Police Keep Killing Mentally Ill Teens, Too


Today The Week is running a piece I wrote about police using excessive force against mentally ill and suicidal individuals.
Reason's Ed Krayewski relayed one such case here last week, in which cops shot a suicidal Kanas teen more than a dozen times despite his lack of apparent weapon and the pleas from his relatives to let them handle the situation. The week before, I highlighted 14 cases of potentially excessive force by cops called in to help with mentally ill individuals this year. Many people responded to that one by asking, "14? Who cares about a measly 14 unnecessary deaths?" But I never said these were the 14 cases, just 14 of the cases from so far this year. I also don't think we should look at these cases as separate from the issues of increasing police militarization, cops' tendency to fatally shoot unarmed black teenagers, and their general propensity to blow everything (tragically) out of proportion.
One common thread in almost all these cases is a lack of police accountability, paired with a departmental statement about how all relevant protocol was followed. If this is what happens when police follow protocol, then perhaps protocol is part of the problem? From my piece at The Week:
About 2,000 communities have implemented what's known as the "crisis intervention team" (CIT) model, a program designed to help officers engage with people with behavioral disorders. There is evidence it can increase the likelihood of an incident's ending with an individual's being transported to health or social services rather than being arrested. It may also "reduce the use of force toward individuals with psychotic disorder." Requiring or encouraging this training might be one important policy change.
If there's anything the events in Ferguson last month brought to light, it's that we have a policing problem in this country. There's just no excuse for how many seemingly defusable encounters end with the use of lethal force. Some blame the growing "militarization" of U.S. police. Others say the root cause is racism, conscious and unconscious, individual and systemic. I'd like to add that our inability to recognize and respond appropriately to mental illness is also worth investigating. But no matter which of these ills we're examining, we come back to a fundamental disconnect between how your average American sees the role of community police and how these police see themselves.
We think cops can be called in to defuse situations — to calmly handle public disturbances, investigate suspicious activity, keep the streets safe, even help get a daughter having a manic episode to the hospital or subdue a son threatening suicide. But many cops seem to see themselves largely as drug warriors and fee collectors, keeping peace by instilling fear and using force.
Read the whole thing here. Read Reason's extensive coverage of police abuse and brutality here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Many people responded to that one by asking, "14? Who cares about a measly 14 unnecessary deaths?"
I'm pretty sure that's more than the number of cops shot down by criminals over the same time period.
So, anyone who thinks 14 deaths is no biggie should also be waving off the "war on cops". Why do I suspect the opposite is true?
Many people responded to that one by asking, "14? Who cares about a measly 14 unnecessary deaths?"
Who?
People in your office? People in Comments? Your parents? Cops? Other Journalists? At prog infested DC cocktail parties?
Who are these people?
Well, there was "jmomls" - one of Reason's resident neocon statist shitheads - in the comments.
So they really waved off any concern about two beheaded journalists, right?
Facebook comments, Twitter responses, comments on here
Something must be seriously wrong with me as I find the picture with this article strangely erotic.
"If this is what happens when police follow protocol, then perhaps protocol is part of the problem?"
Well said.
"fundamental disconnect between how your average American sees the role of community police and how these police see themselves."
Bingo. Great article E.
Hey, I noticed the orange tip on the pistol! It must be an airsoft gun and therefore no harm to anyone!
Guess I'm too observant to be a cop.
When the police are called to deal with a 'behavioral problem', one of two things will happen:
Best case scenario is that the "problem" gets booked into either the hospital jail-ward, or the jail itself;
Worst case scenario is the the "problem" gets carted off to the morgue.
From the cops' standpoint IMO the morgue results in less paperwork.
But many cops seem to see themselves largely as drug warriors and fee collectors,
Add "garbage disposal." Yeah, I've heard that in bluespeak.