James Gunn's The Suicide Squad Is a Movie About Being Canceled (by a Giant Starfish Monster)

The most subversive thing about the movie is that the director was allowed to make it at all.


The various gross-out gags that writer-director James Gunn cooked up for The Suicide Squad include: a stupid talking shark ripping a man in half, John Cena appearing in tighty-whities, a kaiju-sized one-eyed starfish having its ocular cavity eaten out by mind-controlled rats, the pathetic drowning of a man-sized weasel creature, and a slap fight carried out by a character whose superpower is detachable, levitating arms. It's a weird, outrageous, self-consciously over-the-top movie built out of gory B-movie hijinks: Even the title card is written in the shimmery floating blood of a man whose head has been blown up via a remote-controlled, brain-implanted bomb.

What might be even more subversive than the movie itself, though, is the fact that Gunn was allowed to make it all.

Gunn, after all, was the victim of a high-profile cancellation job, an intentional effort to publicly smear him and have him fired for tasteless jokes he'd made on Twitter years earlier.

In 2018, Gunn got involved in a minor and mostly irrelevant online argument about whether liberals should pay any attention to the arguments made by pundits on the right, and specifically Ben Shapiro. Gunn's position was, more or less, that Ben Shapiro is annoying, but also that it might not be the worst idea to occasionally listen to some of your ideological opponents—or at the very least that we shouldn't actively attack people for suggesting that listening to your political opponents might be a good thing.

At the time, Gunn, who had come of age working as a shock-horror maestro for Troma Entertainment—home of the Toxic Avenger films—was riding high on the success of two Guardians of the Galaxy movies for the Marvel Cinematic Universe. He was booked to make a third, and to help oversee Marvel's expansion into cosmic storylines. But Marvel, of course, is owned by the famously risk-averse Disney, which zealously guards its family-friendly image.

So when some right-wing provocateurs dug up a series of years-old tweets by Gunn making vulgar, tasteless Twitter jokes about harming and sometimes sexually exploiting children, Disney gave Gunn the boot.

In one sense, Gunn's tweets were obviously in poor taste—or at least not the taste of what Disney imagines as its typical customer. They certainly did not fit with Disney's clean and friendly corporate image.

In another sense, however, they were exactly what Disney was paying him for. His early work on films like Slither and Tromeo and Juliet was deliberately shocking, intended to amuse and entertain through a particular kind of scatological, self-aware offense giving. The Guardians films, which blended B-movie sci-fi tropes with absurdist weirdo humor, worked as a PG-13 mixdown of his R-rated sensibilities.

Disney had hired Gunn, the vulgar provocateur, and made more than $1 billion in the box office on his ideas. The company then turned around and fired him for having been a vulgar provocateur when online trolls got mad about it.

It's not too hard to imagine a world in which someone like that has trouble working again, or at least has difficulty working for big studios making big-budget movies. Bad tweets can maim even the most promising careers.

But fortunately for both Gunn and those who enjoy his work, Warner Bros., which owns Marvel's main competitor in the world of superheroes, DC Comics, saw an opportunity. The studio was in the process of rebooting The Suicide Squad, which had already been made into a dreadful, self-serious movie by David Ayer. And the Suicide Squad, a hyper-violent, often absurdist team of loser super-anti-heroes, looked like a perfect match for Gunn's particular sensibility.

The result is in theaters and on HBO Max this weekend, and it's a gloriously obscene delight—a gory, funny, surrealist romp through the DC Comics D-list that is both reverent to its source material and an effective send-up of superhero movie pretensions. The Suicide Squad won't be for everyone—if you're sensitive about on-screen blood and guts, stick with Black Widow—but for a movie so dedicated to Gunn's distinctive, adolescent aesthetic, it's also a surprisingly effective crowd pleaser.

The darkest, most amusing thing about the movie, however, might be the way that Gunn has stealthily made it about his own cancellation. (Warning: Minor spoilers ahead.)

It's a movie about a team of villains you're supposed to root for, and one way to make that easier is to draw a distinction between the ordinary bad guys and the truly evil people. And in the movie's moral taxonomy, you can always identify the truly evil by their willingness to…harm and exploit children, a point that is emphasized again and again, until it becomes clear that it's a meta-reference to Gunn's own employment troubles.

Later, it's revealed that the big bad is the aforementioned giant starfish monster, Starro the Conqueror. Starro draws its power from controlling the minds of others via swarms of tiny starfishes attached to their faces, forcing them to act as a mindless, destructive collective. It's a mob, in other words, that grows more powerful as it takes over people's wills.

When the starfish is on the brink of killing a mad scientist who experimented on it for years, the scientist tries to negotiate: "I understand where you are coming from," he pleads, promising to reform his evil ways. "I'm ready for change!" It tears him apart anyway.

Gunn, of course, had deleted his tweets and issued an apology. He was fired anyway.

There are probably some lessons here. For one thing, it can pay to ignore the mob. For another, it's better to judge people by their current work rather than their old tweets. Also, a stupid giant shark-man ripping tearing apart a bad guy in gory slow motion is funnier than you might think.

And there's a happy ending too: Marvel rehired Gunn to write and direct Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, which is coming out in 2023.

NEXT: What We Can Learn From the U.K. About the Delta Variant

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. title infringement? or same group of characters sans Margot Robbie?

    1. Some of the same characters, some different. Margot Robbie is in it.

      1. Fantastic work-from-home 0pportunity for every0ne… Work for three t0 eight a day and start getting paid in XXX the range of 17,000-19,000 dollars a m0nth… Weekly payments Learn More details Good luck…

        See……………VISIT HERE

    2. Nope, mostly new characters and Margot Robbie is still Harley Quinn in this.

      1. kewl. and shut my mouth I didn’t see her in the pic. gracias both ^^^

  2. Why do people take “trends” on facebook & twitter so seriously? Don’t they know that a minority of users are the ones raising hell, choosing to spend way too much time on this trivia. Piss on them.

    1. Because reporters are lazy.

      Once twitter introduced APIs to let people farm it for what’s trending, mainstream press began doing THAT to see what was popular instead of, you know, having actual reporters who knew how to do the job.

      It spiraled downhill from there. Report trending on twitter, so learn to manipulate the algorithm to get your preferred topic in trending, so more reporting, so more manipulation, in an endless spiral down the toilet.

  3. Haven’t seen any of his films, don’t plan to. Doesn’t sound like a person I would want to support. Never liked superhero or gore films or understood why anyone would watch them.

    I have read other reviews of this film and I understand they layer on the left wing nonsense thick.

    1. “Never liked superhero or gore films or understood why anyone would watch them.”

      It’s very telling when someone admits they struggle to fathom the concept of other people liking different things than them

      1. This short horror music video is the anti-cancel culture anthem.

        Cancel Vulture, March of the Cancelbots…

    2. Then why comment?

    3. You sure are a downer seatbelt.

  4. If this was truly subversive John Cena’s character would say, “Taiwan is an independent country!”

    1. Aaargh! This is supposed to be a family channel!

  5. The most subversive thing about the movie is that the director was allowed to make it at all.

    Because there was a Suicide Squad movie like three years ago?

    1. It flopped, so they made it again. Sort of like Justice League. Which having all of the flaws of the first, just twice as long, seemed to succeed. Jeepers, they’ve rebooted Superman more times than Marvel has rebooted Spiderman!

      1. Did you actually watch the Snyder version of Justice League? It’s a completely different movie in tone, dialogue, characterization, and narrative, not just length.

        1. There’s no reason to ever watch a Zach Snyder movie

  6. So Disney is okay with rehiring someone who tweeted totally reprehensible things, but if you’re not quite woke enough, you’re still out?

    1. Yeah, “tasteless tweets” doesn’t really do justice to the shit he posted, and I’m not going to repeat any of his filth in my comment.

      Gunn was allowed to continue in show business precisely because he’s a good loyal entertainment industry democrat, shitting on Trump as required and attacking right wing media personalities. I’m sure he’ll continue to get offered the mega-franchise titles due to being such an obedient, card varying member of legacy Hollywood. What a fucking hypocrite.

      1. I think he was allowed to continue in show business because he makes the studio a shit ton of cash, and at the end of the day that is really all any studio really cares about.

        That, and Warner Brothers was desperate for a director to actually make decent films and stealing a guy who made Disney billions was a no brainer for them.

        Disney just didn’t want to lose one of their best directors to WB, it more or less forced their hand if they wanted to continue making billions off the Guardians franchise. Who were they going to replace Gunn with? Nobody, that’s who. They just had to wait for the lynch mob to cool off, and since apparently no one gave a shit that Gunn directed this film they figured why the hell not.

        1. Taka Watiti (spelling?).

          Thor Ragnarok was the best of those movies, despite Mark Ruffalo’s whining bitchiness

  7. The company then turned around and fired him for having been a vulgar provocateur when online trolls got mad about it.

    Except the stuff wasn’t typical Hollywood scat humor, it was creepy pederastic stuff about Catholic priests chasing after underage schoolgirls, with him and a couple of tarts in costume. Also, Gunn wasn’t some dumbshit teenager when he did those posts, he was in his mid-40s.

    Whether Gunn deserved to be let go for that is up for debate, but let’s not forget the context in which this happened, which Suderman doesn’t even bother mentioning here: Gunn had been quite vociferous that Roseanne Barr deserved to get fired for her own provocative remarks just a few days earlier. Mike Cernovich and a bunch of other wags did what the left does to everyone else–they used the enemy’s tactics against them.

    The Starfish scene referenced here is nothing more than revisionist history from an emotionally stunted asshole who reaped what he had sown.

    1. I’m fine with cancellers getting canceled.

  8. Saw a couple previews and it looks pretty messy. Hard pass.

  9. How long until Ken swoops in with a tl;dr; comparing the movie to liberal/conservative politics?

  10. NERDS!!’

  11. If Robbie isn’t in a half shirt and hot pants forget it.

    1. Best Harley movie of the 3 so far. She has less screen time but makes the most of it.

  12. Another lesson: it pays to judge someone by his enemies…

  13. This movie is so good i just saw the trailer

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.