School Lunch

USDA School Lunch Problems Continue

New research paints a rosy picture of the program. But is the picture telling the whole story?

|

Credit: USDAgov / photo on flickr

Earlier this month, JAMA Pediatrics, published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), posted a new study on the impact of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, the controversial 2010 school-lunch reforms championed by First Lady Michelle Obama and passed by Congress.

The study, by four University of Washington researchers, looked at nearly 1.75 million meals served at three middle and three high schools in Washington State between 2011 and 2014.

The researchers sought to determine the nutritional quality of foods chosen by students, along with school lunch participation rates, both before and after the implementation of the new school-lunch standards mandated under the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010.

The authors are clearly HHFKA fans. The first paragraph of their op-ed describes the school-lunch reforms in glowing terms, with words like "important," "tremendous," and "dramatically" used to label the reforms.

They conclude that students are selecting healthier food and eating fewer calories under the new law. They also conclude that the new law did not—contrary to numerous reports in recent years—reduce student participation in the school-lunch program.

In an op-ed that appears alongside the study, a pair of University of Maryland researchers, Erin R. Hager and Lindsey Turner, both researchers with the University of Maryland School of Medicine, argue that if student resistance to HHFKA meals existed, it has all but ended. They point to research they say shows "that any initial reactivity by students to the meal pattern changes quickly dissipated and the argument that students are abandoning school meals programs in droves is not valid." They also point to "anecdotal reports from schools on declines in lunch participation" after the HHFKA reforms. Hager and Turner also discount the problem of food waste, claiming that "plate waste has not been problematic."

Taken as a whole, both the Washington State study and the Hager and Turner op-ed paint a rosy picture of the USDA National School Lunch Program. But is it an accurate one?

For example, many students eligible for free- or reduced-price meals at the Washington State schools chose not to participate in the school-lunch program.

The authors are correct that the decrease in participation is statistically tiny. Their data showed only a slight decrease in meal participation at the schools, from 47 percent to 46 percent, after implementation of the HHFKA reforms. But because 54 percent of students at the Washington schools that were part of the study are eligible for free and reduced-price meals, we can conclude that a significant percentage of students eligible for no-cost or low-cost meals chose not to participate in the program.

That's meaningful because data on participation in the broader USDA National School Lunch Program are grim, and worsening.

According to federal government data, the USDA School Lunch Program served 258 million fewer lunches in 2014 than it did at its high point, in 2010. The number of students paying full price for school lunches today—now 8.8 million—is at its lowest point in recorded history.

Data on the amount of food waste the National School Lunch Program promotes are equally grim. One study estimates that the amount of food waste caused by the USDA National School Lunch Program each year could top $1.23 billion. Another study, this one by the federal government's own nonpartisan General Accountability Office, found that nearly every state—48 out of 50—reported they "faced challenges" from food waste under the HHFKA rules.

As I've noted before, kids whose families can afford for them to eat something else than USDA school lunches are doing just that. Increasingly, only kids who must eat school lunches do so. The Washington State study shows that even kids whose families are struggling to make ends meet are turning away from the program.

What's more, "participation" is a weasel word if ever there were one. For example, students "participate" in a meal by "taking" a meal, but may never eat the meal. That problem—which leads to increased food waste—is one that existed before the HHFKA reforms but which much anecdotal and some hard data shows has happened with greater frequency after the 2010 reforms. And students may be "offered" the increased servings of fruits and vegetables mandated under the law, but they may not "take" those increased servings.

Reports have taken note of this severe weakness of the Washington State study.

"One limitation of the study is that the researchers looked at the foods that were selected by the students and did not look at whether they ate the items," a Time piece on the new JAMA Pediatrics study notes.

So are kids eating healthier food? This study—like many others—doesn't answer that question. While it has a good deal to say about participation in the USDA's National School Lunch Program, it has little or nothing to say about whether or not the food students take is being eaten.

I think there are far better ways to feed hungry students than relying on the USDA to do the job. I'd love to see an end to the National School Lunch Program. In its place, I'd love to see better alternatives. I've proposed one such alternative, in detail, here.

If researchers choose to wear rose-colored glasses to describe the National School Lunch Program, they're free to do so. But it's important to recognize they're not seeing straight.

Advertisement

NEXT: How Do You Like Them Frankenapples?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Who cares if the program is successful or not? The fact of the matter is, the federal government just has no business regulating these sorts of things in any way. Even if there were benefits that were tangible and measured, I would still be staunchly opposed. That being said it was still no surprise that the government has managed to fail at feeding children. This is a task that most anyone can figure out.

    1. Mail,

      Your comment illustrates the problems libertarianism has with American politics. You make a simple, clear intelligent point. The first two aspects are great, but the last one (intelligence) fails in comparison to flashy, emotionally driven and personally rewarding. The populist promises to personally reward many, and fills a flashy presentation with emotion. So we “care about the kids, while republicans are cheering about hungry kids paying for junk food.”

      Rands calm, intelligent retorts have lots of appeal, just as long ago Democrat Adlai Stevenson had great appeal with very intelligent retorts, as well as great position speeches and position papers. Still, Rand is there in the Senate. Maybe we will get a real salesman one of these days, like Trump or Reagan, who also backs libertarianism strongly.

      Even though you make a great point, that almost everyone can figure this stuff out, theres still a very big raw number who can’t. They are going to be much more likely to fall for the populist. Add the roughly half who are going to vote Dem anyway, and even though there’s some overlap, it’s way too close to toss to quasi socialist loons to not choose the quasi-libertarian, quasi-mercantilist, quasi-imperialists (the Repub).

    2. let them eat cake?

  2. my classmate’s mother-in-law makes $78 hourly on the computer . She has been out of work for 6 months but last month her check was $17581 just working on the computer for a few hours. view website

    [] ???????======== http://www.Wage90.Com

  3. What?! Progressives lying about it the outcome of their programs, inconceivable!

  4. “The authors are clearly HHFKA fans.”

    The author of this article clearly is not.

    There…both of you are dismissed.

    1. There is a difference between criticism and bias. Furthermore, there is a difference between JAMA and an article that is making a political point. You should try to understand those differences.

      1. Since well has Jackass Hole ever understood concepts such as “context” or “register”?

      2. Thank you. Libertarians shall be the referee between bias and criticism.

        1. Jackand Ace|1.23.16 @ 11:36AM|#
          “Thank you. Libertarians shall be the referee between bias and criticism.”

          You’re welcome. You need all the help you can get.

    2. Jackand Ace|1.23.16 @ 9:48AM|#
      “There…both of you are dismissed.”

      Hi there, Jack! Just what we need; simplistic lefty drivel, and you’re just the ignoramus to deliver!
      Keep it up, Jack. Tell us when the rapture is going to happen. Will it be right after one of those fracking earthquakes that no one can feel? Maybe after one of those huge storms that don’t hurt anyone?
      C’mon, Jack, we know you can shovel bullshit for hours.

      1. If he can’t tell us about rapture perhaps information on rupture would be good.

  5. Research that’s tailored to achieve a desired result? That’s unpossible!

  6. The study, by four University of Washington researchers, … The first paragraph of their op-ed

    Not even lunchtime and Linnekin gets the first Reason HnR reaction link of the day.

    1. I think that was supposed to be a reference to the op-ed from the Maryland nannies, which Baylen introduced later. But I could be wrong.

      1. I sincerely hope not for a multitude of reasons.

  7. “According to federal government data, the USDA School Lunch Program served 258 million fewer lunches in 2014 than it did at its high point, in 2010. The number of students paying full price for school lunches today?now 8.8 million?is at its lowest point in recorded history.

    As I’ve noted before, kids whose families can afford for them to eat something else than USDA school lunches are doing just that. Increasingly, only kids who must eat school lunches do so. The Washington State study shows that even kids whose families are struggling to make ends meet are turning away from the program.”

    There are serious consequences of this program which are being overooked by those who’s world view is inferior to a Progressive World View . Evil Teathuglikkkans managed to subvert the wonerfulness of our original intentions by not agreeing with us when we dreamed this government dependency enhancing program and as a result they are responsible for it’s failure.

    The numbers presented in this article indicate that this program highlights the institutional racism inherent in our system as a result of ReThuglikkkan inability to recognize our awesomeness.

    1. As a result of that ReThug shortsightedness The Poor ( liberal code for minorities) are being forced to eat inferior food while the white children are able to enjoy the benefits of superior nutrition and tastier meals due to white privilege.

      Liberal : We must do something. For the children !

      Rational Person: You’ve already done something. That’s why it’s all screwd up.

      Liberal : * sticks fingers in xer ears* Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na I can’t hear you.

  8. Remember the budget crisis of 1995. Here we are. again.

  9. My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..

    Clik This Link inYour Browser….

    ? ? ? ? http://www.Wage90.com

  10. I have little sympathy for the author or this article. This issue isn’t, nor has it ever been, schools’ lunches. The issue is the schools themselves. Get the government out of schools and sit back and marvel at how good lunch can be. At a minimum, get the federal government out of schools. Trying to solve the problems of public schools is a waste of time, money, concern and resources. They’re hopeless and helpless; get over it!

  11. I’ve made $76,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student.I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money.It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it.

    Open This LinkFor More InFormation..

    ??????? http://www.workpost30.com

  12. Yahoo CEO, Marissa Meyer has gone som far as to Support the practice “Work at home” that I have been doing since last year. In this year till now I have earned 66k dollars with my pc, despite the fact that I am a college student. Even newbies can make 39 an hour easily and the average goes up with time. Why not try this.

    Clik This Link inYour Browser…….

    ? ? ? ? http://www.Jobstribune.com

  13. Only the Ministry of Food knows what’s best for you.

  14. My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..

    Clik This Link inYour Browser….

    ? ? ? ? http://www.Jobstribune.com

  15. Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.

    Click This Link inYour Browser……._+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.Paybucket40.com

  16. “Why should libertarians celebrate the blueprint that made powerful government possible?”

    In which Sheldon implies that powerful government wasn’t possible before the USC or in countries without it. What a retard.

  17. my classmate’s mother-in-law makes $78 hourly on the computer . She has been out of work for 6 months but last month her check was $17581 just working on the computer for a few hours. view website

    ???????========[] http://www.Jobstribune.com

  18. My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..

    Clik This Link inYour Browser….

    ? ? ? ? http://www.Workpost30.Com

  19. My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..

    Clik This Link inYour Browser….

    ? ? ? ? http://www.Jobstribune.com

  20. “The first paragraph of their op-ed describes the school-lunch reforms in glowing terms, with words like “important,” “tremendous,” and “dramatically” used to label the reforms.”

    Sounds like they hired Donald Trump as their copy writer.

    1. My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..

      Clik This Link inYour Browser….

      ??????? http://www.netjoin10.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.