Dentists Against Teeth Whitening (When Done by Non-Dentists)
Via Instapundit comes this tawdry case of licensing as protectionism:
Among the many cosmetic services Americans enjoy is teeth whitening. Do-it-yourself kits can be purchased for home use, but some people prefer having the whitening done by beauticians. Who do you suppose finds that unacceptable?
Smile and say, "dentists."
Not all dentists, of course, but the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners decided to act on behalf of those who do. Since 2003, the Board has been issuing cease and desist orders to beauty shops or any other business that offered teeth whitening services. The legal basis for such orders is that the "practice of dentistry" is restricted to licensed dentists and the Board decided that teeth whitening falls within that practice. Unless you're a licensed dentist, you must stop.
Complaints against the unlicensed teeth whiteners came, of course, entirely from dentists, not from customers who paid for the "unauthorized" services. That's the way it always goes with regulatory crackdowns on unlicensed competition in any field. The impetus for the anticompetitive action comes not from angry consumers who think they were not competently treated, but from practitioners unhappy that consumers took their business elsewhere.
Scholars at the Pacific Legal Foundation and Cato Institute have filed briefs in the case and hopefully free(er) markets will prevail.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
OT: http://www.thedailybeast.com/a.....y-lie.html
Where's Michelle Malkin to tell us about the terrible burden of dry cleaning fees cops endure every day?
I would probably be rioting, too.
And when asked to preserve the videotape, it was somehow from the wrong time.
"Whoops"
Wow not sure what to say to that.
From "It's a free country" to "Who said you could do that?" in half my lifetime.
OT: Shriek hardest hit - http://blogs.marketwatch.com/n.....he-sp-500/
Police in Ferguson, Missouri, once charged a man with destruction of property for bleeding on their uniforms while four of them allegedly beat him.
I'm surprised they didn't charge him with attempted murder. He could have had teh EBOLAS!
On Topic:
Richard Hammon has *not* had his teeth whitened.
And on this bombshell...
d
Fo sho!
I approve this message.
DENTAL PLAN
I find this litigation very racist. As a person of other-colored teeth, I demand my individual identity be granted equal treatment under the law and that dentists everywhere be in charge of changing or maintaining the color of everyone's teeth. It's the only way to true equality and freedom.
This case could have huge ramifications for occupational licensing boards. The plaintiffs' argument is not that the restrictions are illegal in themselves, but only that they are illegal collusion when implemented by non-governmental entities. (Government action is granted immunity from anti-trust laws, unfortunately.)
A win for the plaintiffs in this case could require a number of government bureaucrats to sit on the boards rather than being comprised of practitioners alone. I'm uncertain whether this would have any beneficial effects in itself, but it could help destabilize the entrenched system, affecting similarly-structured licensing boards nation-wide.
Not a drastic change, but maybe a creeping trend in the right legal direction . . .
Before I take sides I would like to know what teeth whitening involves. ARE there any issues with it best left to someone trained in dentistry? It seems unlikely, but from the tone of reezy outrage in the article I'm not sure anyone checked.
Is it not a cosmetic procedure rather than a dental procedure? Although I can imagine there is a small minority of beauticians abusing this by using the wrong chemicals and unfortunately this could cause damage to enamel and gums. It's a tough call!
My view on teeth whitening is that you get what you pay for. If you come to my office in Las Vegas, your teeth whitening and any other cosmetic procedures you want will be top of the line and you will be happy with the results. Most professional cosmetic dentists will get you the results you want in a safe manner that you can trust. I usually only see mixed results from patients who say they try "at home" solutions. They are always happier with the results they get from my office.
Just FYI - We use http://ezwhite.com/ (EZ White) at my office.
My office doesn't do teeth whitening (braces and invisalign mostly) but I agree you should stay with the professionals if you want a great result. #lasvegasorthodontist #lasvegasbraces
Almost forgot, EZ White works great for my patients who use invisalign with me.