Food Policy

The U.K. Uses COVID-19 to Justify More Nanny State Junk Food Crackdowns

Bans on ads, displays, refills, and buy-one-get-one-free offers

|

The United Kingdom has been attacking its citizens' food choices for years and now the government is using the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse for a new crackdown.

On Monday, the U.K.'s Department of Health and Social Care announced a pack of new regulations that will be implemented in April 2022 to restrict junk food promotions.

In 2018, London implemented a ban of junk food advertising that was written so broadly that it forbid promotion of all sorts of normal foods (like butter, olive oil, and canned fruit) not because those items were unhealthy but because they had sugar, salt, or fat levels beyond government-approved thresholds.

The U.K. now plans a nationwide ban on television advertisements for what it calls "junk food" before 9 p.m. And that's not the only new regulation. Also on the list:

  • Retailers will not be permitted to offer "buy one, get one free" promotions (or similar offers) for foods the government deems unhealthy.
  • Retails will not be permitted to display these unhealthy foods for promotioal purposes near checkout counters, near the front of the store, or on the ends of aisles.
  • Retailers will not be permitted to promote unhealthy foods on the entry or landing pages of their websites.
  • Free refills of sugary drinks will be banned at restaurants.

"We know families want to be presented with healthier choices," said Public Health Minister Jo Churchill. "This is why we are restricting promotions and introducing a range of measures to make sure the healthy choice is the easy choice." They're going to make it the "easy choice" by deliberately bringing about economic harm to any competing choices!

The government claims that the British people have an obesity problem—more than 63 percent of adults and a third of elementary school children are overweight. Because the United Kingdom has socialized medicine through the National Health Service (NHS), this means the healthcare costs associated with obesity, which are estimated to be 6 billion pounds annually ($8 billion), are everybody's problem.

The U.K. government can't seem to acknowledge or accept the idea that people are voluntarily and willingly making bad choices. This Nanny State mentality means that the government must lay the blame on those who sell or advertise unhealthy food.

"Promotions often appear to help shoppers save money," the agency explained in its press release. "However, data shows that these deals actually increase purchases of promoted products by almost 20%. They encourage people to buy more than they need or intended to buy in the first place."

But people always need food. If you buy more food than you "need or intended to buy in the first place" you can usually save it for the future. That is what sales, promotions, and other low-pricing deals accomplish. They allow people to stock up and store food. That's particularly important when governments everywhere are trying to discourage people from gathering in public places due to the pandemic.

Speaking of COVID-19, even though the U.K.'s food nannyism has been building for years, British officials can't help but try to use the coronavirus as a justification for their actions: "The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to the fore the impact that obesity can have on people's health and health outcomes."

Christopher Snowdon, a regular critic of the United Kingdom's regulatory overreach, an obesity data skeptic, and the head of lifestyle economics at the U.K.-based Institute of Economic Affairs, blasted the British government's condescending new rules on his blog:

All these years I've been buying a pack of four bars of soap and a pack of four tins of baked beans because it worked out cheaper on a per-unit basis than buying one. But now I understand that I would have spent less if I'd have just bought one or two. Admittedly, I'd have had to go shopping more often, but that's a small price to pay for saving money. Thank you, the government, for putting me straight.

Snowdon notes that a ban on buy-one-get-one-free promotions could cost the average family more than 600 pounds (more than $800) a year by the government's own estimate. That means that British officials are trying to deliberately force up the cost of unhealthy foods because they think this will force people to choose healthier alternatives.

But that's just not what happens. Instead, shoppers will turn to black markets. Driving up the price of sodas in Philadelphia with a special tax, for example, did not affect how much soda that people drank. Lots of people there just avoided the taxes by buying their soda elsewhere.

What will U.K. health authorities do when their latest tactics fail to make people eat better? A cynic might assume they're already planning out even more new rules that are doomed to fail.

NEXT: The Trouble With John Roberts’ Brand of Legal Conservatism

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Wanna see some crackdowns? Wait until SleepyJoe is in power. Then you will see some crackdowns.

    1. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple works from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
      on this page…. Visit Here

    2. Crackdowns? Hell no, it will be head down, crack up and get ready to smile.

      1. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to adf do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
        on this page…..work92/7 online

    3. Nah-dems will not go after junk food because they don’t want to lose votes from certain target demographic groups. Same reason they won’t ban menthol cigarettes.

      1. I have received $17634 last month from home by working online in my part time. I am a full time student and doing this easy home based work for 3 to 4 hours a day. This job is very simple to do and its regular earnings are much better than any other office type work.
        See detail here………… USA ONLINE JOBS

    4. APPLY Online work from home USA online work details used this site…….USA ONLINE JOB.

    5. I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly UYT make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new… after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier. Here’s what I do…>> Visit Here

  2. We know families want to be presented with healthier choices,” said Public Health Minister Jo Churchill. “This is why we are restricting choices.

    1. Talk about your island or a large part of it subjugated and starving.

      1. Apparently Nazi Germany won WWII but somehow managed to convince the world that they lost.

        1. Get $192 hourly from Google!…Yes this is Authentic since I just got my first payout of $24413 and this was just of a single week… I have also bought my Range Rover Velar right after this payout…TYH It is really cool job I have ever had and you won’t forgive yourself if you do not check it…

          =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Home Profit System

  3. Yeah I long ago didn’t care what happened in England or Europe for that matter.

  4. I don’t agree with what they’re doing but seems like a logical step from lockdowns and masks. People who know what is best for you telling you what to do to protect you.

  5. Yeah it`s Possible…Anybody can earn 250$+ daily… You can earn from 6000-12000 a month or even more if you work as a full time job…It’s easy, just follow instructions on this page, read it carefully from start to finish… It’s a flexible job but a good
    eaning opportunity… Here is More information.

  6. Spotted — dicks in power.

  7. >>Retailers will not be permitted to offer “buy one, get one free” promotions

    right to contract?

    1. Switch it up to “Buy two, get two free”.

      1. How about “buy one, get one for a penny”? Loopholes anyone?

  8. “We know families want to be presented with healthier choices,”
    We know this, but we are going to take away most of those choices.

    Just because the UK left the EU doesn’t mean they are forsaking fascism.

  9. In the UK you need a license to own a TV. That’s right a license to own a fucking TV so the BBC can continue to broadcast crappy government controlled mind bending “information.”

    1. BBC documentary regarding TV fascism:

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mn1Y7nhB16U

  10. Really scary stuff. An assault on freedom. I will say though people will buy cheaper so if they can get healthy food cheaper than junk that will work.

    1. Yeah I don’t get why they don’t just tax unhealthy foods. Taxation is bad, yeah, but if you’re going to tax anything, start by taxing stuff that kills people.

  11. Well, British food generally sucks as it is, except for bangers and mash and of course fish and chips, which I suppose are junk foods too. Is there anything worth eating there that is not junk food by the government’s definition?

    1. I like how you think. All British food is junk, so a ban on junk food in Britain could only lead to mass starvation.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.