Police Abuse

Likely Grand Jury Investigating Waco Biker Club Massacre Headed by Waco Police Officer

One almost suspects the system doesn't want the real story of what happened during Waco biker club massacre to come out.


I've blogged quite a bit about how the action of the Waco police department and county court system don't seem designed to publicly reveal the truth about what happened during May's highly publicized shootout that killed nine and wounded 18 at a political meeting of biker clubs at the Twin Peaks restaurant. See here, here, and here.

Today the news comes out that the grand jury that will likely be considering the crimes associated with the incident has a foreman who is a Waco police detective. From the Waco Tribune:

James Head, a 34-year police veteran who has spent 26 years with Waco PD, was among the first 14 on the panel qualified to serve on the grand jury and, beyond that, 19th State District Judge Ralph Strother selected Head to serve as the foreman…..Head, wearing his police badge and service pistol, entered the grand jury chambers with the others to begin considering about 100 criminal cases presented by the McLennan County District Attorney's Office.

This panel, which will meet twice a month for the next three months, could consider indictments against the 177 bikers arrested in the wake of the May 17 Twin Peaks shootout that left nine dead and 20 wounded. A grand jury, at some point, also will review Waco police officers' actions in response to the melee that broke out between rival biker groups that day.

"That's the way it turned out," Strother said after Head was selected, noting Texas law says the first 12 people who are qualified are selected for the grand jury….

When asked if he had any involvement in the massive Twin Peaks investigation, Head said, "Not really." He would not elaborate on that answer and deferred additional questions about the Twin Peaks incident to the Waco City Attorney's Office….

"If something comes up that I have worked on or something like that that involved any type of apparent conflict, I am not going to vote on it," Head said.

Details on the Texas grand jury selection process, which shows a judge has a voir dire discretion in the selection process about who is actually qualified, one that was not wisely used in this case. If you are concerned with the full truth of what happened, including any possibility of police misconduct, coming out, that is.

NEXT: Glenn Garvin Reviews The 2000s: A New Reality

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Fuckin’ Waco. Every time I have to drive through there, I think to myself, “Man, I hate Baylor.”

    1. YES! and that ugly-assed stadium that is RIGHT ON THE FREEWAY standing as a temple to the baptist bank accounts that built it.

  2. So the cops shot first?

    1. Han shot first god damned you… Oh, we’re not talking about that. Carry on.

  3. “If something comes up that I have worked on or something like that that involved any type of apparent conflict, I am not going to vote on it,” Head said.”

    So, a police officer serving on a grand jury in the very same jurisdiction that employes him is not apparent enough?

    1. He’s either too stupid, or too corrupt, to realize that him being on this grand jury AT ALL is a king-hell, unwaivable, unresolvable conflict of interest.

      So, as we have suspected, more cops who killed more people without obvious visible legal justification are just going to walk, free as little birds. To kill again, presumably.

  4. This is all just another Jade helm exercise. *adjusts tinfoil hat

  5. How can a law enforcement officer even serve on a jury, grand or otherwise? During voir dire, the first thing I was asked was if I was in law enforcement. I told them I was a corrections officer at the county jail. They thanked me for my time, and let me go.

    1. grand jury isn’t a trial jury- the prosecutor WANTS a home town hero to help him get the indictments he wants.

      1. Grand juries are ostensibly common law derived non-governmental body meant to protect society from the the criminal justice arm of the state. What business a prosecutor has selecting the grand jurors and leading them around on a leash, I don’t know.

  6. I sat in for a grand jury selection hearing, the first thing the prosecutor did was to tell us was that not being truthful in answering their qualification questions would result in contempt of court charges, if that information came out later. His very next question was to see if any of us were opposed to indicting people for non-violent drug crimes or if we were skeptical of police conduct.

  7. “That’s the way it turned out,” Strother said after Head was selected,”

    Sure it is.

    We live in a fuckin’ banana republic.

  8. Welcome To Texas Justice: You Might Beat The Rap, But You Won’t Beat The Ride
    Trigger warning: A firm, even pull keeps the gun from shifting and throwing off your aim.

  9. Im making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

    This is what I do! .. http://www.homejobs20.cf

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.