Freedom Was Giving Us Prosperity and Full Bellies. Political Leaders Squandered What We Had.
Government officials broke the world, and we’re all paying the price.

The good news is that Ukraine, a breadbasket country for much of the world, is shipping food again. This has nudged global food prices off highs that put sufficient calories out of the reach of too many people. The bad news is that supply chains remain disrupted, Russia's invasion of its neighbor still plays havoc with grain and energy markets, and food remains too expensive. Wealthy countries foresee hard times, and the outlook is worse for others who, until recently, were climbing out of poverty and hunger.
"The next five to ten winters will be difficult," Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo warned his countrymen this week. "A very difficult situation is developing throughout Europe."
Anybody seeking a little more cheer made a mistake if they looked to France, where the forecasts are just as depressing.
"I believe that we are in the process of living through a tipping point or great upheaval," French President Emmanuel Macron told his cabinet. "Firstly because we are living through … what could seem like the end of abundance."
Both politicians referred to energy prices soaring because of economic skirmishes with Russia over that country's invasion of Ukraine as well as long years of bad policies that made much of Europe dependent on fuel from the giant to the east. But pandemic-era government spending sprees and supply chains kneecapped by COVID-19 lockdowns and war have the continent's economies sputtering as prices rise overall. If affording the necessities of life is becoming a problem for the comparatively wealthy nations of Europe, imagine what it's like for the rest of the world.
"Record high food prices have triggered a global crisis that will drive millions more into extreme poverty, magnifying hunger and malnutrition, while threatening to erase hard-won gains in development," the World Bank noted on August 15. "The war in Ukraine, supply chain disruptions, and the continued economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic are reversing years of development gains and pushing food prices to all-time highs."
There is some improvement on this front. After months of blockaded ports, mined shipping channels, and trapped shipments, the United Nations and Turkey brokered a deal to let Ukraine's food flow to purchasers around the world who rely on the country's foodstuffs. The first cargoes began crossing the Black Sea just days ago. That has world food prices backing off their peaks.
"The FAO Food Price Index (FFPI) averaged 140.9 points in July 2022, down 13.3 points (8.6 percent) from June, marking the fourth consecutive monthly decline," the U.N.'s Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) announced earlier this month. "Nevertheless, it remained 16.4 points (13.1 percent) above its value in the corresponding month last year."
"Leading the decline, world wheat prices fell by as much as 14.5 percent in July, partly in reaction to the agreement reached between Ukraine and the Russian Federation to unblock Ukraine's main Black Sea ports, indicating the imminent resumption of grain exports from Ukraine," the FAO added.
That's great, but Ukraine's food exports remain at about half of 2021's level, according to data from the country's Agricultural Ministry. And Russia's invasion hampers food production by chasing away farmers, or through deliberate targeting of crops for destruction. Agricultural firms can only sell what they grow, not what was never planted or that burned in the field.
Unfortunately, political officials seeing a potential disaster have done their best to make it worse.
"The global food crisis has been partially made worse by the growing number of food trade restrictions put in place by countries with a goal of increasing domestic supply and reducing prices," adds the World Bank, which predicts "prices at historically high levels through the end of 2024 exacerbating food insecurity and inflation."
It's impossible to overstate what a dramatic and unpleasant turnaround this is from recent history. Humanity had been making progress in reducing hunger and building prosperity in recent decades.
"In the developing regions, the prevalence of undernourishment—which measures the proportion of people who are unable to consume enough food for an active and healthy life—has declined to 12.9 percent of the population, down from 23.3 percent a quarter of a century ago," the FAO noted in 2015.
Likewise, the number of people living below the poverty line around the world plunged from 1.93 billion in 1991 to 659 million in 2018. What produced this remarkable improvement in human fortunes?
"It was liberalism, in the free-market European sense," economist Deirdre N. McCloskey wrote in 2016. "Give masses of ordinary people equality before the law and equality of social dignity, and leave them alone, and it turns out that they become extraordinarily creative and energetic."
Since then, though, pandemic lockdowns interrupted the flow of goods and services around the world, geopolitical tensions and concerns about supply drove additional interference with trade, and ill-considered environmental policies impeded agriculture and energy. And then Russia revived large-scale aggressive warfare and all of its add-on effects.
Not every recent wound was foreseeable or avoidable. Droughts and bad weather that choke off crop yields have always been a constant and unpredictable menace. Nobody wanted a pandemic. And the decision to invade Ukraine rests in the hands of Russia's authoritarian President Vladimir Putin and his cronies.
But thousands of years of scratching in the dirt in search of sustenance should have taught us that prosperity and full bellies are elusive qualities available only when the conditions are right. We can't control every factor that determines whether we are poor or rich, but we can "give masses of ordinary people equality before the law and equality of social dignity, and leave them alone" to maximize our chances no matter what nature and dictators send our way. Leaving people free to innovate, trade, and produce gives us the best chances of success no matter what else happens. It's especially important to leave people alone amidst events we can't influence so as to minimize disruptions.
Of course, that's not what political leaders have done.
So, in 2022, wealthy nations face a possible "end of abundance" while the poor may suffer a return of "extreme poverty, magnifying hunger and malnutrition." And this happened largely because of bad political choices in a world that very recently thought it had escaped poverty and starvation.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I have not ever thought like it would even achievable however my confidant mate got 13,000 us dollars only in four weeks easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail. Look extra details
going this web-page… https://incomebuzz7.blogspot.com/
Oh, please. Things aren't so bad, there's plenty of bugs to go around. Just stay in your hut, global warming will be around shortly to keep you warm.
Either we cause a famine by extending the Rus/Ukr war, or we work toward a negotiated settlement. A settlement would undercut the "Putin [who is brokering the US/Iran agreement] cause Hilary to lose, not our arrogance and stupidity" narrative, and thus isn't possible.
People have to die to prevent the White Progressive from having to admit a mistake.
This goes deeper than the Ukraine war. Under normal circumstances, a war would result in a slight increase in prices as the cheapest source of some goods are cut off and replaced by more expensive sources. What's actually happening is that every alternative is getting squeezed out as totalitarians in the west tighten their grip.
But we have to shut down farmland during a famine to Save The Earth. Nitrogen pollution, dontcha know.
And yet somehow every voting statistic ever released shows the Black population is still being far more "Progressive" than the White population...
You might be confusing progressive with "votes for Democrats". Most black people are religious, socially conservative, and oppose things like gay rights.
That doesn't mean they want honkie mystics bringing back female slavery and Comstockist rape culture. Orango-louts tried to seduce them with (im)Palin, Johnny Torch, Mitt and Fake Objectivist... y nada!
Gay.
Either we cause a famine by extending the Rus/Ukr war, or we work toward a negotiated settlement.
Or Putin gets overthrown or commits suicide.
Helicopter crash or heart attack.
Traditions, you know.
Or perhaps a brave Progressive such as yourself will fly through the window and karate chop his head off.
I think you should attempt it. It may be your destiny.
And let's not forget governments mandating the move to "renewable" energy when there's not enough renewable energy to meet demand.
Sure there is. Those stupid, science denying republicans keep getting in the way. Just like when they wrecked the central planner's food production design, telling farmers what to plant, when to plant, and where to plant. In fact, the wreckers are to blame for all the benevolent central planners failures. If not for them there would be endless clean energy and a chicken in every pot.
GUNS... Who has the use the most Gov-Guns to dictate their ideology is the blame factor.
a chicken in every pot
And the central planners have a plan for when there aren't enough chickens to go around...
Yes! Their plan is to reduce the number of pots!
Exactly. Our only chance of survival is their ineptitude. Of course if that does foil their plans, it will still result in much chaos and misery for regular people before sanity is restored. What they fail to understand is that in Jefferson's comment about the Tree of Liberty is that the blood of both the tyrants and patriots is required. The cabalists are willing to spend the blood of their minions, while patriots willingly, in the gravest extreme, give their own. Just reading the signs I'm leaning towards the patriots.
Further, increasing the demand by huge amounts, subsidizing and then mandating EVs
It turns out the experts are lacking expertise.
Welcome, children, to Reaganism in action.
WTF did people think was going to happen after that 40+ years of Conservatives trickle-down/supply-side Satanomics, aka Conmanitalism incentivizing the Corporate Caliphate's sultans to "invest" profits in bribing, with increased buybacks & dividends, the Conservative Parasite/Donor Class into electing obscene remuneration friendly Boards.
Instead of the Corporate Caliphate's sultans pissing the money away on trivial things like:
a) Higher pay for those who do the actual work that adds the value that creates the wealth. Instead forcing them to now live paycheck to paycheck by redistributing most of the fruits of their labors upwards to a small ruling Oligarchy (aka one of the root causes of current distress) - Which would not only alleviate the need for higher social safety net spending, but allowing for the elimination of the deficit spending, needed to keep the Corporate Caliphate's serfs alive.
b) Even greater Plant & Human Capital investments in order to increase productivity, creating a virtuous feedback loop.
When I think world wide government/corporate collusion on the Green Leap Forward, the medical industrial complex destroying entrepreneurialism and creating barriers to work, and the full court press on the entire concept of individual rights via neo-Marxist concepts like “equity” , I think Reagan.
Eh....I'll give it a C+. A little too unhinged to be a real person.
People like that exist in real life.
But they usual are raging on the street corners in dirty clothes.
Or raging on twitter with a Ukrainian flag for their profile pic.
My FiL still blames Nixon for him getting sent to the Vietnam war.
In 1968.
Everybody's got a 'woo' in-law somewhere on that tree.
If you're sporting a pony tail and are a buff young highshool teacher I'm sure it impresses the popular girls in the class that will think you're dreamy and start spouting that to their parents.
This is a delicious insult.
The 'children' is a nice touch -the tendency to matronize is common with the left. I say it's real, another fuckwit troll drive-by. Has all the economic and political understanding of any of the garden variety progressive. By which I mean, none. The blame being placed on Reagan, likely not a millennial. But a dyed in the wool cultist for certain.
Yeah, this is Hank Philips level
This one praised Stalin last Saturday (the Bulgakov article)
That ... is surprisingly unhinged. A parody account, I hope?
What difference, at this point, does it make?
That 'tard is showing up on other threads and smelling like a true lefty shit-pile.
Do you have a 401K? If so then you're an evil capitalist who invests money and expects the money to grow without any labor on your part.
He would never have a 401K like some capitalist asshole. He's got a trust fund.
Well that was one big dose of stupid.
Unfortunately, that "big dose of stupid", historically gets millions of followers, who then go around killing people by the millions.
@Kuni, you have pretty much perfectly summarized the Nazi political program, complete with the use of the term "parasite".
You really are a vile p.o.s., @Kuni.
Reaganism in action.
Can't tell if this is satire or Kuni is really that much of an idiot.
-jcr
A ginormous share of the blame for the return of increasing privation is ALL of the God-damned STUPID trade warriors of ALL political stripes!
Just ONE case in point, from the archives!
Clear-cut case below, showing the UTTER FAILURE of protectionism in general, and Trumpist protectionism specifically:
Meanwhile in the real world…
https://reason.com/2019/04/22/trumps-washing-machine-tariffs-cleaned-out-consumers/
Trump’s Washing Machine Tariffs Cleaned Out Consumers
A new report finds the tariffs raised $82 million for the U.S. Treasury but ended up increasing costs for consumers by about $1.2 billion.
PROTECTIONISM DOESN’T WORK!!! DUH!!!
Protect American washing-machine makers from Chinese competition? The FIRST thing that American washing-machine makers do, is jack UP their prices… AND the prices of dryers to boot, too! To SOAK the hell out of all of us consumers!!!
From the above-linked Reason article about washing machines…
“All told, those tariffs raised about $82 million for the U.S. Treasury but ended up increasing costs for consumers by about $1.2 billion during 2018 … (deleted). Although the trade policy did cause some manufacturers to shift production from overseas to the United States in an effort to avoid the new tariffs, the 1,800 jobs created by Trump’s washing machine tariffs cost consumers an estimated $820,000 per job.”
Summary: Nickels and dimes to the USA treasury; boatloads of pain for consumers. USA jobs created? Yes, at GREAT expense! Putting these 1.8 K workers on a super-generous welfare program would have been WAY better for all the rest of us! Plus, you know the WORKERS don’t make super-huge bucks (no $820,000 per job for THEM); the goodies flow to the EXECUTIVES at the top of the washing-machine companies! The same ones who play golf with The Donald, and join him for gang-banging Stormy Daniels! Essentially at our expense!
Toosilly pretending he doesn't understand that he is "getting" exactly what his employers wanted.
Eat a bag of dicks, you progressive pretender.
Talking to yourself?
Addendum.
"Firstly because we are living through … what could seem like the end of abundance."
But... but... but... Ron Bailey's been talking about post-scarcity economies for the better part of a decade!
Agricultural firms can only sell what they grow, not what was never planted or that burned in the field.
Says the magazine that routinely blasts Farm Bills by conflating crop insurance with conservation spending and ignoring the other 80+% of any given Farm Bill that goes to "nutrition assistance" programs.
In the heart of all men is the belief that they know better than everyone else. The same man who will bristle at the thought of being "micromanaged" thinks himself knowledgeable enough to stick his nose in the business of people they never met. They see one variable and assume the rest, thinking they know better than people dealing with totally different circumstances.
The battle for freedom is the battle against 3 forces. The first is to tame that destructive force in our own hearts- the force that thinks it knows the best actions for others. The second is to convince others to tame that same force in their hearts. And the third is to battle those who would assume the roll of Top Man.
The Top Man has no power if people have resigned within their hearts to live and let live. And so they are forever looking for crises that mean- just this once- we should subrogate decisions to them. And then it is just a short hop to spending the majority of their time creating such crises.
But the battle can begin at home. In your heart. Have the faith to let others choose the path for themselves.
In the heart of all men is the belief that they know better than everyone else.
I totally disagree. Some of us are happy to leave others alone and let them live their lives.
“Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the other sort.”
― Robert A. Heinlein
As I've said before, the battle between Republicans and Democrats isn't one between power and freedom. It's over what will be controlled and who will control it.
And yet Republicans 'control' factor wishes is to DE-REGULATE 88% of the time.... Your 'boaf sidez' preaching holds no water; but if you have a better feasible 'route' please present it. Perhaps you can run for office..
Which Bush shrank government? Was it Reagan? Nixon?
It was Trump; the one you like to ditch on the most...
If anyone here ever quotes Heinlein in the future, you have to give sarc credit.
Democracy can survive anything, except Democrats.
-Robert Heinleinerr SarcReason is poor propaganda when opposed by the yammering, unceasing lies of shrewd and evil and self-serving men.
Robert HeinleinSarcI think I have the hang of this
“Beware of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors—and miss.” —Robert Heinlein
"Have the faith to let others choose the path for themselves."
I've always thought of this as having enough respect for others to let them choose the path for themselves. I suppose the root of that could be described as "having faith" in people. But maybe we don't even need to go that far: we should leave others alone simply because we wish to be left alone.
Leaches can't leave others alone. It's their very selfish notion of survival..
Criminals don't WORK/EARN they STEAL and DICTATE...
Nice post, Overt.
Here Here
It should be clear that globalization, while providing enormous benefits, does introduce fragility in the form of dependency on stable trade relations between countries, and an enormously extended physical supply chain. When something comes along to stress such a system, the fragile parts will break.
Unfortunately, I doubt very much that the world's various politicians are anywhere near smart enough to recognize these weaknesses, and will take the steps needed to not exacerbate them in the future. The politicians we have today -- especially those in the west -- are just play-actors, not actual leaders. They come from all the pampered, privileged corners of the word, not from the hardscrabble parts where one has to earn a living or starve.
It is possible to reverse the situation, but only by replacing politicians with candidates who have real-world experience. Forget focusing on policies, those are way, way downstream of people. Pick good leaders, then you can ask them to pick good policies. (Which, if they're actually good, they will be doing anyway all on their own.)
The biggest problem was the hubris of morons that thought we could "shut down" the economy. It was apparent from the first time the term was uttered that it was a terrible idea that would have way worse consequences than covid. We didn't save anyone, and now there are hundreds of millions of people starving that weren't prior.
https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/un-report-global-hunger-SOFI-2022-FAO/en
"The biggest problem was the hubris of morons that thought we could "shut down" the economy."
A bit of an explanation and modification:
The grease ball Newsom, like most of the CA politicians, has never had a job; he has slopped at the public trough his entire life, so business functions and requirements are a total mystery to him. But he's entirely too stupid to understand the depth of his ignorance.
Shutting down the businesses was a snap; make it illegal to do that business! The real mistake was the ignorant assumption that businesses could just as easily re-start.
"by replacing politicians with candidates who have real" respect for the USA as defined by the U.S. Constitution..
Famously, there's a lot of ruin in a nation. Can you really blame them for getting curious, and setting out to empirically determine exactly how much?
You'd have thought 2008 would have been a lesson.
Maybe it was, but not the lesson we'd hope they'd have learned.
The Nazi(National Socialist)-Regime has squandered what we had...
BY violating (treasonous-Ly taking-over) the USA per the U.S. Constitution.
Surely there are other places in this world where crops can be grown besides Ukraine.
Of course, but we need to make this about Russia, not Western inflationary policies. There everyone in the West was, minding their own business when... ALL OF A SUDDEN!
Tuccille: Putin's Fault!
Putin: You saw what Ukraine was wearing!
I know, right?
Yes, the US, Canada, Zimbabwe. Oh, wait, Mugabe completely fucked that last one with his policies and turned a breadbasket into a food importer. Trudeau is trying hard with the second one on that list as well.
"Political leaders" in the West gave voters what they wanted: lots of handouts paid for with other people's money. Don't blame the politicians, blame the voters.
Taking for granite there was any amount of election integrity involved.
Election integrity has nothing to do with it. Voters of all parties in the US are greedy, entitled, and want government to give them free stuff.
Many politicians, even Democrats, understand full well that they can't keep printing and borrowing money, that we need big tax increases on the middle class, and that we need to cut back military and social spending. They also understand that if they were to propose that, they and their party would not win another election.
Each of them wants to just stay on the power trip a little longer, none care what happens after he's gone.
Time to stop reading about "Heather and Her Two Mommies (one of Who Used to be her Daddy)" and start reading "Atlas Shrugged". If that's too hard, I suggest Locke's 2nd Treatise, but if that's too hard, I recall some pretty decent comic versions of Hyeck and others of the free-market / classical liberal bent.
The Democrats are asking to reverse the Trump tax cut on the rich and tax increase on the middle class. The filibuster (and two Senators from WV and AZ) is preventing that.
Republicans, even poor ones, don't like it when rich people pay taxes and especially don't like it when the IRS tries to force rich people to the pay the taxes they legally owe. Tax dodgers, like the Trump family, are admired in the GOP.
You are ludicrously out of touch with reality. The bottom 60% of the US income distribution pay no federal income tax at all, a system that simply cannot continue.
You also keep conflating "rich people" with "high income earners". People who make $400000/year aren't "rich". Democrats are going after successful private professionals and small business owners. Democrats are doing everything in their power to make "the rich" (Gates, Bezos, etc.) even richer, and to create large classes of Democrat-voting tax dodgers. Stupid people like you cheer them on in screwing over the American people, and then you even blame Republicans.
Thank you for proving my point about greedy, entitled, stupid American voters: look in the mirror.
"The Democrats are asking to reverse the Trump tax cut on the rich and tax increase on the middle class. The filibuster (and two Senators from WV and AZ) is preventing that."
TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit dooood posts more bullshit.
The bad news is that supply chains remain disrupted, Russia's invasion of its neighbor still plays havoc with grain and energy markets
Russia's invasion does NOT play havoc with the energy markets. The western cut-our-noses-off-to-spite-our-faces sanctions played havoc with energy markets.
Exactly: the economic turmoil in the West is a consequence of policy choices we made, not Russia.
But you're wrong if you think that's unintentional. The policies the Biden administration is instituting, and their consequences, are deliberate and designed to advance their political agenda. High gas prices are no accident.
Exactly so. US and allied nation sanctions on Russia will drive the next stage. If tuccille can't get his head around who is to blame for food shortages and supply issues, he will be flummoxed when the energy crunch hits in earnest. Proxy war was dipshit potus' project; it is the people who pay in blood and suffering for shitty political maneuvering.
Still sucking off momma's (Russia) tit I see...
Leaches gotta suck be it from other citizens or Russia or China; suck, suck, suck...
Yes: you and the Democrats are doing just that.
^Partisan-Hack...
[WE] gang-color Rules!!!
Having a hard time keeping score without a program.
We know that nardz is a whining pile of shit who justifies the Russian invasion for "reasons", and as an asshole given to using twitter as a primary source (REALLY!) can be ignored.
We know that, regardless of any bullshit claims of equivalence, Russia invaded Ukraine.
We know that the issue is of no concern to the US, and is (or should be) a major concern to the EU.
We know that Biden has committed billions of your and my taxes to support a cause where we have no interests.
Missed anything?
I'm not a partisan, I simply come to despise the Democrats, after having been one for much of my life.
Yes, that's the way you think: "us vs them". You really are an evil, ignorant prick.
If you weren't such a partisan-hack imbecile you'd know darn well I despise Democrats agenda probably more than you do. You're just all pissy cause I recognize women as being humans with a personal life you want to shove your opinions into by Gov-Gun force. Yeah; that very same 'tool' the Democrats just LOVE to no end.
So you went from scurrilous accusations of "sucking at Russia's teat" to "partisan hack" to "you don't care about women's personal lives". You just can't make up your mind, can you?
No, I don't know that, given that you are defending their destructive policies and repeating their b.s. propaganda.
Yup, and there was a period there where the damage could've been undone. Russia could've been convinced to just sell the gas to everyone they used to sell it to.
But now? After all of Western Europe has spent months and billions and billions of dollars arming Russia's adversary? They'd have every right to say, "Fuck y'all, you can freeze & starve".
Well Germany claims to have filled 75% of the "target" of their natural gas storage, but that only represents less than 20% of the winter season natural gas consumption. Without the Russian natural gas flowing, there is no way that LNG supply can even keep up with the winter demand. It's going to be a long cold winter in Germany.
Altruist collectivist Germany? The record shows they use Jewish individualists and competing collectivists as a fossil fuel, no?
You know who else’s policies led to long, cold winters in Germany ?
The sanctions didn't touch natural gas and fuel oil. Those were always going to be a lever Putin would pull to muzzle the EU when he wanted to invade a random neighboring country. The only blame here goes to the EU for even accepting Russian fuel in the first place.
Europeans are in the NATO defense alliance; Americans should have put their foot down and said "if you do this, we're going to leave NATO, because we're not going to protect you from the consequences of your poor decision making". Of course, neither Bush nor Obama were willing to do that.
And Democrats are doing it all over again by pushing for a dependence on rare earths, Lithium, and other raw materials from China and Russia.
"The sanctions didn't touch natural gas and fuel oil..."
Is the lying pile of left shit dooood capable of posting without lying?
Nice piece, but you failed to mention the huge price jumps on crudité...
I hear "veggie trays" are better, anyway.
I hear you're a lying pile of lefty shit.
"A crisis made by elits"
Libertarian podcast on this subject.
And an article if you'd rather read.
Somehow, in the United States, the average electric bill is less than a 3rd of what it costs in Britain.
It's hilarious if it's true that Labour is talking about freezing bills for six months as a solution. As if that's never been tried before.
Leftist politicians: selling the solutions of the 1930's to the people of today as progress.
Somehow = deep corporate subsidies for fossil fuels.
What do you recommend the British government do to lower the cost of fossil fuel heating? In a free market, oil is priced based on global, not local, demand. Drilling new wells in the North Sea will take years and even then, the resulting oil will be priced on the global market. The free market, OTOH, is more than happy to raise prices to the point where a lot of people will freeze this Winter. Sometimes, in an emergency, capping the price is the lesser of two evils, even knowing what the results will be later on.
Damn, you're moonbatty. Part of the increase in electricity bills is the use of natural gas which is volatile in price instead of continuing to use and upgrade their nuclear power plants. It's most acute in Germany where the idiots shut down almost all of the nuclear plants in favor of burning more gas.
And price caps never work. They always lead to shortages. See Energy Crisis 1973 and 1979 for more.
Subsidies for fossil fuels in the US and Europe are negligible.
At this point, there is nothing any Western government can do to lower the cost of fossil fuels: they have destroyed the fossil fuel industry and the willingness of investors to make new investments. We'll have to live with the consequences.
Just know that if you think that green energy is somehow going to fill in the gap, you are a fool.
"Somehow = deep corporate subsidies for fossil fuels.
Dooood is a lying pile of lefty shit.
What do you recommend the British government do to lower the cost of fossil fuel heating?
Stop making it more expensive.
And Reason contributor, Brendan O'Neill discusses Sam Harris' TDS.
My goodness gracious!
I notice that for all of Harris' spittle-fueled ranting, there was no actual cite of what danger Trump poses.
It's almost like rational people who like (small-l) liberal democracy would have an issue with an authoritarian movement that tried to stop the peaceful transition of power, threatened the lives of the Vice President and Congresspersons, bludgeoned cops, and stashed weapons caches nearby just in the case.
Like the 2016 election, there, moonbat?
Like BOTH halves of the looter Kleptocracy? Remember what Orwell said abt English writers who realize that communism and fascism are The Same Thing!
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Yes, we do! That's why the Democrats must be kicked out of power.
"It's almost like rational people who like (small-l) liberal democracy would have an issue with an authoritarian movement that tried to stop the peaceful transition of power, threatened the lives of the Vice President and Congresspersons, bludgeoned cops, and stashed weapons caches nearby just in the case."
It's certain that the TDS-addled doooood is a lying pile of lefty shit.
“"I believe that we are in the process of living through a tipping point or great upheaval," French President Emmanuel Macron told his cabinet. "Firstly because we are living through … what could seem like the end of abundance."”
Why am I suddenly reminded of a certain former president’s “economic malaise” speech?
The “we are all are going to have to make due with less” trope has been a consistent theme of the intellectual left since at least the 1930s, when the Great Depression was deemed our “come-uppance” for the “excesses” and “greed” of the 1920s.
Would you rather live with a little less, tighten your belt, etc., or embrace Trumpism? Make [The West] Great Again? No thank you.
Doesn't have to be one or the other. The middle could get off their asses and start voting locally, in national primaries, elections, and state and local referrenda. If you're a bit left, you can vote for Hillary over Bernie, if you're a bit left you can vote for Romney over Trump, but start pruning off the outliers. (I'm not saying that I like any of those choices, but some are more extreme than others.)
No, it has to be one or the other.
(I'm not saying that I like any of those choices, but some are more extreme than others.)
Yes, Trump was the extreme best POTUS we've had since Silent Cal.
Jimmeh never read "Prohibition and the Crash"
Go figure that the inevitable results of the political classes attacks on modern life have come home to roost. This is what happens when you destroy the means of production and replace them with wishes and tons of us have been predicting this for years.
What they're really lamenting is that COVID sped up the process so they're still in office when the results of their idiotic policies starting doing the exact things they wanted them to do. We'll see if they backpedal since some of them might actually be held to account for starting the process to roll us back to the middle ages.
Freedom enriches us!
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/how-freedom-enriches-us
As has been discussed before, central planning inevitably fails because the planners don’t have the knowledge (nor, typically, the desire) to make the best decision for millions of people. Delegate those decisions down to the people themselves, who actually have intimate knowledge of their situations and abilities, and creativity and innovation explode. There’s a reason that new stuff is STILL invented in the USA instead of China — central planners very very rarely innovate because there’s no incentive to do so. (They just steal our ideas and sell them back to us!)
In a world of State-run ‘companies’, nobody (save the well-connected, as always) has access to resources because the State claims dominion over all things. In a free market society, access to resources is price-based. This means that the part-time carpenter (who values raw timber higher than a baker) can head down to the lumber-equivalent version of Randalls and purchase whatever they like. Eventually, the raw wood is turned into a chair (or many chairs) - improving the lives of everybody involved. Maybe this part-time gig is so successful that it turns into a full-time job, perhaps one that requires additional employees — once again improving the lives of everybody involved.
Of course, a single part-time carpenter doesn’t account for the vast difference in standard of living between the two styles of governance. But let’s zoom out just a little bit further. The woman who loves to bake values cooking ingredients higher than the carpenter does and makes the most of those ingredients, exactly how the man who loves to garden values gardening tools higher than others. Every time our resources are ‘optimized’ in this way, society gets just a little bit richer. Compound these small differences over millions of people and hundreds of years, and eventually you’re faced with Randalls supermarket versus the bare and depressing Russian-run version.
As an added bonus, the citizens of a free society are also HAPPIER than communists, specifically because of the freedom to pursue their hopes and dreams. No central planning required. Just free people making their own decisions about how to spend their time and resources.
"...The woman who loves to bake values cooking ingredients higher than the carpenter does and makes the most of those ingredients, exactly how the man who loves to garden values gardening tools higher than others..."
This is both axiomatic and self-evident.
If you wanted that $25 more than the shirt, you'd have kept the money. If the guy selling the shirt wanted it more than the money, he'd have kept the shirt.
Instead, you both ended up 'wealthier' than you were after the trade.
As you mention, not a lot but multiply by the millions of daily transactions.
So, the logical outcome of leftist programs has arrived, the "age of abundance" comes to a close, and now it's time to switch to so-called green energy.
How do we do that when new billions are starting to freeze or starve?
It's like person who blows 100% of his paycheck on living well now, saves nothing, and then finds himself out of work with a leaking roof. How's he going to pay for that?
Stupid!
This doesn't logically follow. Switching to "green" energy doesn't require an immediate cessation of existing energy sources. The vast majority of green energy conversions aren't due to "leftist programs" but to market forces that prefer the cheaper solar and wind to the now more expensive coal. Given the need to keep using fossil fuels in the short term to support the populous, the majority of new renewable generation is adding rather than replacing. Meanwhile, droughts are causing problems for hydroelectric generation so maybe paying attention to the long-term damage caused by adding carbon and methane to the atmosphere is also a good thing.
But hey! Good news for your person who blew their paycheck--the new sources of power are even cheaper than the old sources so he can make a smaller paycheck and still afford them.
Switching to "green" energy doesn't require an immediate cessation of existing energy sources.
What is required is alternate sources that are cheaper than existing sources. Once that happens, the world will switch, and there's nothing the Saud crime family or Exxon can do about it.
It's not going to happen because some creepy girl scowls and scolds us, or by decree from incompetent scumbags like Newsom.
-jcr
Yes, it does, because "green energy" is not cost-competitive. So, without massive government intervention forcing people to switch, they aren't going to switch.
Solar and wind are not cheaper than coal. They appear sometimes cheaper in spot pricing, but even that only because they are massively subsidized by fossil fuel sources of energy.
You need to learn some basic science. More GHG emissions causes more precipitation because it causes more evaporation. Generally, a 1000ppm CO2 world is warmer, wetter, and more temperate than the world we live in.
"...The vast majority of green energy conversions aren't due to "leftist programs" but to market forces that prefer the cheaper solar and wind to the now more expensive coal..."
You're a lying pile of lefty shit. doooood.
The vast majority of green energy conversions aren't due to "leftist programs"
Oh GREAT!!! So we can REPEAL them all NOW!!!!!
See; All it takes is a penny of brains and you'll vote for a USA instead of a Nazi(National Socialist)-Regime.
Shorter"
Dooood is full of shit.
And as a lying pile of lefty shit, Doooood is due nothing more that that.
Dooood, as a brain-damaged pile of lefty shit, probably does believe the bullshit s/he spews here, but as a lying pile of lefty shit, s/he must provide evidence for those claims.
Guessing that we are dealing with an adolescent pile of lefty shit here who LUVs Greta.
Switching to "green" energy doesn't require an immediate cessation of existing energy sources.
You're quite right, it doesn't *require* immediate cessation, but that is what is being mandated.
Good point... or maybe not so good in perspective. "Require" means order at gunpoint in politics.
Holy crap.... looks like I touched a live wire.
Sorry if I was unclear, but my point was that it is out of abundance that we have the resources to research and shift from fossil fuels to coal. If we mess up the economy, where does the capital come from to pay for the research and investment?
The sockie's syntax reveals RED/BLUE binarism. So the cure for "leftist" has to be #StopTheSteal, #BackTheBlue #GrabbingOtherPussy and #ReinstateOrangeHitlerAndJesus
Libertariantranslator needs adjustment in the asshole's meds and treatment for a raging case of TDS.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
It's not bad decisions it's being done on purpose.
The death of "globalism", or at least global trade is responsible for a large portion of this. Climate change with its droughts and hail storms are a large contributing factor. Salt-water intrusion in coastal areas, especially Florida with its unique geology, will make this worse.
Droughts and hail storms have happened throughout prehistory and history, for millions and even billions of years. They are hardly a product of just the current climate. Salt water intrusion is best explained by the removal of fossil fresh water via wells, not climate. Do you even read anything of geology and the history of this planet? Or are you usually this damn stupid?
I'm betting on the anonymous troll whose premises are not in the future in this exchange. Econazis point to Revealed Prophesy. Geologists look at the record, like Al Smith.
Climate change does not lead to widespread "droughts and hail storms". To the contrary, it leads to warmer, milder, wetter climate across the globe.
"...Climate change with its droughts and hail storms are a large contributing factor..."
You're full of shit doooood.
Ukraine is NOT the (wheat) bread basket of the world.
The United States and Russia are, with about 13% of the export market each. Canada and Australia are next. Ukraine is #5 at 9%.
I'm disappointed that Reason printed this "common knowledge" which could have been a direct handout from The Voice of America war propaganda machine. When did Reason stop doing fact checking?
China is the world's largest producer of wheat, however they don't export it in large quantities.
The media in the west is on a total WAR footing. Remember - The truth is the first casualty of war. The reporting about the resumption of grain shipments from Ukraine heaps "praise" on the U.N. and Turkey. Not one word about Russia negotiating and entering into the agreement - nothing. The agreement is a tentative one. Just 120 days. As a result of the insulting reporting, I think Putin will decline to re-new.
Always believe what anonymous sockies post.
Eat shit and die, asswipe.
Are you better off now than the day before Joe Biden took office?
It's the economy, stupid.
Remember, remember, the eighth of November.
"Are you better off now than the day before Joe Biden took office?"
The hope is that people realize that reality.
Joe Biden Squandered What We Had.
Someone fetch LL a hankie! That nasty old Dem party kicked sand in poor little orange Pussy-Grabber's face.
Shove your TDSS up your ass, shitface. Your head wants company.
And then please fuck off and die a painful death.
Blame the King . Oh! It's a democratic Republic; we are the King .
NOT.... This Union of States government is a ***CONSTITUTIONAL*** Republic...
Worshiping democracy (i.e. [WE] mobs RULE!) indoctrination is in the Top-10 indoctrination techniques used to conquer the USA for a Nazi(National Socialism)-Regime .
Tuccille is always a ray of sunshine illuminating reality. When the LP formed, Population was half what it is. Now oceans in the southern hemisphere where 1/9 of humanity reportedly lives on 1/3 of the soil, are slowly cooling about as they warm in the northern hemisphere, according to Zoe Phin. On all that land, old Nazi ships are sticking up out of rivers as irrigation, struggling to water crops, loads that northern atmosphere with water vapor. Asimov and the LP warned against excess populating. Yet some still want to force women to reproduce at gunpoint.
BTW, to make it crystal clear, the whining regarding "excess populating" (overpopulation) by asswipes like you, Ehrlich, and whatever lefty shits who you claim as representing the "LP" are obviously full of shit.
Since the early '70s, the population has approximately doubled and far, far, fewer folks are living in poverty or even close to starvation, now.
Stuff it up your ass, shitbag; your head wants company.
Anybody who warned of overpopulation has turned out to be an idiot.
Not at all. Any woman is free not to reproduce, through abstinence or contraception.
"...Asimov and the LP warned against excess populating..."
Which makes them and you full of shit.