Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

NSA Plan: Pretend To Be Facebook To Spread Malware To Millions

Seriously

Zenon Evans | 3.14.2014 2:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | cc
(cc)
webfever

Last week, Internet security expert Morgan Marquis-Boire warned about the threat of state sponsored surveillance and malware at a human rights conference. Marquis-Boire described how, among other tactics, oppressive regimes like Syria's create websites mimicking Facebook to lure in dissidents. Once a dissident has typed in his email address and password, the government can infiltrate his real account, deliver malware, spy, and blackmail him, his family, his friends, and his entire network.

Members of our own government may wiretap us, fly surveillance drones over our houses, and even spy on each other, but certainly, they would not use the exact same tactics as murderous despots in war-torn countries.

…Right?

Of course they would. This week, Glenn Greenwald and Ryan Gallagher at The Intercept released another batch of classified files from whistle-blower Edward Snowden's seemingly bottomless pit of National Security Agency (NSA) spookiness:

In some cases the NSA has masqueraded as a fake Facebook server, using the social media site as a launching pad to infect a target's computer and exfiltrate files from a hard drive. In others, it has sent out spam emails laced with the malware, which can be tailored to covertly record audio from a computer's microphone and take snapshots with its webcam. The hacking systems have also enabled the NSA to launch cyberattacks by corrupting and disrupting file downloads or denying access to websites.

The "groundbreaking surveillance technology the agency has developed [could] infect potentially millions of computers worldwide," according to The Intercept. Read the full details here.

NSA officials denied Greenwald's claims, according to USA Today, calling them "inaccurate."

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was not pleased to find out that the NSA has been doing the web version of wearing a Halloween mask with his likeness while breaking into people's houses. So, yesterday Zuckerberg did what we all do when we're angry: he posted a fuming status about it on Facebook, writing that he's "so confused and frustrated by… the behavior of the US government," demanded that it "be the champion for the internet, not a threat." Zuckerberg did something else most of us can't do, too. He called President Obama, but still came away with the sense that "it will take a very long time for true full reform." 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Uber Announces New Insurance Policy to Cover Their Drivers When Not Actively Ferrying Passenger

Zenon Evans is a former Reason staff writer and editor.

PoliticsFacebookScience & TechnologyCivil LibertiesPolicyNSASurveillanceTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (47)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Episiarch   12 years ago

    demanded that it "be the champion for the internet, not a threat."

    Governments don't work that way, imbecile.

    I think we've barely touched the surface of the NSA's/CIA's perfidy and spying.

    1. Sudden   12 years ago

      Pretty soon that movie The Lives of Others will look a lot like our own lives.

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        The thing is, is that the Stasi's insane surveillance is merely the logical conclusion of any kind of spying/surveillance mentality. It will always go to 11 eventually, because the more they know...the more they know. It's knowing as much as possible about everyone just in case, and just to know, because knowledge is power. If you offered the shitbags at the NSA the ability to put 1984-style monitors in people's homes, they would jump at it.

        This isn't going away. Especially since modern technology allows a whole new level of spying. It's impossible for them to resist.

        Once again, this is a logical evolution of government. This is one of the things that governments do.

        1. WTF   12 years ago

          Especially since modern technology allows a whole new level of spying.

          The Stasi only wished they had the spying capability of the NSA.

  2. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

    There sure as hell isn't going to be any reform as long as people with more money than good sense keep funding the Ruling Party.

    -jcr

  3. kinnath   12 years ago

    This is all necessary, because the minions of chocolate jesus tell me so.

    1. Sudden   12 years ago

      We don't like to call them minions. "Disciples" please.

      1. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

        Know who else had a bunch of disciples?

        -jcr

        1. Dweebston   12 years ago

          Dr. Who?

    2. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

      Most of the Obots of my acquaintance are maintaining stony silence about the whole NSA matter, as well as about drones. If they deigned to acknowledge it at all, they'd blame ... okay, on the count of three, everybody ....

      1. Sudden   12 years ago

        I've met a few progs who were genuinely aghast at the NSA abuses. Not enough to vote for a guy like Rand Paul, with whom they disagree to the point of frothingly irrational hatred, nor even enough to stop them from voting Dem from the top of the ticket to the bottom, but enough to make them at least feel bad about it.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Must. . .resist. . .temptation. . .to. . .mention. . .how. . .many. . .Germans. . .disliked. . .Hitler. . .but. . .did. . .nothing.

          1. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

            I'm sure that a poll taken in 1946 would have put that figure at 99%.

            -jcr

          2. Surly Chef   12 years ago

            If you're gonna godwin a thread, at least make it funny.

            1. Dweebston   12 years ago

              You know who else wasn't funny?

              1. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

                Seinfeld?

              2. Ted S.   12 years ago

                Paula Poundstone?

            2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              Only if you pay me first. Comedy is hard work.

        2. Spencer   12 years ago

          But DO they disagree with him? I don't think they do. THEY think they do, and I guess that's all that matters.

          1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

            Intellectually, they may disagree. Emotionally, he's still the Boss.

            1. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

              Obama, I mean.

              1. Spencer   12 years ago

                Yes, but I think it's probably the other way with Rand. I think, if they would listen, point by point they would find themselves agreeing.

                But, emotionally, he's the enemy.

            2. Bobarian   12 years ago

              And since they tend to be 95% emotional and 5% intellectual...

              Note: 5% is about the amount needed to keep them from humping the furniture.

              1. R C Dean   12 years ago

                I'd put it more like 92% emotional, with the intellectual component running about, hmmm, carry the 1, . . .

                8%!

      2. Erasmus vs. Luther   12 years ago

        BOOOOOSH!!!! Fair's fair though, it isn't as if he's faultless on the matter. That's still no excuse for the cognitive dissonance oozing from the Left.

        1. Erasmus vs. Luther   12 years ago

          How the Hell did my reply to a comment post as a statement unto itself? Damn NSA must be fucking with my com#%@.. .....f4-:97...derrrrppppp(computer explodes).

  4. kinnath   12 years ago

    If Zuckerberg had any real balls, he'd block all .gov domains from accessing facebook.

  5. MikeP   12 years ago

    You mean Facebook isn't malware already?

    1. mr lizard   12 years ago

      Ya seriously. I have purposefully avoided it do the sheer tsunami of past crazy that will reanimate the skeletons in my closet.

      1. Dweebston   12 years ago

        You really leave a wake, don't you.

        1. mr lizard   12 years ago

          I can't help it Crazy strange is a hellava drug

  6. The DerpRider   12 years ago

    Boo hoo. I'm heartbroken for a guy who claims he has the president on speed dial. D-bag.

    1. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

      Oh, I'm sure he poured enough money into the Ruling Party to have the teleprompter-in-chief's private number.

      -jcr

    2. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

      They spoke by Telescreen.

  7. Spencer   12 years ago

    ""it will take a very long time for true full reform." " Or, it could just take a about 2.5 years, give or take, if we want it... much like the war being over...

  8. The Laconic Marc F Cheney   12 years ago

    NSA officials denied Greenwald's claims, according to USA Today, calling them "inaccurate."

    "It's totally inaccurate that the malware is 'tailored'!"

    1. Bobarian   12 years ago

      "It's totally inaccurate that we spoof facebook to install malware. We use the real thing!"

      1. Pinky   12 years ago

        "groundbreaking surveillance technology the agency has developed [could] infect potentially millions of computers worldwide"

        "It's totally inaccurate that we could infect millions of computers. Hundreds of millions."

  9. AlmightyJB   12 years ago

    Next recruiting ground for major metropolitan LEA's. NSA hackers with these skills. 1984 survalliance is going to look like childs play in 10 years. The corruption, and rampant abuse of rights will be so widespread and ingrained, there will be no going back.

    1. Agammamon   12 years ago

      Remember - your right to privacy is contingent on 'reasonable expectations'.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    I'll bet the NSA didn't even share data with the Justice Department so they could make RICO cases against Mafia Wars users.

  11. wareagle   12 years ago

    Zuckerberg is so mad he's threatening to donate less to various progtard candidates.

  12. ReeceExaminer   12 years ago

    Hopefully Zuckerberg will come to realize that all governments are violent criminal enterprises that will always threaten freedom and never champion it.

  13. ThatSkepticGuy   12 years ago

    "So, yesterday Zuckerberg did what we all do when we're angry: he posted a fuming status about it on Facebook, writing that he's "so confused and frustrated by... the behavior of the US government," demanded that it "be the champion for the internet, not a threat." Zuckerberg did something else most of us can't do, too. He called President Obama, but still came away with the sense that "it will take a very long time for true full reform." "

    Zuckerberg: "If I wait five minutes and then put my hand back in he fire, it won't be hot."

  14. optimusratiostultum   12 years ago

    he ought to try suing for damages, claim lost business from NSA scaring people away

  15. loverfashion   11 years ago

    Wholesale Halloween Costumes
    Sexy Halloween Costumes Online

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

No, It Wasn't Ironic That Second Amendment Advocate Charlie Kirk Was Shot

J.D. Tuccille | 9.15.2025 7:00 AM

AI Chatbots Might Already Be Better Than Humans at Debating

Ronald Bailey | From the October 2025 issue

Brickbat: Stoking Eire

Charles Oliver | 9.15.2025 4:00 AM

Desi Arnaz's Revolution Was Televised

Steven Kurtz | 9.14.2025 6:00 AM

Florida Applies for Federal Reimbursement for 'Alligator Alcatraz' Costs Despite Court Warning

C.J. Ciaramella | 9.13.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300