Commuted Sentence Shows Injustice of Crack Penalties and 'Three Strikes' Provision
Donald Graham got one year for each of the two drug offenses he committed as a teenager, then life at 30.

Before he was arrested for distributing crack cocaine in 2006, Donald Graham had been convicted twice of similar offenses, once when he was 17 and once when he was 19. Both times he was sentenced to a year in state prison. The third time, he was prosecuted under federal law and got life without parole.
Graham appealed his sentence, arguing that the judge who imposed it had improperly counted his first conviction, when he was still a juvenile, as the first of three strikes. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit disagreed. Dissenting from that decision, Judge Gilbert Merritt declared that "the sentencing of this nonviolent, 30-year-old petty drug trafficker to life imprisonment by using a juvenile conviction as a necessary third strike not only violates clear congressional intent revealed by clear rules of statutory construction but also violates sound principles of penological policy based on the Eighth Amendment values recently outlined by the Supreme Court."
Interviewed by the American Civil Liberties Union in 2013, Graham said he would have preferred death to spending the rest of his life in prison. "Why should I want to live?" he said. "I would rather [have] been sentenced to lethal injection, than suffer the way I am. If I did not care for my family I would ask to die, but I must keep my family together. I don't want them to suffer any more than they already are."
Thanks to President Obama, Graham will be reunited with his family next March. He is one of the 72 drug offenders whose sentences Obama commuted last Friday and one of 17 who otherwise would have died behind bars. The latest batch of commutations raises Obama's total to 944, including 324 who received life sentences for nonviolent drug offenses. Given his current pace, it seems likely that Obama, who issued just one commutation during his first term, will surpass 1,000 before he leaves office in January.
Graham's case illustrates the injustice inflicted both by the federal "three strikes" provision and by the differential treatment of crack and cocaine powder. When he was convicted, the mandatory life sentence for a third drug felony applied to crack offenses involving 50 grams (about 10 ounces) or more, while the cutoff for cocaine powder was five kilograms—100 times as much. The Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which Congress approved almost unanimously, made that ratio 18 to 1 rather than 100 to 1, so the new crack cutoff is 280 grams. Had Graham been sentenced after that law took effect, he would have faced a mandatory minimum of 10 years instead of life. But the Fair Sentencing Act did not apply retroactively, meaning that thousands of crack offenders continue to serve sentences that pretty much everyone now agrees are too long.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Everybody knows the umps make bad calls all the time. Applying baseball rules to jurisprudence is a bad idea.
The rules of baseball are already pretty stupid. There's no way a man can walk with four balls.
Come to think of it, baseball metaphors are all pretty bad. You don't slide into first. And one person's making it to third base is another one's second base.
50 grams us 2 ounces, not 10.
Haven't you heard of the neometric ounce of 5 grams?
Don't forget to include the weight of the evidence box the cops put it in to weight it. It all counts.
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link,
go to tech tab for work detail ==========>>> http://www.jobsea3.com
Here judge, fixed that for you.
Let me share the story of Lenny Singleton.
Lenny committed a series of "grab & dash" robberies in 1 week while high on alcohol & crack. He did not have a gun. He did not murder anyone. No one was physically injured. He stole less than $550 & these were his 1st felonies. He earned a college degree & served in our Navy before his addiction.
He got was 2 Life Sentences + 100 yrs, more time than child molesters & murderers get. Lenny would be the 1st to tell you that he needed to do some time ? that is why he plead guilty ? but he did not need to have his life completely taken from him.
Lenny works every business day, lives in the Honor's Dorm, takes every available class for self-improvement, and has co-authored a book to help others called, "Love Conquers All". During the entire 21 yrs he has been in prison, he has not received a single infraction for anything - rare for lifers.
Taxpayers will pay well over a million dollars to keep Lenny for the rest of his life - for robbing less than $550 in crimes where no one was physically injured.
Lenny's case is possibly one of the worst illustrating sentencing disparity. In fact his sentence was so bad that it made the front pg of the NY Times and was featured on Ch. 3 WTKR?
http://wtkr.com/2016/11/04/fro.....r-robbery/
Please learn more & sign Lenny Singleton's petition at http://www.justice4lenny.org
Let me share the story of Lenny Singleton.
Lenny committed a series of "grab & dash" robberies in 1 week while high on alcohol & crack. He did not have a gun. He did not murder anyone. No one was physically injured. He stole less than $550 & these were his 1st felonies. He earned a college degree & served in our Navy before his addiction.
He got was 2 Life Sentences + 100 yrs, more time than child molesters & murderers get. Lenny would be the 1st to tell you that he needed to do some time ? that is why he plead guilty ? but he did not need to have his life completely taken from him.
Lenny works every business day, lives in the Honor's Dorm, takes every available class for self-improvement, and has co-authored a book to help others called, "Love Conquers All". During the entire 21 yrs he has been in prison, he has not received a single infraction for anything - rare for lifers.
Taxpayers will pay well over a million dollars to keep Lenny for the rest of his life - for robbing less than $550 in crimes where no one was physically injured.
Lenny's case is possibly one of the worst illustrating sentencing disparity. In fact his sentence was so bad that it made the front pg of the NY Times and was featured on Ch. 3 WTKR?
http://wtkr.com/2016/11/04/fro.....r-robbery/
Please learn more & sign Lenny Singleton's petition at http://www.justice4lenny.org