Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Watch the First Part of the Libertarian Party Presidential Debate in Full!

Prepare for tonight's Part II by re-living John Stossel grilling Gary Johnson, John McAfee, and Austin Petersen last week

Matt Welch | 4.8.2016 3:18 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Amanda Swafford on Twitter
(Amanda Swafford on Twitter)
Bros before RINOs. ||| Amanda Swafford on Twitter
Amanda Swafford on Twitter

As Ed Krayewski wrote earlier today, Nick Gillespie wrote yesterday, and John Stossel himself wrote the day before that, three of the leading candidates to be the Libertarian Party's presidential standard-bearer in this year of two-party disaffection will be coming back for part two of their Stossel-moderated debate tonight on Fox Business Network at 9 p.m ET. Once again, Kennedy and I will provide post-debate commentary.

I will hopefully have some more pre-game thoughts later, but for now I wanted everyone to enjoy and argue over last week's first heave below:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Revenge Drama Finds Violent New Life in Game of Silence

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsLibertarian PartyWorldWar on DrugsCivil LibertiesEconomicsPolicyElection 2016Gary Johnson
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (51)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    when i hear "pre-game" and "heave", i think of college.

    1. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

      Pre-game warm ups and half-court heaves?

      1. GILMORE?   10 years ago


        pre?game
        ?pr????m/
        North American
        verb
        informal
        gerund or present participle: pre-gaming

        (especially of a person who is underage) drink alcohol before attending an event or social function.
        "a lot of the teenagers had pregamed before they got there"

        heave
        h?v/
        informal

        a case of retching or vomiting.
        "waiting for the heaves to subside"

    2. SIV   10 years ago

      Grab its motherfucking leg

  2. Derpetologist   10 years ago

    For those who can't get enough:

    Spot the Not: quotes about the US from its enemies

    1. The Americans have the watches, but we have the time.

    2. The Americans are good at making fancy cars and refrigerators, but that doesn't mean they are any good at making aircraft.

    3. In appearance it is very powerful but in reality it is nothing to be afraid of; it is a paper tiger.

    4. That paper tiger has nuclear teeth.

    5. No matter how desperately the U.S. may roar, it is nothing but roar of a toothless wolf.The incarnation of all sorts of evil, the empire of devils, is bound to grow old and go to ruin.

    6. The Americans are a little people, a silly people- greedy, barbarous, and cruel.

    7. The Americans are stuck in Iraq and have no way out. They are like a wolf whose tail has been caught in a trap.

    I won't be able to reveal the Not in a reasonable amount of time.

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      Oh, an easy one, D. You won't have to reveal it to this crowd.

      Trust things are join well in your endeavor.

      1. Rich   10 years ago

        *going*

        *** gets coffee ***

    2. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      ""The Americans have the watches, but we have the time.""

      Pretty sure the Wu Tang said this

      "" The Americans are good at making fancy cars and refrigerators, but that doesn't mean they are any good at making aircraft.""

      uh. We suck at making fancy cars. (props to germany). Refrigerators? The top 2 suppliers are both Korean.

      ""In appearance it is very powerful but in reality it is nothing to be afraid of; it is a paper tiger.""

      Mao?

      ""That paper tiger has nuclear teeth.""

      russians?

      """No matter how desperately the U.S. may roar, it is nothing but roar of a toothless wolf.The incarnation of all sorts of evil, the empire of devils, is bound to grow old and go to ruin.""

      I guess bin laden.

      ""The Americans are a little people, a silly people- greedy, barbarous, and cruel.""

      This is from Lawrence of Arabia.

      "" The Americans are stuck in Iraq and have no way out.""

      I'm pretty sure that was Elvis

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        I was thinking 6 was Monty Python at first, but that was a different quote.

    3. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      Isn't 6 from Lawrence of Arabia?

      1. jarflax   10 years ago

        yes it is

        1. jarflax   10 years ago

          but with moar arab

    4. Free Society   10 years ago

      2

      1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

        in retrospect i will guess that it was something the Germans or Japanese said during WWII, suggesting that our industrial advantages would not necessarily translate to military capability

        1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

          Goring, during the "Americans are soft flabby playboys" phase of the war.

          1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

            Sounds right

    5. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      I know 2, 6 and 7. 1 sounds stupid-but-idiots-would-think-it's-clever enough to be one of the North Korea chunks, I've heard the paper tiger thing before, but I thought it was a Japanese guy before Pearl Harbor so 4 wouldn't make sense. 5 I have no idea. If there's only one not, it's 6, but is there more than one?

  3. Spencer   10 years ago

    DFW watching party? No cable... and a wife who hates politics.

    1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      Sorry, I don't do DFW.

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        There is no DFW problem that can't be helped with a little DFP.

  4. Citizen X   10 years ago

    Honestly, i sort of stopped paying attention to the LP race once Morgan Freeman decided not to run.

    1. RBS   10 years ago

      The same Morgan Freeman who narrated several Hilary ads?

      1. Citizen X   10 years ago

        That's the joke.

        1. RBS   10 years ago

          In my defense, we are talking about the LP.

  5. Citizen X   10 years ago

    Can't watch it at work - did Austin Petersen brag about all the hot chicks he knows who are totally thinking about voting for him? Did Gary Johnson say anything libertarian? Did John McAfee have to choke a bitch?

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      IIRC, the takeaway is that McAfee is not a flaming lunatic.

      1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

        or, that he's a flaming lunatic who seems to keep his shit together better on stage than either of the other 2, who looked and acted like baked teenagers.

      2. DaveSs   10 years ago

        I think he knows how to gauge how much cuckoo his audience wants to hear.

        Heard him on a somewhat small-time podcast a few months back. He sounded rather like Alex Jones there.

      3. mad.casual   10 years ago

        He needs to shave. With his voice and the beard, I'm never gonna see and hear him and not think 'Orson Welles'.

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      A succinct summary, Citizen X. I wanna see McAfee choke Peterson while GayJay uses that as a seque about his experiences with thin oxygen on Mt.Everest.

  6. __Warren__   10 years ago

    I'm pulling for Johnson!

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      Are you a member of his staff?

      1. Citizen X   10 years ago

        I think he'll spurt ahead as the excitement of the race builds.

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          Indeed. He's already come into his own.

          1. __Warren__   10 years ago

            It sure looks that way at first glans.

          2. Domestic Dissident   10 years ago

            Remain firm in your resolve.

          3. Citizen X   10 years ago

            You might think the Libertarian candidates are all the same, but really, there's a vas deferens.

            1. Rich   10 years ago

              *** prostrates before Citizen X whilst awaiting Swiss ***

        2. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

          Wankers.

          1. Rich   10 years ago

            ?

            That was totes uncalled for!

            1. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

              That was scrotes uncalled for!

              .... just keep still, I don't think anyone noticed...

        3. SoCal Deathmarch   10 years ago

          And both R's and D's will come all over.... to our side.

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

      So you are hoping Johnson will have wrecked'em?

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        Last time, he damn near killed them!

  7. Brochettaward   10 years ago

    The LP needs to hire the black homeless people Soros and BLM use. Better optics.

    1. waffles   10 years ago

      The Bureau of Land Management denied my homeless application.

  8. waffles   10 years ago

    TL:DW

    Just tell me the right answer to Jewish Bakers Nazi Cakes. Or Nazis Catering Barmitzvah. Whatever.

    1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      During the first hour of the Libertarian Party presidential forum that aired Friday night on the Fox Business Network, leading Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson admitted that in his view, Jewish bakers should be forced by government to bake wedding cakes for Nazis.

      The issue arose when fellow Libertarian presidential candidate Austin Petersen brought to the attention of moderator John Stossel that in an earlier debate in Oregon, Johnson declared that bakeries should be forced to bake wedding cakes for gay couples. Johnson affirmed the position, arguing that being able to discriminate on the basis of religion is a "black hole."

      Ugh. "Hole of color", please.

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   10 years ago

        Black is the absence of color

      2. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

        Once you go black hole, you can't come back.

      3. SIV   10 years ago

        No way the LP nominates this loser twice

  9. Annini   10 years ago

    http://goo.gl/bPOBuL the best dating site for adults meeting.

  10. James Anderson Merritt   10 years ago

    I only wish somebody had been able to photobomb your post-debate commentary with a cardboard cutout of Kmele Foster. I'm eally missing "The Independents," especially during what may well be "your" year. But two out of three ain't bad.

    Also, Matt: "First heave"? Really? Interesting choice of words.

    1. James Anderson Merritt   10 years ago

      eally xxx REALLY

      (In my social circles, "eally" sounds like "eely," which, for us, has dark humor connotations that I didn't intend here. Cut-n-paste strikes again.)

  11. Rufus The Monocled Derp Slayer   10 years ago

    It's good to have a libertarian debate.

    I don't see, after watching it (oh, yes I did) how they're any worse than the clowns running for the two major parties.

    1. jarflax   10 years ago

      Also not worse than said clowns

  12. simplybe   10 years ago

    Watched the 2nd part of the debate still like McAfee the best but would vote for Peterson. Also still think O'Reilly is a complete ass.

  13. JoWaDat889   10 years ago

    Dude I never even thought about that before.

    http://www.Web-Privacy.tk

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

According to Trump, He Has Already Saved 350,000 Lives by Murdering Suspected Drug Smugglers

Jacob Sullum | 10.30.2025 4:50 PM

Deplatforming Nick Fuentes Won't Stop Antisemitism

Robby Soave | 10.30.2025 3:45 PM

A Portland Family Says Their Dad Was Wrongly Arrested by ICE. Now He's Lost in Immigration Detention.

C.J. Ciaramella | 10.30.2025 3:30 PM

America's $30 Trillion Publicly Held Debt Is 42 Times Larger Than It Was in 1980

Veronique de Rugy | 10.30.2025 3:15 PM

Progress Is Good, Actually 

Peter Suderman | 10.30.2025 2:09 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300