Most Texans Want To Legalize Marijuana. Why Doesn't Greg Abbott Listen to Them?
The governor, like Republican politicians in other red states where support for legalization is surprisingly strong, does not seem to think it is risky to defy public opinion.

A new poll finds that 55 percent of Texas voters favor legalizing marijuana for recreational use. That's down a bit from the 60-percent support measured last spring, but it is still a pretty striking result in a state where Republicans outnumber Democrats, control the state legislature, and occupy all statewide elected offices.
As you might expect, there was a big partisan gap in support for legalization. The survey, which The Dallas Morning News conducted this month in collaboration with the University of Texas at Tyler, found that 65 percent of Democrats wanted to legalize recreational marijuana, compared to 63 percent of independents and 43 percent of Republicans. Forty-eight percent of Republicans opposed legalization, while 9 percent offered no opinion.
National polling finds similar differences. In the most recent Gallup poll, 68 percent of respondents favored legalization. That majority included 50 percent of Republicans, 71 percent of independents, and 83 percent of Democrats. An SSRS survey conducted in April found that 54 percent of Republicans thought recreational use should be legal, compared to 78 percent of Democrats and 74 percent of independents.
Current Texas law is far from the policies that most respondents in the Dallas Morning News poll said they support. Although 72 percent of respondents, including two-thirds of Republicans, thought medical use of marijuana should be legal, Texas allows patients access only to cannabis products with negligible THC. Possessing two ounces or less of marijuana is a Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail and a $2,000 fine. Selling more than seven grams (about a quarter of an ounce) is a felony punishable by up to two years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Penalties for cannabis concentrates are much more severe. Simple possession of less than a gram is subject to the same felony penalties as selling more than seven grams of flower. The penalties for possessing concentrates quickly escalate after the one-gram threshold is reached: The maximum is 10 years for one to four grams and 20 years for four to 400 grams. More than that triggers a 10-year mandatory minimum and a maximum sentence of life.
That draconian scheme can lead to absurdly punitive results, such as the 10-year mandatory minimum that a 19-year-old in Round Rock initially faced in 2014 after he was caught with a pound and a half of hash brownies and cookies. Because Texas counts "adulterants and dilutants" as part of a drug's weight, those THC treats qualified as more than 400 grams of concentrate.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican who is running for reelection this year, supports downgrading low-level marijuana possession to a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by no more than a $500 fine. But otherwise, he sees nothing wrong with the way Texas treats cannabis consumers and the people who supply them.
Texas is not the only red state where support for legalization is surprisingly strong. Recent surveys put support at 54 percent in Iowa, 58 percent in Louisiana, and 60 percent in North Carolina.
Last month in Missouri, where a legalization initiative will be on the ballot in November, a Survey USA poll found that 62 percent of registered voters thought recreational marijuana use should be legal. In Arkansas, where voters will consider a similar measure, a Talk Business & Politics/Hendrix College poll conducted in February found that 54 percent of likely voters thought marijuana should be "legal for adults," compared to 32 percent who said it should be legal only for medical use and 11 percent who thought it should not be legal at all. Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, a Republican who ran the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration from 2001 to 2003, opposes the legalization initiative and has urged law enforcement agencies to "stand firm" against it.
Two years ago in South Dakota, 54 percent of voters approved a constitutional amendment that would have legalized recreational marijuana. Last November, in response to a lawsuit backed by Republican Gov. Kristi Noem, the South Dakota Supreme Court overturned that initiative, concluding that it violated the state's "single subject" rule for constitutional amendments. Reformers are trying again this year.
On the face of it, politicians like Abbott, Hutchinson, and Noem are defying the will of the majority, which you might think would be risky. A Mason Dixon poll conducted the month before the South Dakota Supreme Court nixed recreational legalization found that just 39 percent of registered voters approved of the way Noem had handled marijuana policy, while 51 percent disapproved. But pro-legalization voters do not necessarily prioritize that issue.
The stark contrast between states like Texas and the growing number of states that have legalized marijuana could make the issue more salient to voters, since it underlines the injustice of arresting and incarcerating people for conduct that many jurisdictions do not consider a crime. The same vape cartridges that state-licensed pot stores sell in Denver, Albuquerque, and Las Vegas could earn you a prison sentence in Fort Worth. If more voters viewed that situation as an outrage instead of a fun fact, politicians like Abbott might pay more attention to public opinion.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
True libertarians support Republicans who like to lock people up for using unapproved chemicals.
Your tribe mate Jeffy doesn’t want to lock up people for recreational marijuana use, but he does think it’s immoral.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best (lap-54) assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
The biggest dummies are always the ones who think they’re smart.
Untrue libertarians support mandates to force people to put untested drugs into their bodies against their will.
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able to start working from home right away. (res-48) This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
After reading this article:>>> https://getjobshere34.pages.dev
Sullum's best writing is about marijuana, tobacco, vape and other drug policies.
Sullum's worst columns are the 100+ missives he wrote since 2016 trashing and demonizing Trump, who was America's most libertarian President since Cal Coolidge.
Had Trump legalized weed (i.e. removed it from Schedule 1 classification) when he was President (as I repeatedly urged him to do), he'd have been reelected in 2020 by a significant majority of electoral college votes.
Seems like the same Puritanical Republicans who want to ban abortions are the same ones who want to keep pot illegal. Unfortunately, many more open minded Republicans are afraid to upset the Puritans who control the GOP in most states and in Congress)
Great point. Reason and libertarians should just abandoned their principles and praised Trump's policies on trade, protectionism, and immigration.
Poor sarc….
Says one of the "Reason was mean to Trump" crybabies.
Aren’t you always whining that people make fun of you?
Sarc’s a broke ass hypocrite.
I worked part-time from my apartment and earned $30,030. After losing my previous business, I quickly became exhausted. Fortunately, I discovered this jobs online, and as a result, I was able to start earning money from home right away. Anyone can accomplish this elite career and increase their internet income by….
After reading this article:……>> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
Like Waffen Bush said: "He that is not with me is against me and he that scattereth not with me scattereth abroad." It therefore follows, as night follows day, that you either bully girls, jail brown folks/hippies and deport foreigners or you are a commie atheist Jesus-killer who hates the Gee-Oh-Pee!
Yeah, the Trumpsuckers here seem in a state of permanent shock that Reason and libertarian posters don't embrace or suck off Trump the way they do.
Trump has advocated for executing drug dealers.
True, but specifically for opiods, not pot. From ontheissues: Trump argued in 1990 that the only way to win the War on Drugs was to legalize drugs and use the tax revenue to fund drug education programs. As he put it, "You have to take the profit away from these drug czars." While on the campaign trail, President Trump was asked his view on state marijuana policy reform, and he consistently said it should be a states' rights decision.
Bush Daddy and Waffen Bush also demanded the death sentence for production and trade of plant leaf products
Exhibit 1: the kind of idiotic trivialization of politics that is destroying the nation.
You sure its the Republicans who want to keep weed illegal? Dems had control from 2008-2016 and did squat to change it.
Keep in mind, it still takes a 60 vote majority in the Senate to pass anything outside of fiscal matters. Even if the Democrats had the House, Senate, and White House, their hands are tied, unless they can get Republicans on board.
And also know that if Republicans are in charge of anything, by even the slightest, it must mean that they refuse to do anything because Democrats are always willing to compromise. See Trump administration voting record/media coverage. /s
Keep in mind, they didn't even try. Its one thing to lose the vote, but when you don't even try it tells me volumes about how serious you really are.
their hands are tied, unless they can get Republicans on board.
Remember when the ACA didn't become law because zero Republicans signed on.
I don't recall that at all.
Many Dems want to keep pot illegal as well, even though they'll dismiss the charges and let them go since George Floyd. Kamala prosecuted over 2000 people for pot, 1974 of which went to prison. She admitted she smoked pot while listening to Snoop Dog, which means she was smoking it while prosecuting people for using it.
Sullum failed to point out there are large constituencies to keep it illegal, such as all the police, judges, jails, prisons earning their living dealing with recreational drug users, and the social conservatives who believe in using government force to stop people from allegedly, possibly or actually harming themselves from whatever (just like liberals who want to enforce their morality on others - it's just the liberals and social conservatives have different ideas about what's immoral) .
Sullum also fails to point out that libertarians are against making drugs illegal simply because there's no victim, and the laws making drugs illegal also make the drugs and their use more dangerous. Libertarians believe in limiting government in only prosecuting those who initiate harm against others. Smoking pot doesn't qualify. In a free market (like before ~1910) a child could walk into a drug store and purchase some heroin, and heroin addiction was a smaller problem then than now.
In other words, are you sure The Kleptocracy isn't a single gang?
The Prohibition Party and Klan moved to the Gee-Oh-Pee in 1928. Until the LP came along in 1972, there was no growing spoiler vote pressure to repeal bad laws. Now that Grab Others' Pussy infiltrators have conveniently knocked all LP candidates off the Texas ballot, why should Trumpanzees worry about legalizing anything?
This would be news to all the Democrats that opposed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960's and were also Grand Wizards in the KKK, but don't let that stop you from spreading misinformation or anything.
Billy, how could you forget about Trump's executive order created Opioid Commission? Trump weaponized governmental healthcare units, {NIH & CMS}, and the DOJ's DEA when HE mandated the CDC's "Suggested Opioid Prescribing Dosage Guidelines for New Patients" as the maximum dosage for ALL patients.
Sullivan has written about this a few time, but no one seems to care that 50M chronically disabled Americans who suffer with Intractable Pain are being denied the FDA approved medications that have a proven history of successfully improving their quality of life. Trump's Opioid Commission mandates were immediately codified in 34 states with GOP controlled legislatures and 2 others with split legislatures. Those states that did not codify got some extra attention from the DOJ/DEA. Drs. who prescribed more than 90 MME to a patients were threatened and scores were arrested & prosecuted. The recent SCOTUS decision in Ruan & Kahn was unanimous - Government has no role playing Dr. or accusing Dr.s of crime for treating their patients appropriately.
Meanwhile, Trump's Opioid Commission has successful eliminated over 2M #ChronicPainPatients since it went into effect & it continues to kill approximately 1300/day, but no one cares - not the anti-mask/vax/abortion crowds crying about their rights while the 50M being denied treatment are stigmatized as being broke depressed lying dope fiends. I could go on & on, but what's the point. After all, torturing these Americans into becoming "Off-Label" guinea pigs for pharmaceutical experimentation benefits the majority. This is why we are able treat these guinea pigs like parolees, forcing them report in every month & take random drug tests.
Medicare spent over $365M on surgically implanted pain pumps because we can't trust seniors who have been using their medications appropriately for years. We created a whole suicide hotline while ignoring the DEA October '21' report that 85% of suicide attempts & successes are comprised of untreated/under-treated #ChronicPainPatients. Were spending more treating the side-effects that are created when Drs. deliberately ignore a patient's pain. As such, we've a drastic rise in heart-attacks & strokes, but who no one cares. Then we are spending more money on liver & kidney diseases thanks to NSAID pain relievers, but again who cares when we're seeing a rapid increase in in illegal drug overdose deaths among senior citizens search for some sort of pain relief, but again, no one cares.
>>pretty striking result in a state where Republicans outnumber Democrats
1990 called. didja know there are (R) in the Trial Lawyers Association now too? sneaky bastards.
43 percent of Republicans [support]. Forty-eight percent of Republicans opposed legalization, while 9 percent offered no opinion.
That answers the headline question. My question is why are 48% of Texas Republicans, big government cunts?
Because they believe in freedom and small government for "us" but big government for "those people".
Secretary of War Floyd sent 115,000 federal arms South and 44 cannon to Texas. Then on 02MAR1861 the federal tariff stipulated a minimum duty for distilled spirits. This was 2 days before Lincoln's inauguration. Texas seized Ft Brown, a Revenue cutter and arsenals at Galveston, but Carolina, AK, LA, GA, FL all set to seizing federal arsenals too. Next time Texas wants to be fustest with the mostest to help Trump take over the federal government even if he loses the popular vote a third time. Defeat is blamed on liquor, so pot too is banned.
First of all, it's not the governor's job to legalize drugs; the legislature has to do that.
Moreover, the US is a representative democracy, not a direct majoritarian democracy. That means that representatives use their best judgment and don't just blindly implement majority opinion.
So, why might elected representative choose to keep drugs illegal even though the majority favors drug legalization? It might be that they fear negative consequences of legalization that they would be held accountable for.
Republicans hate drugs as much as Democrats hate guns.
Puritans all the way down
Neither party has much use for liberty. They only argue over what they want to control.
Both the Democrats and the Republicans are coalitions of vastly different groups. Traditionally, Democrats attracted social liberals while Republicans attracted economic liberals.
These days, Democrats only attract authoritarians and totalitarians; liberals may not be the majority in the Republican party, but that's the only place they still hang out.
I feel the same way. Both parties get campaign cash from the police, courts, prisons that depend upon enough arrests and convictions to justify their budgets and jobs. Kamala sent nearly 2000 people to prison for pot, while she said she was smoking pot (she claimed she smoked while listening to Snoop Dog, who started his career after Kamala was a prosecutor). Trump campaigned on a state's right to decide their own pot policy, but social conservative Sessions nixed that contrary to his boss' promise. Meanwhile Biden hasn't kept his promise to decriminalize pot at the federal level, and fired a bunch of staffers for pot use, even when that use was in a legal state.
I think the Trump GOP is far more likely to move towards legalization than the Democrats.
All evidence supports that conclusion. And nothing could be more irritating than a competing party selling choice and freedom from coercion--bypassing the Statehouse and getting the Supreme Court to throw out girl-bullying and reinslavement! That 1972 LP platform was the biggest setback to girl-bullying since the Reconstruction Amendments!
Every sane person hates recreational drugs; the only question is whether they ought to be illegal (progressive approach) or whether we should let drug addicts die in the gutter (libertarian/conservative approach).
Unlike drugs, guns have beneficial effects on society, which is why they are protected by the Constitution.
There is a lot of evidence that drugs (alcohol is a drug and is included) have played a pretty major role in our development as a species. Guns have as well, but to blanketly state "Unlike drugs, guns have beneficial effects on society" is inaccurate.
Guns have only been around since about the 9th or 10th century, when Chinese alchemists were looking for a cure for indigestion in gunpowder, but accidentally discovered the volatile properties of gunpowder. The packed it into a piece of bamboo with wadding and a projectile and lo a gun was created.
The stoned ape theory posits that a burst in hominid intelligence development about 20,000 years ago could be attributed to our ancestors following herds of cattle for protection and food and eating the mushrooms that grew from their dung. Cave paintings from 30,000 years ago in French paleolithic caves shows shamanic figures ostensibly drinking alcohol out of horns.
All of this creative thinking (doing drugs) actually led to our ancestors realizing that we could harm one another with tools. No other primate species uses tools in warfare, just us. So without drugs, guns probably would have never been invented.
The truth is that guns and drugs together have been both destructive and beneficial to our development as a species, depending on how you look at it. We may not have won WWII without benzedrine, since a gun is only as good as the person firing it.
There is a lot of evidence that drugs (alcohol is a drug and is included) have played a pretty major role in our development as a species. Guns have as well, but to blanketly state "Unlike drugs, guns have beneficial effects on society" is inaccurate.
Lets see, alcohol and drugs have existed since before Human's were a thing and guns have existed for perhaps 600 years.
I think you're probably full of shit on this one.
Are you autistic? We're obviously talking here in the context of private usage in present day society. Yes, private consumption of recreational drugs is generally bad for people; private legal ownership of guns is generally good for people.
Smallpox and genocides also have played a pretty major role in our development as a species. That doesn't mean that it's a good idea to douse yourself in smallpox or go on a genocidal rampage.
"Unlike drugs, guns have beneficial effects on society"
Now do prohibition.
They see it as "tough love"
So simple, even a caveman can get it. But not Sullum.
Exactly. The Governor of TX has less power than most state chief execs as well
By design, the Lt. Governor of Texas has more power than the actual Governor. They still can't pass laws though.
Reason writers know very little about how any state operates, it would seem.
Why does Republican governor’s policies align with the Republican voter?
What?
mention Trump, the wall, back the blue, and stop the steal and the tards will vote for you no matter how much they disagree with you over weed.. priorities, priorities
What about Roe, CRT,
DIEDEI, BLM, climate, and pronouns? Oh my bad, the mirror-verse.That and have your moles infiltrate the LP, "forget" to pay the candidate fees like the Greens did in 2020, and get all the libertarian competitors conveniently tossed off the ballot. Q.E.D.
Maybe the reason they are willing to ignore them on this issue is because, while support for legalization is broad, it may be very shallow.
In other words, lots of people may be pro legalization, but it scores a 11 out of 10 on most important issues facing the country.
This. And the same is true for abortion.
Really? Women are going to vote for their enslavement?
"The stark contrast between states like Texas and the growing number of states that have legalized marijuana could make the issue more salient to voters..."
He's right about that. I'm actually completely opposed to the drug war and don't think there should be any such thing as an illegal drug, but when I consider the stark contrast between Texas and states like California and New York, it doesn't look good for the legalize states.
Many counties in Texas still ban alcohol!
You mean 5 counties out of 254 is 'many'?
'Several' would be a less loaded word one might think.
As a society becomes more socialistic/communistic, it always becomes less tolerant of drug use. Now what would happen if you were in China, Russia, or North Korea and the intel agency there, found a single stick on you? The ending would be horrific, as you would all agree.
China's fanatical prohibitionism was pretext for Opium Wars. Britain in 1837 pulled all capital out of the USA to arm for combat. It was China's 1903 boycott of US exports that gave TR pretext to sign 1906-1907 prohibition laws disguised as "pure food." Crash! Soon China collapsed into prohibitionist communism in 1911 with U.S. backing. The resulting glut kindled Balkan wars (among opium suppliers) and WW1 was the handiest way to delay ratification of the 1912 anti-drug convention. Coercion begets coercion.
Another possibility is that the private prison industry is a major campaign donor to Abbott and Texas legislators. (Not checked whether this is true, though.)
Campaign donations isn't where the money is in politics.
LOL, what? Another possibility is that aliens have taken over the government and are planning to use humans as fuel. (Not checked whether this is true, though.)
Private prisons are problematic for many reasons, and I support reducing their use, ideally to zero. But when it comes to political support, their spending is a drop in the bucket compared to public sector police and prison guards' unions. You can bet your ass those unions adamantly oppose any reforms that might lead to fewer people being arrested and locked up.
WTF? Libertarianism has degenerated into a mass of potheads thinking if only marijuana was legalized in every State and if everyone would just read Ayn Rand's bullsh*t we'd all live in Utopia. Libertarianism is no different today than the promised nonsense of Marxism or Fascism.
Nice straw man ya got there. It’s fun to attribute silly arguments to your opponents and grant yourself a sense of superiority on that basis.
Mystical altruism justifies the initiation of force by national socialists and international socialists. No libertarians or objectivists use the appeal to altruism to justify the violence of law.
The drug war is a jobs and wealth redistribution program for Republicans designed to funnel taxpayer cash back to Republican politicians. Resistance to legalization is exactly analogous to Democratic resistance to school choice. Follow the money and this should surprise nobody.
Yes. Awareness of how much money is moving in what directions tells us more about how laws are written than any other kind of evidence. But running a dedicated libertarian party with spoiler vote clout increasing 12% per annum--like we had from 1972-1980--messes up their actuarial math. The three-party problem moves the Kleptocracy to repeal just as legalized robbery and murder moves it to... well... rob and murder defenseless victims.
Republicans got Trojan horse moles inside the LP. All those infiltraitors had to do was observe that Green candidates in texas failed to pay registration fees and got kicked off the ballot. All the girl-bullying Mises machine had to do to get rid of the original Roe v Wade party was "forget" to pay those fees. Now God's Own Prohibitionists have no opposition but commie Dems who wholeheartedly support economy-wrecking asset forfeiture looting. Nothing to it.
Arggggg...Ideals are ideal when they are also pragmatic. Although I am not a fan of governance by polling data, the polls do show a changing attitude toward weed by the general populace which I think is a result of the general public actually being educated about weed. While the puritanical republicans, democrats, and yes libertarians fight and claw to defend their "ideals" the fact is that what we need is pragmatism from our elected officials and not adherence to strict principles that usually don't work, piss off most the populace, and erode away at our individual liberties.
So legalize weed already...
LOLweeeeeeeedduuuuuuuuuuuude.
Texas has enough issues without becoming a pot haven, too. After seeing the failure of the legalization crowd's promises in Colorado, better to keep things as they are and let weed states serve as containment zones for drug addicts.
So what? It isn't the governor's job to legalize pot. If Texas wants to legalize it the legislature needs to pass legislation.
Reason: That government is best which governs based on polling data.
Because of effed up gerrymandering in most states, Republicans only have to worry about being the "MOST" conservative choice so that they win their parties primary. They don't have to worry about the center. Same goes for Democrats. 60% of voters in the middle have no real representation.
Legalization of a drug is legislative function, independent of the Governor's preference.
That's true in theory, but not very meaningful in practice. Legislators are unlikely to jeopardize their own pet projects by publicly disagreeing with the governor. Even if a majority of legislators are willing to vote for legalization, that majority might not be veto-proof. (Some states require only a majority to override a veto, but others require a super majority.) While it's not quite as bad in most states as it is at the federal level, executive overreach is still a problem. Governors' effective power is often far greater than their official power, giving them lots of ways to fight legislation they don't like.
Of course Abbott can defy voters on marijuana legislation. For voters who support him, marijuana is probably a fairly low priority even if they support legalization. As long as he keeps on yelling about abortion and immigration, they're going to keep on voting for him. OTOH, I'm willing to bet that most people who do prioritize legalization would sooner punch themselves in the nuts than vote for Abbott.