NSA Ends One Particular Type of Domestic Email Data Collection
No more gathering communications from Americans that were 'about' a foreign target.

Let's hear it for a little bit more communication privacy for Americans! Charlie Savage at The New York Times is reporting via sources that the National Security Agency (NSA) is ending a particular type of intrusive surveillance that scanned the contents of Americans' emails for key words.
Specifically, the NSA monitors messages for references of foreign individuals under their surveillance, even when such communications originate here domestically from Americans. This is often referred to in shorthand as "about" searches, meaning they're looking for messages that are "about" people they're watching, not just from or to these people. The NSA argues that this is legal as part of its job to gather intelligence about potential foreign threats. But this happens without warrants and and the implication here is at the very least the scanning of the contents of Americans' communications without evidence of wrongdoing.
Furthermore it appears as though NSA employees were not able to confine themselves to collecting just the communications that referenced the foreign target. This technical issue had been raised before in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC): Through this process, the NSA was collecting and potentially getting access to all sorts of communications it wasn't supposed to be looking at, even if one were to accept that the "about" searches were legal. From Savage:
The problem stemmed from certain bundled messages that internet companies sometimes packaged together and transmitted as a unit. If even one of them had a foreign target's email address somewhere in it, all were sucked in.
After the N.S.A. brought that issue to the court's attention in 2011, a judge ruled that it violated the Fourth Amendment, which bars unreasonable searches. The agency then proposed putting the bundled messages in a special repository to which analysts, searching through intercepts to write intelligence reports, would generally not have access. The court permitted that type of collection to continue with that restriction.
But last year, officials said, the N.S.A. discovered that analysts were querying the bundled messages in a way that did not comply with those rules. The agency brought the matter to the court's attention, resulting in a delay in reauthorizing the broader warrantless surveillance program until the agency proposed ceasing this collection practice.
And now it looks like, at least for the time being, they're stopping these searches. This is potentially a significant change because of what's called "backdoor" searches. Once the NSA collects information from this warrantless surveillance, it can be used by other federal agencies to search for information about specific Americans in order to target domestic criminal behavior. And they're allowed to do so even though this private information was collected without warrants. So naturally reducing the amount of communications the NSA is collecting will reduce the potential for backdoor, warrantless searches.
It won't eliminate the possibility of these backdoor searches, though, and this decision from the NSA might just be temporary until they figure out a way to resolve the problem of incidental collection of unrelated emails. Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which sets up some of the rules and authorization for this data collection, will sunset this year unless Congress renews it. Privacy and civil rights advocates would like to see reforms to 702 to better protect Americans from unwarranted snooping. This change helps a touch, but there's still going to be a push to try to stop those backdoor searches.
More about Section 702 reforms and federal surveillance issues were discussed in a recent South by Southwest panel moderated by yours truly. Listen in on that lively talk here.
LATE-BREAKING: Here's the NSA's official formal announcement confirming Savage's report.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Here's the NSA's official formal announcement confirming Savage's report.
If this "confirming" doesn't demand scare quotes then I don't know what does.
This is obviously so Trump can more easily commit treason with Russia!!!! Seriously, watch that be the narrative.
Any small step is still a good step nonetheless.
This is often referred to in shorthand as "about" searches, meaning they're looking for messages that are "about" people they're watching, not just from or to these people.
In other words, the NSA stopped doing this because they were turning up nothing but internal NSA emails.
I wonder what the Trump Admin's policy position will be on sec 702? On the one hand he is all about giving the military more leeway/money in the fight against terrorism; on the other hand, he felt the sting of the intelligence community.
My bet is that the status quo will continue unfortunately.
The White House has already said they want Section 702 renewed without changes. Click on the link two paragraphs from the bottom there ("see reforms") for a blog post on that.
Of course, Trump being Trump, he could change his mind. But the WH approach on Trump's surveillance is that the snooping was illegally ordered, not that the laws themselves are wrong.
Damn, was hoping the whole spying on him would have softened his position. But like you said, we'll see what happens when it comes up for renewal.
There are two things which could be done to make warrants much more accountable.
1. Stop the practice of excluding evidence which was not obtained "legally". It's just a fig leaf and makes justice look petty and hare-brained when it excludes obvious evidence and doesn't punish whoever botched obtaining it. The real abuse is using illegal evidence to find legit evidence.
2. Instead, all illegally executed warrants (beyond the scope described, etc) should rebound in like manner on the warrant executor; and all warrants executed by the losing side in a case should rebound on the losing party, regardless of how legal they were.
This is all in addition to only allowing victims (and their guardians / estate) to prosecute harm, and many other changes. None of this will ever happen. But I like to imagine abusive arrests and excessive searches rebounding on the cops with their own humiliating takedowns and having their own houses torn apart in retribution. Or having them pay a buyer's market price to avoid same.
Look, the NSA says they've stopped doing the illegal thing, I believe it, and that settles it. Anyone who thinks they can produce evidence to the contrary is welcome to try. Right?
??????O upto I looked at the paycheck saying $9861 , I accept that my father in law was like they say trully bringing in money in their spare time online. . there best friend haz done this less than 8 months and a short time ago repayed the dept on there appartment and bourt a great Citro?n 2CV . see at this site .??????? ?????____BIG.....EARN....MONEY..___???????-