Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Cops Shoot Dog in Backyard, Bust Owner's Boyfriend for Objecting

J.D. Tuccille | 5.15.2014 2:33 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Rock
Bianca Alakson

Police in Redford Township, Michigan, claim they spotted a suspect through a window in the home of Bianca Alakson and Ryan Showalter. The suspect was wanted for being in a fight, so they gave chase, entering the couple's fenced yard. Which has a "beware of dog" sign on it.

You know what's coming.

That's supposedly when Rock, a 10-month-old Labrador–pit bull mix, "charged" an officer. The cop shot him twice, killing him.

Showalter apparently got a little pissed that his beloved dog had been shot. (That's Rock pictured at right, with Alakson.) So they arrested him for "interfering with police." In his own backyard. After they shot his dog.

There's not much more to add—except that the department is getting hell from the community on its Facebook page.

Just remember, the only thing worse than having a dog so aggressive that it stays in its own yard is objecting when cops shoot it down.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: FCC Moving Forward on "Net Neutrality" Rule That Would Regulate "Fast Lanes"

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

PolicyCivil LibertiesPuppycidePolice AbuseCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (172)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Ten months old, eh? That cop is lucky he escaped with only piss-stained breeches.

    1. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

      The important thing is that he can go home to his wife and kids tonight so they can help him clean the shit out of his underwear.

      1. Andrew S.   11 years ago

        That would assume he was actually scared, and not, you know, pulling a South Park "HE'S COMING RIGHT FOR US!"

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

          He was just trying to "thin out their numbers" to save that dog from starvation. Hero.

        2. JW   11 years ago

          Police might not have this chronic problem of shooting puppies if they would stop hiring such pants-shitting pussies, who "fear for their life" at every shadow or leaf blowing in the wind.

    2. Hydra   11 years ago

      Here we go with the Trayvon Martin kiddie pix again.

      Those dogs grow up fast.

      1. Episiarch   11 years ago

        I can't decide if you're pathetically retarded, Tulpa, or retardedly pathetic. I suppose it could be both, right? In fact, I'm sure it is.

        1. sloopyinca   11 years ago

          Jesus, Epi. Open your fucking email.

      2. Brandon   11 years ago

        Tulpa: *slurrrrp*

  2. Lady Bertrum   11 years ago

    "..they spotted a suspect through a window in the home of Bianca Alakson and Ryan Showalter.."

    No, they spotted Bianca Alakson through her own window and decided they need to "interrogate" her. She's lucky they didn't shoot her boyfriend too.

    1. Drake   11 years ago

      Is that legal? Cops can just peep in windows and break in if they see a reason?

      No knocking, no warrants, just bust in guns drawn?

      That pisses me off more than the dead dog.

      1. Paul.   11 years ago

        Exigent circs.

      2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        Since does legality matter when it comes to the actions of the police?

        1. Warty   11 years ago

          Of course not. Law is a myth.

      3. croaker   11 years ago

        And you wonder why people keep their shades drawn. "Plain view" means they can look into windows if they feel like it. "Peeping Tom" laws don't apply to our Overlords.

        1. R C Dean   11 years ago

          They aren't allowed into the immediate vicinity of your house without probably cause or a warrant, though.

          1. croaker   11 years ago

            You think that stops them?

      4. NL_   11 years ago

        The tribe must forgive the warrior if he visits a tribal elder and chants the appropriate magic words. The Americans call this tribal elder a "judge" and he will grant the warrior clemency from the god called "Law" if the warrior chants the magical words of "officer safety." Truly, the Americans are a strange tribe with unusual customs.

  3. Fluffy   11 years ago

    So was the suspect there, or not?

    Because if the suspect wasn't there, something tells me that the cops lied.

    1. Episiarch   11 years ago

      I think "the cops lied" is a very, very safe default.

      1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

        Well, they did end up with an arrest.

        1. Paul.   11 years ago

          And a dead dog. So I'd say they hit all the bullet points. LITERALLY!

  4. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Yes, I'm curious about whether the suspect was in fact in the house.

    The articles don't follow up.

    1. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

      Why would they? The cops said there was a suspect in the house. Therefore there must have been a suspect in the house.

      1. some guy   11 years ago

        Everyone is suspected of something. QED.

        1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

          I was watching V for vendetta last night and I noticed something. The Party is supposedly an outgrowth of the "conservative" party in the UK as opposed to Labour (stupid British spelling). I never hear it before but caught i last night. That makes my irony mete peg. The left is the very definition of projection even when they are trying to say the "right" things.

          p.s. this comment is relevant because of my stream of consciousness thoughts resulting from cops suspecting everyone of something.

    2. Hydra   11 years ago

      We don't need details, GKC. The cops were obviously in the wrong and H+R will fabricate whatever details are necessary to reach that conclusion.

      1. Episiarch   11 years ago

        Man, Tupa, there is no cop dick you won't suck, is there. You should stop fooling yourself and just become a badge bunny like in your secret fantasies.

        1. sloopyinca   11 years ago

          Did you swallow an entire bucket of gullibility pills today, Epi? I mean, what the fuck are you doing interacting with what is obviously a troll?

          I myself would never stoop so low as to interact with a cop apologist or progressive douchebag on these pages.

      2. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

        Which details did they fabricate?

        1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

          The part where the dog wasn't a viscous killer in need of being put down by our valiant officer.

          1. some guy   11 years ago

            Lab mixes are known for being "thick and adhesive", but in a good way.

            1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

              This one was a viscous killer, trained to attack police officers. Can you prove it wasn't? No? Well then, that's proof that it was.

              1. Old Man With Candy   11 years ago

                You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

              2. sloopyinca   11 years ago

                That's one slick dog!

            2. Spoonman.   11 years ago

              Like molasses in winter.

        2. Hydra   11 years ago

          Watch and see.

          The "poor little puppy couldn't have hurt anyone" angle is already covered. Looking at the pictures at the link you see that "puppy" was pretty huge.

          In case you care, the cops said the suspect got out through the back door which is why they were opening the unsecured gate to the back yard.

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

            "poor little puppy couldn't have hurt
            anyone"

            I thought it was in a secure yard with a BEWARE OF DOG sign.

            "the cops said the suspect got out through the back door"

            And they caught him? Or not? The elusive SOB, he's like the Scarlet Pimpernel.

            1. Hydra   11 years ago

              The yard had an unsecured gate, which is how the cops got in. The couple was hosting a party with the front and back doors open.

              I have no idea if they caught the perp, but if the BF got in the way in the back yard that would explain the interference arrest.

              1. some guy   11 years ago

                That would explain the interference arrest, but not justify it.

                1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                  The interference arrest was because the guy got upset when the cop killed his pet, and didn't immediately and unquestioningly obey the cop's command to go back inside when the guy wanted to check on his bleeding dog.

                  He's lucky the cop didn't shoot him too.

              2. Brandon   11 years ago

                3:10PM if the BF got in the way in the back yard that would explain the interference arrest.

                3:04PMH+R will fabricate whatever details are necessary to reach that conclusion.

                You can't even hide your idiotic projection for 6 minutes?

                1. Hydra   11 years ago

                  Look up the definition of "if", buddy.

              3. Dweebston   11 years ago

                "Secured" doesn't need to mean "locked," chunderbreath. It means the dog was itself incapable of leaving the premises, and therefore the cops were trespassing.

                Since when have locks stopped cops, anyway? Unlike the dog, cops could jump this fence. And I'm willing to bet they'd have shot it just as dead either way.

                1. Hydra   11 years ago

                  Hot pursuit is an exception to trespassing, just like medical necessity or responding to a break-in.

                  1. fuck you tulpa   11 years ago

                    "Hot pursuit is an exception to trespassing"

                    1) no, actually, Tulpa, it is not. They are trespassing, even in cases where they are chasing people. This has been adjudicated many, many, manyt times you're simply wrong. What your idiot ass is trying to say is that they are sometimes justified in trespassing, which prevents them from being prosecuted, but there is no exception for a pursuit that gives them special powers.

              4. Bryan C   11 years ago

                He got in the way. Darn shame.

          2. R C Dean   11 years ago

            the suspect got out through the back door which is why they were opening the unsecured gate to the back yard.

            Either the suspect had already gotten out of the yard and was on his way, in which case why go into the yard, or

            The suspect was still in the yard, in which case he got right past an armed cop with his gun out, loaded, and ready to rock. Somehow.

            This just doesn't add up.

            1. Robert   11 years ago

              I thought it meant the police were inside the house and saw the suspect in the yard thru the window.

          3. 110 Lean   11 years ago

            The "poor little puppy couldn't have hurt anyone" angle is already covered. Looking at the pictures at the link you see that "puppy" was pretty huge.

            Hey asshole, I have a 15 month-old GSD that weighs 70 lbs. If she ran towards a cop TRESPASSING in my yard it would be because she's expecting a treat.

            In case you care, the cops said the suspect got out through the back door which is why they were opening the unsecured gate to the back yard.

            Cops lie.

          4. GamerFromJump   11 years ago

            Being large is a death penalty offense, now?

            I knew it! It's a conspiracy by the little-rat-dog breeding industry!

        3. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

          I'm guessing we're going to have to wait a long time for the answer to that one.

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

            Oh, my apologies.

  5. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    From the comments:

    'Redford Township Police Officers are highly skilled safety personnel who are sworn to support and defend against all enemies. This is the core component of their job. It is unfortunate that, on rare occasions, a weapon must be utilized. Such was the case during the incident that you referenced in your email.

    When this type of situation occurs, an investigation is conducted at the direction of the Chief of Police. The investigation has concluded that the officer was in imminent threat and the discharge of the weapon was necessary.

    Tracey Schultz Kobylarz"

    Procedures were followed. A dog got in the way of out bullets because we're cops.

    Give 'em hell Redford.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      our

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        What I'd like Tracey to answer is why arrest the owner to boot?

        What's wrong with this assholes?

        1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

          What I'd like Tracey to answer is why arrest the owner to boot?

          He was commanded to go back into his home after the cop killed his pet in his backyard, and he failed to obey.

          Fail to obey and all bets are off. You may be arrested, you may be killed. It's a roll of the dice.

          1. R C Dean   11 years ago

            He was commanded to go back into his home

            Pretty much an illegal command, as far as I can tell.

            And where was the alleged suspect during all this? For a bunch of cops in hot pursuit of a violent criminal, they sure seem easily distracted.

            1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

              All police commands are legal because they come from police.

            2. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

              There is no crime more pressing than failure to show heroic first responders their due deference. Guy's lucky he's still breathing.

              1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                Failure to obey is considered to be a threatening act, and reacted to accordingly.

        2. Ted S.   11 years ago

          Because fuck you, that's why.

        3. Soros' Wank-noose   11 years ago

          Here is her fb page, which she seems to use to help conduct official business: https://www.facebook.com/tracey.schultz.kobylarz

    2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      That's pretty wordy. "Fuck you" would have easily sufficed.

    3. Bryan C   11 years ago

      The dog was an enemy.

      You aren't our enemy, are you?

  6. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

    Yeah. They looking through her windows "for a suspect". Right.

  7. Warty   11 years ago

    Remember when Tulpa was doing his "And nothing else happened" bit? Holy shit, that was pathetic.

    1. Paul.   11 years ago

      That was Dunphy.

      1. Brett L   11 years ago

        Was Dunphy a Tulpuppet?

        1. Paul.   11 years ago

          Narp. Dunphy was a peace officer somewhere here in the northwest/seattle area.

          Tulpa is a Professor Emeritus of Devil's Advocate and Surveillance Camera proliferation.

          1. fuck you tulpa   11 years ago

            "Narp."

            Says you, with nothing but your gut to go on.

            He absolutely was a Tulpa sockpuppet.

      2. Warty   11 years ago

        No way. Go back and read them. Clearly Tulpa's voice.

        1. Paul.   11 years ago

          Nah, I seem to remember it was more Dunphy's voice. This new Hydra sockpuppet is definitely Tulpa's voice though.

          1. Hydra   11 years ago

            I'm not Tulpa. I'm not anybody.

            1. Paul.   11 years ago

              ALL HAIL HYDRA!

            2. 110 Lean   11 years ago

              I'm not anybody.

              Someone needs some self-esteem training.

            3. fuck you tulpa   11 years ago

              .

          2. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

            That's what reasonable is for.

            1. Paul.   11 years ago

              I don't like to filter. I like the pleasure of not reading.

  8. All-Seeing Monocle   11 years ago

    The facebook page is a hilarious shit-storm. EVERY damn post on the page has comments/replies and those people are PISSED.

    Samples:
    "Thanks for the bridge update. Now, please stop killing people's pets."
    "How many dogs did you shoot in order to conduct the investigation?"

    Not that it's much consolation, but it's still nice to see them getting publicly called out. A lot more of this would be a step in the right direction.

    1. Bryan C   11 years ago

      "But don't bring your dog! Because they'll shoot it."

      Public ridicule is a distant second to tar-and-feathers, but it'll do.

      1. croaker   11 years ago

        I wonder how much tar and feathers it would take to cover that police building?

  9. SweatingGin   11 years ago

    Well, damnit, too close to home. I drive by there on my way to work. My kid plays soccer two blocks from there.

    1. The DerpRider   11 years ago

      I grew up just off Beech between six and seven mile.

  10. All-Seeing Monocle   11 years ago

    "As always it was a pleasure working with the Redford Township Little League Board members, parents, players and families today for the annual parade to kick off the season. Hope you have a great year and a lot of fun!"

    "Thank you for not the shooting the kids in cold blood."

  11. R C Dean   11 years ago

    a 10-month-old Labrador?pit bull mix

    Which is an actual, no-fooling puppy.

    We need a lot more detail about what happened before the cops trespassed on these people's property. A lot more. Things like:

    (1) What suspect did they think they spotted through the window?

    (2) Where were they when they spotted this suspect? How far? Which window? etc.

    (3) Why didn't they arrest this suspect?

    (4) Why didn't they just wait for him or her to leave the house? What was this "chase" they gave? Did he leave the house and start fleeing? How did he escape, exactly, with all these cops in hot pursuit?

    (5) Were procedures followed? Did all the cops get tucked nice and snug in their beds, with a cookie, after such a hard day?

    1. Hydra   11 years ago

      WTFV

      1. fuck you tulpa   11 years ago

        .

    2. Paul.   11 years ago

      (1) What suspect did they think they spotted through the window?

      There was a Krispy Kreme box on the kitchen counter.

      (2) Where were they when they spotted this suspect? How far? Which window? etc.

      IN the front bushes.

      (3) Why didn't they arrest this suspect?

      Evidence has already been consumed. So they made a new suspect.

      (4) Why didn't they just wait for him or her to leave the house?

      Oh right, now you're going to suggest that they could have just waited for David Koresh to head down to the AM/PM for a pack of Marlboro lights and pop him there instead of turning Waco into a military LZ.

      1. jamesrk   11 years ago

        The dog was in cahoots with the criminal as it let him pass unscathed and un harassed but attacked the valiant officers.

    3. Hydra   11 years ago

      Why didn't they just wait for him or her to leave the house?

      He went out thru the back door which is why they entered the back yard. Any other brilliant tactical suggestions, Patton?

      1. R C Dean   11 years ago

        He went out thru the back door which is why they entered the back yard.

        I'll just repost this:

        Either the suspect had already gotten out of the yard and was on his way, in which case why go into the yard, or

        The suspect was still in the yard, in which case he got right past an armed cop with his gun out, loaded, and ready to rock. Somehow.

        This just doesn't add up.

        1. Hydra   11 years ago

          I won't get into any deep geometry theory here because who wants to read that, but generally if you're chasing someone you have to go through the same areas they went through. Not sure who that theorem is named after but we can look it up later.

          If the cops had shot a fleeing suspect to death, I'm sure H+R would have had no prob, though.

          1. R C Dean   11 years ago

            generally if you're chasing someone you have to go through the same areas they went through.

            So, piecing this together as best we can and taking the cops at their word:

            The cops saw the suspect leave the house through the back door.

            The suspect apparently escaped.

            Was he in the yard when the cops went into the yard? Seems unlikely. So he wasn't in the yard.

            Where did he go? Was it necessary to go through the yard? Unless he was running toward the front of the house, I don't see how the cop at the back didn't need to go through the yard.

            The cops seem to have been too busy arresting people on misdemeanor charges to run down a suspect in a violent crime. Interesting, isn't it, that a cop switches from chasing a violent criminal to arresting a man in his own yard for refusing to go back in the house, no?

            1. R C Dean   11 years ago

              I don't see how the cop at the back needed to go through the yard.

            2. Paul.   11 years ago

              isn't it, that a cop switches from chasing a violent criminal to arresting a man in his own yard for refusing to go back in the house, no?

              this is really one of the most salient points. Violent suspect disappears around the corner! Whoa whoa...stop... stop, this dog owner is mouthing off to us, step over here, sir and place your hands on the wall...

              Clearly the community was in mortal DANGAH!

        2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

          I'm guessing when they perform a necropsy on the hound they'll find the suspect's remains in its stomach.

        3. R C Dean   11 years ago

          What the hell, I'll repost this as well:

          For a bunch of cops in hot pursuit of a violent criminal [which apparently they had in plain view since they know he went out the back door], they sure seem easily distracted.

    4. some guy   11 years ago

      In all fairness, puppies have really sharp teeth, are still growing into their feet, and still have some coordination/control issues. It could have accidentally hurt one of the officers while trying to play with them....

      1. 110 Lean   11 years ago

        Not at ten months.

  12. GroundTruth   11 years ago

    I'd like to wake up one day and see one of these that goes the other way "Dog shoots cop for entering his yard". The text can have something about how important it is at the end of the day for the dog to have done his job correctly. There will be no mention of the cop's family.

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

      I'd like to see some figures on cops actually injured by dogs vs dogs killed by police officers.

    2. Jordan   11 years ago

      One day I'd like to see a dead dog's owner go apeshit kill these thugs. Maybe that would wake them up. Even better if the jury nullifies the verdict.

      1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        Then the entire police department would descend onto the house and kill everyone inside.

        Police would be amended to have officers immediately detain pet owners after killing their pets, for officer safety.

        1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

          *Policy*

    3. RBS   11 years ago

      The follow up story would be something like "Entire city block engulfed in flames in retaliation for vicious cop-killing over the weekend."

    4. some guy   11 years ago

      Now I want to build an automated turret for my dog. It could point wherever he looks and fire whenever he barks. What could possibly go wrong?

  13. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Redford Township Police Officers are highly skilled safety personnel who are sworn to support and defend against all enemies.

    Good grief.

    1. R C Dean   11 years ago

      Its not even a good English sentence. Unless they are sworn to both support AND defend against all enemies. Which would explain their apparent confusion about what the fuck they are supposed to be doing.

      1. croaker   11 years ago

        You don't get it. WE are the enemy. As far as they're concerned, if you're not a fellow jack-booted thug, you're the enemy and only safe when you're dead.

    2. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      All enemies, foreign and domestic, purebred or mixed breed, pit-bull, lab, poodle, whatever...

      1. Almanian!   11 years ago

        One of our dogs is a Dachshund/Papillon mix.

        Goddamned Nazi-Vichy-French bitch....

        (she's the best dog EVER, btw)

  14. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Why didn't the cops call for air support? If they were sure the suspect was on the property, they should have just killed everybody.

    1. Bryan C   11 years ago

      I'm sure there's lots of surplus napalm they can use.

  15. Almanian!   11 years ago

    You ever been to Redford Twp? It's a shithole. It's right by Detroit, so people get Detroit on them, which ruins everything it touches. Including Redford (and Inkster, Taylor, Warren, etc.etc.etc.) Everyone there wants to shoot something.

    Cause they live in Redford Twp.

    So - good shoot murderdeathkill exercise of police authoritah IMHO.

    hth

    1. SweatingGin   11 years ago

      Mixture of white trash and poor blacks, mostly.

  16. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    I thought this just the other day - traditionally, how many mailmen have shot dogs, back in the days when mailmen went on foot and delivered lots of mail? I mean, I understand they were often threatened by dogs, if *Dagwood* comics are anything to go by. So you would imagine they would shoot some of those dogs, the better to go home safely.

    1. Almanian!   11 years ago

      You're thinking back before the USPS SWATzi teams were instituted. The poor bastards were unarmed back in the 70's when I was growing up. We'd sometimes not get mail for a couple months, then the snow would melt - bam, there was the carcass of the poor sod, right where the pack of wild neighborhood dogs had dropped him.

      Happened pretty much at least once every year. Cause dogs were - and continue to be - THAT much of an issue, especially in rural urban suburban everywhere.

    2. 110 Lean   11 years ago

      I live in a neighborhood awash with "pit bulls" and the mail carriers walk there routes. I never hear about them getting attacked.

      1. 110 Lean   11 years ago

        their!

    3. croaker   11 years ago

      Even when mailmen carried guns they didn't shoot dogs at the rate the cops do today.

  17. Fluffy   11 years ago

    The couple was hosting a party with the front and back doors open.

    Hydra, you worthless fuck, posting this undermines every word you have written on this topic.

    You expect me to believe that a dog standing the fucking middle of a party is going to turn superaggressive against someone walking across their backyard?

    This is somehow a dog that, in the middle of a group of people having a party, is going to recognize police - and only police - as intruders and is going to move to attack them?

    Holy shit, save that dog's DNA. We have to clone it and breed a million of them. We can't afford to lose this magical cop-detecting-and-attacking dog.

    1. Christophe   11 years ago

      Isolate the gene, insert it in bald eagles = Libertarian air squadron.

  18. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    One day I'd like to see a dead dog's owner go apeshit kill these thugs. Maybe that would wake them up. Even better if the jury nullifies the verdict.

    Unfortunately, it would be trumpeted far and wide as proof positive of the WAR ON COPZ, and used to justify budget increases to pay for larger and more heavily armed and armored police forces.

    Baboon Army of Occupation, FTW!

  19. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

    Here's my question: when this cop is off duty and at a barbecue does he shoot his family's dogs when they run up to say hello? What's so different about this situation? Might be that he can get away with it here. These people are sick.

    1. Hydra   11 years ago

      He has the option of backing off and not entering someone's yard when he's off duty. When he's on duty he doesn't have that option, he's sworn to protect even at the cost of his own life.

      1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        he's sworn to protect even at the cost of his own life.

        Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha!

        That's funny!

        No. He's sworn to go home safely even at the cost of innocent life.

        How much innocent life? All of it.

      2. Almanian!   11 years ago

        He has the option of backing off and not entering someone's yard when he's off duty. When he's on duty he doesn't have that option

        Fuck, you ARE that stupid. Of COURSE he has that option. "No, you MUST RUN THROUGH THE YARD!"

        No - you can go around, over, under, through if you wish - JUST PLEASE DON'T SHOOT MY FUCKING DOG IF YOU INVADE MY PROPERTY WITHOUT MY PERMISSION, FUCKTARD.

        Goddamn you're stupid.

        1. R C Dean   11 years ago

          "No, you MUST RUN THROUGH THE YARD!"

          And immediately give up the chase to arrest someone for failing to obey.

          See, that's the part that makes me pretty sure that most of the official story is a lie.

          1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

            Granted I haven't seen many police reports of events that I witnessed, but in all cases they were works of fiction loosely based on fact.

          2. Fluffy   11 years ago

            Right.

            The "exigent circumstances" were so extreme that they had to enter this yard and shoot this dog...

            ...but minor enough that once they shot the dog, fuck it, it's Miller Time.

      3. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

        He also has the option to use his baton, or, you know, pet the fucking dog as it probably just wanted to play.

      4. 110 Lean   11 years ago

        He has the option of backing off and not entering someone's yard when he's off duty. When he's on duty he doesn't have that option, he's sworn to protect even at the cost of his own life.

        Being a cop is just like being in the Battle for Gallipoli.

        1. croaker   11 years ago

          Not really. Not enough cops are dying.

      5. dantheserene   11 years ago

        Wait, you were serious?

  20. Paul.   11 years ago

    Could someone post statistics on the number of cops killed by dogs since-- I'll pick a random starting year-- 1947?

    This might give us a good idea of what the chances of a cop dying on the job from a dog would be. That way we could judge the merits of these dog shootings better. Like, "Oh come on, the cop had a 1 in 3 chance of dying if he hadn't shot the puppy!"

    1. Hydra   11 years ago

      You don't need to be afraid for your life to shoot a dog legally. Even severe bodily injury/rabies is justification if it attacks.

      1. Paul.   11 years ago

        Could someone provide statistics on the number of police officers receiving severe bodily injury/rabies from dog attacks?

        1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

          Most cops these days act as if they're rabid. Maybe Tulpa is on to something.

    2. Paul.   11 years ago

      Yeah, seriously, anyone who can find some statistics, it'd be appreciated.

      I keep modifying my google search parameters, but no matter how I craft them, I keep getting overwhelmed by articles about police killing dogs, not the other way around.

    3. some guy   11 years ago

      Could someone post statistics on the number of cops killed by dogs since-- I'll pick a random starting year-- 1947?

      I'm going to guess 0 killed.
      Also 0 severely injured.
      Minor injuries in the low hundreds.
      Since 1947. Just a guess.

      I did manage to find a cop who got bit by a dog, but didn't shoot it. Here. Clearly this officer needs more training.

      1. Christophe   11 years ago

        Bermuda. That explains it.

    4. Rebekah   11 years ago

      I have no idea how accurate it is, but I remember running across this graphic when that Puppycide documentary was on kickstarter.

  21. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    When he's on duty he doesn't have that option, he's sworn to protect even at the cost of his own life.

    You are such a pathetic retard.

  22. creech   11 years ago

    I feel sorry for the poor dog. His instincts were right - don't bother the party guests but defend his turf from uniformed stormtroopers. I wouldn't be at all surprised if some dog lover doesn't key the cop's private automobile at the first opportunity.

  23. Almanian!   11 years ago

    Five dogs in our house. They don't know you, they WILL raise holy hell.

    They're dogs.

    They don't bite or attack, but probably scare the hell out of someone not familiar with dogs. Two little ones about 10lbs, two at about 50lbs, and 100 lbs of Lab Love who wouldn't hurt a brand new baby (like my granddaughter he's had a good sniffing of).

    Yeah - the cop's a fucking dick, and doesn't know shit about how dogs behave.

    1. some guy   11 years ago

      Two medium sized dogs here. They might hurt you a little by accident while trying to get you to play. But that's just because they're big sacks of dumb.

  24. ace_m82   11 years ago

    Look, this is all really simple.

    If someone shoots my dog, I shoot them (perhaps not to kill, but I do shoot them).

    If a cop shoots my dog, then that cop has just started a war, and one that he won't win. I won't win it either, but the casualties will be quite high for one pissed off man. They better run and hope that they die of a heart attack so that God can judge them instead of falling into my hands.

    Solution: Don't shoot my dog. That was simple, no?

    Signed, a former Marine.

    1. R C Dean   11 years ago

      I shoot them (perhaps not to kill, but I do shoot them).

      If you shoot, shoot to kill. Especially when you're shooting someone who has a gun.

      1. ace_m82   11 years ago

        That's good advice... for most people. If I don't think they're much of a threat, I MAY just "shoot to wound". Dog shooting cops are quite a threat though.

        If you take a 308 hollow-point to the femur, I'm thinking you're not too much a threat anymore.

        But yes, under most circumstances, shoot to "end the threat".

        1. R C Dean   11 years ago

          If you take a 308 hollow-point to the femur,

          I'm pretty sure you're not going to make it, unless you get shot in the waiting room of a level 4 trauma hospital. On a slow day.

          1. ace_m82   11 years ago

            Late reply, but I could save his life. Funny how they don't tell you how effective a properly applied tourniquet is at preventing blood loss. It hurts like hell, and he'll almost certainly lose his leg, but he'll be alive.

            A leg for a dog. As Hank Williams Jr. said, "Sounds like justice to me".

  25. croaker   11 years ago

    Police officers who insist on the whole "fear" paradigm should consider this: Cop killers are near the top of the food chain in prison. Eventually the general public will also learn this little tidbit and act accordingly.

  26. Loki   11 years ago

    God damn it. I actually wasn't having a completely shitty day, and then this... Fuck fuckity fuck!

  27. Reverend Draco   11 years ago

    Why are these donut grazers still breathing?

  28. Brett L   11 years ago

    "You're a sick fucker, Mac!"

  29. Hydra   11 years ago

    that doesn't avoid having a cop go in the back yard patrolled by the "puppy", so that doesn'treally solve anything.

  30. Dweebston   11 years ago

    You and I both know the "suspect entering the window" was a post-hoc fabrication. They may have suspected their suspect had entered the house, but as R C points out, there was no way they legitimately sighted him entering the house.

  31. Hydra   11 years ago

    According to the video they saw him in the house, not entering the house.

  32. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

    This, this, a thousand times this.
    If I, as a 10-year-old paperboy, could deal with all the fearsome hounds on my route, then what the fuck is wrong with today's cops?

  33. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

    And I don't even like dogs that much.

  34. Almanian!   11 years ago

    Hah! Yeah, I was 11 when I got my route - had to know how to handle the dogs, cause they were out there. Never got bit in 4 years. WEIRD!

  35. croaker   11 years ago

    It would take me all night to type that list.

  36. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    I searched for "police" on that page, and found no police killed. There were several homeless people and children killed by police dogs, but no dead cops.

  37. Kure'i   11 years ago

    It wouldn't prove anything, anyway. If the number of fatalities were high, cops would say, "SEE! DOGS ARE TEH DANGER!!!1! WE NEED TO SHOOT!!"

    If the number was low, the cops would say, "SEE! IT'S CUZ WE CAN SHOOT AND PROTECT OURSELVES FROM THIS D4NGEROUS CAN1NE MENACE!!!!"

    I'm just surprised they didn't use the default, failsafe, probable cause rubber stamp "we smelled burned marijuana" explanation that I now see on about half the police reports I read.

  38. some guy   11 years ago

    Even serious injury would be very unlikely as cops tend to travel in small packs. I'm sure there's been a number of minor puncture wounds, though.

  39. R C Dean   11 years ago

    I'd be willing to bet that the number of cops seriously injured by stray rounds while shooting at dogs exceeds the number of cops seriously injured by dogs.

  40. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

    Ya know, Cesar Milan has handled some of the craziest dogs and he is still alive.

  41. fuck you tulpa   11 years ago

    ANd according to yuo you're not Tulpa, so...anything else lying fuckwit supporter of lying fuckwits?

  42. Christophe   11 years ago

    Thank you, but as a dog lover, I don't think I want to ruin my Thursday.

  43. Christophe   11 years ago

    In the cops' defense, dogs can probably sense the sociopath in them, and react a little more aggressively to their presence.

  44. GamerFromJump   11 years ago

    They react to cops for the same reason they are supposed to react to Terminators: they sense the remorseless, inhuman killer under the skin.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.

Emma Camp | 6.2.2025 4:57 PM

J.D. Vance Wants a Free Market for Crypto. What About Everything Else?

Eric Boehm | 6.2.2025 4:40 PM

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!