Holder Says Feds to End Racial Profiling. Unless He's Declaring an End to the Drug War, No.


Outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder is making the rounds, promising that the Department of Justice will soon reveal new "guidance" to end racial profiling. He went so far in a speech in Atlanta to suggest that the feds will end it "once and for all." Here's a quote from the Atlanta CBS affiliate and Associated Press from his speech yesterday at Ebeneezer Baptist Church:
"In the coming days, I will announce updated Justice Department guidance regarding profiling by federal law enforcement. This will institute rigorous new standards — and robust safeguards — to help end racial profiling, once and for all," Holder said. "This new guidance will codify our commitment to the very highest standards of fair and effective policing." …
"We are dealing with concerns that are truly national in scope and that threaten the entire nation. Broadly speaking, without mutual understanding between citizens – whose rights must be respected – and law enforcement officers – who make tremendous and often-unheralded personal sacrifices every day to preserve public safety – there can be no meaningful progress," Holder said. "Our police officers cannot be seen as an occupying force disconnected from the communities they serve. Bonds that have been broken must be restored. Bonds that never existed must now be created."
Why are the police seen as an "occupying force"? Because the police, hand in hand with the Department of Justice, have been perpetuating the drug war for decades. They're now doing it with actual military equipment! The administration will not announce an end to the drug war, and therefore the "occupation" will continue.
To be fair, the Department of Justice under Holder has made changes to reduce the use of mandatory minimum sentencing in non-violent drug cases and increase accessibility to federal clemency for non-violent crimes. But as long as there is a drug war, there will be a black market for drugs and money shunted to police departments (including money from Holder's own agency). There will be a drive to get results in a war that cannot possibly ever be won, and therefore a pursuit for low-hanging fruit. That would be poor people without the ability to secure skilled lawyers to protect their interests. And in urban settings that will often end up hitting minorities hardest. That's where communities like Ferguson extract their fines to get the revenue to keep their governments running.
I also suspect the Department of Justice will not announce changes to its asset forfeiture program, where the DOJ shares money and property taken from people suspected of crimes with local law enforcement agencies. The system has proven to be an incubator for police abuse and outright theft from citizens from law enforcement agencies looking to pad their budgets. Yesterday's somewhat lackluster report from the White House about police militarization explored the Equitable Sharing Program and seemed to determine the program had adequate oversight, pointing out that five whole law enforcement agencies have been booted from the program for violations (three of which were civil rights violations). There isn't any sort of indication in the report that the Department of Justice sees any sort of twisted incentives resulting from the very existence of the program.
So nobody should be holding his or her breath at the possibility of large changes. The administration and the Department of Justice still do not acknowledge that the police abuse of communities is a direct result of the power the government has given them or the power of police unions to protect officers from being held responsible for misconduct. Doing so would require believing that government is the cause of—not the solution to—the abuse of minorities.
Reason's annual Webathon is underway! Your (tax-deductible!) gift will help Reason magazine, Reason.com, and Reason TV bring the case for "Free Minds and Free Markets" to bigger and bigger audiences. For giving levels and associated swag, go here now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hey, Reason web guy:
Two things you need to fix on your style sheet:
(1) Give us back our spaces between paragraphs.
(2) Put links back into a bold color.
okthxbai
Thanks.
Thanks dickheads for changing reason again. Now I have to resize my browser window down to the same dimensions as a smart phone so the text size isn't ginormous. How much of a memory hog will it be now? Then there's the looped autoplay ads.
You want my donation? Pull it out of your *censored by Limey kneelers*.
No blank lines between paragraphs now, too?
Things look different. Why do things look different?
[break]
Anyway, I suspect an ulterior motive behind whatever smoke Holder is currently blowing up people's skirts.
Either a glitch or a format change. Expect more pop hits and commercials.
Things look different because it's pledge drive time. They roll out the worst shit at the very time they're asking for money every year. It's the FYTW-a-thon.
"Send your dollars today/
To chase server squirrels away."
the proper way to separate
[breakin']
paragraphs
[electric boogaloo]
Great, now this doesn't make a lot of sense.
I don't think it did before.
Your lunctime derp- choice quotes from Obots through the years
-David Brooks
-Valerie Jarrett
-Dan Lothian
I really feel sorry for Jarrett. Obama might be smarter than her.
Cult of bullshit.
why should anyone believe that what Holder says will in any way resemble what he does? Given the example set by his boss, a more reasonable alternative is to expect the opposite.
What happens when this guidance is ignored? Nothing? Oh, well then.
testes... one... two...
b
strong
i
s
a
"once and for all."
and someone just broke the derp barrier. They said it was impossible.
Believe it or not Alternet has a groat article about not the militarization of the police but the militarism. That is the "us vs them" mentality that cops have. They talk about so many police killings it makes you sick.
http://www.alternet.org/books/.....e-violence
and we report the commonalities in their trauma and mistreatment by law enforcement and the corporate media after the death of their loved ones.
They're losing me.
Except AlterNet wants to create an even bigger police state.
Why isn't Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. in an orange jumpsuit yet?
OT: A radical feminist displays a complete lack of self-awareness.
http://therearesomanythingswro.....esota-ads/
Things are no longer different. Why are things no longer different?
[break]
We need to elect him again so he can fulfill his legacy.
I believe it was Ike who said "Things are more like they are now than they ever were before."
"The future ain't what it used to be." - Yogi Berra
I'll believe that racial profiling by the feds is ended for good, when the feds stop requiring race info for practically everything. They want to know what race I am? How about American!
How white of you.
.
Holder: "Now that I'm leaving the DoJ will start behavin' and stop profiling"
.
Just having this walking talking pos on the sidelines will be an improvement.
The Feds have WAY too much spare time on their hands.
http://www.Anon-Rocks.tk
Gotta like this cop- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMQCFqgAGyM
He could maintain both positions if he starts a drug enforcement campaign against places such as Hollywood, where mostly white people indulge in banned substances. I don't wish those people any ill, but it would help our cause if he did it, by backfiring spectacularly. In fact, that may very well be just what it takes to end the War on Drugs.