Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Anti-Pot Activist on Support for Legalization: 'What Goes Up Must Come Down'

Kevin Sabet implausibly takes solace from a drop in public approval between 1977 and 1985.

Jacob Sullum | 3.20.2015 2:04 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Heritage Foundation

In an interview with Vox's German Lopez, anti-pot activist Kevin Sabet takes solace, rather implausibly, from the dip in public support for marijuana legalization in the late 1970s and early '80s:

Inevitability is the number-one talking point of the legalization movement….That's a really powerful talking point for them, because if people think something is inevitable, even if they're against it, they're likely to surrender [to] it because it's not worth their time to deal with it or fight.

There's no doubt that there's some truth to the momentum for legalization that has grown in the past 10 years or so. But I think what goes up must also come down. I think these things come in cycles. In the 1970s, we had the exact same thing happen with support for legalization. Maybe not as much as we have now, but we did see a dramatic change from the 1950s to the 1970s—in the same way you've seen a change from the 1990s to the 2010s. And that reversed for all sorts of reasons after the 1970s. It might reverse this time, but it might not.

Although I am not generally inclined toward optimism about drug policy, it seems to me that Sabet is grasping at straws. The current level of support for legalization is historically unprecedented—much higher than it was even before the decrease to which Sabet refers. Gallup's numbers show support for marijuana rising from 12 percent in 1969 to 28 percent in 1977, then falling to 23 percent by 1985, after which it resumed its upward climb, reaching 58 percent in 2013 before dropping to 51 percent last year.

Are we already experiencing the reversal for which Sabet is hoping? Probably not. Gallup's 2013 number was unusually and surprisingly high. The 2014 number is closer to the results of other surveys, which generally do not show a drop in support between 2013 and 2014. In the General Social Survey (which is conducted every two years), support for legalization rose from 43 percent in 2012 to 52 percent in 2014. Similarly, the Pew Research Center put support for legalization at 52 percent last October, up from 45 percent in 2011. The CBS News poll shows support rising from 45 percent in April 2013 to 51 percent the following January and February, then falling to 48 percent in May.

Gallup's latest numbers indicate that support for legalization is much stronger now than it ever was in the 1970s—86 percent higher than the 1977 peak. Even if the number dropped as it did after then (by 18 percent between 1977 and 1985), support would still be 54 percent higher than in 1977. And it seems much more likely that the number will continue to rise, given the generational differences on this issue. Last year Pew put support for legalization at 63 percent among respondents born between 1981 and 1996.

Somewhat counterintuitively, self-reported current marijuana use was higher in the late 1970s, when support for legalization was much lower. In the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA), for instance, 20 percent of 26-to-34-year-olds reported using marijuana in the previous month, compared to 13 percent of that same age group in the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Because of changes in methodology, the two surveys are not directly comparable, but the differences tend to boost the NSDUH numbers, meaning the true gap between 1979 and 2013 is probably even bigger. Similarly, the share of high school seniors reporting past-month use of marijuana in the Monitoring the Future Study (which began in 1975) peaked at 37 percent in 1978, compared to 24 percent last year. Increases in marijuana use by teenagers, in fact, had a lot to do with the anti-pot backlash that began around this time.

Although current marijuana use is less common today, the percentage of Americans who have tried marijuana is much larger. Less than a quarter of Americans 26 or older reported ever using marijuana in the 1977 NHSDA, compared to nearly half in the 2013 NSDUH. Even allowing for greater candor in the NSDUH (which the methodological changes were designed to promote), that is a big difference. Widespread direct and indirect experience with marijuana probably is the most important factor driving the increase in support for legalization.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ronald Bailey Explains How Real Factories Will Replace Factory Farms

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyWar on DrugsMarijuanaDrug LegalizationPublic Opinion
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Warren's Strapon   10 years ago

    Sabet's the kind of guy who would have been writing anti-masturbation articles 140 years ago.

    1. jcalonicna   10 years ago

      I make up to $90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to $86h? Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link... Try it, you won't regret it!......
      http://www.jobs-check.com

  2. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

    Well now it's just getting sad.

  3. sahicnavincjhoe   10 years ago

    I've made $64,000 so far this year working online and I'm a full time student. I'm using an online business opportunity I heard about and I've made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I've been doing
    http://www.work-cash.com

  4. Episiarch   10 years ago

    This cat is out of the bag. It was inevitable, and the reason the drug warrior scumbags put a full court press on a stupid plant was because as soon as it was legalized anywhere, the dam would break. Because it's fucking harmless and people enjoy it a lot. And the dam has broken, and the hole is already vastly too large for them to plug it.

  5. bassjoe   10 years ago

    Perhaps he should be wondering instead whether support for the drug war reached a high (heh) decades ago...?

  6. bassjoe   10 years ago

    The legality of a victimless activity shouldn't be up for majority approval so its relative popularity, while encouraging to us libertarian potheads, should be meaningless. (I know, I know...)

  7. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

    Dipshit's gonna dipshit. That's what he gets paid to do.

  8. Hyperion   10 years ago

    You can only grasp at straws when you're desperate.

  9. Scarecrow Repair   10 years ago

    That stat works both ways. Support for illegalization went up and so must go down.

    Idiot. Words fail me to dismiss his idiocy any more plainly.

    I hate fucking idiots like that.

    1. Warren's Strapon   10 years ago

      He may look like an idiot, and he may talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot.

      1. Scarecrow Repair   10 years ago

        There was a navy brat selling papers on my ship when in port. Cost 20 cents, and if you gave him a quarter, he'd just ignore you until you explicitly asked for your change. Then he'd say "It's only a nickle." Made me so mad. I'd yell back "Then give me a dime, cause that way you lose only a nickle." Stupid kid. At least after a while he recognized me and gave the nickle back without asking.

        Zillions of people like that. "Sales tax only has to raise a quarter cent." "Great, how about we drop it a quarter cent?"

        I really hate that particular fucking idiotic thinking, it's so goddammed condescending and patronizing.

    2. Reverend Draco   10 years ago

      I'm told, nearly every day, that my people skills need work.

      My people skills are fine, I just have no tolerance for idiots.

  10. ebonylpenny   10 years ago

    TODAY ONLY : Get Your Own Mac Book Pro With $1000 Visa Gift Card .Get It Here

    http://goo.gl/LpNgjp

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!