Marijuana

Will Local Bans Undermine Marijuana Legalization in Washington?

|

Office of the Attorney General

Washington's liquor control board, charged with regulating that state's newly legal marijuana businesses, will soon begin issuing licenses to producers, processors, and retailers. The applicants include more than 30 would-be growers in Yakima, a city of about 93,000 in central Washington where the liquor control board also plans to license five marijuana retailers. But this week the Yakima City Council made it clear that none of those new businesses is welcome, approving a ban on cannabis suppliers by a 6-to-1 vote.

Can they do that? Yes, according to an opinion issued last week by Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson. Unlike Colorado's legalization initiative, Washington's, known as I-502, does not explicitly authorize local governments to ban cannabusinesses. But neither does it explicitly say they can't, and Ferguson concluded that no such pre-emption is implied either.

"Under Washington law," Ferguson notes, "there is a strong presumption against finding that state law preempts local ordinances." Washington courts have approved local bans on activities, such as hunting and motor boating, that are licensed by the state. Ferugson says "a challenger must meet the heavy burden of proving that state law creates an entitlement to engage in an activity in circumstances outlawed by the local ordinance." In 2005, for example, the Washington Supreme Court struck down a local ordinance that banned smoking in areas where state law explicitly said business owners had the discretion to allow smoking. By contrast, Ferguson says, the marijuana regulations issued under I-502 constitute "regulatory preconditions to engaging in such businesses," rather than "an entitlement to engage in such businesses regardless of local law."

Since Ferguson says local governments may impose explicit bans on cannabusinesses, it is not suprising that he also concludes they are free to impose prohibitive regulations, as long as the rules can be said to promote "public safety, health, or welfare." He notes that I-502 anticipates local regulation of marijuana businesses, saying "the issuance or approval of a license shall not be construed as a license for, or an approval of, any violations of local rules or ordinances," including "building and fire codes, zoning ordinances, and business licensing requirements." So even if the courts do not agree with Ferguson that local bans are consistent with I-502, they might still approve restrictions that amount to bans in practice.

In addition to Yakima, Pierce County and the cities of Wenatchee and Mossyrock have banned marijuana businesses, while more than 20 others have imposed moratoriums that may be allowed to expire. Since the state attorney general is taking the position that local jurisdictions are under no obligation to accept growers, processors, or sellers, challenging bans presumably will fall to licensees. Brian Smith, a spokesman for the liquor control board, says the agency has not yet decided how to handle applicants in jurisdictions with bans.

Last week Sharon Foster, the board's chairwoman, said Ferguson's opinion "will be a disappointment to the majority of Washington's voters who approved Initiative 502." She noted that local bans will "reduce the state's expectations for revenue generated from the legal system we are putting in place." Foster also argued that bans "will impact public safety by allowing the current illicit market to continue." In his opinion Ferguson acknowledges that possibility. "We are mindful that if a large number of jurisdictions were to ban licensees, it could interfere with the measure's intent to supplant the illegal marijuana market," he says. "The legislature, or the people by initiative, can address this potential issue if it actually comes to pass."

NEXT: NYPD Deploying Temporary Surveillance Cameras Across Midtown Manhattan for Super Bowl

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Will Local Bans Undermine Marijuana Legalization in Washington?

    Probably not. Surely there are cities and counties in Washington that will be happy to welcome the pot business.

    But what are the rules regarding ordering marijuana online? Can you do that if you are buying from within the state?

    1. I’m pretty sure Seattle is not going to do any kind of local ban, so the biggest city should still be a pot business haven.

    2. Minus storefront, which will be expensive anyway, I bet most people go through the old channels and it will be difficult for the state to prove provenance. Will you have to keep the sales ticket?

      1. Nope. At least, not now. Once I have the pot on my person, it’s legal and a friend gave it to me. No sale involved.

        1. Esto perpetua. Funny, that’s Idaho’s state motto. Idaho is kinda shaped like a bong.

  2. “We are mindful that if a large number of jurisdictions were to ban licensees, it could interfere with the measure’s intent to supplant the illegal marijuana market,” he says. “The legislature, or the people by initiative, can address this potential issue if it actually comes to pass.”

    And I’ll rule against that bridge when we come to it.

    On the plus side of all of this, it’s guidance for other state legislatures on what potential pitfalls to avoid in their own initiatives.

    1. Ehh, I don’t feel like local dry counties completely killed the repeal of Prohibition.

      1. It did leave bootlegging as a viable business model.

  3. Yes, it’s going to totally stop the legalization movement, or trend, whichever you prefer. Just like dry counties prevented alcohol from staying legal in most places in the country. Derp.

  4. So instead of dry and wet counties, they’ll have high and low counties?

  5. Whiskey river, take my mind.

    Glen Catrine Bonded Warehouse Limited were ordered to pay ?12,000 for polluting the River Ayr, when 6,600 litres of whisky spirit fell into the water.

    A road tanker containing 27,500 litres of whisky spirit was pumped into the wrong vat, leading to an overspill into the roadway by the river.

    The Crown Office said the o

  6. It’s high and dry Counties now. Where you been?

    1. Unfortunately, not in a state with high counties.

  7. I finally understand the reluctance of SJWs to have sex.

    Warning, the mental images that this article conjures are NSFL

    1. Jesus Fucking Christ, why did I click on that? It’s worse than SugarFree Warty Hugeman stories….(shudder).

      Of course, there was this:

      To put it another way, my body belongs to me. I will choose how and when I am sexually intimate with anyone…. – let me finish the sentence: “except an attractive, non-ditch-pig pile of fat woman….”

      Also,

      *barf*

  8. Damn, posting wrong thread.

  9. …the Yakima City Council made it clear that none of those new businesses is welcome…

    The irony being that permitting cannabiz would have improved Yakima’s appeal by a factor of a gazillion.

    I’ve been to and through Yakima multiple times. It’s a shithole on the edge of farm country and a wedge of nowhere known as the Yakama Indian Reservation. Exciting, cool things to do in Yakima include 1) watching gangs of illegal Mexicans shoot each other, and 2), no, actually, #1 is pretty much it.

    1. dammit, I’m just gonna close this tab. I keep fucking confusing it with pm.

  10. The question is it the majority of votes or majority of voters in King County. It is a problem along the I-5 corridors In Oregon or Washington where large metropolitan areas dictate election results. In other words it the problem of dictatorship of the 51%, were the 51% get to fores their views on the minority. At least I-502 gives county a way to opt out instead of having dope shove down their throats . The continuation does illegal pot tragic is moot because Potheads can move to Seattle.

    1. So dope is literally getting shoved down your throat, if your county/municipality allows people to sell pot? Same way with alcohol, is it?

  11. That makes n o sen se dude, http://www.AnonWork.tk

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.