Child Sex Trafficking Prosecutions Down Under Trump
For the second year in a row, federal prosecutions for sex trafficking of children have dropped.

U.S. sex-trafficking prosecutions have fallen since Donald Trump took office, according to a new analysis from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University.
"Prosecutions for sex trafficking of children under a law used against financier Jeffrey Epstein last week are down 26.7 percent over the past fiscal year," TRAC reports. "This is the second year in a row that prosecutions for sex trafficking of children under [federal criminal law] have fallen—a reversal of the grown trend during the Obama years."
Federal prosecutors brought 49 percent of underage sex trafficking cases referred to them in Obama's final full year, according to TRAC records. For the 2017 fiscal year (October 2016 through September 2017), it was 46 percent; for fiscal year 2018, it was down to 42 percent.
For October 2018 through May 2019, the rate had fallen to 39 percent.
This is not necessarily to the discredit of the Trump-era Justice Department. It's possible that greater efforts by state and local prosecutors mean the feds feels comfortable letting them handle it. There could be a greater number of referrals overall, and simply not enough federal manpower to handle them. A greater percentage of the cases being referred to federal prosecutors could be no good, or prosecutors might feel more empowered to reject bad fits.
The ratio of federal prosecutions to convictions for sex trafficking has long been uninspiring—a sign that prosecutors were taking on too many cases that they shouldn't have. Much of the ramp-up of "sex trafficking" prosecutions during the Obama and Biden years involved targeting a wider and wider array of conduct as sex trafficking in a way that seemed to come down hardest on sex workers.
Alternately, the recent drop in prosecution numbers and falling rate of referrals to prosecutors could signal that priorities or commitments for U.S. attorneys have been tied up elsewhere during the Trump administration. It's possible that efforts on immigration, the Russia probe, or whatever else may be coming at the expense of prosecuting sex traffickers.
In any case, last year was hardly a low point in terms of overall number of cases prosecuted. So far, there have been 108 federal prosecutions for underage sex trafficking in fiscal year 2019. If things continue as projected, there will be about 162 total for the year, TRAC says. That's down 27.6 percent from last year and down about 32 percent from 2014—but up 90.6 percent from a decade ago.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's possible that greater efforts by state and local prosecutors mean the feds feels comfortable letting them handle it.
What federal prosecutor worth his salt is letting any convictions escape his resume?
ITT, Sparky throws a tantrum because he was wrong.
And then his mean girls come in to period all over the place.
Democrats are out of power, so of course there are less kids being sexually abused by Democrats.
*drops mic
Is it inconceivable that there simply is less child sex trafficking happening?
Yes. This drop is obviously because most of the child sex traffickers are close personal friends of The Donald so he has ordered the DoJ to stop going after them.
Luckily, we had Mueller to find anything on Trump and no crimes were found.
Maybe they were just pen-pals of Trump.
“$park¥ is the Worst
July.18.2019 at 10:02 am
The fund is for first responders, not everyone who breathed some bad air.”
Your obsession with me is more than a bit disturbing.
$park¥ is the Worst
July.18.2019 at 10:02 am
The fund is for first responders, not everyone who breathed some bad air.
Meh, boring and predictable as always.
Why are you introducing yourself?
“$park¥ is the Worst
July.18.2019 at 10:02 am
The fund is for first responders, not everyone who breathed some bad air.”
Apparently you’re going to keep crying. Guess I win again.
Cry more about being wrong.
“$park¥ is the Worst
July.18.2019 at 10:02 am
The fund is for first responders, not everyone who breathed some bad air.”
That's right, run crybaby.
“$park¥ is the Worst
July.18.2019 at 10:02 am
The fund is for first responders, not everyone who breathed some bad air.”
Sparky, just don't respond to Tulpa. He is clearly a mental patient posting from some psych ward. They only let him post on Reason because it's the only thing that keeps him from smearing feces all over the walls.
I make him look stupid and he can't stand it. You might as well be telling yourself to say something funny.
Hey real quick, do you have that link to the shitty geocities page you cited when we kicked you around for stupidly thinking roundup harmed gut bacteria?
It was pathetic, and I'd like to use it to point out how stupid and gullible you are.
Thanks!
Fun fact!!
Both Trump’s Kentucky and Oklahoma campaign chairs are in jail for child’s sex trafficking.
So when Sparky said "This drop is obviously because most of the child sex traffickers are close personal friends of The Donald so he has ordered the DoJ to stop going after them."
He was wrong again!!
Wow, bad day for him! And I can't imagine admitting your fuckboy was wrong made you too happy either!
lol good one
I know! But that's nice of you to say, you must have had a hard time saying that, what with the many many times I have made you look stupid.
Way to rise above your normal pettiness!
Hey, I'm man enough to admit when I've been outclassed by the master.
And I'm man enough to agree that you're man enough to admit when you've been outclassed by the master!
lol another good one.
So good!
It's conceivable that prostitutes are low-hanging fruit under these laws. If they actually went after child trafficking they'd be in danger of working up a sweat.
If the percentage of cases prosecuted dropped from 46% to 42% (or from 42% to 39% depending on how you count "the last fiscal year" when this fiscal year hasn't yet ended) that's still nowhere near the 26.7% drop in prosecutions they're talking about. Which suggests to me that the majority of this drop in the number of prosecutions isn't due to the reluctance of the Trump administration to prosecute cases but rather due to the drop in the number of cases to prosecute. Rather than going through the mental and linguistic contortions necessary to imply that somehow the drop in the number of cases is a bad thing and it's all Trump's fault, why not just say the number of cases has fallen and that's a good thing?
I mean are you seriously asking? if an asteroid hit earth it would be trumps fault.
Law enforcement has been focusing on the adult based sex trade to find children. You won't find many children this way. After backpage was taken down law enforcement has had a much harder time locating exploited people.
The elephant in the room which I think.is the cause of less cases: FOSTA/SESTA.
After this bill package was passed into law, where did they expect to find victims (or people to coerce into victimhood)?!
After this bill package was passed into law, where did they expect to find victims
In pizza parlors?
In John Podesta's emails?
Epistein's plane?
Mar-a-Lago?
Hollywood?
See, before I pointed out that your shtick here is "the gross guy who fucks everything" you would have had your place atop that list.
So, it's nice to know I ridiculed you hard enough to make you change your behavior.
I just see this as another example of how via Trump we're seeing the first broad pullback of the federal government from authoritarianism in maybe my lifetime. I'm 65.