Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Politics

Go Bar Hopping…for the Sake of California's Disabled

Golden State lawmaker proposes nickel tax on mixed drinks to fund disability programs.

Nick Gillespie | 9.9.2015 10:52 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

From the Twitter feed of Like a Libertarian comes word of a novel (read: disturbing) new tax idea:

A California lawmaker is blending a five-cent-a-drink tax on cocktails into the hectic end-of-session legislative push.

Angered by a budget deal they see as cutting out disabled Californians, advocates have been pushing lawmakers to better fund services. Assemblywoman Susan Bonilla, D-Concord, is hoping the extra revenue can pour into state coffers from martini, margarita and Manhattan glasses.

"I've been aware for a while now that compared to other states our alcohol taxes are abysmally low," Bonilla said, arguing that cocktails are optional luxury items. "I was really looking for a way to fund disabilities services that wouldn't involve a regressive tax."…

Any bill imposing a new tax requires a two-thirds vote and thus long-shot Republican support. The minority party has already roundly rejected new taxes and fees to fund transportation infrastructure and other healthcare needs, but Bonilla said her legislation will serve in part to ensure the disabled aren't left out of the discussion.

"I think most people in California don't realize there's a crisis," Bonilla said, but amid the debate about boosting Medi-Cal reimbursement rates or taxing managed healthcare plans, "no one has really focused on the fact that we have a statutory obligation to fund these services."

Read more here.

And a quick note about California's Republicans holding up progress by withholding "long-shot" support: That's utter bullshit.

As Matt Welch noted a few years back, California is a one-party state, with Democrats not only holding all state-wide offices but commanding leads in both houses of the state legislature. There is nothing going on in California that can plausibly be blamed on Republicans anymore. If Jerry Brown's California has trouble funding any given thing, it's because of the legislative and fiscal priorities he and his Democratic Party have set.

The budget "crisis" in California now rests solely in their hands.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Conservative Anti-Trump Club

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsPolicyCivil LibertiesWar on DrugsNanny StateCaliforniaAlcohol
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (33)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Juvenile Bluster   11 years ago

    In this history of legislators saying "Lets put a tax on X to fund Y" has either of these things ever happened?

    1. The tax is sufficient to fund Y.
    2. The tax is actually used to fund Y.

    1. Mrs. Lemuel Struthers   11 years ago

      In Jersey the lottery earnings were supposed to be a set-aside for education. Of course, that didn't happen.

      Never, never is the money actually used for its supposed purpose. It usually ends up in some general fund and accessible for skimming.

    2. JD the elder   11 years ago

      I think sometimes the money is used to fund Y, but payments from the general fund to Y are reduced by the same amount, so effectively it might as well have just gone into the general fund.

  2. Rhywun   11 years ago

    "our alcohol taxes are abysmally low"

    *facepalm*

    1. Florida Man   11 years ago

      This explains Reason's LA cocktail parties. It all makes sense now.

    2. grrizzly   11 years ago

      Abysmally is her interpretation, but I think the alcohol taxes are indeed low in California because every type of alcohol is so much cheaper over there than in the Northeast.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

        "It's moving! Tax it until it's dead!!!"

        Yeah, but what do you think of the gas prices? Keep in mind that there are 7 refineries in the LA area.

    3. Scarecrow & WoodChipper Repair   11 years ago

      Notice she is too dumb to realize (or care) what this implies for other California taxes which are abysmally high in comparison to other states.

      1. Jerryskids   11 years ago

        It implies that other states have abysmally low tax rates in comparison to California. The ratchet only works one way.

        1. Scarecrow & WoodChipper Repair   11 years ago

          It implies I am so politically naive that I could not see the obvious. Yucch,

  3. MOFO.   11 years ago

    "There is nothing going on in California that can plausibly be blamed on Republicans anymore."

    Why is plausibility a requirement? The people this is targeted to just want someone to blame, plausible is irrelevant.

    1. Almanian - I Hardly Knew Her   11 years ago

      I blame Bush

    2. Somalian Road Corporation   11 years ago

      Republicans are still getting the flak for Prop 13, "a 70s Republican power-grab", ruining education and the very foundations of civilization. Because those poor underdog Democrats are totally powerless to reverse it.

      I've spent a lot of time in California, but I've never lived there, and I still know what it is just from hearing Californians bitch and moan about it.

    3. WTF   11 years ago

      As long as there is even a single Republican holding office in some legislative body, the Republicans will continue to be blamed for the failures of one-party Democratic governance.

      1. Monty Crisco   11 years ago

        Years from now, when a mushroom cloud looms over Tel Aviv and the arab world is dancing in celebration....

        "The Iranians detonated a nuclear device in Israel!!!"

        Democratic politician: "I hope those fucking Rethuglicans are satisfied with what they've done..."

        1. WTF   11 years ago

          "If only they'd supported Obama's nuclear deal with Iran!"

        2. kbolino   11 years ago

          when a mushroom cloud looms over Tel Aviv Riyadh

          more likely

        3. brady949   11 years ago

          I doubt the arab world would be doing much dancing since Israel would nuke everyone in sight in retaliation.

        4. brady949   11 years ago

          Also, WTF does Israel have to do with a tax on gin and tonics?

      2. R C Dean   11 years ago

        As long as there is even a single Republican holding office in some legislative body,

        Not even that. Libertarians hold no offices of note, yet we get blamed for all kinds of shit.

        1. In League with the Dark Ones   11 years ago

          There are 17 Libertarian officeholders in CA.

          You know Religious Institution Representative John Camera (L) on the Van Nuys Neighborhood Council causes all of the problems in LA!

  4. Almanian - I Hardly Knew Her   11 years ago

    Drunk Kenny Rogers from "Mad TV" does not approve

    1. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

      Until he drunk wrecks his car and loses a leg. That charactor is hilarious.

      1. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

        I miss Mad TV. Superior to SNL in every way.

        1. Almanian - Micro Trumper   11 years ago

          Yep - and the birfplace of Keys and Peeles - whose season finale is tonight, I believe.

  5. esteve7   11 years ago

    Don't you know that Evil Republicans stop everything here in California?

    If it mind-boggling that the progs here are so rabid brainwashed that their party literally controlling everything isn't enough. They are just like the thugs in the one-party communist bloc countries, whose failure was always blamed on others

    1. dantheserene   11 years ago

      I'll take "Wreckers and Kulaks" for $1000, Alex.

      1. Monty Crisco   11 years ago

        Goddamn vulture speculators!!!

        / Maduro

    2. Mokers   11 years ago

      And if it isn't the republicans, it's those evil corporations preventing Democrats from doing the right thing.

  6. R C Dean   11 years ago

    The budget "crisis" in California now rests solely in their hands.

    Absolutely.

    If by "their", you mean "the Republicans'".

  7. brady949   11 years ago

    "I was really looking for a way to fund disabilities services that wouldn't involve a regressive tax."

    Because poor people don't drink?

  8. jmomls   11 years ago

    Hey California, how 'bout a tax on each and every illegal alien in the state? You know, the ones that are sucking up all the tax money currently collected that should be spent on actual citizens?

    How about also a cocaine tax on every dope fiend in Hollywood or Sacramento?

  9. In League with the Dark Ones   11 years ago

    Since 2014, the Democrats hold 26 of 40 (or 65%) State Senate seats and 52 of 80 (or 65%) of State Assembly seats. That's 1 seat short of 2/3s of the State Senate and 2 seats short of 2/3s of the State Assembly.

    A supermajority is required to pass a tax increase, so Democrats need 1 non-D State Senator and 2 non-D State Assemblymembers to join them, so until Democrats regain their supermajority status (and thus render Republican membership irrelevant), they'll blame Republicans for "obstructing" legislation.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Yes Bruh, No Bruh

Charles Oliver | 5.6.2026 4:00 AM

Trump's Responses to Kimmel and Comey Highlight His Contempt for Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.6.2026 12:01 AM

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

The People vs. CEQA

Christian Britschgi | 5.5.2026 3:25 PM

How the Slaveholding Founders Really Felt About Slavery

Timothy Sandefur | 5.5.2026 1:20 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks