Why Can't the CDC Tell the Truth About Smoking and Vaping by Teenagers?
The agency ignores downward trends in both kinds of nicotine use and obscures the huge difference in the hazards they pose.

The pandemic has given Americans ample reason to be skeptical of pronouncements by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A press release the CDC issued today reminds us that the agency's habit of misleading the public began long before anyone had heard of COVID-19.
According to the latest results from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), the CDC says, "about 2.55 million U.S. middle and high school students reported current (past 30-day) use of a tobacco product in 2021." If you have not been paying attention to the CDC's inveterate dishonesty on this subject, it may surprise you to learn that most of those 2.55 million students did not use products that contained tobacco.
The CDC routinely conflates e-cigarettes with "tobacco products," despite the vast difference between the risks posed by vaping nicotine and the risks posed by inhaling smoke from conventional cigarettes. The press release notes that "about 1 in 3" of those 2.55 million students "used at least one type of combustible tobacco product," which means two-thirds did not. The CDC says 410,000 of the past-month "tobacco product" users, or just 16 percent, were cigarette smokers. But the CDC implies that such distinctions don't really matter, because "youth use of tobacco products is unsafe in any form—combustible, smokeless, or electronic."
The CDC, which claims to follow the science and deliver its findings to Americans who don't have time to read and digest the relevant research, is deliberately obscuring the medically crucial point that e-cigarettes are far less hazardous than the conventional, combustible kind. Statements like this one help explain why a large and growing share of the public mistakenly believes that vaping is just as dangerous as smoking, if not more so.
Here is something else that may surprise you, since the CDC is determined to ignore it: Smoking among teenagers has been falling since the late 1990s, and that downward trend accelerated as vaping took off. The replacement of smoking by vaping is indisputably an improvement in terms of "public health," which the CDC claims to be promoting. But the agency instead portrays it as a grave danger to the youth of America.

In the 2021 NYTS, less than 2 percent of high school students reported that they had smoked cigarettes in the previous month, down from 4.6 percent in 2020, 8.1 percent in 2018, and 15.8 percent in 2011. The CDC completely overlooks this good news, because it undermines the agency's attempt to gin up public alarm about "tobacco use" by teenagers.
The NYTS measured a sharp increase in past-month e-cigarette use by high school students between 2017 and 2019, which led to many warnings about the "epidemic" of underage vaping. But that rate, which peaked at 27.5 percent, fell to less than 20 percent in 2020 and about 11 percent in 2021.
The CDC warns that the 2021 numbers "cannot be compared with results from previous NYTS surveys," which "were primarily conducted on school campuses." Due to the pandemic, the 2021 survey was "administered online to allow eligible students to complete the survey at home, school, or somewhere else." Half of the students took the survey at school, while the other half took it at home or elsewhere. Although "we remain confident in our study results," the CDC says, "the reporting of tobacco use might differ by the setting where the survey was completed."
The CDC can't have it both ways. If the 2021 survey presents an accurate picture of "tobacco use" by middle and high school students, which the CDC says it does, any bias created by the change in methodology must not be very important.
"Differences in tobacco product use by survey completion setting might be caused by potential underreporting of behaviors, reduced access to tobacco products while at home, or other unmeasured characteristics among students participating outside of the classroom," says the CDC's NYTS report, which was published today in the agency's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The CDC seems to be suggesting that students who completed the survey at home may have been less honest than students who completed it in school. While that's possible, it is also plausible that the enhanced sense of privacy at home increased candor.
In any case, the CDC's report on the e-cigarette results, which it published last September, notes that "15.0% of high school students who took the survey in a school building or classroom reported currently using e-cigarettes," which is still 23 percent lower than the rate in 2020 (19.6 percent) and 45 percent lower than the rate in 2019 (27.5 percent). The report did not acknowledge that downward trend. Here is how the headline summed up the survey results: "Youth E-Cigarette Use Remains Serious Public Health Concern Amid COVID-19 Pandemic."
Today's report notes that the overall rate of "current tobacco product use" among students who took the survey at school was 11.7 percent, which is down from 16.2 percent in 2020 and 23 percent in 2019. The CDC does not mention that drop either, although it would not have been affected by the 2021 change in the settings where students completed the survey.
One reason the CDC ignores the declines in smoking, vaping, and overall "tobacco use" is apparent in today's report, which describes "the availability of flavors" as a factor that "might continue to promote tobacco product use among U.S. youths." The report and the accompanying press release recommend "restricting the sales of flavored e-cigarettes" as a strategy to "reduce tobacco product use and initiation among all youth."
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which seems bent on banning nearly all the vaping products currently available in the United States, has embraced this strategy. The FDA, like the CDC, takes a dim view of e-liquid flavors other than tobacco (and perhaps menthol) because teenagers like them. But so do adults, who overwhelmingly prefer the supposedly juvenile flavors that anti-vaping politicians consider intolerable.
If you are determined to ban those products, it is inconvenient to acknowledge that the result is likely to be more smoking-related deaths than otherwise would occur, since less flavor variety will make vaping less appealing as a harm-reducing alternative to smoking. It is likewise inconvenient to acknowledge that the "epidemic" of underage e-cigarette use is fading fast or that smoking by teenagers has fallen to record lows in recent years, a trend that is at least partly due to the fact that some of them are vaping instead.
The CDC, in short, is distorting the evidence to support its preexisting policy preferences. Sound familiar?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why Can't the CDC Tell the Truth
Because it would break their streak?
Force of habit?
Addiction to lying? (Lying= gateway drug to the hard stuff like career politics)
[JOIN NOW] I really make A LOT OF MONEY ($200-$300/hour) online from my laptop. Last month I received almost $50,000. this line work is simple and straightforward. bty You don’t need to go to the office, it’s online work from home. You become independent after joining this position. I really appreciate my friend.
....
Who pointed it out to me SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. QAAZ I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
For more detail … http://jobscash.tk/
They're trying to game the Vegas odds before they finally place a large bet on themselves. Kind of like the opposite of what Bobby Riggs is alleged to have done.
Your lies protect me, my lies protect you.
I'll take 'Headlines Twice as Long as Needed' for $400, Alex.
The truth is the CDC could care less about health, it is a political institution.
Why Can't the CDC Tell the Truth
Because it is inherent in the fascist make up to lie.
In all seriousness, the CDC is a government public health agency. Its interest is not in accurate, factual information, it is in advancing the government agenda. It will frame a narrative to advance a desired policy because it is inherently political.
People who are complaining that science has become politicized are only just now realizing what's been true for some time.
Calling the CDC a "health agency" assumes facts not in evidence.
Read: emphasis should be on public. They work for the government. Their interest is the government's agenda, not the interests of private persons.
But why is their agenda...THIS?
Elections have consequences.
Because vaping looks like smoking, and the anti-smoking zealots HATE HATE HATEHATEHATEHATEHATE smoking. The CDC and FDA are filled with these zealots.
You are absolutely right here. Every government actor is actually serving the interest of the government, that is the central result of Public Choice Theory after all.
So the real question here isn't whether the CDC is following the agenda of the government. The real question is whether the agenda of the government, that the CDC is following, is the correct one in this case.
And the answer is, in this case, no. The government shouldn't be banning vaping. Because it's not their job to be banning products like that. Regardless of what the CDC says or doesn't say.
I think the government's agenda is wrong anytime it involves disseminating any information that is not complete and accurate. So, as far as I'm concerned, the CDC has been actively evil for at least three years.
Bingo.
The CDC is in the business of controlling public opinion. It is a paternalistic technocracy and, for that reason, their ends will always justify their means, and the certainty of their own correctness will lead them to omit any information that cuts against their narrative, regardless of the information's veracity, because undermines their credibility.
Because they don’t have to.
Breaking: Juicy is not suicidal.
Speaking of liars.
Let’s hope he is lying again.
It's probably a disservice that he said this because people are more likely to believe the opposite of what he said than his actual words.
He’s go8mg to love jail. Probably become a pass around pack.
I guess now that Joe Biden has unofficially declared COVID to be “over”, the hacks at the CDC can get back to their previous useless jobs. No somewhat intelligent person should take the CDC seriously after the past two years, but politicians with Ds after their name and their groupies will continue to.
The CDC is but a rogue agency of the Nazi-Regime.
The people never gave the federal government permission/authority for the CDC. Nazi Supreme Court flakes did. Isn't it about time to bring back the USA? Don't vote Nazi's into the government; they swear an oath, lie about it and dictate how ever their gov-gun control allows. That's not what the USA is.
I expect that the CDC will reverse its rulings on vaping at about the time that the big tobacco companies own 100% of the means of production.
"The CDC can't have it both ways." They most certainly can. They can have it three ways, or four ways, or no ways at all (full release of COVID data).
Naive, sweet Jacob. So much to learn. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the CDC is always right.
Why Can't the CDC Tell the Truth About Smoking and Vaping by Teenagers?
For the same reason CDC (and US SG and all state/local health departments) have refused to tell the truth about the smokeless tobacco (which like vaping, is 99% less harmful than cigarette smoking, is NOT a gateway to cigarettes, and has helped millions of smokers quit smoking) by teenagers since 1986.
When FDA first banned nicotine vaping product imports in 2009, the FDA (along with CDC's director, the US SG and Big Pharma financed/owned AAP) all falsely claimed the nicotine vaping was addicting many US children to nicotine, was a gateway to cigarette smoking for teens, didn't help any smokers quit smoking, and may be more harmful than cigarette smoking.
Every single one of those claims was a lie, but CDC, FDA, the US SG, and all state/local health department have adopted policies to repeat these lies (long after they were proven to be lies).
These government health officials and agencies have been protecting cigarette markets (and keeping people smoking) due to lobbying by Big Pharma (note that FDA's Center for Tobacco Products Director, Mitch Zeller, was previously a lobbyist for Nicorette and Nicoderm maker GSK who lied about the risks of smokeless tobacco (and then vaping) to lobby FDA to ban the sale of all new smokeless tobacco and then new vapor products (while grandfathering in the sale of all truly lethal cigarettes).
After Zeller came to FDA in 2013, he proposed banning the sale of all nicotine vapor products, which FDA legally achieved in September 2020 after years of litigation and Scott Gottlieb's delay.
Several million nicotine vapor products (i.e. >99.99%) currently on the US market have already been banned by FDA, but FDA hasn't taken enforcement action against them (because FDA has only approved the sale of one vapor product so far, one owned by BAT/RJ Reynolds.
You kind of have that wrong. The "government health officials" have been protecting the "cigarette market" due to the Tabaco Settlement. Several State have borrowed heavily against the projected revenue from the Settlement.
As one who sued then PA AG Mike Fisher and the seven largest cigarette manufacturers to block PA's MSA in 1998 (which failed in court, but prompted the AG, then Gov Ridge and the PA General Assembly to spend all MSA funds on public health programs) vinced, it is clear to me (and any other objective person) that the $.75/pack (now $1.50/pack due to 3% annual increases in payments) has significantly reduced cigarette consumption in the US, which was my goal when urging dozens of attorneys (and then dozens of County Execs and State AGs) to sue the cigarette companies after Clinton became president in 1992.
US cigarette consumption has declined from 32 billion packs in 1986 down to 10 billion packs last year.
Had it not been for the lies and zero tolerance policies on very low risk smokeless tobacco, dissolvable tobacco and nicotine vapes by CDC, the US SG and FDA (and the J&J/GSK/Pfizer financed lobbyists/PR hacks at CTFK, ACS, AHA, ALA, AAP, AMA), cigarette consumption would be below 5 billion packs per year.
The worst part of the MSA was the so-called Truth campaign foundation it financed, which has spent billions of dollars deceiving the public to believe smokefree tobacco products (smokeless, dissolvables, vapes) are even more harmful than cigarette smoking, which is public health malpractice.
Half of the increase in teen vaping from 2013 - 2019 was due to THC vape products (especially in states that legalized weed sales, including vapes).
While the CDC's NYTS survey asked if and found that teens were increasingly reporting vaping THC (especially from 2016 - 2019), but the CDC, FDA, US SG and all state/local health departments falsely claimed (in hundreds of press releases, journal articles and quotes to the news media) that all teen vapers were vaping nicotine, and thus were tobacco users.
It was all a deceitful way to scare the public in order for FDA's Mitch Zeller to impose a cigarette protecting ban on the sale of virtually all nicotine vapor products on the US market.
Here's a recent article detailing some of CDC's and FDA's many lies about vaping.
https://www.theamericanconsumer.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/E-Cigarette-Report.pdf
The CDC is an enemy of the people. They are a tool for democrats to oppress and control. Lies and hysteria is their MO.
Build back emphysema.
There's a simpler answer than most commenters have suggested. Having been anti-tobacco and largely succeeded, they can't stand the idea of giving anything back. Even if it's not relevant to their original justifications, still, we won it, it's ours, and we're not giving anything back.
It's related to the old cliche often associated with Stalin: what's mine is mine, what's yours is negotiable. Always give nothing back, and always demand more.
My question is why is there a CDC.
I agree. The CDC has been proven worthless.
We need a single agency that combines the librarian function of the CDC, the functions of the FDA and NIH - fully Government funded with no big pharma influence.
Why is there a cdc? Easy. We have a cdc to regulate public health. If health is not going to shit as designed, we have the cdc there to ensure that it will.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/18/health/cdc-coronavirus-lab-contamination-testing.html
There you have it. Just when Covid was stalling, the cdc was there to make sure tests didn’t make it to the market unless they were themselves contaminated with the virus. Oh, and then they tried to cover that up by locking the fda out of the building for 48 hours.
Your tax dollars at work dipshits.
The pandemic has caused the medical establishment to lose virtually all its credibility.
The CDC and Fauci's institute have severely damaged all medical authority. Good luck trying to claim to have the voice of science in the future.
Public health policy and science are two terms difficult to use together in a sentence bin a positive manner. The CDC lies to promote a public health policy not based on science, but irrational biases. Lying is something done all the time in crafting public health policy.
Usually there is the "free rider" aspect of the commons problem that prompts various levels of lying (think Fauci and Covid). However, I don't understand the motivation for the CDC lies this time.
Personally, I would much rather see folks vape than smoke.
Could it be that the Public Piggies are afraid of a reduction in tobacco tax revenue?
They are paid off by big cig. That’s why.
Exactly right. The only group the war on e-cigs benefits is traditional tobacco companies.
Why can't the Communist Disease Concealers tell the truth about something enjoyable? Critics who once carped that Sullum has no sense of humor now tuck their tails and stalk away in shame!