Taxpayers Pay the Price for DeSantis' War on Disney
Florida's governor has declared a regulatory war on one of the state's biggest employers. But it's the taxpayers who may ultimately pay the price.

Ron DeSantis, Florida's Republican governor, has declared a regulatory war on one of the state's biggest employers. But it's taxpayers who may ultimately pay the price.
In March, DeSantis signed into law H.B. 1577, which described itself as "an act relating to parental rights in education." The bill limits discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity in public school instruction and authorizes parents to sue school districts that break the vaguely written rules.
Walt Disney Company CEO Bob Chapek initially tried to keep the company publicly neutral on the bill. But after it passed, Chapek and Disney, responding to pressure from the company's employees, both spoke out against H.B. 1577.
Irked by the criticism, DeSantis and Florida's Republican-controlled legislature took aim at the Reedy Creek Improvement District (RCID), which state lawmakers established in 1967 to give Disney substantial autonomy within the nearly 40 square miles it owns in Orange and Osceola counties. The special district allows Disney to control zoning, construction, infrastructure, emergency services, and taxation to pay for all of it.
While Florida has more than 1,800 special districts, Republicans targeted Disney by restricting the bill to districts established prior to 1968. DeSantis made it clear when he signed the bill that it was punishment for criticism of H.B. 1577. "You're a corporation in Burbank, California, and you're going to marshal your economic might to attack the parents of my state," he said. "We view that as a provocation, and we're going to fight back." The bill would dissolve the RCID and five other pre-1968 districts in 2023.
While DeSantis and other Florida Republicans seem to view the RCID as an undeserved privilege, it freed Orange and Osceola counties, along with their taxpayers, from responsibility for Disney's massive park. For instance, Disney pays the Orange County Sheriff's Office millions of dollars each year for policing services. Orange County Mayor Jerry L. Demings said it would be "catastrophic" for the county's budget if it had to pay for first-responder services in the park. DeSantis suggested in May that the state could take over the district.
The RCID also has $1 billion in bond debt. In an April statement to bondholders, Reedy Creek representatives said the district cannot be dissolved under Florida law unless those debts are paid off.
What happens next is not entirely clear, although an early attempt by a group of nearby taxpayers to sue DeSantis was dismissed due to lack of standing. Some First Amendment scholars suggested that Disney could challenge the law as a form of unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination. As of mid-May, Disney had not filed such a lawsuit.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "DeSantis vs. Disney."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Taxpayers Pay the Price for DeSantis' War on Disney
You mean taxpayers like Disney?
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra
money online visiting this site.> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
I’m being given 100-120$ greenbacks per-hr. to finish a few copy past task on my laptop. I even have definitely now no longer imagined like it might even feasible however my confidant buddy turned into receiving $30k simply in 4 weeks operating this clean opportunity & she has encouraged me to try.
.
For More Details:>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
Taxpayers Pay the Price for DeSantis' War on Disney
You mean taxpayers like Disney?
Rephrasing of the author position:
"I think that the people's representatives in government should be silenced and neutered when corporations become woke Political Action Committees. "
(And the same for shareholders, too. )
The reality is that Disney has enjoyed sweet deals in low taxes for years. Maybe they should pony up?
Management needs to manage, employees need to let it.
Well Disney will just transfer those higher costs to their customers....
Or not as apparently Disney is not responsible for the bonds anymore.
Anyway, tourists to Disney are paying for this.
Works for me.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (vsg-12) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
Sounds good.
Ok. Go woke, go broke.
Did you know #DeathSantis literally made it illegal for anyone in the state of Florida to say "GAY"?
If he's the GOP nominee in 2024 (since Drumpf is going to prison any day now) I guarantee the Koch-funded libertarians at Reason.com will vote for Biden in even larger numbers than they did in 2020. 🙂
#LibertariansForBiden
You are literally an idiot.
He's a satire account.
Granted it's hard to tell nowadays.
What with Jeff, shrike and Sqrlsy, Poe's Law is pretty much the rule here rather than the exception.
No, he's a MAGA-hat troll account. There's no humor or irony in anything that he posts. Just a whiney nationalist.
Projection.
Looks like he nailed you and your ilk pretty nicely.
Oh, my, “ilk”. Chuckle. I guess that does it, Joe.
Rich coming from one of Shrike's many sockpuppets.
So Kiddie Raper dusted off an old sock?
Go suck a Koch, OBL.
Your tears are delicious you pedo bitch.
The walls are closing in!
Impressive even for Scott.
Seven paragraphs of incorrect opinion and speculation of what happens next, then the one true fact; "What happens next is not entirely clear".
He omits the focus of the parental rights bill is K thru 5, young children.
He admits the special district bill technically affects all 1,800 plus special districts, then say it "targets" Disney. But only at the end of the paragraph does he mention in passing the other five special districts in the same category as Disney. And the bill does not directly dissolve Disney, or the other five. It identifies conditions that have to be legislatively corrected buy next year to bring the districts into constitutional compliance.
He strongly implies that somehow Disney will never again pay taxes, and other county taxpayers will have to assume all of the expenses. Trust me, Disney will be paying for Disney.
But other than that, a very nice article on why corporations should not get special privileges.
Test of the parental rights bill, "An act relating to parental rights in education"
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/1557/BillText/er/PDF
Text of the "Disney" bill; "A bill to be entitled
2 An act relating to independent special districts"
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022C/3C/BillText/Filed/PDF
"Seven paragraphs of incorrect opinion and speculation of what happens next, then the one true fact; "What happens next is not entirely clear"
It's his gift.
Text of the parental rights bill
Text of the "Disney" bill
This is why comments are important. A couple of short posts can neutralize an articles worth of gaslighting.
That last part is the biggest because it's such a blatant lie. Yes, the state would assume the bonds, but it also gets the taxes that the special districts would receive, which should balance out
The early line has Shackford favored to win today's Best Load of Crap on Reason.
That’s saying something these days. Given the overall line up of shit.
In his slim defense he did manage to not say "don't say gay" and does seem to have figured out that the "This is a 1A/property rights/taxes issue." argument, even if he's still wrong, is going to get more mileage than the previous "Whaddyamean pedophiles shouldn't be able to groom your children? Who are you parents to think you know what's better for your kids than the public school teachers?" argument.
The point, Longtobeenslavedbymygovernor, is that DeSantis targeted Disney because it's CEO criticized the state government and DeSantis and his lapdog legislators have no fucking idea how this will play out and didn't care. It was enacted in about 2 days and unlike normal legislation, and despite the fact that the ramifications of this are complex, featured no expert or public comment.
It's impossible to claim you are for freedom and then defend the governor for going ballistic and punishing a company because he didn't like what it's CEO said.
By the way, The Villgages, which is a retirement community favored by GOP politicians, including DeSantis, for speeches is a special district which is not getting that "privilege" yanked.
Disney screwed up by speaking out.
Yes they did. But screwing up doesn’t cancel your first amendment rights. DeSantis is being a statist thug.
...by treating them like all other businesses in the state?
...by removing a special privilege. We will see whether or not FL voters agree with DeSantis at the next gubernatorial election (Hint: 200K more Republicans in FL since DeSantis took office. Can I LOL about your statist thug comment now, or when he landslides?).
Sorry Joey, you progs have gone too far for too long. Now it’s going to get really fucking bad for you.
Yes, based on the headline I clicked expecting to see data. X taxpayers or Y cities or counties will be paying Z dollars for the services that Disney previously paid for.
I didn't see any data.
This article means nothing. Says nothing. Does Reason have an editor?
>defending the most evil corporation ingroomers.
>literally worse than the Dutch East India Company
OK groomer.
"But after it passed, Chapek and Disney, responding to pressure from the company's employees, both spoke out against H.B. 1577."
Because, apparently, the employees are incapable of speaking for themselves.
And Chapek is incapable of telling employees they are employees, not directors.
He should fire some of them, just to show them who’s boss.
Why is the default assumption that Disney isn't going to pay any taxes? Disney will just pay taxes to the state and county, instead of to itself.
Disney should actually pay more taxes than it does now.
Exactly. If Disney was going to pay less they wouldn't be fighting it.
Yeah, Shackford wants us to think everyone will be paying for services for Disney, except Disney.
OK groomer. Care to stop with the hissyfit and actually try to report honestly for once or should we expect nothing but identity politics from you?
Is Shackford gay?
Which Disney allowed a company politics dispute to drive them into unnecessarily commenting on Florida legislation. The most vocal employees were based in California, many of whom are in a department scheduled for relocation to Orlando. These employees, in part, were looking to throw a monkey wrench into that relocation and based opposition to it on the media's disinformation campaign about what the Florida bill actually did.
This is considerably more complicated than what is being presented here.
Scott doesn’t do nuance or complicated anymore.
For this argument to make sense, we have to assume there will be no property, sales, entertainment, or hotel taxes on the various Disney holdings, now or in the future.
That would mean that Florida just gave Disney a free ride into the future as punishment. Unlikely.
Scott's practicing a little journolismist technique popularly called "lying".
But I wonder what grade he got on his book report.
Good or bad tax payers always pay.
That's the key. The expenses will remain the same, the bill will remain the same, and people will pay just as much. There was no free ride before, and there is no expensive ride after.
Pedo mad!
Upcoming Disney production: Mean Tweets 2, The Rise of Death Santis
Floridamanbad.
if Florida Man is mad about his taxes he can vote for a new governor
A libertarian understands that pretty much every taxpayer and homeowner would be better off if we privatized services and didn’t force people to pay for them through taxation. That’s the benefit of liberty. Everybody else has to pay for the graft and corruption associated with government services.
Granting the benefits of liberty only to select, politically connected corporations while forcing everybody else for corrupt, inefficient government isn’t libertarian.
If Disney is forced to pay for the same lousy services as everybody else, they can throw their considerable political weight around to actually do something about it, instead of lobbying for sexual grooming in primary schools.
"instead of lobbying for sexual grooming in primary schools."
Jesus.
You’re pro child rape, so I’m sure you’re against DeSantis.
Corporations are people too, my friend.
And it is well established that people disagreeing with a law must pay a steep price for that disagreement. That's just science.
Shouldn't the author of this article be writing for VOX or CNN? Seriously, there's some industrial grade bullshit on offer here.
Or nambla
He needs to get ahold of Chemjeff. Jeffy is the new owner of NAMBLA.
If that's true, then wouldn't Disney want to dissolve the RCID? Why haven't they done it, if it would save them so many expenses and put that burden on Florida taxpayers?
While DeSantis and other Florida Republicans seem to view the RCID as an undeserved privilege, it freed Orange and Osceola counties, along with their taxpayers, from responsibility for Disney's massive park. For instance, Disney pays the Orange County Sheriff's Office millions of dollars each year for policing services. Orange County Mayor Jerry L. Demings said it would be "catastrophic" for the county's budget if it had to pay for first-responder services in the park. DeSantis suggested in May that the state could take over the district.
I'm trying to understand how this isn't a Win for Disney.
You seem to think disney will pay no taxes. The taxes will now be levied by a city council and or county and state. If I were them I would charge a $100 per person tax to go to disney. Parking fees, environmental fees, business taxes. And if disney tries to leave look at all the billions it leaves behind.
I can't see how Florida can lose.
Some First Amendment scholars suggested that Disney could challenge the law as a form of unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination.
This is me rubbing my hands together hoping that Disney tries this and Democrats back it.
I miss when tReason wasn't a shitty leftist rag.
I don't mind the lefty columns. I can read them, analyze them and recognize the leftist bullshit they're built on. There are plenty of more moderate and righty columns too. I don't want reason to just print articles that support my viewpoint, I want it to print all viewpoints and let me figure things out.
Only DeSantis would try to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs by fueling the state government with piles of money from tourists, who go to Disney resorts. What zoning board is going to oversee Cinderella's castle? This is not a normal place. Perhaps if Disney moves to South Carolina it will become a normal place again.
Maybe he values the kids of FL more than fueling state government with ill-gotten cash. Maybe he doesn't want to cede control of FL to CA liberal elites. Maybe his view is a little longer than the next fiscal year. Maybe he's actually a statesman, instead of merely a politician.
When disney decided to try and force Florida to maintain homosexual porn in school libraries the governor said no. Disney has since lost billions of dollars in value. Seems to me the people have spoken.
Get woke Go broke.
May disney and every other hate worshiping corporation go broke.
I'd prefer they wake up from their woke dream-world and just get back to providing entertainment and jobs. There are a lot of businesses I think have gone crazy and turned into liberal voiceboxes, I don't want them to fold, I want them to go sane and go back to doing what they should be doing.
This!
Beyond direct partisan politics, companies like Disney are drawing criticism for ruining their products.
There is a cottage industry of commentary complaining about the way that Disney has changed and the way they are treating their IP like Marvel and Star Wars. Disney's top executives have bent the knee and pledged that every show and movie they produce will have some LGBTQIA "representation". They have pledged to promote diversity and inclusion above all else.
This has resulted in the odd situation where Disney makes shows and movies staring their most valuable characters in which those characters are humiliated, subordinated and replaced in the name of equity and inclusion. It has resulted in the odd scenario of making a children's cartoon show that features a brochure-like moment where a trans-man offers his opinions on which feminine hygiene products he prefers.
These changes to their product has drawn some political praise and some political criticism. But they have drawn much more criticism from people who simply liked Disney entertainment and characters as they were and do not wish to see their favored source of entertainment wrecked and internally mocked. These critics are not politically motivated, but rather are fans of a Luke Skywalker who fights for good against evil, a Thor who is a powerful warrior who protects the defenseless, a Loki who is a malevolent and powerful villain turned hero who defeats even the most powerful foes....
Not a childish and irresponsibleLuke Skywalker who refuses to help and is easily bested by an untrained wanna-be Jedi who replaces him as the true hero
- not a feckless buffoon Thor who shirks responsivility,, blubbers away literally and metaphorically and is bested in every way by a tiny woman who supplants him only because she ticks diversity boxes....
Not an emasculated Loki who is replaced by a better and more powerful female version of himself and literally emasculated by being repeatedly beaten and kicked in the man-bits by various women for comedic effect.....
It isn't that Disney executives have a political point of view. It is that they have decided that entertainment value should be subservient to propaganda value. This choice has angered and offended a large chunk of their fan base not due to politics, but because it has robbed them of a favorite source of entertainment. It is the same phenomenon that would occur if the NBA were to suddenly declare that 50% of players must be women, and were to outlaw dunking in the interest of equity. Basketball fans would hate the product, not because they are opposed to women, but because they are fans of elite basketball athletic competition.
Corporations who fall for this pressure to subvert their product in the name of political messaging are eventually doomed to fail in a free society. Competition will eventually provide alternative outlets. The extent to which this does not happen will be a measure of how far we are from that perfect ideal of a free society.
Only a person who is a left-over Jim Jones Kool Aid drinker would have the kind of thought pattern. Disney is nothing but a bunch of Woke LGBTQ-whatever organization that is NO LONGER FAMILY FRIENDLY. Disney's days of being special has ended because they decided they wanted to be IDIOTS AND MORONS. But if you want to keep drinking the VOMIT the Woke MENTALLY SICK ARE SPEWING GO AHEAD AND DRINK IT IN. Remember TRUTH is NOT WHAT YOU MAKE OF IT. There are NO SHADES OF GRAY for TRUTH. As opposed to what this corrupt decadent sick twisted perverted society thinks there is but TWO GENDERS everything else is a mental sickness and those who ENABLE IT ARE JUST AS BAD AS THOSE WHO ENABLE ALCOHOLICS!
Irked by criticism?
Criticism?
Why do people have to be so utterly dishonest when discussing politics?
Disney did not "irk" by being "critical", they pledged to use their considerable resources to change Florida's government. Their pledge of action was explicitly partisan and political.
Now, there are claims to be made about political participation by corporations, but reason's version ain't it. This is an odd case, because Disney enjoyed a special protected status, and this action by the state removed that special protection. So the state is on much firmer ground than critics pretend.
But it is the other side of the argument where things get really tangled. This article argues that we are talking about political speech by a corporation. This article argues that this is something that cannot and should not be even indirectly implicated in any state action. Someone should tell that to the folks who want Citizens United overturned and who claim that corporations are not people and have no right to political participation of any kind.
Interestingly, for the most part, these are the exact same people. Like every issue of the left, it is "whose side benefits?" that is despositive in the analysis. Corporations like Disney (which includes movies, TV and streaming chanels, ABC news , ESPN and other speech products) have every right to get involved in any political decision they see fit, including explicitly partisan actions. Including direct contributions to parties and candidates. Including in-kind contributions. Including direct and indirect cooperation and coordination with candidates and parties.
But should other corporations, small groups of individuals, or individuals seek to weigh in on the other side of an issue, the full weight of the government and party controlled corporations may be used against them without repercussion. Not just the private actions of individuals choosing to associate or not, but corporations who provide broad public services leveraging rheir power not just against parties or politicians, but also against anyone who will not toe the party line in support of the party.
This kind of direct entanglement of government, party, and corporations has a name. It is not a pretty name.
So it looks like Shackford's beat is to be so triggered by the Florida parental rights bill that he turns his beat into Florida-man Derangement Syndrome?
So Roe broke ENB, and anti-grooming broke Shackford?
Reason writers either want to kill kids, or fuck them.
Just all the tourists to Disney pay for this, never fair.
"But it's the taxpayers who may ultimately pay the price.
Let me know when that happens, until then it is pure political partisan speculation.
Also taxpayer have been paying the bills for Disney for years as Disney got special treatment in their special district. That does need to end, Disney needs to pay the same taxes as every other business. In the long end I guess the change will be either a wash or tax payer benefit.