Police Abuse

Albuquerque Civilian Police Oversight Members Resign: Can't Keep Lying to the Community

|

poopers
APD Party Patrol

On the same day the Department of Justice (DOJ) released its findings on civil rights violations at the Albuquerque Police Department (APD), the city told its Police Oversight Commission (POC) that it couldn't rule against whatever the police chief decides about complaints against cops.

Three members of the commission complained about their toothlessness in letters of resignation this week. Via KOAT:

"The city attorney's office addressed the POC on April 10, 2014, and stated that we have no power to decide against the APD Chief or against the independent review officer's findings regarding citizens' complaints," reads [one of the quitting members, Jonathan] Siegel's letter. "I cannot continue to pretend or deceive the members of our community into believing that our city has any real civilian oversight." 

The city's response pointed to the DOJ's findings about the role an "effective" oversight commission can play and said the government was "hopeful"  the City Council would work with the DOJ on "continued efforts to reform and implement needed changes." The DOJ, in fact, called Albuquerque's "broken civilian oversight process" one of the "deficiencies" that contributed to the use of excessive force. No charges were announced by the DOJ in conjunction with the findings of a pattern and practice of excessive force by members of the APD.

The fight over robust civilian oversight's an old story in Albuquerque. As the Washington Post Radley Balko explains at The Watch blog, the cycle of police abuse, cover-up, and scandal has been going on for some time. One reform- minded police chief brought in in 1998 to fix that generation's problem of police abuse was then railroaded out of the department just three years later with the help of Albuquerque voters.

More on Albuquerque's problems at Reason 24/7.

NEXT: Gun Rights and 'Justice Stevens' Foolishness'

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. 3 of how many on the commission I wonder. At least there’s a few folks who take (took) their job seriously…

  2. No charges were announced by the DOJ in conjunction with the findings of a pattern and practice of excessive force by members of the APD.

    So, then, deficiencies all around?

  3. For some reason voters are willing to trust a government entity more than a private one. I think this fact alone is reason to privatize police forces. The current level of accountability is a joke.

  4. “One reform- minded police chief brought in in 1998 to fix that generation’s problem of police abuse was then railroaded out of the department just three years later with the help of Albuquerque voters.”

    I think therein lies the problem. There are people and cops willing to reform but the people in their infinite strange stupidity vote against it. It’s almost as if they enjoy being tied up against their will and getting fucked in the ass.

    1. Ah, yes. The all-important David Brooks voter.

  5. Ultimately, in order for a civilian review board to have any power, the courts would have to get on board. Ain’t gonna happen.

  6. That Balko piece is outstanding and depressing in equal measure.

  7. Dude seems like he knows what is going on man.

    http://www.GotsDatAnon.tk

  8. I wonder if there are latent ethnic tensions in Albuquerque which contributes to their aggressive policing style?

  9. 3 turds for the alt-text

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.