DOJ Backs Off CIA/Senate Snooping Slap Fight

The Justice Department will not be getting involved in the feud between the CIA and the Senate Intelligence Committee over accusations that the CIA illegally snooped on Senate staffers preparing a report on torture and counter-accusations that the staffers illegally got their hands on unreleased classified CIA documents during the process. The feud was so bad that it actually caused security state worshipper Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) to publicly declare that government surveillance is a terrible thing and the Fourth Amendment matters—when applied to the Senate, of course. From McClatchy's Washington bureau:
"The department carefully reviewed the matters referred to us and did not find sufficient evidence to warrant a criminal investigation," said Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr.
The news marks an apparent end to an extraordinary feud that spilled into the public forum in early March over the committee's report on the agency's post-9/11 enhanced interrogation program. The dispute included competing Justice Department referrals, with both the CIA and the Senate Intelligence Committee accusing the other side of criminal conduct throughout the course of the interrogation study.
I explained the details of the fight back in March. This Senate report analyzing CIA interrogation methods during the Iraq war is known to be very critical of the methods used by the CIA during the Bush administration. Senate staffers were given access to CIA documents through a special computer network at the CIA's offices. CIA employees, other than IT workers, were not supposed to have access to the machines. During the preparation of the report, staffers discovered documents disappearing out of the system, deleted by the CIA. Later they discovered an internal CIA report (called the Panetta Review) analyzing their interrogation methods. Feinstein said the report validated her committee's concerns about interrogation methods.
Later the report disappeared from the computer system. The CIA claims that Senate staff illegally gained access to the report somehow, and it should not have been accessible to them. Feinstein responded that it was the CIA that provided access to this report in the first place and that it was a violation of the Fourth Amendment for CIA to search Senate staff computers without a warrant. The CIA, in turn, went to the Justice Department, accusing Senate staffers of illegally removing classified information. But the Justice Department apparently wants nothing to do with it.
The Senate's report on torture still has not been released. The Senate Intelligence Committee has voted to declassify parts of it, but the CIA gets to review it first to determine whether any of the information would threaten national security if made public.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The Justice Department will not be getting involved in the feud between the CIA and the Senate Intelligence Committee
Surprise, surprise, surprise!
/Gomer Pyle
"The department carefully reviewed the matters referred to us and did not find sufficient evidence to warrant a criminal investigation," said Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr.
"We've got better things to do than look into who committed what crime."
One wonders if the DOJ decides what is important by how well it can be turned into clickbait on CNN, or if CNN puts more effort into promoting what the DOJ thinks is important.
But at this point, what difference does it make? Anyone want to set an over-under on the percentage of Americans that even know this story is (was?) a thing? 0.01%?
That's a tough one, L.
Maybe we can "hone" in on it: What percentage of Americans have heard of Dianne Feinstein or the Fourth Amendment?
Well, I presume most have heard of the ordinal "fourth" and of these things called "Amendments". The combination of the two, however, may be quite foreign.
The 4th Amendment is the one that guarantees health care, right?
transparency again.
What's this transparency you speak of? Didn't RvWade establish a right to privacy for the govt?
/Tryin to make the pieces fit
"The department carefully reviewed the matters referred to us and did not find sufficient evidence to warrant a criminal investigation," said Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr.
Then, Pete, how about sharing that crappy li'l' ol' evidence with the public?
Move along, folks. Nothing to see here.
I'd pay to see Feinstein get slapped. Like this: http://youtu.be/_3320FeI2Gs
I always have a knee-jerk reaction to certain politicians' positions, even if they run contrary to my own principles. Feinstein is one. If she's ag'in it, I want to automatically be fer it, and vice versa. That's how vile some of these people are.
Good to see the Legislature standing up to the Executive....not.
When was that ever the intended purpose of the legislature? 1789? Get with the times, bro.
Liberty for me but not for thee.
Do people like Feinstein EVER consider their hypocrisy?
Nope. Never even occurs to them. Completely sociopathic.
The CRIPPLE FIGHT
will not be televised.
More's the pity. Nothing to see here! Move along!