Hey, Nancy Pelosi: 'National Debt Should Be a Top Priority'
A bipartisan group of lawmakers are calling for two deficit reduction ideas to be included in this year's federal budget bill.

Ahead of the annual congressional scramble to piece together a federal budget—a process that will begin in earnest after President Joe Biden's state of the union address next week—a bipartisan group of lawmakers are asking a question that's rarely part of the proceedings these days.
How are we actually going to pay for all this?
In a letter sent on Tuesday, 24 members of the House of Representatives called on Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D–Calif.) to take some small but important steps to rein in America's out-of-control national debt. The letter highlights the fact that policies enacted during the past five years—including pandemic relief, but also "Congress' perennially broken budget process and fiscal policies"—have added $13 trillion to the projected levels of debt in 2031, at the end of the 10-year window Congress uses for budgeting.
"It has been over a decade since Congress enacted any legislation that significantly addressed these longstanding structural problems or improved the nation's fiscal outlook," the lawmakers wrote to Pelosi. "Our national debt should be a top priority for both parties and addressed on a bipartisan basis."
Yes, the letter represents the view of just 24 of the House's 435 members. Still, any discussion of the debt and the need to address it is welcome.
America's national debt cracked the $30 trillion mark earlier this month, and projections show that it will continue to grow (both in absolute terms and as a percentage of the size of the economy) for the foreseeable future. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) now forecasts that the debt will be twice the size of the economy by 2051, while the Government Accountability Office (GAO) predicts that the debt will grow to four times the size of America's economy before the end of the century. Those projections do not account for the effects of future recessions, pandemics, wars, or other costly and unexpected problems.
"U.S. fiscal policy today is not sustainable," argue Veronique de Rugy and Jack Salmon, researchers at the Mercatus Center, a free market think tank, in a new report published Wednesday. "Not only is our debt ratio at the highest level in peacetime history, but also our future budgetary outlook is even bleaker."
Perhaps it was the symbolic $30 trillion debt threshold that has prompted some lawmakers to call on Pelosi to take action. But another factor is the high levels of inflation America is currently experiencing. As Reason has previously explained, inflation and high debt create a trap for policymakers: higher inflation could lead the Federal Reserve raise interest rates, which would increase the payments owed on the debt.
Regardless of the reasons, the 24 lawmakers who signed this week's letter are asking for two policies that are the lowest of low-hanging fruit. First, they are seeking the creation of a bipartisan debt commission, similar to one implemented during President Barack Obama's first term that helped trigger modest reductions in annual budget deficits following the Great Recession.
Commissions are a great way for lawmakers to make it look like they're doing something without actually doing it, of course, but in this case, it might be a helpful exercise. It has been so long since debt and deficit politics have featured prominently in politics that it's not clear whether there is a workable coalition in Congress to address the debt. A commission may help organize and focus those debates—and may raise further awareness among voters.
The second idea is slightly more concrete. The lawmakers are asking Pelosi to include in the budget changes to how the debt ceiling operates. The proposed changes would allow the president to unilaterally lift the debt limit as long as Congress has passed a budget resolution that contains certain debt-reduction measures for the current year. Failing that, the president would still be able to raise the debt ceiling unilaterally, though Congress would have 30 days to override the decision.
It's yet another delegation of congressional authority to the executive, but Rep. Scott Peters (D–Calif.), one of the members to sign this week's letter to Pelosi, says the upshot is an end to political brinkmanship over the debt ceiling—a recurring showdown that often features a government shutdown but that does not accomplish anything in terms of debt and deficit policy.
And, remember, raising the debt ceiling is not the same as adding to the debt. The debt ceiling merely authorizes the Treasury to borrow funds to pay for spending already approved by Congress. Objections to increasing the debt ceiling amount to little more than a refusal to pay overdue credit card bills—a temper tantrum that doesn't address the actual problem of overspending.
A bipartisan debt commission and changes to the debt ceiling won't fix America's fiscal mess, but they are "commonsense ideas" that "would be important steps in the right direction," according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that advocates for reducing the deficit.
And they are steps that the country will have to take, sooner or later. "We owe it to our children," the lawmakers wrote to Pelosi, "to acknowledge our country's unsustainable fiscal trajectory and work together, across the aisle, to address it over time."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Can't they just pluck a few leaves off the Magic Money Tree?
Only under a double rainbow.
Conjoined unicorns' farts?
""Our national debt should be a top priority for both parties and addressed on a bipartisan basis."
It is, they are.
Increasing it.
Junkies dey dont want off da Dope.
When will Piglousi die? Mc Stain needs help drinking in hell.
That's exactly what they will do. Plan accordingly.
The Build Back Better Bill does juts that. It specifically addresses the 94.33% debt initiated under Reagan, Bush 1&2 and Trump. Pelosi and the Biden administration are already overseeing a federal government budget surplus of $119 billion in January 2022 compared with a deficit of $163 billion in the same month last year.
The Republicans are obstructing the BBB, they refuse to take responsibility for their excessive spending.
Are you fucking joking? If so, it’s a so-so attempt. If you’re not, kill yourself.
You need to take a math class and an Econ class
If this isn't a parody, it's the most delusional thing posted today, and that takes quite a bit.
its a Troll and interesting..my two responses were instantly deleted.
I think congressman should work on commission
If they balance the budget, they get their salary
I bet we balance the budget in 6 months
Nancy Pelosi is so awesome. We in the billionaire-funded #Resistance couldn't ask for a better Congressional leader.
Pelosi on Putin: "This is the same tyrant who attacked our democracy in 2016."
#LibertariansForGettingToughWithRussia
"'This is a Sudetenland' -- Pelosi on Russian aggression in Ukraine"
I can barely contain my excitement. We might actually get the war with Russia I've been craving since 2016.
#LibertariansForPelosi
[JOIN NOW] I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($200 to $300 / hr.) online from my laptop. Last month I got cheek of nearly 30,000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have to go office, Its home online job. hhj You become independent after joining this job. I really thanks to my friend who refer me this:-
..
SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
#LibertariansForWar
#BidenIs
Putin knows PissPants Joe is a toddering senile waste.
If Trump were Pres, this wouldnt be happening.
And if BidenS werent screwing around in Ukraine this wouldnt be happening.
Balanced budget in 5 years, maybe less....
TRUMP: There are so many things that we can cut ... and we can balance the budget very quickly. HANNITY: You think in five years? TRUMP: I think over a five-year period. And I don't know, maybe I could even surprise you. [Fox News - Hannity, 1/21/16]
If trump had won a second term, the national debt would be paid off by now.
We just need to get rid of the democrats and the RINO’s.
Luckily the reps can vote for trump in jail, see Eugene Debs.
Haha, the lead prosecutor for the New York investigation into Trump just resigned, making it doubtful any further investigation will continue. Seems highly unlikely he will be going to jail. But you keep the hope alive.
N Y Atty Gen Letitia James is conducting a parallel civil investigation and has successfully gone to court to force Trump and two of his children to sit for depositions in the coming days. She was astonished that trump disagreed with his own lawyers in his signed pleading, amazingly the next day. The Unindicted Co-Conspirator keeps committing more crimes, Toilet-Gate and 15 boxes of stolen classified documents. He continues to go on TV confessing to crimes of lying about his properties, confessing that his properties are worth more than he fraudulently claimed on years of tax forms, which is why his Mazar acct. firm quit and is giving evidence of his decade tax fraud. https://www.justsecurity.org/75032/litigation-tracker-pending-criminal-and-civil-cases-against-donald-trump/
Yep just keep believing, especially as this is a civil case and not a criminal case
?????
Thanks President Biden and Pelosi:
Biden economy: Highest GDP since 1984. Stronger than pre- pandemic.(Bureau of Economic Analysis ) Unemployment rate "full employment.”
Fastest decline on record.( US Department of Labor) Wages highest increase in 21 years. ( US Department of Labor) Disposable income higher than 2019-20. (Bureau of Economic Analysis ) Child poverty cut in half. (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) More jobs added in first year than ever before. ( US Department of Labor) All sectors have seen job gains. ( US Department of Labor) Bankruptcy rate lowest in 21 years. Record 5,364,025 new business starts. (The Business Formation Statistics (BFS), U.S. Census Bureau )
Treasury Department :
The federal government ran a budget surplus of $119 billion in January 2022 compared with a deficit of $163 billion in the same month last year.
Nice try Shreek.
If we had a surplus, that would be amazing news, but I've not even seen Biden try to make those claims. As for the rest of your statement, it's just as delusional as the rest of your statement.
The surplus in January is usually largely to due to holiday spending and interest earned on income tax overpayments. During the next three months, these overpayments will be paid back as a result of people filing income tax returns. The surplus doesn't begin to cover the overpayments (and the fact that a good percentage of tax payers receive refunds larger than their accrued annual tax bill). This is why mentioning the surplus in January has always been considered an anomaly that is not considered durable. The costs of entitlements is so much a driver of the debt, that if you ended all federal expenditures, and only used all federal taxes, including payroll, income and excise taxes only to pay for entitlements we would still run a deficit (not to mention likely crashing the economy in the process as well as spiking unemployment drastically as all federal and elected officials, plus the military would be out of a job, which would only drive up entitlement costs further) trying to forecast a surplus without meaningful entitlement reform is pure smoke and mirrors bullshit.
You could also institute a 100% confiscatory tax on all assets at face value owned by the top 5% and even if this was possible (which it isn't as once you started moving that many assets the value of those assets would crash and ruin the economy) and still not make up the short fall in our budgets. Considering we haven't passed a budget in multiple years, and are working on continuing resolutions you also can't credit Biden with any decrease in the deficit at this time, or any decrease in debt accumulation. Any budget passed in March will only be good until September anyhow.
24 members of the House of Representatives
24 Congress persons actually care enough about the national debt to write a letter?
I doubt five of them would have voted for the Simpson-Bowles debt reduction plan.
Signing a letter is easy.
Isn’t this the part where you tell the inflation hawks how stupid they are?
Republicans Obstructing the amazing economic success, thanks to president Biden and Pelosi, is too easy to damage American Democracy...
Biden economy: Highest GDP since 1984. Stronger than pre- pandemic.(Bureau of Economic Analysis ) Unemployment rate "full employment.”
Fastest decline on record.( US Department of Labor) Wages highest increase in 21 years. ( US Department of Labor) Disposable income higher than 2019-20. (Bureau of Economic Analysis ) Child poverty cut in half. (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) More jobs added in first year than ever before. ( US Department of Labor) All sectors have seen job gains. ( US Department of Labor) Bankruptcy rate lowest in 21 years. Record 5,364,025 new business starts. (The Business Formation Statistics (BFS), U.S. Census Bureau )
Treasury Department :
The federal government ran a budget surplus of $119 billion in January 2022 compared with a deficit of $163 billion in the same month last year.
Cut and paste delusions now.
Turn yourself in, pederast.
Why do I think what Nancy really means is "Its time to double taxes!"?
Because the Trump Billionaires who got 83% of the Trump tax scam, at everyone else's expense, want you to believe that so they can continue to rip you off...
Every word you posted after ‘because’ is bullshit.
What world do you live in? What part of the multiverse did you come from, and is the TVA after you?
Just because you are a paranoid lunatic does not mean that the Tennessee Valley Authority is not out to get you.
Because they are.
"at everyone else's expense" --- Oh; do tell.... How did you *EARN* that money? Typical leftard; feels their freedom is the freedom to steal by gov-guns.
Blink once if you really believe any of that and twice if someone is forcing you to post.
We all got what you voted for bohem!
And we got it too!
Shit splatters equally.
Yeah, but who wants to pay 7 trillion dollars a year in taxes?
Only two? Amateurs.
Eliminate the CDC.
Eliminate anything federal to do with education.
End student loan guarantees.
Eliminate all federal funds associated with "global climate warming change".
Eliminate the energy department
Eliminate the transportation department.
(Be sure it is eliminate, not reduce. If you don't dig out the root and salt the earth, they will come beck.)
+++++++++++++++++++
1111111111111111111
Ironic you did not list the massive corporate tax avoidance, the subsidized corporate welfare more than twice what we spend on social services, not to mention the 60% of our taxes going down the Pentagon blackhole that has never passed an audit. . How do you account for that, unless you are a right wing corporate fascist?
None of your facts ar win order. You’re either more idiotic than our usual idiots, or Buttplug.
Actually, most of our budget is taken up non-discretionary spending, and FICA doesn't even come close to covering it.
Parody? It's so hard to tell these days.
lol... Oh but he did BIG TIME...
"subsidized corporate welfare"
As all that subsidizing comes entirely from the list presented.
The federal government has no authority for Social Services either.
I think congressman should work on commission
If they balance the budget, they get their salary
I bet we balance the budget in 6 months
End federal student loans. End national endowment for the arts. End any and all assistance to public broadcasting.
While 24 members is not a lot, if they stick to their position they could be effect. The number at this time is enough to either pass or hold up legislation. SO, the question is would they hold up under pressure from their parties? It would also be interesting to know if these are moderates from competitive districts?
(D) or (R), there are no longer moderates.
You have to be a wild-eyed fanatic to survive in either one.
Well, you have to pretend to be one at least.
Problem comes with party control of big money for elections. What used to be small, local affairs like for a house seat are so party funded that pissing off Pelosi or whoever means Party money goes away or, worse, against you.
Senate is more so. Even state level offices there's a pretty big party money boost, so you don't want to buck the big spender that is Republican or Democrat leadership.
heh, I'm extra cynical today.
Well, we seem to be doing incredible well under President Biden. We usually do under Democratic presidents.
Biden economy: Highest GDP since 1984. Stronger than pre- pandemic.(Bureau of Economic Analysis ) Unemployment rate "full employment.”
Fastest decline on record.( US Department of Labor) Wages highest increase in 21 years. ( US Department of Labor) Disposable income higher than 2019-20. (Bureau of Economic Analysis ) Child poverty cut in half. (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) More jobs added in first year than ever before. ( US Department of Labor) All sectors have seen job gains. ( US Department of Labor) Bankruptcy rate lowest in 21 years. Record 5,364,025 new business starts. (The Business Formation Statistics (BFS), U.S. Census Bureau )
Treasury Department :
The federal government ran a budget surplus of $119 billion in January 2022 compared with a deficit of $163 billion in the same month last year.
I assume that bullshit was part of some Media Matters talking points list. I’m sure you d9nt even understand what you posted.
You are correct the comment above is cut and paste. It is also true that the economy tends to do better under Democrats. Debt tends to decrease under Democratic Presidents because these are the times that Republicans are deficit hawks.
Really depends on when you start your analysis. Usually analysis like this start with Bill Clinton or some other arbitrary time period purposely chosen to slant the analysis.
Some of that is because really large deficient spending, while not engaged in war, started with President Reagan. But I am open to another analysis, what President would you start the analysis with?
Also, would you agree that the deficit hawk in Republican tends to only come out when the President is a Democrat?
An analysis factoring in the pandemic would be a good start, then dropping your attempts at objectivity, 'moderate politics,' would be another.
Where were these clowns when the R's were whisking Trump's unfunded tax cuts through the Congress?
It is very impressive how they assume that nobody remembers anything from more than about 20 minutes ago.
Do you remember the part where federal revenues went UP after the tax changes?
As a Navy friend said when I mentioned " spending like drunken sailors..." drunken sailors stop ( drinking, whoring) when they run out of money."
94.33% debt initiated under Reagan, Bush 1&2 and Trump. Pelosi and the Biden administration are already overseeing a federal government budget surplus of $119 billion in January 2022 compared with a deficit of $163 billion in the same month last year.
Don't get your hopes up.
Biden is planning to spend over 6 trillion dollars this year, and next and the year after that.
Tax revenues are around 4 trillion with no political will to raise them, and no growing economy to raise them automatically.
In other words, by the end of his first term, Biden's share of the debt will be around 25%. (10 out of 40 trillion)
and much of its welfare !
8 T + 2021
The surplus in 2022 is a normal aberration that occurs most years, but didn't occur in 2021 due to the pandemic outliers and decreased economic activity. It's a meaningless data point. Which is why not even Biden is crowing about it. It also isn't forecasted to last. So, it's delusional even to bring it up.
Congress never stops, though. And we just cannot get rid of the fuckers.
Of course not.
Recall the 2008 CBR deadline and how they ignored it?
A reason looking for an excuse.
She is joining this recognizing the DemonRats will lose both houses in November, and focusing on the debt is a way for them to limit the powers and influence of the Republicans.
"Perhaps it was the symbolic $30 trillion debt threshold that has prompted some lawmakers to call on Pelosi to take action."
Even after trillions spent by Reagan (for, ostensibly, ending the cold war), the national debt, in 1990, was something like $4 trillion in today's money.
Maybe we need a "debt threshold" a whole lot less than $30 trillion.
Uh, sorry. $8.5 trillion in today's money.
Don't worry, math is racist.
Yeah, I keep forgetting that.
94.33% debt initiated under Reagan, Bush 1&2 and Trump. Pelosi and the Biden administration are already overseeing a federal government budget surplus of $119 billion in January 2022 compared with a deficit of $163 billion in the same month last year.
Yeah you keep pasting that shit here. I’ll bet you copied most or all of it from another source. Do you even understand what you copy/pasted? Probably not.
Which is expected, as democrats are incapable of understanding economics.
Leaving out Clinton, Obama, and Biden makes this parody too on the nose.
Can someone explain to me how allowing the President to unilaterally lift the debt ceiling is going to help lower our national debt? Opposite day must be every day in Washington.
On top of that, we all know that when Congress says they are "cutting" spending, what they are really doing is reducing proposed increases.
Yeah, that weaseled in because they know Dems are losing House and Senate soon.
Brandon still has some milking left in him.
I would have thought the EPA would have forbid the "smoke" part of "smoke and mirrors" by now.
Yeah, bring it up this year, when there's no chance of Pelosi doing anything.
Lol
We've also asked Nancy to give up vodka and Botox.
How many "We" signed and sent that delusional fantasy request?
Silcon and botox..both leak in a body and tend to migrate to the brain causing irrational stupidity
Oh no! Shell contract into a giant wrinkled rectum without Botox!
How about when we run out of money, the Congress is notified, and any spending authorizations after that fact are voided. that keeps us from the stupid argument of thinking the only "responsible" option is simply to raise the debt ceiling.
"Big deal, we hit an iceberg. Help me re-arrange these deck chairs, will you?"
The hilarious thing about small-government libertarians also being national debt obsessives is that their face is arguing against itself. The federal government's deficit is equivalent to a private sector surplus, so what you're arguing in favor of is raising taxes.
And yes, the US should raise certain taxes. There is too much money in certain private-sector pockets. I'm glad we're finally on the same page.
You assume government owns everything and ‘allows people to keep some of their money’. When it’s the other way around.
It's neither way around. Ownership is a legal abstraction. It's a guarantee that the government will send armed goons if someone violates the claim government has granted you to a plot of land or some shit. It's rather circular.
confiscating 401K's and your savings accounts (when they decide we need to consumer more) leaving IOU's will occur. And the Wapo will tar anyone as a nazi or putin lover if you object. Authoritarianism is now called "democracy" in the US..
The government could do that. It can do anything. It has the greatest military force the world has ever known, not to mention a vast ocean of very well-fed police forces.
I suggest not voting for fascist lunatics, but that's exactly what you're going to do, isn't it?
We didn't, but Biden won anyhow. If you look at the actual practices and policies of Fascism, it's far closer to the Democrats platform than the Republican ones.
Democrats need a Platform...with a trap door.
That's exactly what he assumes and has said plenty of times in the past. Don't let him say otherwise.
Eric, I appreciate the idea of this article but she is not the root problem. The root problem is that Americans refuse to elect ANY candidate that says they will balance the budget/spending OR heaven forbid attempt to cut Federal largesse by say 2% per year.
Youre a piss poor LIAR.
SHE is the ramrod for spending. The House does budgeting.
https://www.thebalance.com/us-deficit-by-year-3306306
FY Deficit Debt Increase (in billions) Deficit-to-GDP Ratio
1929 ($1) ($1) (0.7%)
1930 ($1) ($1) (0.8%)
1931 $0 $1 0.6%
1932 $3 $2 4.6%
1933 $3 $3 4.6%
1934 $4 $5 5.4%
1935 $3 $2 3.8%
1936 $4 $5 5.1%
1937 $2 $3 2.4%
1938 $0 $1 0.1%
1939 $3 $3 3.0%
1940 $3 $3 2.8%
1941 $5 $6 3.8%
1942 $21 $23 12.4%
1943 $55 $64 26.9%
1944 $48 $64 21.2%
1945 $48 $58 20.9%
1946 $16 $10 7.0%
1947 ($4) ($11) (1.6%)
1948 ($12) ($6) (4.3%)
1949 ($1) $0 (0.2%)
1950 $3 $5 1.0%
1951 ($6) ($2) (1.8%)
1952 $2 $4 0.4%
1953 $6 $7 1.7%
1954 $1 $5 0.3%
1955 $3 $3 0.7%
1956 ($4) ($2) (0.9%)
1957 ($3) ($2) (0.7%)
1958 $3 $6 0.6%
1959 $13 $8 2.5%
1960 $0 $2 (0.1%)
1961 $3 $3 0.6%
1962 $7 $9 1.2%
1963 $5 $8 0.7%
1964 $6 $6 0.9%
1965 $1 $6 0.2%
1966 $4 $3 0.5%
1967 $9 $6 1.0%
1968 $25 $21 2.7%
1969 ($3) $6 (0.3%)
1970 $3 $17 0.3%
1971 $23 $27 2.0%
1972 $23 $29 1.8%
1973 $15 $31 1.0%
1974 $6 $17 0.4%
1975 $53 $58 3.2%
1976 $74 $87 3.9%
1977 $54 $78 2.6%
1978 $59 $73 2.5%
1979 $41 $55 1.6%
1980 $74 $81 2.6%
1981 $79 $90 2.5%
1982 $128 $144 3.8%
1983 $208 $235 5.7%
1984 $185 $195 4.6%
1985 $212 $251 4.9%
1986 $221 $302 4.8%
1987 $150 $225 3.1%
1988 $155 $252 3.0%
1989 $153 $255 2.7%
1990 $221 $376 3.7%
1991 $269 $432 4.4%
1992 $290 $399 4.5%
1993 $255 $347 3.7%
1994 $203 $281 2.8%
1995 $164 $281 2.1%
1996 $107 $251 1.3%
1997 $22 $188 0.3%
1998 ($69) $113 (0.8%)
1999 ($126) $130 (1.3%)
2000 ($236) $18 (2.3%)
2001 ($128) $133 (1.2%)
2002 $158 $421 1.4%
2003 $378 $555 3.3%
2004 $413 $596 3.4%
2005 $318 $554 2.4%
2006 $248 $574 1.8%
2007 $161 $501 1.1%
2008 $459 $1,017 3.1%
2009 $1,413 $1,885 9.8%
2010 $1,294 $1,652 8.6%
2011 $1,300 $1,229 8.3%
2012 $1,077 $1,276 6.6%
2013 $680 $672 4.0%
2014 $485 $1,086 2.8%
2015 $442 $327 2.4%
2016 $585 $1,423 3.1%
2017 $665 $671 3.4%
2018 $779 $1,271 3.8%
2019 $984 $1,203 4.6%
2020 $3,132 $4,226 15.0%
2021 $2,772 $1,484 12.1%
lowest Deficit increase as % of GDP for each president.
Trump : 3.4%
Obama: 2.4%
Bush 43: -1.2% (budget surplus)
Clinton: -2.3% (budget surplus)
Bush 41: 2.7%
Reagan: 2.5%
Carter: 1.6%
Ford: 0.4% * (four months of 1974)
*Gold Standard dropped in 1971*
Nixon: -0.3% (budget surplus)
Obama And Biden fucked us good. 4 digits...
Well, they can inflate it away albeit at the risk of destroying the republic.
Look at this point it the principal can't be paid back. and there is NO elected politician who will either cut spending or raise taxes enormously which is needed (one and most likely both).
The Fed could simply forgive the debt it is holding but you would get deflation and a huge recession (as not rolling over the debt would essentially be a huge monetary contraction).
Or all western democracies can just default and we move to a new currency, one tied to say gold and get govt out of deciding what money is or what interest rates or credit should be. And that isn't going to occur.
Most likely they will debase the currency and blame say white privilege when society starts to collapse or find a war to fight
Agree. Inflation is a politician’s time-honored method of reducing the value of indebtedness. Since there are relatively few other somewhat palatable solutions, this will likely be the course of action. The easiest way of achieving this is to do nothing to counter high inflation while understating the true rate of inflation, thus lowering future entitlement payments in relative terms. Both of these are already happening.
liar. No inflation now, just like none in 2012 when the Lying Media were screaming about it.
Inflation was 0.8% in 2012, a historical low.
They shouted" inflation" as a cover for Obamas i mnsane incompetence in economics.
None now either . Arbitrary price increases due to lack of SALES is NOT INFLATION.
Also, Putin just told Biden to fuck off and has announced further military actions in Ukraine and has warned the US and Western Europe not to try and intervene. Seems like Biden is batting a 1.000 on foreign policies as well as economic policies.
Bet me...Putins getting Biden OUT of there.
Notice how quiet Team Drool are on this...
He promises a speech tomorrow after he talks to everyone on the phone to announce more sanctions. Because the first ones worked so well and scared Putin to bad, he completely ignored them.
Biden asking Putey to not hack us established Bidet as a powerful respectable world figure...
My ass...
Grovelling droolung bastard..
Fuck Joe Biden
Also both Boris Johnson and Biden telephoned the Ukrainian president to give their support, because he has time to take meaningless phone calls while his country is being invaded, he has nothing more pressing. Also both Biden and Johnson condemned this actions and states they are entirely Russia's choice. Because that will show Putin.
Putin knows NATO is not ready or willing to go to war over this and the sanctions don't seem to scare him. On the other hand the Dow Jones futures are off by over 800 points and oil futures shot up 3% already.
Pelosi and the Democrats are very concerned about the deficit. Concerned about increasing the deficit by trillions as soon and as much as possible!
Good news, free everything for everybody! Effective tax rate for working people, 110% of all income.
I can't get behind a proposal to give the President--any president---authority to raise the debt ceiling unilaterally. The argument that debt ceiling fights are an ineffective temper tantrum is valid, but at the very least, it is the only thing that puts deficit spending back into national attention, however briefly and ineffectively. Something must be done to address the ever accelerating launch over the fiscal cliff, but this isn't it.
What happened to The House controlling the Budget process? Pelosi was having a screaming fit when she thought Trump was taking her little spending
kingdom away.
She needs a stay at Betty Fords place. Hillbag should join her.
Peppermint Psaki going on Cable TV?
So they need another BARF ?
Bitter
Angry
Radical
Feminist ?
Shes not 290 pounds, she cant be on the View.
Not only for sane debt reduction but restricting spending will also help with the inflation crisis. Start with unspent but approved money for Covid and cancel it. That should be the easy one.
thre is no inflation crisis.
They invented it just like in 2010-2012
Rising prices when inflation was 0.8% 2012 at a historic low.
My own Congresscritter, Chris Pappas, is one of the signatories. His devotion to fiscal sanity is newfound; I'm pretty sure he's voted for every single spendapalooza bill that's come through the House, including Build Back Better. I interpret his signature as essentially saying: "I really want to be re-elected in November, maybe this will fool enough voters in NH-01 at the margin."
The government will not reduce the deficit unless it can be done in such a way that allows them to spend even more tax dollars. This requires some other ridiculous rationalization from some fringe "economist".
" economist " is like " virologist " or " CDC director"
All in Clown suits
Pelosi will die having spent most of the wealth of three generations born after her who will have to pay for it. She will spend eternity in Hell which is the only consolation to those she abused.
Democrats repeatedly commit fiscal abuse because they are selfish and irresponsible. That's a fact.
That's a lie that Republicans tell themselves. National debt has gone up essentially the same under Republicans and Democrats and then they both point their fingers and do nothing and keep spending like a drunk in a whorehouse. They both have shitty policies, and you know that as well as I do.
Democratic legislation doesn't all get repealed just because Republicans gain a majority.... But you're right; it should.
But good luck trying to prove your baseline theory as we all watched the D-Team pitch 10x the spending that every R pitched.
I wonder why Reason articles always talk about democrats running up the debt when Republicans blow up the debt just as much, they just happen to spend on different priorities. Neither party is innocent in this.
And never-mind if that spending is for Constitutional Purposes or Nazi-Regime building to take-over the USA... /s
VH 032 Linker 2
Triethylene glycol is a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based PROTAC linker. Triethylene glycol can be used in the synthesis of a series of PROTACs.
https://ptc.bocsci.com/product/triethylene-glycol-cas-112-27-6-291918.html