Drug War

Lying Drug Tests Incriminate Innocent People

Unreliable field kits result in false convictions as well as false accusations.

|

Dr. Bronner's, YouTube

Although field tests for illegal drugs are notoriously unreliable, the law enforcement agencies that use them don't seem to have heard the news. In my latest Forbes column, I note that cops and prosecutors continue to put unjustified faith in these tests despite the national publicity attracted by cases in which people are falsely incriminated by them:

In 2007 Don Bolles, drummer for the punk rock band the Germs, was arrested for possession of the banned depressant GHB, commonly known as the "date rape drug," after police in Newport Beach, California, pulled over his van because of a broken taillight. The charges were dropped after a lab test showed that the bottle of "yellowish goop" in his toiletry bag contained exactly what the label said: an all-natural, peppermint-infused cleanser produced by Dr. Bronner's Magic Soap.

In 2012 Robert and Adlynn Harte were awakened by sheriff's deputies pounding on the door of their house in Leawood, Kansas, demanding entry so they could search the place for the marijuana plants they were sure they'd find there. The deputies forced Robert Harte to the floor at gunpoint and then confined him, his wife, their 7-year-old daughter, and their 13-year-old son to the living room sofa while they spent two and a half hours looking in vain for evidence of criminal activity. It turned out that the "saturated plant material" deputies found in the couple's kitchen garbage was not marijuana but loose tea.

In 2013 Alexander Bernstein spent a month in a Pennsylvania jail after state troopers pulled over the rental car in which he was riding, found "two brick-size packages" of white powder in the trunk, and charged him with possessing and conspiring to distribute cocaine. His bail, originally set at $500,000, was reduced to $25,000 four weeks later, which is how he finally managed to get out of jail. Five days after his release, a lab test showed the white powder was what he had claimed all along: homemade soap.

These are just a few examples of the periodically publicized brushes with the law caused by unreliable but widely used field tests for illegal drugs. Many people suffer consequences worse than the embarrassment, legal costs, and temporary loss of freedom experienced by Bolles (who spent three days in jail), the Hartes (who had to mount an expensive legal battle just to find out why their house was searched and so far have been rebuffed in their attempt to win compensation), and Bernstein (who last fall sued the state troopers responsible for his arrest and detention). In this week's New York Times Magazine, ProPublica reporters Ryan Gabrielson and Topher Sanders estimate that thousands of Americans have been not just falsely accused but falsely convicted of drug crimes based on erroneous field test results.

Read the whole thing.

NEXT: Calling 911 from a phone to obtain its number does not 'search' it, court rules

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Thank god the public gets the latest info on our Gloriois Drug Warriors from CSI & Law & Order instead of those wreckers at ProPublica.

  2. Arrests using faulty tests should require compensation that comes out of pensions.

    1. I actually prefer that prosecutors busted for gross misconduct should serve the maximum sentence of the the the people they’ve sent to jail. So send an innocent man to deathr ow by withholding exculpatory evidence, then congrats, you’re a cold blooded murderer, enjoy death row while you can.

      1. That too.

        Misconduct must have costs.

      2. Really,I thought we all agreed on wood chippers?

        1. The boats first, then run em through.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism

    2. Arrests using faulty tests should require compensation that comes out of pensions.

      “That’s why we use *dogs*.”

  3. The cops could just lie about having done a field test, like the Dallas narcotics detectives did in the infamous Dallas Sheetrock Scandal.

    As Texas Monthly put it: “Two aggressive Dallas cops. One confidential informant. Hundreds of pounds of cocaine. Fifty-three drug traffickers busted. Sound too good to be true? It was.” Unfortunately, their cast of characters left out an over-zealous, conviction-happy DA and several incompetent judges. There were no gullible jurors involved since the whole scam was to prosecute Mexicans with little or no English for serious drug trafficking charges and plea bargain down for an instant conviction.

    After putting over 50 people in prison, one lying cop got five-years and the other three got probation.

  4. The charges were dropped after a lab test showed that the bottle of “yellowish goop” in his toiletry bag contained exactly what the label said: an all-natural, peppermint-infused cleanser produced by Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soap.

    “All-One! All-One!”

  5. My buddy’s step-mother makes $96 an hour on this PC. She has been fired for 9 months but last month her payment was $9600 just working on the PC for a few hours. Check It out what she do..

    GO to the web>>>>>>>>> http://www.CareerPlus90.com

  6. That’s extremely terrible.As I metioned in a talk with my friends. When a drug was designed, the related identification method should also be discoveried for once for a while use. It could be in simple form like a test paper, or complicated ones like living organism models developed in 2D or 3D cell culure system.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.