Supreme Court to Decide if Cellphone Searches Require Warrants
Rules currently vary
The Supreme Court today agreed to decide the unsolved constitutional question of whether police may search, without warrants, the mobile phones of suspects they arrest.
The justices did not immediately schedule a hearing in the most important digital rights issue the high court has decided to review this term.
The outcome is expected to shore up conflicting federal and state rulings, as well as varying state laws that are all over the map as mobile phones have become virtual extensions of ourselves, housing everything from email to instant-message chats to our papers and effects. The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project last year found that about 91 percent of adult Americans own a mobile phone. In 2012, there were 12,196,959 arrests in the United States, about one for every 2 seconds, according to the latest FBI data available.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
No matter how the court decides, dogs will be trained to "indicate" that there is probable cause to search the phone anyway.