America's Junk Food Diet Might Be Better For the Environment than USDA Recommendations
If you truly love the planet, then keep eating those potato chips—and ignoring the government's diet recommendations.
A new study finds that if Americans switched to the food types recommended by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) diet recommendations, greenhouse gas emissions would actually increase by 12 percent.
That's if Americans kept eating at their current calorie levels. Cutting back on calories while changing diet could produce a small decline in emissions—about 1 percent. That's fairly modest, and it would require a huge shift in eating patterns.
Like a lot of studies look at the environmental impact of food choices, the research, which was first published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology, notes the outsize environmental impact of meat. It takes a lot of energy to produce and ship beef, in particular, which accounts for 4 percent of the food supply but 36 percent of emissions that stem from dietary choices.
Cutting back on beef consumption, as the USDA recommends, would reduce emissions (although it wouldn't have much impact on carbon alone). But as Gwynn Guilford points out in an item on the study at online business magazine Quartz, a switch to more USDA friendly food choices would also entail reducing emissions-light food types like fat and sugar, which, well, Americans eat quite a bit of. In other words, there's a trade-off.
If this study's estimates are on target, then what it ultimately suggests is that, barring punitive measures to widely discourage eating certain types of foods, it could be quite hard to achieve meaningful emissions reduction from dietary changes. The 1 percent reduction only arrives when most Americans totally revamp their food choices and significantly reduce their caloric intake, which would be a pretty tall order. And it also hints at the ways that government food guidelines can have unintended consequences. Follow them at your peril, or the planet's.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Everything you do entails externalities.
Therefore, totalitarianism.
Wait, in the Salon article posted in AM links, they talk about French school kids eating meat every day instead of junk food. Maybe French school kids are a prime cause of CO2 emissions?
Me must eat French school kids. For environment.
*We*
No, just you. I’m good with eating the cows.
Why do you hate environment?
Because the environment hated me first.
Not to mention that if you die sooner that will greatly reduce your carbon footprint.
“Nuke the planet from orbit, it’s the only way to save Gaia”?
Interesting article! I wonder what we’ll eat after 100 years from now…