Jurassic World Dominion Is a Sad, Desperate Nostalgia Trip
The original Jurassic Park is the best summer movie ever. The latest sequel just wants to remind you the original exists.

Let's settle this debate right now: There is no greater summer movie than the original Jurassic Park.
When I say summer movie, I'm not just talking about any movie released between May and August. I'm talking about big-budget, high-concept, special effects–driven, almost ridelike movie experiences. In 1993, Steven Spielberg's dino-terror adventure set the standard for all past and present warm-weather popcorn blockbusters. And while there have been more than a few top-notch entries in the summer movie canon since, Jurassic Park has never been surpassed.
In part, that's due to the era in which it was released. Spielberg, then in his mid-40s, was at a pivot point in his career, transitioning from populist entertainer to Hollywood eminence. Moviemaking technology, too, was changing: Jurassic Park is justifiably celebrated for its groundbreaking digital effects, but a majority of the dinosaur shots in the film were created using old-school physical effects—props and puppets rather than pixels. Spielberg used those effects not just to generate awe at the movie's special effects, but at the idea that dinosaurs could walk the earth.
But it's also a result of flawless execution. The cast is appealing, and the characters are just distinct enough. The script is a simple but effective clockwork that winds up the tension for an hour, setting elaborate traps for its characters, and then unleashes theme park hell. It's perfectly paced at just over two hours long, and there's a heart-stopping mid-movie Tyrannosaurus rex attack with a slew of seared-on-your-eyelids images moviegoers still recognize today.
Jurassic Park is, at this point, practically the definitional summer movie. When someone talks about wanting to go see a summer popcorn movie, what they are really talking about is wanting to go see Jurassic Park. And when studios release big summer tentpoles, there is almost always a sense in which what they are really hoping to do is release another Jurassic Park.
And so, in the ensuing three decades, Hollywood has given viewers multiple additional opportunities to see Jurassic Park. First there was The Lost World, Spielberg's more mean-spirited, blackly comic immediate sequel, and then there was the inevitable whiff of a follow-up in Joe Johnston's Jurassic Park III. Starting in 2015, the series returned with Jurassic World, a competent if gratingly manipulative nostalgia play, and Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, an odd if often effective detour into more overt monster movie territory.
None of these sequels came anywhere close to capturing the thrills of the original, but there was always something enjoyable about them, no matter how perfunctory they seemed. Sadly, the same cannot be said for the latest installment, Jurassic World Dominion. It's a desultory slog, overlong and underdeveloped, with a convoluted, deeply stupid story that renders old characters dull and does nothing for the new characters it introduces.
There are some potentially interesting ideas here about the expansion of dinosaur technology into the ordinary world—dinos in the wild, black markets for illegal dinosaur sales, even trained laser-guided attack dinosaurs (really)—but none of them come together. The story vaguely gestures at geopolitical relevance with go-nowhere plot points about animal liberation and genetically engineered crops; this is apparently a world with dinosaurs, but without Golden Rice.
Billed as a capstone to the franchise, in which all the franchise's threads finally come together, Dominion instead spends most of its nearly two-and-a-half-hour running time in search of a reason to exist. It never finds one.
And so it falls back on desperate, empty nostalgia instead, with returning cast members, including Laura Dern and Sam Neill as the scientist heroes of the original film, plus myriad shots and sequences that play less like nods to the original than like tired remakes. There's a late-film T. rex attack that all but replicates the iconic encounter from the original, all but begging audiences to cheer for moments calibrated to remind them of the far superior source material.
Notably, Dominion's nostalgia trips point almost exclusively to the first film in the franchise. It has no identity of its own, no reason for existing, so it settles for reminding viewers that Jurassic Park existed. On that point, at least, I find myself nodding along. Jurassic Park does exist, and it's a much better movie. With summer upon us, your best bet is to just watch the original instead.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I hate hollywood keeps doing this. It is boring and predicitable and never as good as the orginial. It is basically new coke, nobody wants it. An admission your new movie sucks so here is a look back at how great the original was.
Hollywood is incapable of originality. If they didn’t buy the rights to a book, then they have to make up the script from pieces of older movies. And sometimes just take the older scripts in their entirety and simply recast them for the latest political statement.
There are some good Hollywood writers, but they are rare and unappreciated. They tend to go to productions where they are appreciated, not “blockbuster” movies.
I’ve made so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. (res-50) It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do.
.
For more details visit:>>> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
haven’t seen any of the Chris Pratt ones. I assume they’ll all run on TNT one rainy Sunday in the near future
All you need to know about the Chris Pratt JPs is that all you need to do to stop a charging dinosaur is to hold out your hand and stare. You can see every one of those scenes in the preview, so no need to actually go see the movie.
Unless you like Bryce Dallas Howard…..
the Carl’s JR commercials help.
First one was ok, second one sucked
Predator
Aliens
The Last Starfighter.
Look, Jurassic Park is good, real good. But it comes at the end of the golden age of genre cinema. There is tons of very real competition from the preceding 15 years.
And Jaws. It has that special summer element of beaches and swimming.
Agreed. Jaws.
And like Jurassic Park, they should’ve stopped with the original.
Last Starfighter is fucking spectacular to this day.
I’ll throw Lost Boys on the pile.
Last Starfighter is amazing! In my top ten all time favorite films to watch. That an Iron Eagle are two movies from the 80s that I can watch over and over and enjoy.
I’d add Terminator 2 and maybe True Lies to the list.
There was a good 20 year run from the late’70’s to the mid 90’s where movies were fucking great.
For a while I was wondering if it was just age and nostalgia – old people always think the days of their youth are the best – but no, genuinely great cinema (even if sequels were still all too often cash-grabs – though stuff like T2 and Aliens were great in their own rights).
Of course, it came out alongside a lot of forgettable dreck. And that’s the problem – no one wants to take a risk anymore. 95% of everything is shit (even in the 80’s) and if you’re not throwing a lot of stuff at the wall to see what sticks then you’re not going to get a lot that sticks.
Ah, T2 is good one.
I’ll add T2 to ID4. I was too young to catch T2 in theaters though
Jaws. Alien. Suderman is a hipster hack, but he likes spielberg and cgi dinosaurs in his family-friendly schlock.
Michael Keaton Batman owned 1989
Star Wars
Raiders of the Lost Ark
None of those movies come even close to the impact that Jurassic Park had during that summer. JP was in theaters for months and months and months in my city because people kept going back to see it. While I love all the movies that were listed above (and many of them I like more than JP), none of them had that kind of a run.
This says more about the marketing, the economy and the population than the quality of the movie. The movie itself told a mediocre, hackneyed and predictable story w/ good cgi dinosaurs. People seeing movies multiple times is not an indicator, if it were, Star Wars would beat JP hands down, so would Rocky Horror Picture Show.
Independence Day ftw
First there was The Lost World, Spielberg’s more mean-spirited, blackly comic immediate sequel, and then there was the inevitable whiff of a follow-up in Joe Johnston’s Jurassic Park III.
I question not just the perceptiveness but the very humanity of anyone who puts down JP III in favor of The Lost World, which is easily and by far the worst sequel in the series and one of the worst of all time.
The Michael Crichton books were so much better. Less Disney amusement park ride and more sheer terror.
I woke up one morning to an earthquake after reading Lost World and I was sure the building was being attacked by a T-Rex.
I don’t think I was ever disappointed by a Chrichton book…except maybe Timeline. They all had that edgy blend of science fiction easily blended into reality, that made them easy to relate to and hard to put down. Whereas Dune (one of my favorite novels) continues to take weeks for me to get through, every one of Chrichton’s books took 3 – 4 days tops, because he was so good at writing.
Michael Crichton books were so much better…Lost World.
The Lost World was so bad compared to his other books including JP I assume it was ghostwritten.