Why Shouldn't Al Sharpton and Rand Paul Have Breakfast Together?
What matters isn't whether one of them is a good guy. It's whether their meeting can contribute to reform.

Last week Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) had breakfast with the Rev. Al Sharpton, at Sharpton's request. The meeting appears to have been productive for both parties. Sharpton obviously isn't likely to back Paul for president, but he's taking the opportunity to put pressure on Hillary Clinton on various civil rights issues where Paul's talk has been bolder than Clinton's. Paul in turn can build up his civil rights image a little without sanctioning any of the ugliness in Sharpton's past. Put differently, both men get the advantages of a meeting without the disadvantages of an endorsement.
Naturally, Paul's critics are treating this as an endorsement anyway. Jennifer Rubin, a medium who channels neoconservative opinion for The Washington Post, put on her concern-troll hat yesterday and wrote this:
Why is Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) courting Sharpton and why don't Republicans denounce him for doing so, just as they do Democrats?…If Paul wants to take on criminal justice reform, more power to him. And if he thinks this will boost him with African American voters, he won't be the first pol to try to pick agenda items that impress slices of the electorate. But in doing precisely what the administration and so many liberals do—treating Al Sharpton as a respected and important figure—he does his own credibility harm.
Somehow I have a hard time imagining Rubin reacting this way if Paul had broken bread with Dick Cheney or Sheldon Adelson.
My view? A movement to roll back mass incarceration, overcriminalization, and police militarization is more likely to succeed if it has support on both the left and the right. Sharpton has influence on the left, Paul has influence on the right, and both are open to cooperation. The sane question to ask here isn't whether either one of them is a good guy; it's whether their meeting can actually contribute to that movement in a significant way.
I'm not sure it will. It's just a breakfast, after all. But I can't imagine how refusing to meet would have helped any of those causes.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
They have some common ground: Rand Paul believes in lower taxes, and Al Sharpton doesn't believe he should pay taxes.
Maybe Rand should have taken some time to sober up before posing for that photo.
"Dude, I'm SO wasted!"
/Rand Spiccoli
Well, Rand Paul can meet with anybody he chooses, AFAIK. But Sharpton is still a prick.
What, you have some kind of problem with that whole 'history of suborning murder' thing?
But he hasn't done that for like, HOURS, now.
"We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it."[
Sharpton can be very funny.
I have to say that I loved it when he ran for president. He really is a buffoon, but he was also the only person at any primary debates who was doing any debating.
Cause Al Sharpton is an evil fuck and might get some of his 'tard on Rand Paul?
I dunno. If Paul's not a' skeert o' that, have breakfast with the monster.
But in doing precisely what the administration and so many liberals do?treating Al Sharpton as a respected and important figure?he does his own credibility harm.
Because, in some circles, Sharpton *is* important and respected. It may not be fair, and it may not be kind, but that's how the game is played.
It's almost like politics involves dealing with a diversity of opinions on who is 'important and respected' or something.
Sharpton does look rather confused to be there in that photo.
Could Paul's closed eyes be symbolic of something....?
Holy crap, Sharpton has gotten *thin!* Two of the current versions of Sharpton could have fit into the 1980s version.
These days Alex Castellanos looks more like Al Sharpton than Al Sharpton looks like Al Sharpton.
Thin Al reminds me of Charlie Rangel. There are some differences (Charlie has wider cheeks for one...) but the similarities are a bit eerie.
That's who I thought it was at first.
Pundit, meet grandstanding nitwit.
Kind of a strange photograph. You'd think that they'd get Paul with his eyes open. Unless he didn't want to be photographed in the first place.
"Use the one where Paul is blinking. That'll help make him stupid or drunk or something."
Why shouldn't Andrew Breitbart have dinner with Bill Ayers? What's the worst that could happen?
Bill Ayers would make a stew out of him. Not Breitbart's fault of course, since he's dead.
Well if Ayers is willing to dig up Breitbart I think he at least deserves to take his corpse out to dinner, Weekend at Bernie's style.
I wouldn't put it past him.
I'm glad that Paul wants to increase his civil rights creds. Couldn't he accomplish this with someone other than a life long race hustler and demagogue?
Since the association actually diminishes my opinion of Rand's civil rights cred, I'd say "probably"
Jennifer Rubin is just being her usual 'tard self.
The fact of the matter is that Paul is rightly opposed to over-criminalization and police militarization. There's a very strong conservative case against those things. If Sharpton wants those things as well for different reasons, so what? It would be moronic to avoid seeing if Sharpton can use his influence to make curtailing those things come to pass.
Sometimes, you have a commonality of interests with people you otherwise oppose. Adults recognize that and act accordingly. Retards thumb their nose and stamp their feet.
Geh!
It should read: "...if Sharpton wants to curtail those things..."
Well said!
Worked for Pat Robertson.
If he had refused then he'd have been branded a racist.
Or he's a double plus racist for meeting with Sharpton in the first place because: "Al Sharpton does not speak for all black people." Or something.
Why would Paul give half a fuck what that halfwit Rubin thinks? There is zero chance she supports anything he wants to do unless he starts endorsing invading everyone all the time and increasing the defense budget to infinity. At least with Sharpton there is the possibility of some common ground.
It is pretty funny. At this point Rubin merits little more than an eyeroll even from the right.
Why? Perhaps because Sharpton is a bigot, a liar, a fraud and a racemonger?
But then again, this is reason, where certain forms of bigotry are acceptable.
So are half of the senators he works with. That's really not sufficient reason for a politician not to associate with someone.
Half? I think you're undercutting that by a factor of at least 2.
Yes, I was being awfully generous there.
Wow, Sharpton looks really old. Is he dying or something?
Whether Al Sharpton should be taken seriously or not is irrelevant. For some reason he is, so I'm sure if Rand had refused to meet with him it would just provide more fuel for the "RAND PAUL IS A RACISTY RACIST TEATHUGLIKKKOCHSUCKERAN!!!!!11!!!!!!11!!!!" narrative that the left is sure to use as we get closer to 2016.
Why Shouldn't Al Sharpton and Rand Paul Have Breakfast Together?
I wouldn't eat breakfast with that ignorant, POS, race-baiting swindler if it came with $1000.
I would eat breakfast with anyone for $500.
Why Shouldn't Al Sharpton and Rand Paul Have Breakfast Together?
Because Al Sharpton is a mendacious, race-baiting, prick.
Whatever disease Sharpscum has that is slowly turning him into Skeltor: progress faster, please.