Texas Can't Start Enforcing Social Media Law, Says SCOTUS
Plus: Who's bringing fentanyl across the border? Will Austin become a sanctuary city for abortion? And more...

The Supreme Court has temporarily blocked enforcement of a Texas tech law. The law treats large social media platforms like common carriers and prohibits them from making independent decisions about content moderation.
Specifically, the law bans large tech companies from viewpoint-based blocking, restricting, or editorializing about social media content—a purview large enough to prevent platforms from moderating even the types of content that few would object to a private company limiting. It also requires them to set up an appeal system for users whose content is removed.
The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas held last December that the Texas social media law was unconstitutional. But the law recently scored a win with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which in May issued a stay on the district court's decision.
That meant Texas was free to start enforcing the law.
In response, tech industry groups NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) asked the Supreme Court to intervene and vacate the 5th Circuit's stay.
And now it has, in a 5-4 decision issued Tuesday.
The majority—a conservative-liberal mix that included Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—did not offer reasoning for their ruling.
A dissent penned by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, can be found here. Justice Elena Kagan also dissented.
To be clear, the headline here is *not* the dissent; it's that Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kavanaugh, and Justice Barrett *all* voted to block HB20.
That's a pretty powerful sign of where #SCOTUS is heading on this case—and issue—even if the dissent's analysis is … alarming. https://t.co/3BN1t9KO3C
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) May 31, 2022
SCOTUS' decision means that Texas cannot start trying to treat large internet platforms like common carriers while the case plays out. But the 5th Circuit is still mulling the merits of the NetChoice and CCIA case against the law.
FREE MINDS
Data on fentanyl seizures at the Southern border challenges the conservative narrative:
NEW! I cataloged every CBP press release and official Twitter post about fentanyl seizures at the southern border over the last 6 months. The data makes it crystal clear—it's not migrants.
Only TWO publicly-reported seizures were linked to people crossing between ports of entry. pic.twitter.com/eBM9oJn8Rw
— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@ReichlinMelnick) May 31, 2022
FREE MARKETS
Will the city of Austin defy a potential Texas law criminalizing abortion? The state law—which makes it a felony to perform an abortion—will go into effect if Roe v. Wade is overturned. Some believe the law's language is loose enough that it would criminalize not just abortion doctors but women who try to self-induce an abortion with medication. But in Austin, "Councilmember Chito Vela is proposing a resolution that would direct the city's police department to make criminal enforcement, arrest and investigation of abortions its lowest priority and restrict city funds and city staff from being used to investigate, catalogue or report suspected abortions," notes Politico.
"This is not an academic conversation," Vela told Politico. "This is a very real conversation where people's lives could be destroyed by these criminal prosecutions. In Texas, you're an adult at 17. We are looking at the prospect of a 17-year-old girl who has an unplanned pregnancy and is seeking an abortion [being] subjected to first-degree felony charges — up to 99 years in jail — and that's just absolutely unacceptable."
FOLLOWUP
• News that the Uvalde, Texas, shooter entered Robb Elementary School through a door a teacher left propped open turns out to be false. Video footage shows the teacher shutting the door, which was supposed to lock automatically when closed but for some reason did not.
• "The Uvalde Police Department and the Uvalde Independent School District police force are no longer cooperating with the Texas Department of Public Safety's investigation into the massacre at Robb Elementary School and the state's review of the law enforcement response," reports ABC News.
• The first funerals for victims of the Uvalde shooting were held on Tuesday for 10-year-old Amerie Joe Garza and for Ellie Garcia, who would have turned 10 on Saturday. "This week alone there will be 11 funerals," The Texas Tribune reports.
QUICK HITS
• The Department of Justice is appealing the court ruling ending the federal mask mandate on airplanes and other transit.
• A new Gallup poll on economic confidence finds "the lowest reading in Gallup's trend during the coronavirus pandemic, and likely the lowest confidence has been since the tail end of the Great Recession in early 2009."
• "The good news is that there are some promising technical solutions for making plastics infinitely recyclable on the horizon," writes Reason's Ron Bailey in response to a recent Atlantic article that said plastics recycling will never work so single-use plastics should be banned.
• Are Democrats souring on Sen. Amy Klobuchar's (D–Minn.) antitrust bill?
• A reminder that J.D. Vance wants to ban porn.
• What?
A California appeals court has ruled that bees are "fish" for purposes of the state's endangered species act. While "commonly understood" that a fish "lives in aquatic environments," "terrestrial invertebrate[s]," including bumble bees, qualify legally. https://t.co/X1ShOKFYYQ pic.twitter.com/Htr8OfKjAO
— Ajit Pai (@AjitPai) May 31, 2022
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The Supreme Court has temporarily blocked enforcement of a Texas tech law.
Kagan knows not to mess with Texas!
I even have made $30,180 only in 30 days straightforwardly working a few easy tasks through my PC. Just when I have lost my office position, (res-40) I was so perturbed but at last I’ve found this simple on-line employment & this way I could collect thousands simply from home. Any individual can try this best job and get more money online going this article….
.
>>>>>>> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
Based on the proclivity of law enforcement there to cower in the face of a lone gunman, I doubt she fears anything having to do with Texas
Only TWO publicly-reported seizures were linked to people crossing between ports of entry.
IF IT SAVES BUT ONE LIFE
lets ignore the others on teh list which include pedestrians trucks and vehicles. Are pedestrians not people and are the vehicles not controlled by people, this is plain stupid. And this list only includes those by border patrol not those captured latter within cities that are directly traced back to illegal migrants.
If you're crossing at a port of entry - which you would need to do because you're not getting a truck across the desert - then you're not an illegal immigrant.
Which is what the post was about.
Actually, in modern infantile US politics, if it just FEELS like it might save one life then we have a mandate to enforce any draconian policy.
But in Austin, "Councilmember Chito Vela is proposing a resolution that would direct the city's police department to make criminal enforcement, arrest and investigation of abortions its lowest priority ..."
As long as they get to keep prioritizing their ultimate of low hanging fruit: drug arrests.
Odd, given that the Texas law has no criminal penalties involved in the first place.
I don't find it odd that BLITHERING IDIOTS have to puzzle over the implications of a VERY simple fact: If you are found liable in a CIVIL proceeding in the courts of Government Almighty, and you say "fuck off" to the jury and-or judge's findings and penalties, the cops of Government Almighty will STILL be given the tasks of finding you, and then beating you up, taking your shit, shooting you, etc.!
"fuck off" to the jury and-or judge's findings and penalties, the cops of Government Almighty will STILL be given the tasks of finding you, and then beating you up, taking your shit, shooting you, etc.!
I believe that is incorrect. I believe that in civil findings between private parties, once the ruling is made, it is up to the plaintiff in the case to collect any settlement. The cops don't get involved. Because it is a civil matter.
To wit:
Holy cow...SQRSLY is STILL responding to me? Been blocked for months and, clearly, I've not missed much
As much as I like SQRSLY like the back-room sprog you don't let out when company's over, you can't just dial 911 and tell the cops "my neighbor owes me money" and get their door kicked in. If your neighbor owes you money, that's between you and your neighbor. It's a civil matter.
See Gawker going bankrupt... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollea_v._Gawker
The end of the story is STILL that Government Almighty forcibly takes your shit away from you! Otherwise, why did Gawker roll over, pay up, play dead, and go bankrupt?
https://www.peoples-law.org/can-state-take-my-stuff-seizure-and-civil-forfeiture-property
What is Civil Forfeiture?
Civil forfeiture is a process where a court transfers ownership of property to the federal, state, or local government. It is a civil action the government brings against the property itself, and not against the owner of the property. Forfeiture is independent of any criminal proceedings, and is not a form of punishment. While it is generally used for enforcement of drug laws, civil forfeiture may apply to all types of property, such as real property, vehicles, equipment, and accessories.
SQRLSY back now... So Government Almighty, as the result of "CIVIL" actions, can take ALL of my shit if they want to! So far, we just need to be thankful to Government Almighty that, unlike the Grinch, they do NOT take our LAST can of "Who Hash", and make us starve to death! Property is life, people!!!
My cousin represented himself before the state Supreme Court and won a judgement against an incorporated city. The city, a very financially stable one, told him to fuck off, they weren't going to pay him anything. In order to collect, he would have had to start all over again at the lowest level courts while the city's attorneys would have drug the whole thing out with infinite numbers of filing and delays. He never saw a penny out of them. We have a wonderful court system here where no mechanism to enforce judgements against the losers being baked into the judgements.
"...won a judgement against an incorporated city." A part of Government Almighty! Government Almighty agencies can tell the peons to "fuck off", if they feel like it. Peons, even large corporations or companies of peons, may NOT tell the courts and their verdicts to fuck off, so long as they have ANY money left! See See Gawker going bankrupt... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollea_v._Gawker
"the Texas law has no criminal penalties involved"
The uncharitable view would be that Councilmember Chito Vela is simply virtue signaling.
Odd how ENB never mentioned that.
You'll find this difficult to believe, given the virtue-signaling, but Vela is a progressive.
Only TWO publicly-reported seizures were linked to people crossing between ports of entry.
So it’s mostly robots carrying drugs?
Robots with calves the size of cantaloupes.
News that the Uvalde, Texas, shooter-
whose name we shall not mention
-entered Robb Elementary School through a door a teacher left propped open turns out to be false.
So where does this leave us on the single-entry proposals? Reinforced or rightwing distraction?
For one thing, pretty useless in California, where most schools have park-like campuses with numerous separate buildings, all maybe surrounded by a chain-link fence. Lots of other states with moderate weather probably have the same.
So I guess those schools get stuff stolen out of them every night because the doors aren’t locked?
So I guess you want children to die.
Yup, pretty much. I also hate Canadians.
Hell, our middle school is that way and it rains nearly nonstop during school season. Each class has an 'inside' entry (through the pod), an 'outside' entry, AND an adjoining class door (typically locked but not always).
So why was the door locked when police arrive?
I think the locked door referred to was only on the classroom itself. Hence, the "barricade" reported on the news was just a locked door. They certainly don't make barricades like they used to.
And they didn't even attempt to get the key, because they thought it was a barricaded suspect situation. Only government could fail so spectacularly.
The Uvalde Police Department and the Uvalde Independent School District police force are no longer cooperating with the Texas Department of Public Safety's investigation...
They know you never talk to cops.
I don’t understand what that means and they don’t really say in the article. Don’t think the Rangers need you to cooperate, case in point they raided the County Judge of Harris county’s offices and charged three of her employees. Don’t recon they asked for cooperation prior to that action.
"This week alone there will be 11 funerals," The Texas Tribune reports.
They're telling you up front because by Thursday there will be some big thing else to take media center stage.
The Department of Justice is appealing the court ruling ending the federal mask mandate on airplanes and other transit.
They're really hoping to doom congressional dems.
Because it’s been 5 weeks and everyone is dead that flew in an airplane since the mandate was dropped?
It's pretty apparent that there aren't many repeat flyers. After the first batch died 3 weeks ago, there are still millions of morons lining up to breathe in the black death every day.
Unsurprisingly, the 'seasonality theorists' were correct again that nothing that we (or don't do) can stop the springtime lull in covid.
'Luckily', the sunbelt summer surge is right around the corner.
Cunts have nothing better to do? They should all be fired.
"A reminder that J.D. Vance wants to ban porn."
The HuffPo piece you linked to does not remotely provide any evidence of that. The linked article from it also avoids any quotes from him about it.
So, I need some proof. You, as usual, failed to provide.
They provided a link and direct quotes from Vance! What do YOU want, paranoid crybaby, do you expect the Reason writers to send Vance over to you in your mom's basement, and YELL his (Vance's stances) authoritarian bullshit in your ears, before you will believe that Vance has said what he's said? No! Just like the blithering idiot you are, you will believe whatever you want to believe, despite ALL the evidence that the world can offer you! Christ on a cracker!
No, damikesc is right here, the article does not provide a DIRECT quote from Vance saying "I want to ban porn". The article has a statement from Vance's interviewer that Vance said he wants to ban pornography. And if you read the Crisis Magazine article, the interviewer here is clearly sympathetic to Vance's overall policies. So I am not sure why damikesc thinks we should not believe this claim.
You just described what you were doing yesterday.
You mean, going to the source material to see what was actually said and reported, instead of creating politically motivated strawmen? Why yes, I think I am doing that here as well.
No, ignoring what is generally already known for rhetorical purposes.
And you were also pulling yesterday the trick you did just now. Rewording and twisting a statement to mean something else, and then arguing for or against your restatement.
That would be standard, not at all radical sophistry.
Chemjeff Cookie-cutter Marxist sounds about right.
Or just go with Lying Jeffy.
Aaand, here we go again from you. Congratulations on changing the subject away from Vance and pornography, and now trying to make it entirely about me. That is what trolls do. USE a topic of discussion as a basis for launching personal attacks. Both you and Jesse make this place infinitely worse through your trolling. Just fuck off. I'm tired of your bullshit.
You should bark at him to get the discussion back on track.
You fuck off, you paid troll. The value a fifty-center like you contributes to discussion here is less than zero.
You're not even a libertarian, the only positions you advocate are whatever talking-points popped up on your daily pdf from your boss (usually antithetical to libertarianism), and the rest of the time you run cover for the Democratic Party.
Just fuck off. I know that I speak for everyone here when I say that we're all disgusted by your bullshit. Everyone hates you. You're a troll that nobody wants here.
You mean like when you are given primary sourced material from people like Rufo on CRT being used in schools?
So you have no actual evidence? But you take an uncited reporter at his word when you agree with it? Yet you dismissed Biden's words yesterday and polls on gun control as well. Very odd behavior.
Everything he says is dishonest. He can be defined by the words "bad faith".
"Yip yip yip" goes ML the attack poodle
Why do you think this is clever?
He’s trying to recreate Dee’s squawking.
jeffy is an Alinsky radical. His favorite fallacy is the "Motte and Bailey", i.e. make whatever claim you want, when called out, assert "that's not the point, this is". When people who have witnessed his dishonest discourse for years point this out, he whines that he is the one being trolled, i.e., "you are making this personal to discredit my argument".
jeffy forces it to be personal. He is never honest, although sometimes he pretends to the truth as a distraction. That is exactly what he is doing in this thread.
Also see: JFree, DOL, sarcasmic. White Mike and Joe Friday attempt it, but are just too dumb to pull it off (fire extinguishers and bear spray, LOL!).
He drove the "we are just trying to teach about the history of slavery" Motte/Bailey into the ground during CRT debates. It is one of his favorite moves.
If not for direct gaslighting, the motte/bailey, and eviscerating strawmen, he wouldn't have much to post here.
A sympathetic reporter claimed that Vance wanted to ban pornography. And if you read my comments carefully - I know you can, if you try - I never claimed that it was an undisputed fact that he wants to ban pornography. Only that a reasonable case can be made that he does. So ENB is wrong here for flatly stating as fact that Vance wants to ban pornography, that has not (yet) been concretely established.
And how did I arrive at this conclusion? I went to the source material and looked at what was actually said and what was actually reported. You know, using empirical evidence. Which is exactly what I did with Biden and his statement about 9mm ammunition. Biden never stated he wanted to ban all handguns in his comments on Monday. In both cases I used the empirical evidence at hand, and I didn't substitute it for what I might have pretended that they said so that I could bash them.
And from a purely selfish perspective, sure, I would have LOVED it if Vance had actually directly said "I want to ban pornography". Because I already think Vance is a kook and a nut who doesn't belong anywhere near the levers of power and I am more than happy to have one more reason to demonstrate why he does not belong in the Senate. But he didn't actually directly say that, did he? When damikesc pointed that out, what was my response? I AGREED WITH HIM, didn't I Jesse? Hmm? Don't I deserve a little bit of credit for that?
Oh wait, no, you will never give me credit for anything because you are a dishonest attack dog. To give me credit for anything would be to actually entertain the possibility of having a discussion with me. You don't do that. You just attack attack attack. Acts of good faith on my part are met with snarls and attacks from you. One does not reason with a junkyard dog. You make this place worse with each comment that you post here.
No he didn't, ML has the quotes below. It doesn't discuss banning anything. It talks about the apparent harm.
Again, you are doing what you claimed people were doing over Biden's 9mm comments even those are more directly in line with what people claimed Biden was saying. The fact the WH had to go out of its way to say Biden wasn't claiming he was going to ban handguns is much more positive of the interpretation you said was in bad faith than the one you are making in bad faith now.
Being a complete hypocrite is just one of the many ways Lying Jeffy is dishonest.
I gave you a direct quote from Biden last night and you tried to explain it away as him just wanting to ban assault weapons. Then when I pointed out he literally said 9mm pistol you tried to conflate it with high capacity stuff.
As far as I can see, there is no direct quote of Vance saying he wants to ban porn. If one surfaces, then he can fuck right off too.
This is what I would like an answer to. He twisted and tried to land a praiseworthy mental gymnastics move saying Biden of course wasn't talking about 9mm HANDGUNS and somehow despite in that same statement demonizing 9mm rounds and complaining about them, he couldnt possible have been talking about banning the most common method, by far, of using a 9mm round: the common handgun.
When presented with the prior quote of biden specifically saying 9mm pistols needed a ban, he completely disappeared from the conversation.
Extremely similar to when he would be presented with a plethora of examples of CRT being both indirectly (praxis) and directly (cited from the NEA documents) implemented, after claiming they weren't, and then completely disappearing only to appear in the next days comment thread with the same repeat gaslighting.
So what is it Jeffy? You accused me of copy pasting the fox news take on this, and now have nothing to say for yourself when given evidence he likely was talking about handguns. Where did you disappear to?
"So I am not sure why damikesc thinks we should not believe this claim."
Because the writer had few problems providing other quotes...but a quote that he supported BANNING porn was not provided.
I'll say porn is likely a negative thing overall but I have zero desire to attempt to ban it.
It’s telling who Lying Jeffy gives the benefit of the doubt, vs. those he doesn’t.
I remember only the absolute worst bad faith takes of any Trump statement from him, while he is currently willing to give Biden 5 mulligans to get it right.
But he definitely is an independent, individualist, libertarian. Not a collectivist, white-apologizing liberal hack.
"They provided a link and direct quotes from Vance! What do YOU want"
These quotes?
“and we know that at least one cause of this is that we have allowed, under the banner of libertarianism, pornography to seep even into our youngest minds through the channels of the internet.”
“Again, we made a political choice that the freedom to consume pornography was more important than the public goods, like marriage and family and happiness,” he continued. “We can’t ignore the fact that we made that choice and we shouldn’t shy away from the fact that we can make new choices in the future.”
Fretting about pornography's effect on families and children isn't the same thing as calling for porn to be banned.
Like Vance on porn, I think tobacco, marijuana, alcohol and cocaine's effects are mostly harmful when used recreationally. But I also don't think that they should be banned.
As usual, Sqrlsy and ENB didn't read the associated linked article.
This is like saying, "I think that we'd all be INFINITELY FAR better off if Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer was DEAD", and then saying, "But no one should kill her, you misinterpreted what I was saying! I never called for her to be killed!"
Weasel-words straight from the Lying Evil One, is what we're looking at, here!
"This is like saying"
It's not, but keep posting spam. I hope you understand, whatever side you support is worse off the more you post stuff like this.
This is like saying that whatever I don't like, even if it is true, MUST be SPAM! Like idiots say! Don't tell me the facts if I don't like them!
As an additional tip, I should let you know that while I am sure you are continually using all caps words in all of your posts as a way to add emphasis, it just makes you look like you're a screaming lunatic. Maybe try and use bold and italics instead.
Ask me if I give a shit! 90% or so of the posters here are brain-dead fanatics who will never change their minds about anything anyway! I save my detailed writings (with MANY links, WAY beyond the measly TWO allowed per-post here) for persons capable of reading and honest thinking. See the 2 links at the end of the below.
I for one can’t STAND the idea that a casual reader here of a libertarian news and commenting site would read the vapid and vile comments, and conclude, “Oh, so THAT’s what libertarians are all about!” No, it’s just that libertarians (and VERY few others) still believe in free speech, so the troglodytes come HERE, where their vile lies & vapid insults will NOT be taken down!
The intelligent, well-informed, and benevolent members of tribes have ALWAYS been resented by those who are made to look relatively worse (often FAR worse), as compared to the advanced ones. Especially when the advanced ones denigrate tribalism. The advanced ones DARE to openly mock “MY Tribe’s lies leading to violence against your tribe GOOD! Your tribe’s lies leading to violence against MY Tribe BAD! VERY bad!” And then that’s when the Jesus-killers, Mahatma Gandhi-killers, Martin Luther King Jr.-killers, etc., unsheath their long knives!
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
Yup, screaming lunatic.
Also sprach die (thus spoke the) Jesus-killer (Mahatma Gandhi-killer, Martin Luther King Jr.-killer, etc.)... MASSIVE projection going on here!
Yup, screaming lunatic.
Did you hit your head? That post was even more retarded than usual.
"...the lowest reading in Gallup's trend during the coronavirus pandemic, and likely the lowest confidence has been since the tail end of the Great Recession in early 2009."
To be fair, poll respondents are well aware we're heading into another recession.
https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1531994813943500801?t=PUVjAmVNntimuCc4nEhMZQ&s=19
The Times of London reports that the BBC changed the wording of a rape victim’s testimony because woke employees didn’t want to ‘misgender’ the biological man who allegedly carried out the abuse.
[Link]
Misgendering is literally rape.
It's worse. As we all know, ladydick isn't real dick, and hepussy doesn't count.
Once all sexual encounters are controlled by the Federal Bureau of Personal Relations, accepting whatever is in your partners pants will be required under law. Because equity.
Guypie smells just like testicles.
Jesus....
Wherever the words “he” or “him” were used by the woman, the BBC changed the language to “they” or “them”
So she was gangraped.
With the passive voice and gender appropriateness I think you mean, "A group of people walked past her on the street."
The majority ... did not offer reasoning for their ruling.
*** eagerly ***
But they *did* pound their gavels authoritatively, right?
If by “pound their gavels” you mean some clerk hitting a “Save” button in the Supreme Court’s office software.
I bet you are fun at parties.
She just stands in the corner and squawks.
Scrolling angrily at the Truth feeds to yell at conservatives.
Only the part where they throw Mike off the balcony.
That’s the spirit!
Do you ever reflect on why 90% of the commentariat mocks and despises you?
Was thinking more of the Colosseum, since it seems to consider itself some sort of hero, fighting all of the right-leaning folks. No weapons for it, since it is one of the 'betters,' and lots of large carnivores.
The good news is that there are some promising technical solutions for making plastics infinitely recyclable on the horizon...
Unless those solutions are turning plastics into solar panels or ethanol, not interested.
A reminder that J.D. Vance wants to ban porn.
Hawt. Forbidden porn.
Even better. Forbidden hillbilly porn.
Everything is almost-incest hillbilly porn nowadays. It's impossible to find a title that doesn't include stepmom, stepdad or stepsister.
I scroll titles some days, because the shit that people get off on is pretty funny. Once upon a time, it was the straight-laced righties who were sure to be fucked up under the image of ethical purity. Now, it's the progressives and left-leaning fucks. Every single time. I don't mean their porn viewing tastes alone, I mean, they are generally lacking in ethics and simply promote the idea that they are virtuous. Little surprise, given that their entire existence seems based on pretense related to appearance of virtue.
Better than the cuck phase the porn world went through pre rona.
Fucking this^^^
Video footage shows the teacher shutting the door, which was supposed to lock automatically when closed but for some reason did not.
Oh, FFS! Just sue the door manufacturer and be done with it!
Or the rock manufacturer.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/06/01/there-is-no-bipartisan-gun-compromise-in-the-works-just-gop-capitulation/
Cannot figure out why so many conservatives loathe the GOP.
'Cause even the GOP isn't usually, generally stupid enough and totalitarian enough to MANDATE that people buy Reason Magazines, maybe?
Hey Damiksec, damiskec, and damikesc, and ALL of your other socks…
How is your totalitarian scheme to FORCE people to buy Reason magazines coming along?
Free speech (freedom from “Cancel Culture”) comes from Facebook, Twitter, Tik-Tok, and Google, right? THAT is why we need to pass laws to prohibit these DANGEROUS companies (which, ugh!, the BASTARDS, put profits above people!)!!! We must pass new laws to retract “Section 230” and FORCE the evil corporations to provide us all (EXCEPT for my political enemies, of course!) with a “UBIFS”, a Universal Basic Income of Free Speech!
So leftist “false flag” commenters will inundate Reason-dot-com with shitloads of PROTECTED racist comments, and then pissed-off readers and advertisers and buyers (of Reason magazine) will all BOYCOTT Reason! And right-wing idiots like Damikesc will then FORCE people to support Reason, so as to nullify the attempts at boycotts! THAT is your ultimate authoritarian “fix” here!!!
“Now, to “protect” Reason from this meddling here, are we going to REQUIRE readers and advertisers to support Reason, to protect Reason from boycotts?”
Yup. Basically. Sounds rough. (Quote damikesc)
(Etc.)
See https://reason.com/2020/06/24/the-new-censors/
But he swears he's not a tribalist, folks.
Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer LIKES (and supports) totalitarians that want to FORCE people to buy magazines! Holly Cow! What an UDDER surprise, Mammary-Fuhrer!!!
Yup, screaming lunatic.
Also sprach die (thus spoke the) Jesus-killer (Mahatma Gandhi-killer, Martin Luther King Jr.-killer, etc.)... MASSIVE projection going on here!
Yup, screaming lunatic.
What the fuck does that have to do with squishy Republicans capitulating on “gun control”?
It has to do with damikesc being a blithering idiot, who is NEVER wrong, In His Own Perfect Mind! Along with a LOT of other idiots around here! Why damikesc is NOT so ashamed of itself, that it just STOPS posting here, I don't understand!
Fun compromise number q
No dem is allowed funs
Wow need coffee
"A California appeals court has ruled that bees are "fish" for purposes of the state's endangered species act. "
And, "people" aren't really people, either.... just "subjects."
And Elephant = Person. And Man = Woman.
Words...not really sure what they're for anymore.
"If you call a dog's tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?"
4
Sam as if 4 girls and a tyranny guy go to dinner how many girls went out
4
Tyranny guy? Newsom?
Once again, that radical DeSantis and his pen stand firmly against "THE SCIENCE".
https://www.flgov.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Gov.-Ron-DeSantis-Proclamation-Declaring-Emma-Weyant-as-NCAA-500y-Freestyle-National-Champion.pdf
I repeat my assertion that Trump was no 12D chess genius. Just a fairly normal guy playing checkers opposed by people who struggle to be one dimensional.
Go ahead, attack DeSantis for legally declaring Emma Weyant the winner.
“It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is.“
This is the type of shit why people have no faith in the judicial system. Words no longer matter if you're a judge on the left. You knownhow you want to rule and you will rule that way.
Yeah, it is a bad ruling.
Let's talk about Sussman.
So the Obama appointed judge basically hampered the prosecution when it ruled the text message from the night before could not be used as proof Sussman lied. Basically dismissing the written proof he lied to Baker. This was done under the ruling that the indictment only referred to the lies told in person, not the day before. Why is this important? The statute of limitations has passed and adding the lie from the text was not allowed due to the limitations. This was because the IG did not give Durham the texts until 6 months after the statute of limitations passed respite having it for over 3 years. So we know sussman lied, the judge ruled the jury could not used the definitive proof. The text was only allowed to be used as inference he lied in person the next day.
https://nypost.com/2022/05/31/michael-sussman-acquittal-slammed-by-experts-donald-trump-jr/
The Clinton donor jury spoke the next day and implied they didn't care what proof existed, the indictment should never have happened because sussman lying to the fbi wasn't a big deal. These comments were in the Washington post. Remember these lies are what led to the Trump russia narrative that led to 50 million dollars spent under Mueller and crippled the presidency of an elected president.
But thanks to the evidence that emerged from this trial, the walls are closing in on The Big Fish!
Now known as 'The Big Bee'.
Heh...nice
The walls are never going to close in on the Clintons or the Bidens.
However, history will judge them for the corrupt fascists that they are.
Supposedly, one of the jurists’ daughters is on Sussman’s daughters’ crew team as well.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/michael-sussmann-has-been-acquitted?s=r
The fact that D.C. is 90% democrat and the jury included 3 Clinton donors was amazing.
Let's be honest, with a DC jury, it would not have mattered if Sussman said "Yo, I lied!"
The sad thing is that he basically did and even that wasn't enough.
Here's the jury foreman explaining that they didn't convict because they don't agree with the law about lying to the FBI:
“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,” she said of the case. “There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/may/31/michael-sussmann-clinton-campaign-lawyer-found-not/
“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,” she said of the case. “There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”
Seems that should have come up during jury selection. IANAL, anyone know if there’s any consequences for lying to the court during jury selection? Not that this judge cared, obviously, but in general?
I thought we were in favor of jury nullification?
I am. But if I was in a jury pool and was asked questions that would indicate I didn’t think the charges presented should be a crime, I wouldn’t lie about it.
Call me skeptical, but I bet if Flynn had a jury trial and this was the same foreman, you wouldn’t get the same result or statement.
The fucking jury foreman no less.
When your mom says you have to have a trial but you don't wanna have a trial...
He did, in writing, the judge dismissed it as not relevant
If you thought a Dem could be convicted in DC you are deluding yourself. You would have a better chance of convicting a White guy of assaulting a Black guy in 1950s Alabama, ain’t gonna happen.
Clumps of cancer like Mike Laursen need to be dragged out into the streets and executed.
crippled the greatest Presidency since before George Washington? oh my
No one said that.
Did you hit your head? That post was even more retarded than usual.
Here is what the right doesn't get about Sussman; he is legally innocent of the charge made against him and the entire case was a sham designed to blame everything on the Clinton campaign and let the FBI and the IC off the hook.
The theory of the Sussman case was that he lied to the FBI and didn't tell them he was Hillary Clinton's attorney and because of that the FBI thought the evidence he had about Russia and Trump was legit and proceeded with the investigation. That is almost certainly not true. The FBI and IC were in on the whole thing from the beginning. They knew who Sussman was and where the information came from. Durham was trying to convict Sussman of lying to his co conspirators.
Had Sussman pled guilty or been convicted, it would have established as a proven fact in court that the whole Russia thing was the result of the Clinton campaign's dirty tricks and lying to the FBI and established the FBI as an innocent victim. Had Sussman ever come back and told the truth that the FBI knew exactly who he was and were in on the plot, he either would have been violating his plea agreement or been a convicted criminal making a self serving lie. Durham only brought the case against Sussman rather than bringing any number of cases against FBI and DOJ officials he could have brought because he was appointed to conduct a sham investigation that blamed the whole think on the Clinton campaign and got the FBI and IC off the hook.
It is a shame that the right punditsphere is too stupid to understand that. Instead of seeing this for what it is, they are taking the bait and going on about the evil Democrats on the jury and letting the FBI and IC off the hook just like Durham and the rest of them want them to.
You understand that everything you just said was not even remotely true
Oh really? I don't think so. If you think so, explain why. Otherwise, stop wasting everyone's time saying stupid and unsupported things.
They had a text of Sussman lying to Baker.
During the trial Durham presented memos saying the lower level agents were asking why they were investigating it when the information seemed to be false and asking who submitted the material so they could interview them. The FBI leadership did not allow them to investigate the source and kept pushing the Alfa bank story in collusion to continue their investigation into Trump.
Did you even watch the trial or read up on it?
And Baker is one of the biggest scumbags in Washington. I don't believe anything Baker says and certainly don't believe for a moment that he didn't know who Sussman was. They all knew who Sussman was and who he worked for. So, the lie, even if it did happen wasn't material.
During the trial Durham presented memos saying the lower level agents were asking why they were investigating it when the information seemed to be false and asking who submitted the material so they could interview them. The FBI leadership did not allow them to investigate the source and kept pushing the Alfa bank story in collusion to continue their investigation into Trump.
Which shows that the FBI leadership was in on the scam. Therefore, the FBI knew who Sussman was. The case amounted to trying to convict Sussman of lying to his co-conspirators.
Can you take the FBI's cock out of your mouth long enough to think more clearly about this issue?
You don’t have to think the leadership of the FBI wasn’t in on it to also think Sussman lied to agents about his intentions. Having low ground level agents be presented with it, then have leadership keep pushing it has it’s own benefits.
What we saw was jury nullification.
Team D should keep this mind....that can work both ways.
Maybe it was. Or maybe even Democrats know the FBI are scumbags and really don't think lying to them should be or is a crime. Everyone on the right screaming about jury nullification spent the last two years saying how dishonest the FBI is and how no one should ever believe a word the FBI says or convict anyone based on the FBI's word. I tend to agree with them about that. I do, however, disagree with them that the defendant being some scumbag Democratic lawyer somehow renders all of that untrue.
If you want to blame anyone for this, blame Durham from bringing such a BS charge as his premier prosecution in what is claimed to be the biggest political scandal since Watergate.
In this case the lie helped propagate a 50 million dollar special prosecutor. Did you miss that part?
In this case the lie helped propagate a 50 million dollar special prosecutor. Did you miss that part?
Oh yeah, the FBI was just the innocent victims of they lying Clinton campaign and Sussman. They were not in on the whole thing. NO. They would have never launched that investigation if only they had known that the whole thing was cooked up by Sussman.
Are you fucking kidding me Jesse? I mean really. You normally are not this stupid. Get the fuck out of here with that nonsense. The case was brought so that the FBI could claim the whole thing was the result of the Clinton campaign lying to them and avoid being held accountable for being part of the conspiracy. Durham is a career DOJ hack. He wasn't brought into find the truth. He was brought in to cover for the FBI and DOJ. And sadly, most of the right is so fucking stupid, they are going to let him get away with doing that.
“the indictment should never have happened because sussman lying to the fbi wasn't a big deal.”
I don’t know if o necessarily disagree with this. Of course agreeing with them means that you have to agree that General Flynn lying to the FBI wasn’t a big deal either. Somehow I bet our leftist posters don’t agree with that.
A new Gallup poll on economic confidence finds "the lowest reading in Gallup's trend during the coronavirus pandemic, and likely the lowest confidence has been since the tail end of the Great Recession in early 2009."
Literally impossible.
Reason's leading economics expert says the Biden economy is the best in US history. There's no way that many Americans fail to appreciate it. Sad to see Gallup is now a wingnut.com disinformation operation.
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
#BestEconomyEver
OBL....what are 'safe' sources of info, not a part of wingnut.com?
Salon? NPR? Vox? What?
According to the data, 57.5% of respondents said that preventing properly trained teachers from carrying firearms in schools makes schools somewhat or much more dangerous. Just 30.8% said the opposite.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/exclusive-majority-of-americans-believe-armed-educators-make-schools-safer
Now when a teacher suggests straight white males are the source of all trouble in the world, who's going to talk back?
UMKC promotes ‘Angry White Men and How They Ruined the World’
https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=17252
Do we really want to arm the groomers?
I had a High school teacher wordlessly pull out a gun and line up 6 bullets on his desk.
I have no idea what his point was, He was an extremely ignorant history teacher. He had already told us he was quitting to become a P.I. and as far as I know no disciplinary action was taken against him.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/05/31/breaking-the-fbi-maintains-a-workspace-including-computer-portal-inside-the-law-firm-of-perkins-coie-the-ramifications-are-significant/
And…nothing will happen.
Why would libritarian care about the gov serving one party?
A California appeals court has ruled that bees are "fish" for purposes of the state's endangered species act.
And therefore can participate in NCAA Division I Women's Swimming and Diving.
No, fish are women in that scenario. I would love to see Lia Thomas take on a yellowfin tuna in the 100m freestyle.
But only one of them smells like tuna.
when is merperson getting added to the LGBTQ++++ letters? Can I get an <M?
Biden continues to push masks on plans and trains.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-moves-to-force-americans-to-mask-up-again-on-airplanes
Among first acts, Biden to call for 100 days of mask-wearing.
Almost 2 fucking years ago.
We obviously weren't masking hard enough.
If it saves one vote!
BBC is refusing to acknowledge statements of rape victims of men dressed as females to reference them being men.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/bbc-changes-victims-statement-to-avoid-misgendering-her-rapist
In the USA, the GOP will "help out" in such cases, by NOT allowing the raped women to get abortions!!! All MUST Hail the Sacred Fartilized Egg Smells! Thanks, GOP, may I have another?
Back on mute spaz.
Wow, we are all SOOOO impressed by your ability to use the "mute" button! Do you also know how to pick your nose? Please tell us ALL about that!
Fuck off, idiot troll.
Wow, we are SOOOO impressed by your ability to use words like "fuck off" and "troll"! Yer Mamma mys be SOOO proud of you! All this, after the social workers told her that she'd be lucky if You ever learned to feed Your Own Perfect Face, by Yourself!
Fuck off, idiot troll.
Don't know why you took that sock off mute in the first place. Just limited engagement when you're bored is needed.
That’s all it was. Then I just ignore the shiteater until the spamming starts taking to much time to scroll past.
Don't worry the Cali "privacy" law is still okau
Yelled finally admits inflation is not transitory and is bad. But who could have known? Aside from the dozens of economists who said Biden's spending plans would lead to inflation. But continue to trust Yellen and your betters in the future.
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/yellen
Mom barred from school property after speaking out at school board meetings.
https://pjmedia.com/uncategorized/stacey-lennox/2022/05/31/georgia-mom-barred-from-school-district-property-after-speaking-out-at-school-board-meeting-n1598852
Likely said only due to the release of the latest CBO report.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/the-cbo-confirms-bidenflation-is-real
Well this went on the wrong post. Meh.
Democrats try to shift the rise of gun violence away from the defend the police and blm movement to blame gun sales.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/crime/democrats-reframe-rising-crime-as-gun-control-issue
I never got a final response from Jeff yesterday. We last landed on Biden having had an old quote about 9mm PISTOLS being too much, and then with his recent comments on 9mm rounds, I had asked with those two things taken together if he could admit that Biden just might have been talking about 9mm HANDGUNS.
He stopped responding when the old Biden quote about 9mm pistols came up. Still wondering if Biden gets the absolute benefit of the doubt, as was allowed to Trump exactly 0 times.
Silly Jimbo, you know the answer to that.
Schools on Chicago drop failing grades to 19%. Get 20% and you pass.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/schools-normalize-bad-study-habits-and-failure
Equity!
And just to be clear, even in these low-expectation times, you have to either be a real dumbass or not even trying at all to get less than 60 percent. These curriculums are specifically designed to get people who aren't that smart on to the next grade level.
That these schools have to admit that their students can't even get 60% of the course material correct shows what a decrepit fucking state urban public schools are in these days. Some Indiana hayseed that went to school with Abraham Lincoln in the 1810s was smarter than these sad sacks.
On a multiple choice test with 4 options, random chance should give you 25%. Just pick "C" everytime and you pass!
San Francisco mayor to give millions to only trans homeless.
https://www.ktvu.com/news/san-francisco-mayors-budget-to-address-transgender-homelessness
That is outrageous but did it really matter? What homeless guy is going to be above claiming to be "trans" if there is a buck involved and what dingbat leftist is going to question his claim no matter how obviously absurd?
How much makeup / clothing constitutes trans?
Considering that you can still have a dick and only like women and still be "trans", I would say none.
Just identify as a woman, per that 'expert' in front of congress last week.
I'm not homeless, trans or living in San Francisco but I'll identify as such for some of those millions.
Report shows Obama administration continued to engage with Iran subverting Trumps foreign policy.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/05/report-ex-obama-officials-engaged-in-shadow-diplomacy-with-iran-to-derail-trump-foreign-policy/
Somehow secret dealings with a foreign enemy in order to undermine an elected government administration isn't treason, but protesting electoral fraud is.
Democrats continue to believe giving those making up to 150k a year or 300k per family 10k for student loans is a fair and just policy. Democrat activists continue to demand more.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/05/biden-reportedly-preparing-to-forgive-10000-in-student-loan-debt-per-borrower/
It shows how Obama was right that Biden can fuck anything up Ten thousand dollars is nowhere near enough to make any real difference or in any way placate the people who want student loan forgiveness. It is, however, enough to outrage the large majority of the country who opposes forgiveness. So, Biden is accomplishing nothing with his base at the expense of further alienating the majority of voters outside of his base. Way to go Joe.
Plus, you get to feel stupid for not having outstanding loans.
To think I went to a lower rated grad school so I didn't have to take on as much debt and then actually got a job and paid that debt off. Just call me sucker.
Quit flaunting your white privilege.
If you haven't watched the Ricky Gervais netflix special, it isn't bad. Not great but it has its funny parts. What is interesting is that Gervais doesn't really tell any jokes about transgenderism. He just repeats what the movement claims to believe and the joke as they say writes itself. For example one bit is about women not wanting men to use the women's restroom because "what if he rapes me" to which Gervais says "what if 'she' rapes you, you bigot". It gets a laugh but it is not really a joke. Proof of that comes today.
BBC 'changed rape victim's quotes to avoid misgendering her trans attacker'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10870705/BBC-changed-rape-victims-quotes-avoid-misgendering-trans-attacker.html
What if "she" rapes you, you bigot!
Sigh. Remember when the Brits fought off real Nazis?
SQRTSLY approved lefty battle strategy, shit your pants and strut around with your cock out. Nobody wants to fight in the trenches against that.
the ladies ... with beards and cocks lol
The best joke of the whole show by far is the one about treating pedophiles by weaning them off children with midgets. That was laugh out loud funny. And I don't laugh out loud about much.
agreed. fell off couch.
it was aight. Some good moments. He hit the trans stuff perfectly.
Definitely some luls though. I found myself scrolling on my phone a few times as he had some drawn out jokes that werent really killing.
But overall, pretty good. We really need people like Gervais and Chapelle in an age where half of society has willing thrown their bullshit detectors in the garbage can.
The problem is that you can't do comedy about things you don't understand. Gervais is a brit whose politics are left of Trotsky. So, he understands the woke left and the jokes he makes about them are funny. He understands his family and where he grew up. So, the jokes he makes about that are funny. What he doesn't understand, being an atheist, is religion. So, his jokes about religion and God were total worn cliches. I am pretty sure I heard David Brenner make the joke about people who believe in reincarnation always thinking they were important and famous in past lives back in the 70s on the Johnny Carson show. There was about a 20 minute stretch in the middle of the show where is he talking about God and religion where it was one lame, cliché after another. God punishing gays with AIDS jokes? It is 2022 for God's sake. The 80s called and it wants its routine back Rick.
It was good at the beginning and it finished pretty strong when he talked about his mother and his family. Again, if he would stick to thinks he understands, he can be funny.
The problem is that you can't do comedy about things you don't understand. Gervais is a brit whose politics are left of Trotsky. So, he understands the woke left and the jokes he makes about them are funny. He understands his family and where he grew up. So, the jokes he makes about that are funny.
That's why his slams on Hollywood elites at the Golden Globes hit so hard, too, because he's part of that crowd and knows their weak points.
Forcing me to use someone else's preferred pronouns in compelled speech!
It is not just that, it is a compelled lie.
Free speech is white privilege.
G.K. Chesterton saw this coming almost a century ago:
“We shall soon be in a world in which a man may be howled down for saying that two and two make four, in which furious party cries will be raised against anybody who says that cows have horns, in which people will persecute the heresy of calling a triangle a three-sided figure, and hang a man for maddening mob with the news that grass is green.”
He could have found that out from the history of his Mother Church, right, otter-fish-man? 🙂
otter-fish-man?
Yes, you were the one justifying the classification of a whale as a fish by saying The Church classified any animal that swam and lived in water as a fish.
This was One Dead, Unjugged Rabbit-Fish earlier.
For fuck's sake. It wasn't the church that defined it, Encog. It was the English language.
Fish simply meant "aquatic animal" in English until well after Linnaeus because modern taxonomical definitions weren't a thing. The same held true for several other languages as well.
And I don't have to justify fuck all. Pick up any history book covering taxonomy and you'll read exactly what I said. I'm actually a little staggered you didn't know that.
The debate the churchmen had were whether or not beavers and geese were "aquatic animals" aka "fish" because they spent time in the air and on land too.
Maybe Kav and ACB are just laying a little pre-Dobbs de-politicization ammunition here since this isn't even a decision on the merits and there is no opinion to box them into if/when it ultimately is determined on the merits. Or maybe they legitimately have some principles that are neither theocratic nor lock-step with GOP agenda. Or perhaps it is primarily the latter but they are no doubt cognizant of the former.
There is only two things that can be said for sure about the Narzgul; that liberal justices never become less liberal and that every justice gets drunk off the power and does whatever they want without any regard to being in step with either political party.
"The majority—a conservative-liberal mix that included Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—did not offer reasoning for their ruling.
A dissent penned by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, can be found here. Justice Elena Kagan also dissented"
Wait--we've been told by all kinds of Smart People and Media Pundits that the court is a strictly partisan body, and how our legal foundation rests on the ratio of D vs R justices. Are they just messing with us?
They are just lying hacks. Most decisions the court makes are about boring issues that don't really involve politics. On those issues, the perceived right left split is generally meaningless.
• A new Gallup poll on economic confidence finds "the lowest reading in Gallup's trend during the coronavirus pandemic, and likely the lowest confidence has been since the tail end of the Great Recession in early 2009."
Say what you will about The Great Recession, my store shelves were never empty, while a stern looking babushka from behind the counter told me "there is none today!".
I am old enough to remember the 70s, though I was a child. I can't remember the gas lines but they clearly happened. But, I don't remember and have never been told about there ever being a shortage of anything except gasoline. Even in the worst of the 70s, you could still get anything you needed, provided you had the money.
You really have to go back to the 30s to find an economy as bad as this one is about to become.
The difference between the 70s and 80s and now is that the banks would actually pay interest on your dollars. You could get a 10 percent return on a CD. Now if you're in dollars you're fucked and the alternatives aren't any better. Yeah this is going to be much worse.
The last time the average income savings rate amongst the population was consistently above 10 percent was the mid-1980s. It briefly rose above that during the Great Recession, but that was only because people were sinking every available spare coin they had in to paying down debts, which really isn't the same thing.
The Fed REALLY fucked us over by keeping interest rates so low for so long, and the problem is we're run by post-Obama Democrats, not Harding-era Republicans, who would make us take our medicine and get us out of this tailspin ASAP.
In other words - no. No they will not.
What they will do is propose a toothless resolution that even if passed will still leave plenty of room for law enforcement to continue to uphold the law - 'lowest priority' does not mean 'no enforcement' after all - while the city pols can both virtue signal and escape sticky issues of exactly how independent municipal law enforcement agencies and governments are from the state government.
Also, the state of Texas has its own law enforcement that can enforce state law. So, the Austin police not doing so doesn't mean a whole lot when the Texas Rangers show up to do it for them.
Which is/was really how it was going to be anyway. The Department of Health doesn't phone up the local police chief when they look at Gosnell's record and see that he was guilty of multiple health violations while performing abortions, they phone up the FBI who recruits a few men from The State Police to arrest people and shut things down while the local PD, maybe, stops civilians from climbing over the barricades.
I live in a city which has a whole list of things that are categorized as "lowest priority" and let me tell you, when they say "lowest priority" they mean "no enforcement".
I dunno, bro, California made enforcing shoplifting laws a low priority and, from what I understand, retail disappeared there along with most of what we call civilization
Herr Von Kleist...was gibt neue? Wie gehts mit dem OKW?
• The Department of Justice is appealing the court ruling ending the federal mask mandate on airplanes and other transit.
So I guess these assholes on the court want us all to catch Monkeypox?
The good news is that there are some promising technical solutions for making plastics infinitely recyclable on the horizon...
Which will be delivered by drone or self-driving Segway.
>>Will the city of Austin defy a potential Texas law criminalizing abortion?
hopes are high! losers.
In Texas, you're an adult at 17.
For all purposes? Only in matters of criminal responsibility? I'd like more details about this, it seems like a remarkable statement.
Being an adult is quite arbitrary in the eyes of the law. Remember the 2 girls in Milwaukee who were found to be simultaneously adults and children, for the purposes of the same transaction (sending pictures of their boobies)..
IIR, both were about 13 and were charged as an adult for corrupting the morals of a minor... The girl herself. Literally charged as an adult for taking pictures of a nekkid minor... Herself.
And the important point to remember, this prosecutor was not run out of town on a rail.
Joe is working on that, no guns for you.
(but if you want to cut your dick off, here's a federal check)
also, somebody explain taking pride in inherent qualities please and thank you.
As long as that inherent quality that you are taking pride in isn't being white, taking pride in your inherent qualities is the greatest thing ever. Don't you understand that bigot!!
when is I Love Chicks Pride month?
As long as you understand that the chick can have a beard and a dick, any month you want.
if no beards and I also get to be a chick it can be called a hot girl-on-girl scene.
If you are a chick, June.
That's not even a joke--check out the differences between the varius "_________ Pride" and "White Pride" on Wikipedia alone.
Please go, Brandon.
lol take Brandon ... please.
The "bees are fish" court decision deserves a deeper dive. The judge sounds absolutely insane in the bit of the ruling that is posted.... Basically, "fish live in the water. And mollusks do to. And the law treats mollusks and shellfish as fish under this law. Some mollusks live on land. Salamanders are semi-aquatic, and therefore count as fish. Mollusks and crustaceans are Invertebrates. Therefore, all Invertebrates are fish."
That is Abbott and Costello level reasoning.
And tellingly, fish are not Invertebrates. They have a spne and an endoskeleton, just like us. So by this logic, all animals are fish. And therefore, all animals are covered by this law. Including your cousin Vinnie.
uh ... did you say utes?
The problem is that California law literally and incorrectly defines "fish" to actually include invertebrates. That's why the court concluded that when California law uses the term "fish", it doesn't actually necessarily mean fish.
Don't blame the courts, blame incompetent California lawmakers.
Alito is right. Texas may be wrong, but Alito is right.
By the bi, folks, June is Pride Month, and here's a little reminder that LGBTQ+ individual rights are not out of the forest yet. And it's another reminder of why we need to uphold the right to keep and bear arms:
Texas Pastor Condemns City's Pride Celebration And Calls For Execution Of Gay People In Horrific Council Meeting Speech
https://www.comicsands.com/arlington-texas-christian-pastor-pride-2657419554.htm
And this why there are groups like this:
Pink Pistols
https://www.pinkpistols.org/
Keep your glitter and powder dry!
free Pussy Riot!
Na Zdorovie!
In a free society, you have to accept that there are people like this baptist pastor who hold such beliefs.
And he is right to the extent that "pride celebrations" are not the job of city government.
The comicsands link is 404'ed now and would otherwise seem like a joke.
That said, the idea that a group represents individual rights and that any verbal attacks against the group can/should be purged from all corners is pretty fucked up. If he's giving instructions on where to pick up the guns, where to set up firing positions, etc., yes go get him. Otherwise, remote Texas pastors are so far removed from what is/isn't a human right in in our democracy this isn't even a decent joke.
Here's the story. Missed the 'l' on the end:
https://www.comicsands.com/arlington-texas-christian-pastor-pride-2657419554.html
"Why would we promote disease and AIDS in our community?"
I'd bet money he's an anti-vaxxer and anti-masker.
And funny thing, Uvalde, Texas isn't distant and is now known worldwide.
And even if this Jackleg Pastor hasn't named names and given specifics, free people have every Goddamn right to keep an eye on him in any public space and to keep their arms ready.
You know the law in Texas according to Ron "Tater Salad" White, right?
"You kill somebody and we'll kill you right back!"
You know the law in Texas according to Ron "Tater Salad" White, right?
Said nothing about keeping an eye on him. Still haven't watched him and won't. That said, there are homosexuals who knowingly contracted and transmitted HIV. There are homosexual groups, nationally-known and advocated organizations, that advocate the rather unequivocal rape of children. As I've pointed out before, Robert Swope wrote in The Hoya that The Vagina Monologues celebrates the lesbian rape of a drunken 13-yr.-old girl and was drummed out of a Jesuit University for criticizing it.
"You kill somebody and we'll kill you right back!"
He's hardly the only person, even on this forum, who thinks there are people who do things morally to earn an expedient death.
Do we get to imprison all straight people for all the straight kiddie fucking? That's most of the kiddie fucking, after all.
That said, the idea that a group represents individual rights and that any verbal attacks against the group can/should be purged from all corners is pretty fucked up.
Oh, and Jackleg Pastor and his flock of Sheeple meet that description quite well. I bet he wouldn't cotton to somebody wanting to execute Baptists for being Baptists.
And, in turn, if they're giving instructions on where to pick up the guns, where to set up firing positions, etc., yes go get them.
In a free society, nobdy has to put up with threats without giving a response. And if that threat is directed your way you have a right to respond with force in self-defense.
As for parades of any kind, you are right from a strictly Libertarian standpoint...but what happened to your Subsidiariariaritytytyty? Does it only apply to some and not others?
As for parades of any kind, you are right from a strictly Libertarian standpoint...but what happened to your Subsidiariariaritytytyty? Does it only apply to some and not others?
Still in good standing. In Chicago, various "Little [Ethnicity]" villages celebrate their own traditional holidays. A Pride Parade in Boystown makes perfect sense. Veteran's Day (or Memorial Day or Armed Forces Day, not all 3) and Independence Day on a city-wide level makes some sense but, otherwise, yeah, celebrate your cultural diversity locally. Remote churches in the rural US shouldn't generally be allowed to occupy county roads and state highways to celebrate Easter or whatever.
On the flip side, what happened to avoiding advancing a false 'oppressor on victim' narrative in place of a 'victim on victim' narrative? Zero opposition to you defending yourself as you see fit, at the same time, if you're going to get killed in TX (or pretty much anywhere else), it's overwhelmingly more likely to be someone you know than someone you don't. Even if you are killed by a stranger, it's overwhelmingly more likely to be for agnostic/atheistic reasons. Even if you are killed by a stranger for religious reasons, in TX (and most of the rest of the states), the perpetrator is overwhelmingly more likely to be Catholic or non-denominational.
I don't trust your actuarial acumen as long as someone is making death threats. The moment those go out, all bets are off.
Yes, you should be able to own guns and use them in self defense.
However, the pastor didn't actually make threats, he pointed out what legal punishments for sodomy are according to his interpretation of the Bible.
Subsidiarity means that governmental functions and policy decisions should be made at as local a level as policy, not that local governments can do whatever they want to. Sponsoring gay pride parades is not a proper function of government at any level.
However, the pastor didn't actually make threats, he pointed out what legal punishments for sodomy are according to his interpretation of the Bible.
He was quoting them and giving the punishments his favor. He wasn't just being some cypher.
Well, the right to keep and bear arms give me both a choice and an echo in the face of evil in the name of Divine righteousness...or just a choice if I use a crossbow.
Subsidiarity means that governmental functions and policy decisions should be made at as local a level as policy, not that local governments can do whatever they want to. Sponsoring gay pride parades is not a proper function of government at any level.
I'll let you and mad.casual oil-wrestle over that.
Why the fuck are they celebrating the Alphabet Sex Cult, but a public Christmas nativity scene is a step too far? Either celebrate all religions and let Episcopalians, Shia, Parsees and the Jedi also have government ordained and mandated celebrations or none. Pick one.
I'll pick none and even say no parades of any kind on Government roads.
But one thing I'll never do is give up my right to keep and bear arms against would-be tyrants like this Jackleg Pastor and his flock of brainwashed Sheeple. If they want to be alleged God-appointed executioners, they can risk getting shot and killed too.
Yes, almost everybody here supports the right to bear arms.
However, let's be clear: your life is not at risk from that pastor.
However, let's be clear: your life is not at risk from that pastor.
And you know this how?
One thing I know for sure: I know that any and all risks he and his flock of Sheeple pose will be met with ventilation.
In summary: the state can force bakers, photographers, and web designers to engage in speech they find objectionable, but once you are a multi-billion dollar business, you can't be held accountable for your speech, for your terms of service, and can't even be treated as a telecommunications provider.
Glad we cleared that up.
Look, it's right there, direct quote from Jesus himself, in The Bible. The Good Samaritan defended multi-national corporations' rights to shove people they didn't like into the gutter, rob them, and make sure they stayed there.
The state doesn't compel bakers to engage in speech. It also doesn't force social media companies into platforming speech. That's consistent with the first amendment all around. You just don't understand because you're not smart.
Yes, it does.
I'll take that statement for all its worth, given that it comes from an incoherent fat slob.