Former Ron Paul Campaign Aides Indicted Again for Campaign Finance Reporting Violation After Initial Federal Failure to Convict
Because of federal prosecutorial error that led to some of the initial charges against them being dropped before trial (since they were based on legally inadmissible evidence), former Ron Paul campaign aides Jesse Benton and John Tate (both still part of the larger world of Paul family political fund raising and grassroots activism) and Dimitri Kesari (already convicted on one related charge in a trial last month), are once again facing trial in federal court over charges related to not reporting to the government payoffs to Iowa state Sen. Kent Sorenson for his endorsement for Ron Paul.

Associated Press guides you through the thickets of the latest:
In a new grand jury indictment filed Thursday in federal court in Des Moines, Paul's 2012 campaign chairman Jesse Benton, campaign manager John Tate and deputy manager Dimitri Kesari are charged with conspiracy to cover up $73,000 in campaign payments to former Iowa Sen. Kent Sorenson….
Benton, Tate and Kesari also are charged with causing false campaign contribution reports to be filed to the Federal Election Commission and participating in a false statement scheme. Benton and Tate are charged with causing the campaign to file false records of the payments. Kesari was convicted of that charge last month.
The three men were originally charged in August, but a judge dismissed charges against Tate and all but one charge against Benton because they were based on information the government obtained during FBI interviews last year that the judge said was not admissible.
In the new indictment the charges are based primarily on emails and other communication the prosecutors plan to offer into evidence…..
The first court appearance for the three on the new charges is set for Dec. 2. Prosecutors filed a motion seeking a Feb. 8 trial.
My reporting on their original August indictment, and their original (mostly, except for one guilty verdict for Kesari) acquittal last month.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Aren't there current presidential candidates that require prosecution right now?
You are calling for the prosecution of politicians, and their underlings ??? Are you crazy ???!!!
Good one, PM.
Thread winner. Shut it down, folks, nothing left to say.
The nice thing about having 300,000 criminal offenses on the books is that you can always make something stick, no matter the circumstances.
Exactly. And since it's impossible to enforce all of them against everyone at all times, prosecutorial discretion dictates that they can make internal determination as to how limited resources are directed. I.e., against political enemies and disfavored groups.
I saw congress was actually attempting to require men's rea for federal criminal prosecution. It would be a nice addition me thinks.
A long time ago, I expressed the belief that Ron Paul was a very shitty judge of character, and too nice to fire people who needed to be fired.
I stand by this belief to this day, because of stupid, sordid shit like this.
Well, Eric Dondero denies being fired. If anyone deserved to be fired -- by which I mean dropped into the fiery bowels of a volcano -- then certainly Eric Dondero did.
Dondero
You know what to do. =)
See, this is why we need more campaign finance regulation. We need rules that NO team of lawyers can successfully navigate. It's the only way to keep elections fair. GRARGH!~ KKKERPERASHUNZ!!!! /progtard
If at first you don't succeed....
I just got paid $6784 working off my laptop this month. And if you think that's cool, my divorced friend has twin toddlers and made over $9k her first month. It feels so good making so much money when other people have to work for so much less. This is what I do,
http://www.OnlineCash9.Com