NY Sheriff's Deputy Turns Off Dashcam While Pulling Over Drunk Cop, Drunk Cop Allegedly Assaults Officers Trying to Arrest Him
Deputy says he knew cop from high school so felt comfortable turning off the dash-cam. DA worried there may not be policies in place.


A Syracuse, New York, cop was charged with aggravated drinking under the influence, misdemeanor criminal mischief and harassment, and resisting arrest after he was pulled over on December 18 and blew three times the legal limit. According to police reports, the cop, Ty Cogan, allegedly fought with the officers trying to arrest him—kicking and trying to bite the officers, rolling around on the ground, and at one point allegedly telling the officers to "shoot me."
It's no open and shut case, however, because the Onondaga County sheriff's deputy who arrived at the scene, Jeffrey Passino, decided to turn off his dash-cam after taking Cogan's license. Passino says he turned off the dash-cam not because Cogan was a cop but because he knew him from high school and was therefore "comfortable" with him. The district attorney is concerned no policies may be in place for how to use dashboard and other police cameras, as Syracuse.com reports:
Onondaga County District Attorney William Fitzpatrick said he and other DAs from the National District Attorneys Association, for which he is president-elect, have serious concerns about officers using body cameras without having protocols in place.
He thinks a lack of consistent rules in any department could jeopardize cases.
"We all agreed you should have written protocols that are followed," Fitzpatrick said. "I get concerned when a protocol isn't followed."
Dave Roberts, senior program manager of the International Chiefs of Police's Technology Center, emphasized the need for departments to have well-crafted, vetted and enforceable policies for using technology.
"Establishing what those guidelines are … is important so that everyone understands the rules and how you can monitor what we're doing to ensure we're acting properly," Roberts said.
The sheriff's office has not said what its policy is for turning the dashboard cameras off, or whether officers are given discretion.
Cogan was suspended with pay after his arrest. He's worked for the Syracuse Police Department for nine years and makes a base salary of $67,000.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Not guilty and fire cop.
Seems easy to me.
Which cop?
Yes.
The one who turned off his dashcam, but SF's answer is fine too.
Without video and audio to confirm the report, it should be assumed that the cop is lying.
YES. I'm trying to figure out if it makes it better or worse that he said he turned off the cam because he knew him or because he was a cop...
I'm trying to figure out if it makes it better or worse that he said he turned off the cam because he knew him or because he was a cop...
Worse. He might as well have said, "I had a personal bias, so I obliterated any objective record of what happened."
That was my initial reaction- but is it better to have a personal bias or an institutional one?
It could probably go both ways, especially in cases with slightly different details.
IMO, if his personal judgement/bias was abysmal, institutional bias is irrelevant.
They are both bad. They just need a rule that you don't turn off the camera ever when something is happening.
Why allow cops to turn off the camera at all?
That question only really matters if you believe one of the biases wouldn't have prompted him to turn the camera off.
He turned it off so what would normally happen in that situation wouldn't happen. In other words, he knew that the possible outcome from review of the video would lead to further charges against an associate, so he skirted the rules.
This is my thinking. Cop A tuirned off the camera to protect Drunken Piggy.
Which cop?
aggravated drinking under the influence
Not drinking under the influence!!!!1!
aggravated drinking under the influence
Dammit!
what's the point of drinking if you're not aggravated?
you've obviously never heard of peer pressure.
The relf-reinforcing conformity among docks?
Oh, wait, that's pier pressure.
and the push for me to finish the last slice is pie pressure.
I always thought pi pressure was irrational
A persistent influence pushing one to design architecture for the National Socialist Party?
Oh, I thought you said Speer pressure.
The district attorney is concerned no policies may be in place for how to use dashboard and other police cameras,
Based on the constant references to cops doing stupid shit because there wasn't a policy telling them not to, I can only conclude that way too many cops are complete subnormals.
you'd be amazed at how very normal it is for people to not know how to behave without a policy that dictates.
If this were a non-cop, the lack of video evidence would be irrelevant to the ease conviction. Judges and prosecutors don't know who to throw their knee-jerk support behind when both parties are cops. This is an illustration of that.
you aren't insinuating that a cop's eyewitness testimony is taken as a factual account unless there is direct evidence to oppose it, are you?
You know who else insinuated stuff?
This guy https://twitter.com/the_insinuator ?
Him too.
And he wasn't shot a dozen times? Imagine that.
he is a cop- and white.
a black teen would have been cut in half with bullets.
Yes, and the cop would be claiming "he tried to run over me."
He thinks a lack of consistent rules in any department could jeopardize cases.
How's this for a "carefully crafted" policy: no footage, no case. And a monetary fine for the cop.
And he wasn't shot a dozen times?
He was asking for it.
Cogan was suspended with pay after his arrest.
Way to bait the Dunphy, Ed.
The district attorney is concerned no policies may be in place for how to use dashboard and other police cameras, as Syracuse.com reports:
"Smoke detectors are in the main cabin and in the bathrooms. Tampering with a smoke detector is a violation of federal law, and will be prosecuted"
Fire both cops. The one for drunk driving and the other for failure to collect evidence.
surely failure to collect evidence isn't a fireable offense... I mean, they're just human beans.
You don't know what it's like out there! I've *worked* in the private sector. They expect *results*.
I am shocked, SHOCKED, to discover there is gambling fraud going on here!
A nationwide cellphone company distributing phones and cellphone plans in Denver as part of a massive government program says it is "outraged by the unacceptable actions" uncovered by a CBS4 undercover investigation.
The response from Total Call Mobile comes nearly three months after an undercover CBS4 investigation revealed multiple examples of fraud and cheating in the phone distribution program.
http://denver.cbslocal.com/201.....e-program/
Obviously they need a bigger budget for oversight.
YOU CANNOT BE SUSPENDED WITH PAY. He is simply on leave. Or maybe on unscheduled vacay.
But I read on Facebook that cops are held to a higher standard!
If he had nothing to hide...
So much for Professional Courtesy.