Congress Should Let These Three Things DIE Already!
The last Congress was one of the least-productive ever, at least in terms of passing legislation. Contrary to goo-goo types who want a government that does somehthing/anything to justify its paycheck, gridlock isn't such a bad thing. Indeed, it's the reason why real outlays per capita were flat or slightly lower for a few years after 2009's unrestrained spending orgy.
It's unlcear whether gridlock will survive a fully Republican Congress. The GOP majority in both houses might be able to muscle through certain things and, if the last two-term Democrat in the White House is any indication, we might even be treated to the spectacle of a lame-duck president working with the GOP majority to pass some stuff.
However that might shake out, Reason mag economics columnist and Mercatus Center policy analyst Veronique de Rugy identifies three things that Congress should…just let die. Our brave lawmakers can make things better by letting sunsetting laws and policies just fade away like MacArthur after Korea.
Specifically, Congress can let the charter for the Export-Import Bank and some provisions of the Patriot Act ride off into oblivion. And Congress can let the sequester caps return as scheduled. "What we need," reads the headline at The Daily Beast, "is a Seinfeld Congress." That is, one that does nothing, at least in these three cases.
[These] changes…will not fundamentally alter the untenable fiscal course our federal government is on. And they are relatively small compared to the changes that I usually call for from lawmakers.
They are, however, low-hanging fruit because all that is required is for Congress do nothing! In addition, each of the changes would send a significant signal that—unlike the previous Republican-controlled Congress—the new Republican Congress is serious about reining in our overgrown federal government….
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who's the editor of this damn rag?!?
Seriously. Does Gillespie have a spell checker?
This never happened when what's her name was here.
my buddy's sister-in-law makes $67 an hour on the internet . She has been without a job for 6 months but last month her paycheck was $12455 just working on the internet for a few hours. website link..........
????? http://www.work-reviews.com
Would she be willing to star in a snuff film?
My best friend's mother-in-law makes $85 /hour on the internet . She has been out of work for 5 months but last month her pay was $16453 just working on the internet for a few hours.
Visit this website ????? http://www.jobsfish.com
we might even be treated to the spectacle of a lame-duck president working with the GOP majority to pass some stuff.
We already are. Obama and the Repub leadership have been trying to jam immigration ramnestyform through for months now.
my roomate's half-sister makes $69 hourly on the laptop . She has been without a job for 10 months but last month her check was $15722 just working on the laptop for a few hours. why not look here...........
????? http://www.netjob70.com