Federal Regulators Botch Oversight of GM's Killer Cobalts, Demand More Money
The House Energy and Commerce Committee issued the findings of its months-long investigation of NHTSA's (National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration) handling of GM's ignition switch debacle and they are damning!
It turns out the agency missed the true cause of why GM's 2005 Cobalt and its sister cars were sometimes suddenly stopping and crashing because it did not understand the workings of the advanced airbag systems that it had itself mandated.
NHTSA is supposed to be command central for the auto industry. It constantly monitors information about vehicles

on the road from multiple sources, launches investigations when it detects a trend involving particular models, and orders remedies.
Because NHTSA is motivated neither by bottom-line considerations nor hampered by informational gaps, the theory goes, it can monitor automakers better than they can themselves, I note in my column in The Week this morning. But the reality is that NHTSA is way in over its head and the Congressional investigation illustrates that perfectly. "NHTSA's safety defect investigators' understanding of the systems failed to keep pace with the evolution of the technology," the report said. Hence the agency for years misinterpreted the data at its disposal. Meanwhile, according to GM's own admission 19 people were killed in 30-plus crashes.
Yet, instead, of dropping on the ground and genuflecting for its manifest ineptitude in protecting the drivers in whose name it exists, its chief went before Congress this week and demanded more money for more staff.
Go here to read the whole thing.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What would you have the poor, understaffed bureaucrats do, Dalmia?
If some funding wasn't sufficient to prevent these sorts of SNAFUs, obviously more than some is necessary.
Yes, of course the answer is more money. The answer to things like this is always more money, more power, or both.
So a bureaucracy is incompetent at the thing it was created to do? More money.
So the state has spent the last several decades pouring other people's money into the largest city and its school system, while the city and its schools steadily get worse? More money. (Hi, Heather Mizeur.)
What CAN'T more federal funding fix?
Deficits?
Ye can't fool me - there be no killer Kobolds! They be strictly first-level monsters; me parrot could peck them to death.