Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Inflation

Inflation Hits 8.2 Percent After Another Month of Sharply Rising Prices

Prices rose by 0.4 percent in September, faster than economists expected and indicating that rising interest rates aren't getting the job done.

Eric Boehm | 10.13.2022 9:55 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
The latest consumer price index report released on Thursday morning confirms that prices are still rising and dollars are not worth as much as they used to be. | Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash
(Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash)

Inflation continued burning a hole in Americans' wallets last month.

Prices rose by an average of 0.4 percent overall, driven primarily by rising costs for housing, food, and medical care. According to the newly released data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, prices rose by 8.2 percent overall during the last 12 months ending in September. Food prices have climbed by 11.2 percent in the past year, while energy prices are up by a whopping 19.7 percent despite falling by about 2 percent in September.

September's rising prices occurred despite the ongoing attempts by the Federal Reserve to bring inflation under control with higher interest rates, and it points to ongoing fiscal difficulties for both everyday Americans and the federal government that caused much of this current mess.

Here are the rest of the ugly details from Thursday's consumer price index (CPI) report:

Particularly worrying is that so-called core CPI, which filters out more volatile categories like food and energy prices, rose by 0.6 percent last month. In other words, inflation is widespread throughout the economy and no longer contained to the categories that were driving the phenomenon a year ago. Far from being transitory, inflation now seems to be a deeply rooted problem.

The CPI rose +0.4% in September, and is now running at 8.2%, down from 8.3%.

Excluding food and energy, prices rose +0.6% in the month, so core inflation is 6.6%.

Inflation is proving to be more resilient -- and more troubling -- than many had hoped or forecast.

— Justin Wolfers (@JustinWolfers) October 13, 2022

Rising prices are primarily a concern for Americans who have to actually pay their bills and balance their budgets, of course. But ongoing inflation is increasingly becoming a problem for the federal government as well.

As Reason has reported, rising interest rates needed to combat inflation will rebound onto the federal balance sheet by making the federal debt more expensive. Even when interest rates were at or near historical lows, interest payments on the national debt were on course to become one of the largest segments of the federal budget within the coming decade. Higher interest rates mean the government will have to spend a significantly larger amount of revenue on simply managing the existing debt—a nasty feedback loop that makes the government's already untenable fiscal situation considerably worse.

The warnings have been coming for years. But no one has been listening. "For well over a decade, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has been issuing stark warnings about the nation's current debt levels and the long-term buildup of debt they portend," Reason's Peter Suderman wrote last week.

But, wait, there's yet another problem. Social Security hands out annual cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs, to beneficiaries, and those adjustments are based on the rate of annual inflation each September. This year, that means Social Security benefits will increase by 8.7 percent.

That's good news for elderly Americans, but it's only going to accelerate another fiscal crisis. Social Security is already on track to be insolvent by 2034—at which point, unless Congress acts, benefits will be cut across the board.

In one sense, then, persistently rising inflation is an immediate problem for everyone who has to eat, pay rent, and likes having lights and heat in their homes. That's bad enough, but September's inflation report is also a harbinger of other major problems to come.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Union Group Tries To Bully L.A. Times Into Burying Racist Remarks

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

InflationEconomicsBiden AdministrationGrocery storesGasolineEconomyInterest ratesCostSocial Security
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (107)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Illocust   3 years ago

    So glad I started renting a house before this really hit. My rent is not gong to go up nearly as fast as apartment dwellers.

    1. 5.56   3 years ago

      Hey where’s Jackie? Did she die in Iraq like Beau?

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

        They both took the same bullet for Hillary when she came under sniper fire.

        1. 5.56   3 years ago (edited)

          I would thank em for their service. But that would make em Hillary’s servers.

          1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

            They really got wiped out.

            1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   3 years ago

              What, you mean like with a cloth?

              1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

                Eye-bleach, if it's Hillary.

                1. OliviaOnline   3 years ago (edited)

                  I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
                  For more detail visit this site.. http://www.Profit97.com

                  1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   3 years ago

                    Biden's fault.

                    1. InsaneTrollLogic   3 years ago

                      You replied to a bot?

                      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

                    2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   3 years ago

                      You're all bots, idiot.

                    3. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

                      This from the actual fifty-center.

                    4. InsaneTrollLogic   3 years ago

                      Maybe you are a bot, Shrike, but I am..
                      Er..
                      Rebooting

                    5. evaekbasia   3 years ago (edited)

                      Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (ad-07) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs

                      Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/

        2. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

          Brian Williams can vouch. He was there too.

    2. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   3 years ago

      To quote pj orurke (pre tds)
      I was a progressive tool I collage, and my grandmother was a staunch republican. One day to try and get a rise out of her I asked her what the difference between a Democrat and a republican was. She said "Republicans own"

  2. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

    This is what we get for having an economy based on spittin tobaccy.

    1. 5.56   3 years ago

      I think it’s really more important to find Jackie right now. Or MOM: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GSTkeM7wE80

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

        This is to the point where I can't laugh at it. It's incredibly sad. This man is being abused.

        1. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   3 years ago

          I have 0 sympathy for traitorous child molesters

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

        Oh, and the media reaction to this?

        Republicans pounce.

        POLITICS
        Joe Biden's 'Where's Mom?' Remarks Go Viral as Critics Jump on Apparent Confusion

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   3 years ago

          Is this man even going to make it to midterms at this point?

          1. Beezard   3 years ago

            I bet my money and my life he wouldn’t make a year. Luckily, no one took me up on it. (Because I have more hours to work now and more bills to pay.)

        2. Sevo   3 years ago

          "apparent" confusion?!
          It's spelled: "obvious", and also "continuing".

        3. middlefinger   3 years ago

          Better yet, there’s a Democrat Pennsylvania is sending to the senate that makes Joe Biden look lucid.

        4. One-Punch_Man   3 years ago

          Yeap! They aren't even media anymore. Just a wing of the democrats. Than they wonder why no one trusts them.

  3. Overt   3 years ago

    What is really crazy is that a month ago when the numbers were (slightly) better, the press and all the usual suspects in these comments were doing victory laps.

    1. JohannesDinkle   3 years ago

      The 8.4% rate is over September last year, which had 5.4% inflation over the year before. That's almost 14% inflation since Biden took office.
      Not any of this is anyone's fault of course.

      1. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   3 years ago

        It's bohem. He voted and simped for the fucking moron

      2. American Mongrel   3 years ago

        14.25

    2. One-Punch_Man   3 years ago

      I'm old enough to remember when Senile Old Joe said inflation was beat and did his victory dance. Wait, that was July/August/

  4. Longtobefree   3 years ago

    Yet another record set by democrat policies.

    1. Iris Jensen   3 years ago (edited)

      After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i’ve had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me.They offer jobs for which people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500.Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet.

      Read all about it here……..>>> OnlineCareer1

  5. JFree   3 years ago

    The only way to obliterate inflation after 25+ years of inflating asset bubbles is to obliterate asset prices. But methinks the beneficiaries of those asset prices think inflation was caused by someone else and someone else needs to scream in pain with the fix

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   3 years ago

      I suggest you look up "Volker, Paul" before you spout off on how to fix it.

      1. JFree   3 years ago

        High interest rates by themselves don't fix it. The only way to fix it is to eliminate the debt that props up those asset prices. And yes high interest rates can do that - but until THAT debt is wiped out, ain't o impact on inflation

    2. Overt   3 years ago

      This is cargo cult mentality in its finest.

      According to JFear, the cause of inflation is Asset Price inflation. So if you just obliterate the price of assets, you obliterate inflation. Just as the cargo cults of the pacific thought that airfields and other infrastructure caused cargo ships to arrive, and figured if they built fake airfields they'd get the cargo ships to come back.

      Assets inflate because of monetary inflation, not the other way around. The only way to stop monetary inflation is to lower the velocity and quantity of money. Asset prices will then either reduce, or productivity will catch up to them.

      1. JFree   3 years ago

        Asset prices inflated because of free money for well over a decade. That free money did not inflate prices of stuff - until pajama class used asset prices to take on debt to buy stuff during COVID.
        If you can't see that this is the problem, then it is because you don't want to see it.

        1. Its_Not_Inevitable   3 years ago

          This is the real "trickle down". Or as some might call it, the Cantillon effect.

        2. Sevo   3 years ago

          JFree? You're full of shit.

          1. middlefinger   3 years ago

            Leftists don’t know where union paychecks and pensions come from. …electricity, water indoor plumbing or money/credit for that matter.

            A lot them, like Biden the younger in Pennsylvania, have a trust fund that supports their Marxist studies lifestyles.

        3. Overt   3 years ago

          Example 8 Billion of JFear spouting off about shit he doesn't understand.

          "Asset prices inflated because of free money for well over a decade."

          Many people- like economists- would call this increase in asset prices "inflation". But for some reason JFear doesn't want to.

          "That free money did not inflate prices of stuff"

          Well, it did...it increased the prices of stuff like assets. But if JFear states such self-contradictory nonsense with enough assurance, maybe he'll convince someone.

          "– until pajama class used asset prices to take on debt to buy stuff during COVID."

          Ok, so JFear is arguing that somehow debt caused inflation. Get that? Joe Bob took out a $100,000 HELOC and used it to buy a car, pushing up prices, you see?

          But wait.

          Where did that $100,000 come from? It was loaned by someone who now doesn't have $100,000 to spend. If Joe Bob hadn't had a Highly-priced-but-totally-not-due-to-inflation house to borrow against, what would that lender have instead spent it on? A car of their own perhaps? Maybe they'd have invested it in a small business which would use it to buy a car? Or maybe it would have been used to pay construction workers to build a building- money that they would use to- wait for it- buy a car?

          The "Inflated-but-not-inflationary" asset prices and debt DIDN'T CAUSE INFLATION. Because the pajama-class villains in JFear's story didn't make that money. They were loaned it by someone else, who in turn could not spend it- a net zero impact on money supply. All that happened was money *that was already in the system* was transferred to a class of people that JFear doesn't like, and so they are the ones to point a wagging finger at.

          The problem was not Asset Prices- they were a symptom. The problem was all the Free Money. For fucks sake, this shit has been high-school knowledge for decades.

          Now [checks script], I think this is the part where JFree jumps in and accuses me of being some gold hording, crypto nut Mises Caucus racist.

  6. Get To Da Chippah   3 years ago

    Destroying the gig economy will fix this mess Trump left us!

    /Brandon Administration

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      Independent workers have independent thoughts, and we can’t have that!

      1. Not Robbers=Nut Rubbers   3 years ago

        Willie, remove the colored chalk from the classrooms.

    2. HillTown Trader   3 years ago

      Please explain that bit of questionable logic.

  7. InsaneTrollLogic   3 years ago

    But Buttplug tells me that it's only the price of spittin' tobaccy that's gone up, and only by a dime!

    1. Not Robbers=Nut Rubbers   3 years ago

      But, but, but.....it's global inflation...the US is only 103rd in terms of inflation....we're worse than almost every large, highly developed economy but we're still better than Venezuela and Zimbabwe.

      --SPB2

      1. TJJ2000   3 years ago

        Venezuela was recently Democrats 'dreamboat' for the USA.
        It's amazing how many times they can be so wrong and never admit it.

  8. n00bdragon   3 years ago

    The great thing about today's fiscal problems is that they are beat-for-beat repeats of the same problems from the 1970s so we can see exactly what's going to happen and exactly how it's going to end. Just watch. First they'll try rationing the energy, then the interest rates REALLY going to spike. Once interest rates climb above inflation and stay there for awhile, inflation will go down.

    1. Cyrano   3 years ago

      In the 1970s, the US government could afford to pay higher interest rates on the then smaller national debt. Today’s government absolutely cannot. This is a much worse problem.

      1. n00bdragon   3 years ago

        That's the cause of inflation. The government can always print money to meet its obligations and short of having a bloody revolution where debts are canceled at gun point that's how they'll do it. The only way inflation stops though, is when the market comes to believe that a debt (bond) of $1 will be worth more (in purchasing power) at its maturity date than the same dollar today in their pocket. That risk that you won't get your money back has to be worth something.

        1. Cyrano   3 years ago

          You said that the government raised interest rates in the 1970s to combat inflation. I’m saying they can’t do that now and still afford to pay the nation’s debt.

          1. n00bdragon   3 years ago

            Ah, I think I see where you're going. How can the fed "afford" to pay me $1.10 tomorrow for $1.00 today without causing yet more inflation by printing the difference? You had $1.00 today, tomorrow there's $1.10 floating around. That's 10% inflation.

            BUT!

            Inflation isn't the amount of money floating around. It doesn't automatically become worth less because more of it exists. Say for a moment that I really want to buy a widget, which costs $1.00 today, but because I know that inflation is 10% per day, I figure that tomorrow a widget will probably cost $1.10. Now Uncle Sam comes along and offers me a loan. He will give me $1.00 now if I pay him back $1.01 tomorrow. I'd be stupid not to take this deal! I can now buy a widget today for $1.00 and tomorrow I'll have $1.10 worth of widgets in my possession in exchange for only $1.01 worth of debt and I've effectively made $0.09! Widgets fly off the shelves increasing demand, prices go up. Money pours out of the fed to feed the demand. Inflation! But what if Uncle Sam offers me $1.00 today if I pay him back $1.15 tomorrow? Buying that widget today is no longer an automatic money maker. Demand cools. Prices go down. Inflation stops. But Uncle Sam has debts of his own, and now that he's borrowing at the increased rate to pay his own debts, that hurts him too. Lucky for him. He can always print the difference. Yes, this does inject money into the economy that was previously tied up in the fed's balance sheet. Is it inflationary? You betcha it is! And while it's unwinding the counterforce of that inflation will likely keep inflation high even with high interest rates, a textbook recipe for long and horrible stagflation. But, eventually, barring some horrible armed uprising, the fed's balance sheet will unwind, the deflationary pressure of market forces will finally overtake the inflationary pressure of government debt and growth will once again be possible.

            Given how bad the situation is, I have no doubt that this period of stagflation will be terrible. Every manner of hackneyed quick-fix political solution will be tried, including a nice steaming dollop of socialism, but hopefully we make it through it in one piece. There will be a lot of bleeding, I just really hope that it's financial bleeding and economic damage rather than physical bleeding and human damage.

  9. MWAocdoc   3 years ago

    Meanwhile the President of the United States is threatening OPEC with vague consequences for refusing to increase production and reduce prices; and he's threatening Putin with vague consequences for wantonly invading a former colony; and Putin is vaguely threatening to use nuclear weapons if Ukraine doesn't stop successfully reclaiming lost territory Putin invaded. And all of this just in time for the mid-term elections while the voters are vaguely sort of not paying much attention to the vaguely destructive politicians they elected to vaguely run the country.

    1. One-Punch_Man   3 years ago

      Vague? I thought he said he wouldn't share his applesauce with them. Wait, or was that send Kamala over to give a speech

  10. Moonrocks   3 years ago

    Is it odd that there's not a single mention of recession?

    1. 5.56   3 years ago

      Boehm might be reluctantly avoiding that term.

      1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

        He may have gone bananas. 🙂

        1. Cyrano   3 years ago

          Nice one!

        2. InsaneTrollLogic   3 years ago

          This banana's just getting started.

        3. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

          ‘Brandon Goes Bananas!’

          Coming soon from Disney.

          1. perlmonger   3 years ago

            'Brandon's Banana Hammock!'

            Coming soon from Disney.

            1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

              With the tagline What's Biden Hiden'

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      It's after *looks at watch* 9 am on the West coast. We'll need to look up the latest definition.

  11. 5.56   3 years ago

    Hey man, hows the reluctant voting for biden going?

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

      Same place Jackie's going.

  12. Eeyore   3 years ago

    A couple of months left to get to 10%.

  13. Rich   3 years ago

    rising interest rates aren't getting the job done.

    Obviously the solution is to mandate that everyone burn a portion (8%?) of the paper money in their possession. Better yet, to declare non-digital currency worthless!

    1. HillTown Trader   3 years ago

      SSA handing an extra 8.7% to 23% of American does NOT help keep inflation down.

      Biden is fueling inflation with extra government spending, which Powell is trying to put on the brakes > that does not get the job done.

  14. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   3 years ago

    Federal Deficit Fell by $1.4 Trillion in Fiscal Year 2022, CBO Estimates

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/federal-deficit-fell-by-1-4-trillion-in-fiscal-year-2022-cbo-estimates-11665527740

    At least Fatass Donnie's spending spree has ended. And yes, I know Joe piled on his part.

    1. Ted AKA Teddy Salad, CIA/US Ballet Force   3 years ago

      Doesn’t it just make you want to end you own life? You should go for it!

    2. Spiritus Mundi   3 years ago

      Look who failed high school civics.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   3 years ago

        Here is your homework: CBO data - non partisan

        Trump Added More to the National Debt Than Obama and Bush
        DROWNING IN DEBT
        The fiscally irresponsible 45th president somehow bloated deficits more in four years than his predecessors did in eight.
        Brian Riedl
        Published May. 29, 2022 8:00PM ET

        Reducing deficits from the $10 trillion projection should have been easy. During Trump’s presidency, faster-than-expected economic growth raised the ten-year revenue projections by $1.3 trillion, and lower-than-expected interest rates shaved the ten-year interest cost projections by $2.6 trillion. That’s $3.9 trillion in automatic budget savings without lifting a finger.
        Instead of building on those savings, the president helped enact $7.8 trillion in new initiatives, flipping his total fiscal imprint to a $3.9 trillion net cost. The largest drivers were pandemic-relief legislation ($3.9 trillion), the 2017 tax cuts ($2 trillion), and legislation raising the discretionary spending caps ($1.6 trillion). Other costs included disaster aid and other discretionary spending ($493 billion), repeal of several Affordable Care Act-related taxes ($299 billion), and hundreds of small policies ($201 billion).

        https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-added-more-to-the-national-debt-than-obama-and-bush

        1. VULGAR MADMAN   3 years ago

          Gotta love that impartial news source.
          Although I guess it’s an improvement over links to child porn.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   3 years ago

            CBO data = non partisan.

            Daily Beast just reported it. Of course Bratfart would never report on Donnie's big deficit legacy.

            1. VULGAR MADMAN   3 years ago

              Is “bratfart” another of your creepy websites?

        2. Sevo   3 years ago

          turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, a TDS-addled shit pile and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        3. InsaneTrollLogic   3 years ago

          That post is biased.

        4. Spiritus Mundi   3 years ago

          Presidesnt don't make the budget dumbass. The House does.

          1. Sevo   3 years ago

            "...The House does."

            In this case, at Biden's direction.

        5. TJJ2000   3 years ago (edited)

          What a load of garbage….

          And the references to “projections” are where?

          Which pandemic-relief – The CARES ACT was $1T not 3.9 (must of added on Biden’s and just never-mind that was a Democrats Proposal) and what new initiatives; one would think a $7.8T Act would make news somewhere.

          But why not just start from the very headline. Any news talking about predecessors without talking about inflation is B.S. propaganda. And frankly I know for a fact the ‘debt added’ during Obama’s first term was more (+ outpacing inflation) than Trumps.

  15. Spiritus Mundi   3 years ago

    Just a reminder how Reason shills for dems:

    https://reason.com/2022/06/10/has-inflation-peaked/

    1. JesseAz   3 years ago

      They will never admit to how wrong they've been.

  16. Dillinger   3 years ago

    >>That's good news for elderly Americans

    a little shocked we even have any left after the Fauci Germ Warfare Offensive

    1. StackOfCoins   3 years ago

      If COVID has been a disease primarily affecting young people, we wouldn't have had lockdowns or a pandemic declaration. That was all old people shitting their Depends.

      1. Stuck in California   3 years ago

        Historically, old people vote.

        Kids are hit and miss. As are other demographics. But the AARP set always goes to the polls.

  17. Ersatz   3 years ago (edited)

    Social Security is already on track to be insolvent by 2034—at which point, unless Congress acts, benefits will be cut across the board.

    That has to have been calculated before the old people got their covid rewards – both from direct infection and the shots. What with the covid cull and the excess deaths in ‘covid protected’ people who got their protective ‘vaccines’ [which is running at around +16% according to some sources] Social Security should be looking pretty good about now.

    Just remember all you young people – go get that booster. Take one for the SS team!

  18. Its_Not_Inevitable   3 years ago

    " interest payments on the national debt were on course to become one of the largest segments of the federal budget within the coming decade. "

    Solution: spend MORE on the other segments!

    1. JesseAz   3 years ago

      I remember the leftitarians here saying how smart it was to build up debt at 0% rates...

  19. StackOfCoins   3 years ago

    Fuck Joe Biden.

  20. NOYB2   3 years ago

    Prices rose by 0.4 percent in September, faster than economists expected and indicating that rising interest rates aren't getting the job done.

    Inflation will persist as long as the federal government keeps printing and distributing money to "help" people with rising prices. It will get even worse if the government wants to "help" the economy using Keynesian economics.

    As it turns out, printing more money doesn't make more goods appear. If goods are scarce, all you can do is let prices rise so that people are discouraged from consuming as much.

    1. Stuck in California   3 years ago

      It might make more jobs. You know for paper manufacturers, or companies that make ink. Pressmen -- I hear they're all out of work now that newspapers aren't on paper.

      Wait, we don't make money like that anymore, do we? We just have an unelected cabal of bankers do "quantitative easing", give virtual currency to other bankers, and inflate the values of random markets.

  21. middlefinger   3 years ago

    Free food or snap rose by 25 percent in early 2021. millions of additional people here consuming because open borders and sanctuary city SNAP, housing, energy, water sewage welfare transfers.

    Gee, WTF is an economist or expert. Trust the experts, right Reason?

  22. One-Punch_Man   3 years ago

    "Unexpectedly" when it's a Democrat.

    Same as when a Republicans mess up that is the story.
    When a Democrat mess up, how the Republicans react is the story.

    Biden could help energy by remove his EO. He's won't. He also asked to delay the cuts to after the midterms but hey Dem can do that but Trump/Rump/Orange man bad couldn't. Humm.

    CA says let's give more money out. I'm sure Biden will follow.

    I picture Orpah - "You get a trillion, and you get a trillion, and you get a trillion"

  23. Tony   3 years ago

    The Fed is going to have to make a lot of people a lot poorer in order to see the types of adjustments they want considering those price hikes are based on supply shortages due to global events.

    I don't understand why everyone was so sanguine about having a fucking Republican from the Carlyle Group as Fed chair. The only people he ever sees at lunch are the types of people whose biggest problem in life is that low unemployment has given workers a tiny bit more leverage.

    Amazing how these folks hate when outcomes are determined by the simple interaction of supply and demand, if those outcomes are good for anyone but them.

    1. One-Punch_Man   3 years ago

      Tony, Tony, yeap it's all the republicans fault. I mean they said it was transitory right? Also said it wasn't bad? Or if you can't afford gas to buy an electric car? Or you know that it was beaten and everything was fine? They really signed up for the BBB and the IRA right?

      I know know, they are the ones that gave out money to there cronies. Oh way..

      Yeap rest of the world issue, Biden and friends had nothing to do with it.

      How much do they pay you to write this crap?

      1. Tony   3 years ago

        So surely you can explain how this is Biden's fault, who his friends are, and how it's their fault too.

        Counterpoint to me: the fed is a dumb machine whose job is to get inflation to 2%, and changing the interest rate isn't an adequate tool for the job, something Powell has as much as said.

        Still, it can't have gone unnoticed that workers saw a modest uptick in wages and negotiating power, even to the extent of union rumblings. You gotta quash that crap before it gets out of control.

        1. Sevo   3 years ago

          "So surely you can explain how this is Biden’s fault..."

          Easy to explain to anyone capable of rational consideration, so there's no use wasting time on shit--bag here.

        2. TJJ2000   3 years ago (edited)

          Maybe your problem is assuming it is the ‘dumb machines’ job.

          Maybe the people never gave the ‘dumb machine’ authority to fix inflation nor to cause it by ‘funny-fiat money’. Seems there was something about gold and silver as a trade median.

          And just never-mind the Federal Reserve Act being from Demonrats.

      2. TJJ2000   3 years ago

        Projection is the greatest character strength of all leftards.

    2. Sevo   3 years ago

      "The Fed is going to have to make a lot of people a lot poorer in order to see the types of adjustments they want considering those price hikes are based on supply shortages due to global events."
      The fed is attempting to avoid a major increase in poverty, which increase has been occasioned by Biden's attempt to buy every vote he can with 'free' (your) money.

      "I don’t understand why everyone was so sanguine about having a fucking Republican from the Carlyle Group as Fed chair. The only people he ever sees at lunch are the types of people whose biggest problem in life is that low unemployment has given workers a tiny bit more leverage.
      Shitbag is a liar, inventing any strawman he can when the issue is over his head, as most all issues are. This is just one of many, many things shitbag doesn't understand

      "Amazing how these folks hate when outcomes are determined by the simple interaction of supply and demand, if those outcomes are good for anyone but them."
      It's amusing when shit-bag makes an ass of himself, being totally in the dark as to the true meaning of the terms.
      Yes, this is a matter of 'supply and demand', ignoring the fact that Biden's 24/7 use of the money printing presses have distorted demand in hardly imaginable degrees, while supply has been stymied by Newsom and other lefty-wing tin-pot-dictator wannabes.
      This is sort of like 'supply and demand' where the bank clerk 'supplies' the goods on 'demand' of the robber with the gun; 'supply and demand', right?

  24. CE   3 years ago

    I guess you could still call it transitory, but that's one heck of a long transition.

  25. raspberrydinners   3 years ago

    The debt is kind of irrelevant. It isn't in the long run but rates should've been raised in 2018 or hell, a bit earlier but of course we had a tangerine screaming at the Fed about that. That and Powell just didn't have the stones to turn off the tap of easy money.

    And the issue and why the rate rises aren't doing enough is it's a supply issue. Considering it's a global phenomenon and rates aren't hitting it as much as you'd hope just means supply needs to catch up. Sadly that will just require a bit more time.

    1. TJJ2000   3 years ago

      FDR - The Great Depression
      Obama - The Great Recession
      Biden - The Great Inflation

      But, but, but.... It's all Republicans fault... /s
      1,000,000,000 excuses why it's not National Socialist (syn; Nazi-Democrats) policies.
      "It wasn't us." will be stamped on their gravestones.

      As it is with countless other Communist/Nazi - fanclub supporters.

  26. Azathoth!!   3 years ago

    Far from being transitory, inflation now seems to be a deeply rooted problem.

    Deeply rooted?

    Really?

    This is 'rooted' in idiot leftist pandemic policies coupled with the disastrous energy policies of the Biden junta coupled with the WEF omelet making that's taking place around the globe.

    It's roots are shallow, but wide. spread through thin topsoil by endless media manipulation. A strategy that can only last so long as reality does not diverge too far from the fantasy the propagandists are spinning.

  27. Liberty Lover   3 years ago

    But inflation is mostly stable at around 8% and mostly transitory, should only be a problem for the next 5-10 years depending on who you talk too. But don't worry you liberal trolls Biden has a plan, blame it on the Republicans taking Congress in the mid-terms. On the other hand, only liberal trolls are stupid enough to believe that lie.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Celebrate Independence Day by Insulting a Politician

J.D. Tuccille | 7.4.2025 7:00 AM

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!