Drug Policy

Canada Hobbles 'Legal' Marijuana With Burdensome Rules

Once again, underground suppliers step in when over-regulated markets can’t satisfy customers.


Marijuana legalization was supposed to give Canada's cannabis fanciers access to above board and reliable drug sources while providing tax revenue for the government. But one year in, large numbers of Canadian cannabis users continue to rely on underground dealers. Like with U.S. states that have grudgingly legalized marijuana for recreational use, the black market goes on thriving and generating profits because politicians and regulators have hobbled legal businesses and inconvenienced consumers through high taxes and excessive rules.

As a result, Canada's legal market is largely uncompetitive with the long-established black market there.

Canada has a federal system, like the United States, so you have a multi-layer regulatory system. First, you have federal officials who have managed to run up a backlog for license approvals for sales, for research, and for the issuance of regulations. Then, rules vary from province to province. Some are worse than others.

"I did $1.4 million in sales, which is the highest sales of any retailer in Newfoundland, as far as I know. And I'm just barely scraping by," one marijuana retailer told the CBC. By provincial law, he's limited to an 8 percent commission on his sales. Out of that, he must pay a dollar per gram excise tax, and then 2.5 percent to credit card companies. And he's limited in his offerings, since cannabis edibles aren't yet legal.

By contrast, the former (and possibly future, he says) black market dealer points out that "you can buy a pound of weed for up to $1,600 and sell it for $3,000 on the illegal market right now, and dealers deliver it to your door within a couple hours."

Across the continent, British Columbia also makes the legal market a huge hassle.

In Vancouver, despite the province's reputation as a cannabis haven, "licensing has been glacial," owing "to a change in power in the provincial government and cities being slow to approve zoning and other requirements," reports AP. "Regulatory hurdles have also made it tough for B.C.'s many small growers to be licensed; instead, production is dominated by large corporations churning out pot by the ton from massive greenhouses."

By contrast, Alberta, with a more relaxed approach, hosts more than half of Canada's 560 licensed marijuana stores.

"One year past the end of cannabis prohibition, Calgary already has more cannabis stores—66—than any other city in Canada, with Edmonton second at 48," notes the Calgary Herald. "Another 154 locations have been approved in Calgary."

That's a major contrast to Canada's most populous provinces given that "Ontario and Quebec, which together make up two-thirds of Canada's population, have only about 45 shops between them," says AP.

"Every level wants to regulate [in Canada]," Brett Wilson of Canoe Financial, an investment firm, told the CanTech Letter. "We have the province regulating the number of pot shops in the city, then the city will come in and say, 'Well, we don't want one too close to this school.' And so there's all sorts of regulatory bureaucracy."

So, marijuana-shopping in much of Canada—especially population centers—remains a difficult task if you stick to the legal market. But people don't have to do that. The black market was well-established and responsive long before Canada dipped its toes into legalization. Half-hearted legalization gives consumers good reason to stay loyal to their underground dealers, and dealers strong incentives to stay off the books.

According to Statistics Canada, 41.9 percent of marijuana users continue to patronize illicit vendors, compared to the 48.3 percent using legal sources (homegrown and "other" sources make up the gap). Importantly, illegal dealers appear to be keeping the heavier users, too, with the black market estimated at $5 billion to $7 billion, compared to the $1 billion for legal sales.

A big part of the problem seems to be that government officials assumed that most of their constituents really wanted to move into the legal market and were willing to suffer inconvenience and expense in order to do so. Instead, it's apparent that what people want are good products and responsive services at competitive prices, and many are not especially concerned as to whether or not vendors have government permission.

This should not be a surprise to anybody who has observed state-level legalization efforts in the U.S., where unenthusiastic legalizers managed to keep black markets healthy by burdening legal growers and dealers with rules and taxes.

Three years after legalization, California's illicit marijuana market continues to eclipse the legal one because of crippling restrictions. Towns have the power, which most have exercised, to ban retail pot shops. And fees add up and up.

It's "$2,500 a year for the water board discharge permit. It's $750 a year for the pond permit. It's $1,350 application fee to the county, plus another $675 when they actually give you the permit annually," one former illegal grower tallied for CBS News, explaining the more than $50,000 he spent trying to go straight.

Should he manage to get his product to market, California will tax it at up to 45 percent—a rate consumers can and do skip by staying with their black market dealers.

Other states also also slammed consumers with taxes and strangled businesses with red tape, predictably keeping underground dealers thriving in the process.

In Washington, despite evidence of a hobbled industry, officials stubbornly stand by their 37 percent tax and their ban on delivery. "The biggest challenge is that we are not a free market," grower Alex Cooley told Seattle Business. "We are a controlled market trying to act like a free market.

Colorado, by contrast, has been willing to cut marijuana taxes and consider regulatory changes, including relaxed rules. That's made the legal market more attractive for providers and consumers alike. (Black market exports to restrictive states continue to be big business, of course.)

That the same economic incentives and human reactions operate in Canada is entirely unsurprising. If you only nominally "legalize" a good or service, in a way that makes it uncompetitive with black market suppliers, lots of people will happily keep that underground market functioning.

So, thanks, Canadian officials, for the latest demonstration of the perverse effects of government meddling in markets. Now please, for everybody's sake, back off.

NEXT: Trump Makes Baghdadi Death About Humiliation, not Human Rights

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. What a joke.

    1. Only govt could fu up a perfectly functioning albeit illegal market. Their idea, if you will, was to make dope less available and hence, less interesting to utes. And standardized and flea free. Ha I say. The utes set the price and they don’t like the terms of reference. Each little burg and muni across the land sets it own local laws for dope, not unlike liquor laws which are hardly universal and/or standard.

      Until the retail market which is as fragmented as Israeli or Italian politics becomes a bit more unfettered, this legalization thingy will remain a joke.

    2. Searching for a supplemental source of income?
      This is the easiest way I have found to earn $9000+ per month over the internet. Work for a few hours per week in your free time and get paid on a regular basis.
      go to home media tech tab for more detail.☛ https://bit.ly/36brMRr

  2. https://www.ksa-pools.com
    افضل شركة انشاء مسابح بالرياض 0550055284 شركة الرجيب لانشاء المسابح
    the best swimming pools building’s company in ksa

  3. I am shocked. Shocked I tell you. Who would have thought that Canada would be so intrusive?

    Oh wait, the answer is: Everybody.

  4. Marijuana legalization was supposed to give Canada’s cannabis fanciers access to above board and reliable drug sources while providing tax revenue for the government.


    It’s a huge scam to buy votes from pot heads and these morons fall for it.

    Marijuana in some US states is decriminalized to a point but the product is still treated like some commodity that requires higher taxation and regulation.

    For the USA, repealing the unconstitutional Controlled Substances Act is one of the few ways to “legalize” marijuana. In America, a Constitutional Amendment, like the 18th Amendment, is required to ban products and services. If you don’t have such a thing then marijuana is 100% already.

    1. I’m all for fighting the good fight on the “unconstitutionality” of all kinds of things that have flown under SCOTUS’ wildly generous interpretation of the commerce clause. But I think you’re gonna have to admit it’s mostly a lost cause at this point, and we might need a constitutional amendment to enforce our preferred interpretation of the commerce clause.

      1. Nope. If I let the basic structure of our constitution supremacy go I might as well let it all go.

        I can’t help our poor education system where many American are too stupid to know how the basis for our government works. I can educate and talk about it.

        The alternative is Civil War. We are here as a nation because of common constitutional principles. If not, lets throw down now and get this over with while Im young.

  5. Trudeau got reelected so he doesn’t need to buy your Canadian votes anymore.

  6. The ruling class really does not like policy changes coming from the bottom up. At least it is not something like Brexit.

    1. The history of mankind is the history of a succession of self-nominated elites, each of whom firmly believed hat they were placed on Earth by Divine Providence to tell the rest of us what to do. And the progress (if any) of Human civilization can be measured by the degree to which the Common Man can tell the current Elite to go climb a tree…and make it stick.

      And, BOY, do the elites hate it when that happens.

  7. The state must transition from prohibitionists rooting out a contraband item to competitors stamping out market rivals. Give them some time. I’m sure it will all be perfection soon.

  8. The math is fishy in the Newfoundland story. If legal markup is limited to 8%, how is the illegal markup of nearly 100% competitive?

    1. You don’t honestly think that both parties are paying the same wholesale prices, do you?

      Because that would be sad.

      You, not the pricing.

  9. Reminds me of the NJ weed law that failed to pass because NJ Ds didn’t get the regulatory/tax structure they wanted.

    Random ideas for incentivizing elected officials; withhold some pay until passing a post-term poll, combine w/formal contract. Force them to work like any contract employee and sue their asses if they fail to produce deliverables.

  10. Did you think the Huffington Post was joking when it referred to the cannabis reform movement as “Tax and Regulate?”

    1. The tax and regulate language was actually from some of the advocacy groups (I want to say NORML is responsible for that particular phrase, but I might be wrong). They basically saw the fastest route to legalization (as a political event) being a scenario where they tell all these cash-strapped states with a lot of red in the budget that legalizing weed would be a huge gain, plus a popular political move. There’s no politician alive who can resist the siren allure of more tax dollars combined with more approval.

      The plan after legalization was to fight all the wonky schemes they come up with and try to get something closer to a un- or at least less-regulated market. We’ll see how that works out – I think they’ve grossly underestimated politicians’ unwillingness to butt out of anything they’ve stuck their noses into.

      1. The mantra of leviathans big and small is “more is never enough.”

      2. “The tax and regulate language was actually from some of the advocacy groups…”

        That strategy has come home to roost, as it were.

  11. J.D. Tucille, I cringe when ‘black’ is the adjective used to modify market instead of the adjectives illicit or underground.

    1. Just what this place needs, another over the top parody account…

  12. When Massachusetts allowed the opening of the first and only two marijuana stores in the state, there were lines around the block, and all I could say to myself was: “Don’t you people have a guy?”

  13. It is the way to delete temporary files in windows 10 at https://deletetemporaryfileswindows10.com online.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.