Pot-Shop Cop Reinstatement Gives Police Black Eye
Police union-backed rules protect bad cops.
If you're wondering why police officers sometimes lose the trust of the communities they serve, forget about the overheated rhetoric from Black Lives Matter and focus instead on an ongoing local matter.
Santa Ana, Calif., police raided the dispensary in 2015, accusing it of selling marijuana without a permit. The dispensary's lawyer released an edited video that made national news and later released the full, unedited version. As officers served the warrant, they ordered the people there onto the ground and appeared to make disparaging remarks about a Sky High volunteer, an amputee sitting in a wheelchair.
One officer allegedly said: "Did you punch that one-legged old Benita?" The other officer seems to have said: "I was about to kick her in her **** nub." Nice, huh? The video also shows an officer munching on snacks and apparently disabling the store's security cameras. Had there not been a hidden camera, it's unlikely this case would have gotten much attention.
Because of union-backed rules and legal decisions that protect the privacy of officers, the city wouldn't comment on "personnel matters" related to three officers at the raid. In July, the Orange County Register reported that three of the officers, Brandon Matthew Sontag, Nicole Lynn Quijas and Jorge Arroyo, were no longer on the force.
The Register later reported the three were fired and charged by the Orange County District Attorney's Office with petty theft and Sontag also was charged with vandalism. The three pleaded not guilty to the charges. That's a fair way to handle the matter. But the issue returned to the news this month after the city's personnel board reinstated Sontag. It is still considering reinstatement appeals by the other two.
In an admirable act of courage, the Santa Ana City Council voted 4-3 to appeal the reinstatement to the Superior Court. But Mayor Miguel Pulido and council members Jose Solorio and Juan Villegas voted against appeal. All three had been elected with enormous support from the city's police union.
The raid already has cost city taxpayers $100,000 as part of a settlement to a federal lawsuit filed by the dispensary's owners. The Voice of OC noted that the raid "was not the first time Sontag's conduct cost the city." The city paid $2.45 million in 2011 to settle a case brought by the family of a woman Sontag shot to death and $100,000 to a man who was, according to the Register, rammed by a police cruiser in a parking lot.
Every profession attracts its share of characters, but this situation reinforces one of my theories about why policing problems often fester. A small number of officers can cause a lot of problems. Union political activism and protections make it inordinately difficult to discipline, fire and prosecute even those caught on camera doing atrocious things.
That lack of justice breeds community frustration—and can have a corrosive effect within departments. Note that other officers at the pot-shop raid didn't appear, based on the video, to try to stop this behavior, which reinforces the point about corrosiveness. In an ideal world, other police officers should be the first line of defense if their fellows behave in such a manner.
Solorio was quoted expressing concern that an appeals could end up costing the city too much money if it loses, and said the firings were "unfair" because of insufficient discipline for the raid's supervisor. But I've seen him in action in the state Capitol. In 2007, Solorio was chairman of the Assembly Public Safety Committee when legislation was introduced to make it easier for the public to learn about police officers disciplined for their on-the-job power.
The hearing room was filled with boisterous police union members. Solorio reserved the front seats for union lobbyists. As I wrote for the Register at the time: "Solorio gave a bizarre, rambling speech complaining about the rapper Ice-T, about rap-music lyrics in general… and claiming that police already are vilified by the public." He used his power to crush the bill without a vote.
The Santa Ana police union, which in May 2016 reportedly had a shake-up with the goal of taking a more aggressive political stance, certainly knew what it was doing in spending large amounts of campaign cash on behalf of Solorio, Pulido and Villegas.
Union backers typically say that unions "are just doing their job" protecting officers. That's a fine argument if unions were one of many voices in the Capitol and City Hall. But they are a dominant force in the former and typically are the dominant presence in local elections. The result is serious and legitimate public concerns about the use of force, gang injunctions and poor community relations never get aired. Don't they work for us?
Until this kind of outsized union influence is scaled back, it will be nearly impossible to make reasonable reforms to police departments—and to punish officers who clearly deserve punishment. If police officers really want to build better relationships within the communities they protect and serve, they need to spend less time worrying about over-the-top rhetoric and more time getting their own house in order.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
An officer breaking the law is bad enough but breaking the law during the course of doing his duty is unforgivable. The police unions have to be dismantled.
Breaking the law, especially while on duty, is the main motive to be a cop.
Come on, that kind of idiotic and over-the-top statement doesn't help either.
Right, I mean people only become cops to help and protect other people. It is known.
What the fuck is wrong with you people? Neither statement is true. I guess it's too much to ask to expect nuanced thinking...
I can understand the approach of seeing the combination of: a little column A and a little column B, comprises a more veritable perception of (almost) any object.
But doesn't it bother you in the slightest that when it comes to cops, column A is glorified while column B rests at its leisure immune to righteous punishment?
Oh, of course it bothers me that cops get off from all kinds of stuff they shouldn't. But that's a lot different than the unthinking blanket statements above, which have to do with individuals.
Also, we swim in waters where we hear about this all the time. I think we all need to worry about engaging in the base rate fallacy. It's important to think objectively about the actual incidence of events and overall risks.
That's why we have Bailey around here. He has already debunked the idea that cops are getting killed at higher rates over the last couple years. I'd like to see an analysis of the rates of bad outcomes resulting from all interactions of cops and citizens. You'd probably have to graduate the data by the type of interaction, location, and demographics. But I suspect the bad outcome incidence is a small number.
Trouble is, it's hard to get good statistics. How often do you get high-quality independent footage of cop behavior? To be honest, I'd rather that policing was like most other professions, and stories that made the news were about egregiously unfair dismissals, not borderline criminal acts that the unions supported just because the perpetrators were cops.
ummm. I know more cops who became cops because they love power than doing it for career or protecting people.
Same with more people become marines due to the ability to power trip vs any other reason.
Shitty dicks gravitate to where power is...duh. Basic common sense.
...the firings were "unfair" because of insufficient discipline for the raid's supervisor.
"Was I not supposed to spoliate evidence? Was that wrong?"
"Oh, I thought you said 'exfoliate'! My bad."
??????O I've made $64,000 so far this year working online and I'm a full time student. In using an online business opportunity I heard about and I've made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Ceres what I do,...??????? ?????____BIG- EARN -MONEY____???????-
Sure, but they also work for people who are full fledged supporters of the war on DRUUGGZZZ.
If you don't want to get treated like a thug, don't act like a thug. Isn't that what they say?
I believe the term is If you don't want to get treated like a thug, don't act like a thug around their thugs.
It amazes me how blatantly evil politicians can be. (It shouldn't, I know). I don't know how they can live with themselves when they defend the indefensible like what these cops did.
Money eases most burdens; or so I have been lead to believe.
money/power and they have no soul or heart or conscience?
I find it so utterly preposterous that an employee of the government, a government that sets the labor laws, needs union protection from said government. I am as anti-union as a person can be, but I at least can understand the (faulty) reasoning for a union to protect employees from "greedy corporations". I can find no justification whatsoever for a union to protect government employees.
Interesting point.
nice point. Now, if we extend the logic just one more small step, we end up with the coppers being protected from "greedy citizens".
"That's a fair way to handle the matter."
Actually, it's not. If a bunch of boisterous teenagers rushed into the shop, unarmed, and vandalized it, it would be a fair way to handle the matter. However, this was a gang of armed thugs acting under color of law.
The three pleaded not guilty to the charges. That's a fair way to handle the matter. But the issue returned to the news this month after the city's personnel board reinstated Sontag. It is still considering reinstatement appeals by the other two.
This is a little confusing. They were charged, but the city is considering reinstatement? Shouldn't there be a trial and acquittal before anyone considers reinstatement?
Not confusing at all. Immoral, unethical and shameful but see my comment below about who is actually calling the shots.
None of the charges are felonies. More the pity.
So many questions flowing a faulty premise. The police do not work for us, nor do they report to the politicians. It is exactly the opposite. Once you recognize that the politicians work for the police, everything makes more sense. The police are the masters, the politicians work for them.
One might at first glance recoil to this assessment but just think about this clear case in point:
A single FBI (super cops) director went toe to toe with HRC -- who regardless of political views is/was of the most powerful politicians in all of America (and the world) -- and the FBI director won.
When is the last time you saw a president tangle with the FBI? The FBI director could probably bring down any president he wanted to.
RE: Pot-Shop Cop Reinstatement Gives Police Black Eye
Police union-backed rules protect bad cops.
Hey!
The police unions haven't protected bad cops any more than the UAW has protected bad car manufacturing workers or the NEA protecting bad teachers.
Wake up!
How does that classic line go?
'Justice, and the side action, is its own reward.'
"Nicole Lynn Quijas "
I gotta say , this doesn't sound like something a wise latina would do, what with the fullness of her experience and all.
At this point, it's sort of like a gangster when they act out of line somehow. they take out a roll of bills and throw some money on the ground for the unpleasantness the little people had to endure. except it's our wallet they're dipping into.
back to the Animal Farm, where some pigs are just more equal than other pigs.
when will THE PEOPLE wake up and GET IT? They continue to elect the folks who perpatuate this nonsense. So WHY, then, are they surprised when the two-legged rats infest the city?
??????OWallace: My total earnings for first month was very low... Just little over $250, but it was then when I realized this is the real deal and not yet another scam you see all over the internet! There are no words to describe the feeling you get when your first paycheck arrives and what excitement I felt at that moment realizing that making money from home is in fact very possible. After my first month I dedicated more time and put more effort in working this and my second month was already much more better (2nd paycheck I got was for $990)... Now, 6 months later, I am earning just over $2500 a month . I am a little slow with my work and I am not that good with computers and that's why I think a younger person could be able to earn much much more than this... ....??????? ?????____BIG- EARN .MONEY____???????-
Perhaps the job of policeman is inherently corrupting?
Santa Ana, Calif., police raided the dispensary in 2015, accusing it of selling marijuana without a permit. The dispensary's lawyer released an edited video that made national news and later released the full, unedited version. As officers served the warrant, they ordered the people there onto the ground and appeared to make disparaging remarks about a Sky High volunteer, an amputee sitting in a wheelchair.
????? ?????
????? ?????
I looked at the check for $8628 , I didnt believe that...my... father in law was like actualie taking home money in there spare time on there computar. . there sisters roommate haz done this for under 17 months and just cleard the morgage on there apartment and got a gorgeous Chevrolet Corvette . go to websit========= http://www.net.pro70.com
??????O before I saw the check saying $8075 , I did not believe ...that...my mother in law wiz like they say actuality receiving money in their spare time at there laptop. . there sisters roommate has been doing this less than 14 months and as of now replayed the mortgage on there villa and blurt a gorgeous Subaru Imprecate .. ?.....??????? ?????____BIG.....EARN....MONEY..___???????-
Right.... the stupid claim that the way evil wins is for good men to do nothing in the face of it... that's a LIE. A GOOD MAN will never stand silently by as evil does its work. A GOOD man will always act to stop evil. If one can, and fails/refuses, that one is NOT "good" but evil.
Let us begin calling that spade what it is... a spade. the "good cops" have left, moved on, etc, leaving the corrupt to lead the corrupt into deeper corruption.
This is why there is an IQ limit on hiring cops. They don't want smart cops. Smart cops leave after five years, go to law school, and become defense attorneys.
Unless very naive, why would a good person want to become a cop in a bad neighborhood or bad department? Only to profit from the badness, it would seem.