Free Press

'Fight Back' Against Government, Urges Journalist Targeted by Administration

|

James Risen
UC Berkeley

James Risen, a New York Times reporter, potentially faces jail time as he resists efforts by the Obama administration to squeeze him for his sources on a story about a failed CIA operation. Now that the Supreme Court has rejected his appeal, he's almost entirely at the mercy of the Department of Justice. Under such pressure, some reporters would fold, while others would just lawyer up. Risen is shooting back, publicly castigating the Obama administration in March as "the greatest enemy of press freedom that we have encountered in at least a generation." He also wants the press to continue going after government no matter the backlash from imperious officials.

"Journalists have no choice but to fight back because if they don't, they will become irrelevant," Risen told journalism students at Colby College in Maine just this past weekend as he received the Elijah Parish Lovejoy Award for journalism.

Some of the attendees seemed to want to let the guy in the White House and his top cronies off the hook, asking what role role Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder played in his persecution. Risen wasn't having any of it.

"I don't think any of this would be happening under the Obama administration if Obama didn't want to do it," Risen said. "I think Obama hates the press. I think he doesn't like the press and he hates leaks."

The Committee to Protect Journalists made the same point in a special report last year:

U.S. President Barack Obama came into office pledging open government, but he has fallen short of his promise. Journalists and transparency advocates say the White House curbs routine disclosure of information and deploys its own media to evade scrutiny by the press. Aggressive prosecution of leakers of classified information and broad electronic surveillance programs deter government sources from speaking to journalists.

That report quoted David E. Sanger of The New York Times saying, "This is the most closed, control freak administration I've ever covered."

Following up on the theme, the Associated Press (a target of Obama administration surveillance) last month published a list of "8 ways the Obama administration is blocking information." That article noted that "day-to-day intimidation of sources is chilling" and that the administration even tries to control the information that state and local officials can disclose. Surveillance technology and practices are among the "secrets" administration officials lean on local agencies to keep quiet.

Threatened by an administation that is actively hostile to transparency, public disclosure, and the independent press, James Risen's vow to go to jail to protect his sources' confidentiality is a hell of a good example to set for rising young journalists.

That said, hopefully the Obama administration wil have the decency to back off so he doesn't have to keep the promise.

NEXT: Congrats, Luddites: Consensual Sex App Killed Off By Apple

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Risen is shooting back, publicly castigating the Obama administration in March as “the greatest enemy of press freedom that we have encountered in at least a generation.” He also wants the press to continue going after government no matter the backlash from imperious officials.

    I guess he is blissfully unaware of his employer’s unwavering support for the Obama administration.

    1. *I guess he is blissfully unaware of his employer’s unwavering support for the Obama administration.*

      No kidding. I guess I’m an evil ratbastid for hoping that the entire NYT staff gets sent to GTMO.

  2. First they came for… well, who did they come for first? There have been so many I can’t remember. Perhaps we don’t even know.

    1. Smokers.

      1. Straight up…420 dude.

      2. smokers before husky kids? How far back are we going with this?

        1. 1933?

  3. Boy, I hope Risen’s ready to be randomly audited for the next few years by the IRS.

  4. And nothing else happened. Because the press made the decision to be the dems lap dogs and have kissed Obama’s ass since day one. They could ask tough questions of the administration. They could print and air stories about all the scandals, broken promises, and usurpation. But they won’t. Team uber alles!

    1. Oh you jester! How could they kiss his arse if they are lap dogs?

  5. Anything adult needs to fight back against anything government. This is the age of Bitcoin and rebellious technology designed to fuck off those in charge of violently imposing their will upon those who choose to live outside central planning.

  6. “‘Fight Back’ Against Government, Urges Journalist “

    He’s just biting my man’s style

  7. Huffington Post ran an article describing his harsh words about Obama and his war on the press. The comments were 10-1 in favor of Obama and against the “corporate-owned” press that wasn’t doing its job like the First Amendment intended.

    1. To HuffPo commenters, I’m guessing the intent of the First Amendment as regards the media is to be lapdogs when the guy in the White House has a D after his name but tough when it’s an R

    2. Link and examples please.

      You can’t just go around ‘describing’ prog-froth. WE NEEDS TO SEE.

      1. It’s pretty obvious once you get in there.

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…..40960.html

      2. Damn masochist!

  8. Yet another phony scandal.

  9. “Journalists have no choice but to fight back because if they don’t, they will become irrelevant.”

    That ship may have already sailed.

    “I think Obama hates the press. I think he doesn’t like the press and he hates leaks.”

    So sayeth the rejected lover.

    “This is the most closed, control freak administration I’ve ever covered.”

    And you’re only now discovering this? Where have you been for the last six years?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.