Drug War

This Florida Inmate Is Serving an Outdated Drug Sentence. Now He Has Coronavirus

Reason profiled William Forrester's 15-year mandatory minimum sentence in a 2017 investigation into Florida's draconian opioid trafficking laws.

|

Florida inmate William Forrester has served 11 years of a mandatory minimum drug sentence that is no longer on the books, imposed by a judge who thought it was too excessive.

William Forrester

Now he's one of 67 inmates at Bay Correctional Facility who has tested positive for COVID-19, as of today's numbers from the Florida Department of Corrections (FDOC).

Forrester, 64, suffers from multiple health issues and had a lung removed due to cancer before his incarceration, putting him at high risk of serious complications from the virus.

"I did try the furlough, but it kept getting rejected," Forrester writes in an email to Reason. "I hoped it may stop me from contracting COVID-19, but I caught it anyway. I have done 12 long years and now I'm down to 11 months. I had no idea my last year would be so rough. I've been pretty sick this past week but I am starting to feel better."

Forrester's case is in many ways a microcosm of the problems facing Florida's prisons. It shows how the drug war created a prison system bloated with elderly inmates serving mandatory minimums; how multiple levels of government failed to substantively address those injustices and declining prison conditions; and how the COVID-19 pandemic has put an exclamation point on all these failures.

"Florida had several options that could have been used to release Mr. Forrester," says Greg Newburn, director of state policy at the criminal justice advocacy group FAMM. "The Clemency Board could have commuted his sentence, Governor DeSantis could have granted a reprieve, and the Department of Corrections could have furloughed him into the care of a qualified sponsor. Instead, no one did anything, and now Mr. Forrester is sick."

Reason first profiled Forrester's case in a 2017 investigation into Florida's draconian opioid trafficking laws. Legislators passed harsh mandatory minimum sentences for drug trafficking in the late 1990s with the intention of targeting major dealers, but the weight thresholds to trigger the sentences were so low that prosecutors and police predominantly used them to ensnare low-level and first-time drug offenders, who were locked away for years, sometimes decades, for selling a bottle of pills.

Forrester was sentenced in 2009 to a mandatory-minimum 15 years in prison for trafficking oxycodone and obtaining a substance by fraud. In his case, a pharmacist filled a prescription for 120 oxycodone pills. When he came back to fill a second prescription, the pharmacist called the doctor to verify. When the doctor said he did not authorize either prescription, Forrester was arrested for trafficking the meds he had obtained the month before, as well as for forging the current prescription. Despite the trafficking charge, there was no evidence he intended to sell the pills.

At Forrester's sentencing hearing, the judge had no choice but to sentence him to the mandatory-minimum term. He told Forrester that if drug rehabilitation "was an option, then certainly we would talk about it. But my hands are tied by the law, and I have to sentence you to 15 years, and there's no ifs, ands, or buts about it. The legislature has said for this particular crime, we prescribe a fixed sentence. It doesn't give me A, B or C. I've only got A."

"I had no idea such long sentencing laws for not selling pills were even in existence," Forrester wrote in a 2017 letter to Reason. "I thought 'drug trafficking' laws were for people found guilty of huge quantities of drugs such as moving it in boats, planes, trunks of cars, etc."

The Florida state legislature amended the law in 2014 to raise the thresholds to trigger mandatory trafficking sentences, acknowledging they were far too harsh, but those changes were not retroactive. 

As a result, Forrester and hundreds of other Florida inmates are serving sentences that have since been taken off the books. Had he been sentenced under the 2014 thresholds, Forrester would've gotten out last year.

Florida lawmakers have introduced bills over the past several years to try and grant retroactive relief to these inmates, but all have failed.

Forrester also applied to have his sentence commuted through the state's Executive Clemency Board. His petition had the support of the judge who sentenced him to prison. 

"At the time of sentencing and even today I believe that the sentence was excessive given the crime, his criminal history, and the involvement of addiction in his life," Florida Senior Circuit Judge Roger McDonald wrote in a 2018 letter to the Executive Clemency Board.

The board denied the petition.

Because he's nearing the end of his sentence, Forrester would also be eligible for work release, but because one of his lungs was removed, he's considered disabled and therefore ineligible.

Forrester applied for a furlough—a temporary release into home confinement. FAMM has called on the FDOC to use its little-known statutory power to temporarily grant furlough to vulnerable inmates, but the FDOC disagrees with FAMM's interpretation of the statute.

The FDOC first told Forrester he had filled out the wrong form. On his second try, he was told medical furloughs were only available to those on work release, which of course he didn't qualify for because of his medical conditions.

"I want to let you know that we just got locked down in our cells, we are quarantined," Forrester wrote in a July 4 email to an advocacy group for incarcerated people. "Someone who lives in here is sick. The inevitable has just happened."

FDC reported the first case of COVID-19 at Bay Correctional Facility on July 8.

Prisoners are 5.5 times more likely to get COVID-19 and three times more likely to die from it, according to a study published this week in JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. States have released more than 33,000 incarcerated people in response to the threat of the virus, according to UCLA's COVID-19 Behind Bars tracking project. 

However, Florida has only released three inmates under a "conditional medical release" statute, which only allows inmates to be released if they are about to die or become "permanently incapacitated." Unlike in some other states, FDOC Secretary Mark Inch does not have the discretionary authority to release inmates.

In the meantime, 2,632 inmates and 885 staff members have tested positive for COVID-19, according to the latest numbers from the FDOC, and 29 inmates have died.

"We're hopeful [Forrester] will recover," Newburn says, "and we hope Florida's political leaders will pause, reflect, and reconsider the wisdom of not releasing anyone while COVID wreaks havoc inside our state prison system."

NEXT: Government Rescinds July 6 Directive on Student Visa Rules

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. People in jail for drugs should be released. But murderers in prison should be kept there, even if they are old and might catch COVID. Recently released inmates are testing positive for COVID-19, even when when they were screened before release, and did not show any symptoms until after being released. This is raising “concerns” that the disease “could spread to the communities where people return upon release,” according to a TV station. Inmates who are released often end up with their parents, who are older and could die from a case of COVID that would have much less effect on the typical inmate, who is young and unlikely to die of COVID.
    Sex offenders and murderers are being released from jail due to the coronavirus, enabling some of them to commit new crimes. ABC News reported that a high-risk registered sex offender was arrested just two weeks after a controversial early release from the Orange County Jail. Seven inmates who were deemed high-risk sex offenders were released early in April by a court commissioner, triggering criticism and warnings from law enforcement officials who said the release was not necessary because the jails were not overcrowded. In Massachusetts, convicted murderers were among the more than 200 inmates released by the Massachusetts Department of Correction under a state Supreme Court order citing the coronavirus pandemic. One of the murderers stabbed her victim 108 times over the course of several hours.

    1. I earned $5000 ultimate month by using operating online only for 5 to 8 hours on my computer and this was so smooth that i personally couldn’t accept as true with before working on this website.TRe if you too need to earn this sort of huge cash then come and be part of us. do this internet-website online..

      ===============►Home Profit System

    2. I’m all for updating sentences based on new law. If Charlie Manson got his death sentence commuted when the law changed, so should anyone else.

      That said, it’s a completely different issue than letting people out because COVID. That’s bullshit. Just like the rest of life, prison is full of risks and limitations, and the potential for getting sick, injured, or dead is part of that. It comes with the territory and logical fallacies don’t change that.

      1. The difference is that your sentence doesn’t allow the DOC to expose you to unreasonable harm. The DOC has a duty to keep you safe, because unlike the “rest of life” prisoners have no power to make choices to mitigate their exposure.

        1. “unreasonable harm.”

          When all cause death rates in prisons actually go up you might have an argument. Because prisons tend to be higher risk environments in general.

          Which, while true, is not unreasonable. Considering who is in them it is a given.

          1. When who is in them are non-violent drug offenders, I’d say the threshold for unreasonable risk of harm to those individuals is extremely low. I don’t think there’s any real argument that once COVID-19 is in a corrections facility there is a serious risk to inmates exceeding the general risk to the public.

            1. *isn’t a serious risk

              1. I earned $5000 ultimate month by using operating online only for 5 to 8 hours on my computer and this was so smooth that i personally couldn’t accept as true with before working on this websitecxc.. if you too need to earn this sort of huge cash then come and be part of us. do this internet-website online..
                See detail here…………Money90

    3. No one should be released from prison “because COVID”.

      COVID-19 is just the latest excuse for springing criminals from the hoosegow. And that’s all it is: An excuse.

      The severity of penalties for possessing opioids is a different matter. If someone is USING the drugs, I don’t think there should be any penalty – just as there’s no penalty for smoking. But if a serious medical condition arises from their choice to use the drugs, that’s on them and they shouldn’t expect anyone to provide them free medical care. (Similarly, if a smoker gets lung cancer, their insurance shouldn’t cover it unless they’ve paid a premium commensurate with the added risk.)

      Ironically, the difference between the pre- and post-2004 standards is… 2 years? 13%?

  2. Lots of people outside of jail get covid too.

    1. I really don’t feel any tears jerk when they want to profile prisoners getting covid. It has killed over 100k in the country and I’m supposed to be extra sympathetic to people in jail facing the same risks as everyone else? I haven’t actually looked at the numbers, but I don’t believe that covid deaths in prisons are any worse than the cities

      1. Even if they were much worse, so what? Did someone somewhere say that prison [sorry, correctional facilities] doesn’t naturally come with a few downsides? It also means there’s no such thing as casual Friday too. OMG!

        On the good side, it comes with a great free dental plan.

    2. Release convicts because COVID. Confine non-convicts because COVID.

      1. Now you’re getting it.

  3. This prisoner doesn’t appear to be a black man. Haven’t we been told, by experts no less, that only black men get disproportionate prison sentences? We should note, too, that Joe Biden approved the tough laws.

  4. I don’t feel tears but this guy shouldn’t be in prison anyway. So he gets double fucked over which gets him a little extra sympathy from me, whatever that’s worth (that and 50 cents will get you a cup of coffee).

    1. I earned $5000 ultimate month by using operating online only for 5 to 8 hours on my computer and this was so smooth that i personally couldn’t accept as true with before working on this website. if you too need to earn this sort of huge cash then come and be part of us. do this internet-website online.********************ReadMore.

  5. ●US Dollar Rain Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by google fantastic job oppertunity provide for our community pepoles who,s already using facebook to earn money 85000$ every month and more through facebook and google new project to create money at home withen few hours.Everybody can get this job now and start earning online by just open this link and then go through instructions to get started……….COPY HERE====►►CLICK HERE.

  6. I earned $5000 ultimate month by using operating online only for 5 to 8 hours on my computer and this was so smooth that i personally couldn’t accept as true with before working on this website.WSs if you too need to earn this sort of huge cash then come and be part of us. do this internet-website online..

    ===============► Detail Here.

  7. While not public enemy number one, Mr. Forrester had several prior chances. He was arrested and pled nolo to battery in 1999. He pled nolo to attempt to obtain drug by fraud in 2000. He once again pled to that same charge in 2006 and 2007 before going to prison for the same charge in 2008. Reason usually does a good job reporting. Did you fail to mention the four prior arrests to make the reader more sympathetic or did you fail to do your homework?

    1. Or maybe they just “failed to mention” the record because sometimes “Reason” lies.

      Apparently Forrester did NOT go to prison for 120 pills and an attempt to buy 120 more.

      Apparently he went to prison because he was a repeat offender who didn’t learn.

Please to post comments