Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

California Government Bans Itself from Flying Confederate Flag

Zenon Evans | 8.22.2014 3:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | cc
(cc)
markhillary, foter

The California legislature yesterday approved A.B. 2444, which restricts the state government's use of the Confederate flag.

From the bill, which now heads to the desk of Gov. Jery Brown:

This bill would prohibit the State of California from selling or displaying the Battle Flag of the Confederacy, or a similar image, or tangible personal property inscribed with those images, unless the image appears in a book, digital medium, or state museum that serves an educational or historical purpose.

Brown will almost certainly sign it, since the measure passed the assembly 71-1. The senate approved it 33-2 earlier in the week.

The only dissenting voice in the assembly was Tim Donnelly (R-Twin Peaks), who previously explained on Facebook, "I abhor racism but this bill is antithetical to the first amendment, which was designed to protect controversial forms of speech."

He also stated to the Los Angeles Times, "I'm a strict Constitutionalist. It's painful and lonely."

Isadore Hall III (D-Compton), who introduced the legislation, says that it is not a free speech violation, and is intended to limit government. The bill "respects Constitutional protections by restricting government speech, not individual speech, and will send a strong message that California and its taxpayers will not be in the business of promoting racism, exclusion, oppression or violence towards others."

In a press release, he said:

The Confederate Flag is a symbol of racism, exclusion, oppression and violence towards many Americans. Its symbolism and history is directly linked to the enslavement, torture and murder of millions of Americans through the mid-19th Century. Even today, its public display is designed only to instill fear, intimidation and a direct threat of violence towards others.

The Huffington Post notes that "last month, Brown had all Confederate flag materials swiftly removed from the California State Fair after Hall brought their increased presence to his attention."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ferguson Cop Darren Wilson May Not Have Been Badly Injured by Michael Brown After All

Zenon Evans is a former Reason staff writer and editor.

PoliticsPolicyCivil LibertiesCultureBansCaliforniaFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (37)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    WHAT

    THE

    FUCK?

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Nothing to cut

  2. See Double You   11 years ago

    Hmm, I'm not sure. On the one hand, the bill does seem to limit only what government officials can do. But does this apply to all government employees? If it only applies to them while they are in their official capacity, I don't think it's a problem.

    Still, what a waste of time and money, which is what Democrat government is all about!

  3. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

    that California and its taxpayers

    One of these things is not like the other..

  4. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

    Look, California can't escape its moral responsibilities for being a slave state and a willing member of the Confederacy that easily.

  5. Zeb   11 years ago

    I don't think there is any first amendment issue, but why would this be necessary at all? Have parts of the California government been considering flying the Confederate flag?

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      Maybe all those parts that want to secede from the rest of the state are using Confederate flags? I dunno, it's fucking La-La Land, who knows why they do anything?

    2. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

      Weren't they available in a government gift shop somewhere? I remember reading about it here but can't recall the details.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Maybe some kind if historical thingee? Did some old Confederate soldiers maybe relocate there after the war?

        1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

          Certainly many veterans of all stripes headed out west after the war. I kinda doubt that it's a big enough thing to keep them in stock at a gift shop like you are in NW Georgia.

          This doesn't really bother me at all. The Confederate Flag is tainted and I don't think that it's wrong for an elected state government to prohibit it's sale at government stores.

          1. Bryan C   11 years ago

            Since there shouldn't be any such thing as a "government store" this policy is fine with me.

            1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

              Yeah, if we're going that route there are a lot of government things that shouldn't exist.

            2. Tonio   11 years ago

              Yeah, but what's a bigger threat to liberty a government-run gift shop at a government-run park, or a highly militarized police and surveillance state?

              Priorities, people, priorities.

  6. Corning   11 years ago

    OT:

    Romney has a Huge Frankenstein sized head.

    http://l1.yimg.com/bt/api/res/.....b2640460f4

    That or Ryan has a really small head.

    1. Headless Body of Agnew   11 years ago

      Mormonism and catholicism will do that to people, as any licensed and board-accredited phrenologist will tell you.

  7. Tonio   11 years ago

    Sounds like someone needed to grandstand about something.

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      California will not tolerate the secession of the Southern states and wishes to show its unity with President Lincoln.

  8. Corning   11 years ago

    I would prefer a bill that prohibits the State from selling pretty much everything.

    Why the hell is the state selling flags in the first place? Hell its flag buying budget should be cut by 99% as well.

  9. PRX   11 years ago

    those are nice principals Isadore

  10. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    The Confederate Flag is a symbol of racism, exclusion, oppression and violence towards many Americans.

    One could say the same about the Cuban flag, the Black Power flag, and the flags of the USSR and China.

    1. Corning   11 years ago

      One could say the same about the Cuban flag, the Black Power flag, and the flags of the USSR and China.

      and the British flag and the American flag.

      Might as well throw in the Mexican and Canadian flag as well.

      Red Maple leaf of oppression!!!

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        More slavery occurred under the U.S. flag than the Stars and Bars (or the battle flag that has everyone so unhappy).

        1. Calidissident   11 years ago

          Well that isn't surprising, given that the confederacy was only around for 4 years. And unlike confederate secession, the colonies did not secede to protect slavery. Also, any attempt prior to the civil war to abolish slavery in the entire country could have and would have been blocked by the future confederate states.

          1. Rev-Match   11 years ago

            Your entire comment relies on a false premise. 1)The Confederate States seceded, not to "protect slavery", but to escape economic exploitation just like the American Colonies did. 2)There is reason to believe that slavery would be safer with the states remaining in the union (without hostilities). Lincoln did not intend to interfere with slavery (he actually supported an amendment that would've enshrined it in the federal Constitution), as stated in his inaugural address. He did, however, intend to enforce the astronomically high tariffs imposed on southern trade.
            With the states remaining in union the northern stated would have had to continue enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act. If the seceding states peacefully left, there would no longer be a reason to and escaped slaves would have been free as soon as they crossed the Union/Confederate border.

            Additional food for thought: The Federal Government of the united States was never given the power to prevent any state from seceding for any reason. Some states (like Virginia) explicitly reserved the right to secede when ratifying the Constitution. Incidentally, VA did not vote to leave the union until Lincoln (unconstitutionally) called on her to raise an army to invade the seceding states, viewing this (correctly) as a overreach of federal power.

            P.s. I do not see how the Confederate States could've/would've "blocked" Federal legislation of another country. They certainly didn't do so after being kept in the union at gunpoint.

  11. Almanian!   11 years ago

    Damn. Just when I think Cali's legislature can't do any more stupid shit, they stoop to the occasion and exceed their previous lows.

    This was a truly meaningless gesture. Thanks, Cali!

    1. Zeb   11 years ago

      Well at least it is pretty harmless too. Maybe they should spend more time on stuff like this.

  12. wareagle   11 years ago

    you can always count on the elected class in California to put stupidity on full display. Your tax dollars hard at work.

  13. Rorschach Carlyle   11 years ago

    Ok, so how often does the confederate flag actually fly over the California Capitol anyway? I've been to California plenty of times, and I don't recall seeing a single one.

  14. Stevecsd   11 years ago

    As stupid as the legislators & governor are in California, it would be better if they spent 99% of their time on useless laws like this than the $125 billion behemoth wasteful budget. Their state pension plans are going to bankrupt them sooner rather than later and they won't fix that either. I am a second generation Californian, both of my parents were born in California, and I lived their 53 years. I don't recall ever seeing a Confederate flag anywhere on government property there. I left 7 years ago & don't miss the absolute mess that is California politics.

  15. Rich   11 years ago

    "Even today, its public display is designed only to instill fear, intimidation and a direct threat of violence towards others."

    Citation needed, Isadore.

  16. creech   11 years ago

    Is this about vendors selling flags at a State Fair booth or something? I'm certain (chuckle) that the legislation also prohibits sales of Che t-shirts. And when will Gov. Brown get around to apologizing for official California laws that treated Chinese immigrants as vermin?

  17. userve32   11 years ago

    Dude this makes all kinds of crazy sense dude.

    http://www.AnonCrypt.tk

  18. Sloth Fratelli   11 years ago

    So they banned themselves from using the image of the flag of slavery. Good start.

    Now if only they'd ban themselves from enslaving people via taxation, we'd really be on a roll.

  19. Rev-Match   11 years ago

    Its symbolism and history is directly linked to the enslavement, torture and murder of millions of Americans through the mid-19th Century.

    Nope. Its history is linked the the Army of Northern Virginia. It is nothing more than a battle flag.

    Even today, its public display is designed only to instill fear, intimidation and a direct threat of violence towards others.

    Wrong again. Most people I've ever known to use it do so in the same way as the Gadsden Flag.

    1. Sloth Fratelli   11 years ago

      And the ANV was just a bunch of innocent guys wearing gray, wandering around with cannons and rifles for no particular purpose?

      The battle flag was incorporated into the Confederate national flag in 1863, anyway.

      1. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

        I couldn't tell you whether or not they were innocent, but they were fighting a defensive war against an invading force that killed hundreds of thousands of people.

  20. chmercier   11 years ago

    In other news: The State of California has banned its members from using or displaying the flags and banners of the Holy Roman Empire, the Duchy of Wallachia, the Margravate of Bavaria, the Kindgom of Bohemia, and stone markers of Cambyses II, Emperor of the Achaemenids.

  21. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

    In other news, Putin declared it illegal for the Russian government to fly the stars and stripes.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

The Criminal Justice System Was Found Guilty in the Karen Read Trial

Billy Binion | 6.21.2025 6:30 AM

Obama Adviser Jason Furman on Biden, Neoliberalism, and Keynesian Economics

Nick Gillespie | From the July 2025 issue

The Federal Government Owns Too Much Land. Selling It Helps Rural Communities.

Jack Nicastro | 6.20.2025 5:37 PM

A Judge's Order Freeing Mahmoud Khalil Is Yet Another Loss for the Trump Administration's Immigration Agenda

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.20.2025 4:41 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!