, other crimes kick in: sales tax evasion, income tax evasion, money laundering. That's not going to get a lot of sympathy from voters who get audited for not paying their nannies' Social Security.
Proclamations and pardons that apply to nobody are the best and most honest kind
Joe Biden: supercunt.
Well they were, after all, convicted high crimes, so let’s not go all pot-y about how long this budding process takes to shake out.
Are you saying nobody got out of the joint?
So they canhit back at their jailers? These are clearly axe grinders! It makes sense-a-million to let them keep slowing their roll in the joint, to be blunt. But hey, politicians do zigzag with such policies….
I seed what you did there. They will just paper it over and leaf everyone holding the bag.
Decriminalizing marijuana use would require new legislation.
Untrue. It simply requires recognizing what everybody already knows, which is that marijuana does not qualify as a Schedule I narcotic per the clear language of the Controlled Substances Act.
I understand that presidents keep claiming they don't have this power, but they are lying.
Note that at the same time the Biden administration is implying, just as Obama came out and said, that they can't do this, they also have a team 'studying' doing exactly this. Because they can, in fact, do this - they just don't have the balls.
I believe there's an anti-cannabis UN treaty involved. We'd have to go through all the trouble of telling the UN to go to hell, and nobody fucks with the UN any more than they fuck with a Biden.
1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs
https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=VI-15&chapter=6
Things might be changing.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/12/1079132
Or not.
Meanwhile, the United States voted to remove cannabis from Schedule IV of the Single Convention while retaining them in Schedule I, saying it is “consistent with the science demonstrating that while a safe and effective cannabis-derived therapeutic has been developed, cannabis itself continues to pose significant risks to public health and should continue to be controlled under the international drug control conventions”.
I believe there’s an anti-cannabis UN treaty involved.
There is, but continued US support for it is a big reason why it's still in place, although I agree that no small part of that support is simply maintaining the pretense that the UN matters.
If the US were to stop supporting the treaty, my guess is that it wouldn't last long.
The main problem there is that most countries that signed that UN treaty did so under duress from the US government.
Justin Trudeau (the great anointed) pushed legalization plus regulation and taxation through parliament and the bill received royal assent on 21 June 2018 and came into force on 17 October 2018. The UN and the US government said nothing. Believe it or not, the UN's authority only extends to those who recognize it (see also how China reacts to UN complaints about slave labor).
Like California, Canada regulated and taxed the hell out of weed so that a new class of crime has emerged, viz, bootleg marijuana which is cheaper than the taxed kind.
If marijuana is legislated into Schedule I then it needs to be legislated out. If it's simply up to the discretion of the DEA (which I believe is the case) then I'm pretty sure the change could be made by executive order.
If it’s simply up to the discretion of the DEA (which I believe is the case)
DEA and FDA together have authority over what drugs are included in which Schedule.
The president could do it by EO today if he wanted to, but as Mr. Skids points out, at the least it would piss off the UN, and we don't do that. Unless we have a good reason.
We are the UN. Without us it would cease to exist.
Exactly, see above for how Canada reacted to the UN.
It still didn't stop them from screwing up legalization. 🙂
And of course the team 'studying' this is a group that's out to determine if it helps, or hurts, their chances of being reelected. I doubt it has anything at all to do with health, safety, or the legality of such an EO.
The weird thing to me is that modern Democrats are for a whole host of pretty radical idea's and yet this in particular, that has broad support, is somehow a bridge too far for the party.
One of the last lines of defense for moderate Dems (fewer though they be) is support from police unions. #Defund did them major damage already; committing to #Legalize would be the last straw.
They still have the teachers' unions.
Afaik marijuana and its cannabinoids are specifically listed as Sched 1 in the CSA. So it would take either Congress or the DEA/FDA to change that
POTUS is the DEA/FDA.
Ordering the rescheduling of a drug would be an entirely legitimate use of an EO.
Given that it was all constitutional overreach to begin with, why not?
What clear language? It's based on the unavoidably nebulous concept of "abuse".
"Marijuana" and "cannabinoids" are explicitly enumerated in the CSA, with specific limits and penalties. No, the administration cannot simply decriminalize or reschedule them.
Balls as in law-changing LP spoiler votes? I remember when the Libertarian Party had that sort of thing... before the Terrorist Welcome Mat borders plank, the Vigilante-Executions plank, the Anarcho-Communist candidate albatross and cowardly deletion of the "women are still sorta individuals" plank. Our 1972 platform could be worth about 12 million votes now--if only we had it back.
It's the thought that counts, I guess. He got all his good press by making the announcement, so now all these news agencies can sheepishly write an article about how, well, technically no one will be pardoned.
Want to bet that they don't?
so now all these news agencies can sheepishly write an article about how, well, technically no one will be pardoned
Thanks, I needed a good laugh.
This looks like a job for The Memory Hole.
Nothing escapes. Not even enlightenment.
That's AFTER the next prohibitionist looter-subsidized election.
So Biden is as honest as sullum
Hey Reason! I guess if you want high quality sentencing reform, you need Republicans in Congress and a Trump in the White House (First Step Act for 500, Alex!).
No one in power actually wants pot to be legal. Simple as. Kamala Harris is the VP. Get a clue.
. . . "for conduct involving amounts of cannabis that are far less than what dispensaries routinely handle on a daily basis.""
Holy crap, that's like comparing the amount of wood I need to build my deck, and the amount you might find at a lumber yard.
Why are we equating simple possession with possession of 1,000+ plants or 1,000+ kilos of pot? Are they really the same thing?
I really thought the hippies would legalize it. But no. They hire a bunch of straight edge punks.
Yes, we knew and we told you this. Because we in the comments read the White House website... which said from the very beginning, there were literally zero people in jail over marijuana simple possession.
Brandon lies, and Reason is shocked. SHOCKED. And also appalled.
Who does Brandon think he is, anyway, a journalist?
I would love to see Democrats argue for releasing and pardoning drug dealers en masse... That would make for an excellent collection of Republican TV ads!
"Vote for me! My Democrat challenger wants to put drug dealers back on the street!"
There were drug dealers on the streets back when NY was New Amsterdam! Hundreds of years of newsprint reveal no real problem until Teedy Rosenfeld, Taft and Wilson's political pals began sending men with guns put to ban enjoyables and shoot the disobedient--all this to please Imperial China and americanize its mass-decapitation policies. Look at where the Great Leap Forward of prohibition has gotten China.
Yeah Reason was pretty jazzed up about their hero Joe and his great first step a couple weeks ago. Now they've figured out they got rolled again.
It’s almost like they’re paid to get fooled by Democrats.
But no more mean tweets.
I'll support decriminalizing drug use just a soon as people support decriminalizing tax evasion: they are both victimless crimes, but unlike drug prohibition, income taxation is actually harmful.
Who else remembers when Obama promised to end DEA harassment of marijuana patients and then did fuck-all about it in office?
-jcr
The fact that higher level offenders were willing to knowingly commit felonies makes them materially different than the people doing the same thing legally today. They don't deserve release.
To be fair this was only to garner headlines from a dutiful and ADHD-addled press ahead of the midterms. They're never going to actually put a dent in the highly lucrative business known as prohibition.
Prohibition lucrative? In 1837 China ordered all English dope dealers to leave. Immediately all British capital was taken out of the U.S. Economy as the “Panic” of 1837. Arms thus bought defeated China in 3 wars, with Brits, Germans, French, Dutch, Yanks now sending heroin and syringes through proxies until the 1912 Opium Cartel glut caused WW1. This goodness of prohibition made beer a felony and brought calls for bans on peyote & hemp before the 1929 crash resulted. Exporting drug bans brought another World war, then the 1971, 1987 and 2008 crashes. Good stuff, this prohibition, wars & crashes…
Portugal decriminalized drugs, and how has immigrants waiting in line for visas and banks that are the envy of Europe.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link.......>>> Topcitypay
"The Post notes that Rubis, who was born in El Salvador and immigrated to the United States with his family as a child, "has earned three degrees, including a master's in Christian counseling"
Telling people to trust in a fictional character is not "counseling".
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..
For more detail visit the given link…….>>>
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..
For more detail visit the given link…….>>> https://www.Worksful.com
???.????????.???
I get paid over ?200$? per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over ?10k? a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..
For more detail visit the given link…….>>> ???.????????.???
this si cool thing
Biden lied again, hardly news.
It's amusing how many Progressives believed Biden was gonna be a reformer on this issue. His entire history has been on the other side opposing reform. The same goes with Kamala, the great irony here is that Trump did more for criminal justice reform (going in the less draconian direction) than any Democratic President in recent history. Slick Willie, Barry, and Sleepy Joe make Trump look like a civil libertarian by comparison.
The notion that there are numerous individuals who are languishing in prison serving lengthy sentences just for having marijuana in their possession is ridiculous. It is mythical. It is a lie. I would love to see Reason show us even one such case that is not a plea bargain. Most of the people serving time for just one charge of marijuana possession took a plea to avoid trial on a whole laundry list of drug charges. Many of them were originally charged with selling cocaine, meth, heroin or other hard drugs and took a plea to a marijuana possession charge with a lengthy sentence to avoid an even longer sentence for possession of drugs and firearms in the same case. Quit with the sob stories implying some mope with a couple blunts getting forty years. It didn't happen - ever.
Helps with pain, insomnia, and much more. Has less calories than a 12 pack. It needs to be made legal across the board -- no need to reschedule, no need to do anything, but change the archaic law! Allow adults the same rights as alcohol, regulate the same way and punish misuse the same way. Don't overthink, don't overcomplicate!