NYPD Helps Give 'Flood Wall Street' a Major First Amendment Victory

This past Monday's "Flood Wall Street" march and sit-in, organized by remnants of the Occupy Wall Street movement, was designed to provoke a confrontation with the police that would lead to mass arrests, which for the most part failed, but not before attracting national attention to their cause via theatrical civil disobedience.

Prior to the march, leaders of the happening used the human mic to offer "Non-violent Direct Action Training," which included instructions on how to be arrested peacefully and providing pens to write the phone number for the National Lawyers Guild on your arm.
Their stated goal was to "shut down" Wall Street, and by extension capitalism, to end the climate crisis, but after 8 hours of sporadic sitting and standing, performance art, and the return of Hipster Cop, the crowd had thinned-out significantly and only 102 arrests were made.
The part of Broadway in Lower Manhattan, just north of Bowling Green, is narrow and frequently congested even without 3,000 people in the middle of the street. Police erected barricades to separate the two sides of the street, and about a dozen bored-looking cops paced back and forth within those barricades for hours while Flood Wall Street had their moment.
Though most protesters were peaceful, many shouted insults at the police and some, like the prankster who tried to lasso the Wall Street Bull, came perilously close to assaulting police officers, which could have easily sparked a wider confrontation.
What most befuddled and frustrated the protesters was that the cops seemed to be in no hurry to crack skulls and drag thousands of hippies to the pokey.

They could be forgiven for expecting a heavy-handed reponse from the NYPD, given how the cops handled the eviction of the orignal Occupy Wall Street encampment, but credit where it's due, the police allowed the protesters to have their say before calling off the party as night fell, and then handling the dispersement as peaceably as possible.
Brooklyn College professor and police reform advocate Alex S. Vitale praised the NYPD for its patience, tolerance and professionalism, going so far as to award them credit for giving the First Amendment "a major victory":
A couple of thousand people showed up and at around 11:30 a.m. many sat down next the bull sculpture in the middle of Broadway just above Bowling Green. They were allowed to occupy that space for much of the afternoon. The police made no effort to arrest them, disperse them, or even to isolate them from onlookers. This was a major departure from past practice. Similar efforts in recent years have been met with widespread use of force to push demonstrators onto sidewalks along with often random arrests to intimidate others.
By around 3:30 PM many of those sitting in dispersed, but several hundred marched north towards Wall Street. Police made little to no effort to contain them until demonstrators attempted to breach the barriers blocking access to Wall Street. At that point a few people were subjected to pepper spray and punches as they wrestled with police over the barricades there--a not unreasonable use of force given the circumstances.
Even after that violent confrontation, police allowed people to occupy Broadway for another 3 hours before finally warning, then arresting the remaining 100 protestors in a calm, deliberate, and methodical manner.
While some may criticize the mayor for tying the NYPD's hands, in fact this is an example of the kind of more tolerant and flexible policing the city needs as an antidote to 20 years of aggressive zero tolerance approaches. The First Amendment scored a major victory this week.
Reason TV covered Flood Wall Street and the larger climate march on Sunday. Watch here, here, and below:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ignoring the dipshits was a very good response. When the bronies march--another subset of people with a rich inner array of delusions--they should largely ignore them as well.
Touche.
I agree with what you said.
OBAMA IS A TOOL OF WALL STREET CAPITALISTS!
The Emo-Progs are celebrating Holder's resignation right now. They are as crazy as the wingnuts are.
I bet you're the kind of guy who would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around. I'll be watching you.
Did your parents have any children who lived???
In other e Blasio news: He killed a transvestite groundhog and the Staten Island Zoo covered it up.
(Staten Island has a zoo?)
Chuck didn't jump! He was pushed!
Bitch set me up!
I saw some movie once (don't remember what it was) that mentioned a zoo in Brooklyn. I'd only ever heard of the Bronx and Central Park Zoos at the time, so I looked it up in an atlas. Turns out New York has a zoo in every borough.
Did you have to repost that video and put the self-satisfied mug of Chris Hedges on our screens? Really?
"...was designed to provoke a confrontation with the police that would lead to mass arrests, which for the most part failed, but not before attracting national attention to their cause via theatrical civil disobedience."
Was that the intent of the climate marchers, or was it the crowd at Ted Bundy's ranch?
"Though most protesters were peaceful, many shouted insults at the police and some, like the prankster who tried to lasso the Wall Street Bull, came perilously close to assaulting police officers, which could have easily sparked a wider confrontation."
Gee, Anthony, if that would have been a "confrontation," what do you think those lunkheads at Bundy's ranch aiming rifles at authorities were trying to do? Oh, that one was righteous civil disobedience aimed at authorities, eh?
That's why Reason is the Official Magazine of the Bundy Ranch.
I get tired of the constant polls of Bundy ranchers they publish. I mean, cover some other topic, already!
Just pointing out how hypocritically Reason judges civil disobedience.
Because the government seizing property is the same as kids trying to start a fight with cops.
There you go...we have to leave all judgements as to the validity of civil disobedience events in the hands of libertarians...only they can judge.
"civil disobedience events"
Defending your own property against violent unconstitutional seizure by a rogue federal agency /= 'civil disobedience'.
its just defending yourself from tyranny.
Purposely trying to get your heads kicked in by cops in a useless gesture of moral narcissism? Call it what you want, but its not the same thing.
Were the Bundy Ranch protestors deliberately trying to get arrested?
They were deliberately confronting authorities...same as the climate marchers.
So they weren't trying to get arrested, correct?
Maybe they could post something about MJ or immigration or teh ghey marryings?
Ted Bundy?
Ted...Al...Cliven...whats the difference.
Who has denied that the Flood Wall Street march was civil disobedience? Who has criticized them for using the tactic?
Who the fuck are you babbling at?
By "First Amendment Victory" you mean the right to practice their crazy hybrid religion of failed Marxist economics and failed scientific hypothesis?
But no peyote!!!!
No, I don't think anyone is challenging that. Peaceful assembly.
"Their stated goal was to "shut down" Wall Street, and by extension capitalism, to end the climate crisis"
Hmmm.
If everyone holds hands and forms a Human Chain Across America?
WE CAN PROBABLY END WORLD HUNGER
BECAUSE SOMETIMES, BELIEVING IS ALL WE HAVE
Did they at least not throw their trash all over the ground this time?
Its ORGANIC, man. Composting and stuff.
http://gothamist.com/2014/09/2....._trash.php
Kinda uncertain how this give Flood Wall Street a victory.
I see that it was a victory for the First Amendment--albeit a sad one--seeing that many of the marchers would do away with the First Amendment if they could.